Could you live on $471,465 per year?

[citygator]

U.S. households hold $160.35 trillion in combined wealth,

I will assume this value includes unrealized assets like Home Value, 401K, equities etc.

If all sold or auctioned off to "share" value would drop to nearly zero?

Get off the boards with your kumBya campfire fairy tale you dumb OX. I dont think it is possible. Who stays in $10M mansion 5000sqft and who remains in trailers?

Its illustrative. You can borrow against all that which is what Elon Musk does. Doesnt drive anything to zero.

 

[hadit]

No, it's a yearly amount and you apparently don't know what wealth redistribution is. Nothing you say would happen after 2 years. Stay on topic and stop making assumptions. We have taken care of whites for 249 years now, so you really need to stop.

Where in the article does it say it's an annual amount? Quote it, please.

 

[hadit]

Wrong again.

Then it should be easy for you to cite specifically from the article where it says that would be an annual amount. Go for it, we'll wait, for a while.

 

[mudwhistle]

People talk badly about socialism and Marxism. Most don't even know what they are. But here is a question for you:

Could you live on $471,465 per year?

If Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across the US, How Much Money Would Every Person Have?​

According to the Federal Reserve, U.S. households hold $160.35 trillion in combined wealth, which is the value of every American’s assets minus their liabilities.

To say it’s distributed unevenly is too much of an understatement to even qualify as an understatement. The bottom 50% of the country shares less than 3% of that enormous pie, while the most fortunate 10% gorge on nearly all of it.

Here’s a look at how much money each American would have if every person got an equal slice of the country’s wealth.

According to Google’s Data Commons project, the U.S. is home to roughly 340.11 million people.

If they divvied up the country’s $160.35 trillion jackpot equally, each would have about $471,465. That’s $942,930 per couple. If a couple had two kids, the four of them would be sitting pretty with $1.89 million.

MSN

Well the problem with free societies is we aren't all equally poor.

Some of us are rich.

Too bad you're not one of them.

Without the rich your society crumbles.

 

[OldFlame]

Stupid people are dangerous, the op is the perfect example of that.

 

[Meister]

People talk badly about socialism and Marxism. Most don't even know what they are. But here is a question for you:

Could you live on $471,465 per year?

If Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across the US, How Much Money Would Every Person Have?​

According to the Federal Reserve, U.S. households hold $160.35 trillion in combined wealth, which is the value of every American’s assets minus their liabilities.

To say it’s distributed unevenly is too much of an understatement to even qualify as an understatement. The bottom 50% of the country shares less than 3% of that enormous pie, while the most fortunate 10% gorge on nearly all of it.

Here’s a look at how much money each American would have if every person got an equal slice of the country’s wealth.

According to Google’s Data Commons project, the U.S. is home to roughly 340.11 million people.

If they divvied up the country’s $160.35 trillion jackpot equally, each would have about $471,465. That’s $942,930 per couple. If a couple had two kids, the four of them would be sitting pretty with $1.89 million.

MSN

Go to work and ask for a raise, child, because you sure don't understand what you actually posted.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Since wealth can only be redistributed once, your figure of 471,465 dollars is a sum total, not a yearly amount.

Two years after such an illegal and unconstitutional redistribution, those who were wealthy before the redistribution will be once again, and those who were poor will once again be poor.

However, let's talk about your debilitating envy. You clearly want others to take care of you and you don't want to do jack shit for yourself.

well again, that shows you how solid the thought process was that went into it in the first place

 

[Woodznutz]

Just get a job

Stop buying things that have no lasting value.
Sew up that hole in your pocket.
Don't pretend you're rich by dressing rich.
Use spare time for more work, less play.
Live cheap until you don't have to.
You're in hole...stop digging.
You're welcome.

 

[IM2]

According to Google’s Data Commons project, the U.S. is home to roughly 340.11 million people.

If they divvied up the country’s $160.35 trillion jackpot equally, each would have about $471,465. That’s $942,930 per couple. If a couple had two kids, the four of them would be sitting pretty with $1.89 million.

Data Commons

Data Commons aggregates and harmonizes global, open data, giving everyone the power to uncover insights with natural language questions

datacommons.org

And I think its funny that I got told to get a job from ***** who sits at home living off hubby. She is basically nothing more than a glorified call girl, maid, and cook.

 

[hadit]

According to Google’s Data Commons project, the U.S. is home to roughly 340.11 million people.

If they divvied up the country’s $160.35 trillion jackpot equally, each would have about $471,465. That’s $942,930 per couple. If a couple had two kids, the four of them would be sitting pretty with $1.89 million.

Data Commons

Data Commons aggregates and harmonizes global, open data, giving everyone the power to uncover insights with natural language questions

datacommons.org

And I think its funny that I got told to get a job from ***** who sits at home living off hubby. She is basically nothing more than a glorified call girl, maid, and cook.

Each would HAVE, not be getting every year. Has that sunk in yet?

 

[IM2]

Well the problem with free societies is we aren't all equally poor.

Some of us are rich.

Too bad you're not one of them.

Without the rich your society crumbles.

Because of the wealth disparity, our society is crumbling. But keep on letting the obscenely rich tell you how great things are.

 

[IM2]

Each would HAVE, not be getting every year. Has that sunk in yet?

Yawn!

 

[Meister]

No, it's a yearly amount and you apparently don't know what wealth redistribution is. Nothing you say would happen after 2 years. Stay on topic and stop making assumptions. We have taken care of whites for 249 years now, so you really need to stop.

Finally, IM2 whips out his................. race card.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Because of the wealth disparity, our society is crumbling. But keep on letting the obscenely rich tell you how great things are.

The difference between rich and poor has always been there, always

 

[Mac-7]

People talk badly about socialism and Marxism. Most don't even know what they are. But here is a question for you:

Could you live on $471,465 per year?

If Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across the US, How Much Money Would Every Person Have?​

According to the Federal Reserve, U.S. households hold $160.35 trillion in combined wealth, which is the value of every American’s assets minus their liabilities.

To say it’s distributed unevenly is too much of an understatement to even qualify as an understatement. The bottom 50% of the country shares less than 3% of that enormous pie, while the most fortunate 10% gorge on nearly all of it.

Here’s a look at how much money each American would have if every person got an equal slice of the country’s wealth.

According to Google’s Data Commons project, the U.S. is home to roughly 340.11 million people.

If they divvied up the country’s $160.35 trillion jackpot equally, each would have about $471,465. That’s $942,930 per couple. If a couple had two kids, the four of them would be sitting pretty with $1.89 million.

MSN

Will the neo marxists ever learn?

Wealth redistribution on such a scale never works because the cream ALWAYS rises to the top eventually

 

[mudwhistle]

Because of the wealth disparity, our society is crumbling. But keep on letting the obscenely rich tell you how great things are.

Nope....that's not how it works.

In any healthy society there is more than the rich and the poor. There is a Middle-Class that makes up most of the population.

Socialism doesn't work in reality. You have to have some Capitalism in any society for it to exist. Just ask the Russians or the Chinese about the need for Middle-Class consumers.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Finally, IM2 whips out his................. race card.

Every single time

 

[theHawk]

People talk badly about socialism and Marxism. Most don't even know what they are. But here is a question for you:

Could you live on $471,465 per year?

If Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across the US, How Much Money Would Every Person Have?​

According to the Federal Reserve, U.S. households hold $160.35 trillion in combined wealth, which is the value of every American’s assets minus their liabilities.

To say it’s distributed unevenly is too much of an understatement to even qualify as an understatement. The bottom 50% of the country shares less than 3% of that enormous pie, while the most fortunate 10% gorge on nearly all of it.

Here’s a look at how much money each American would have if every person got an equal slice of the country’s wealth.

According to Google’s Data Commons project, the U.S. is home to roughly 340.11 million people.

If they divvied up the country’s $160.35 trillion jackpot equally, each would have about $471,465. That’s $942,930 per couple. If a couple had two kids, the four of them would be sitting pretty with $1.89 million.

MSN

Oh my. IM2 isn’t even hiding it anymore, he’s a full blown communist.

Stupid lazy **** wants to sit on his ass and get paid half a million dollars for it.

 

[Luckyone]

So thats why Communist nations are the worlds happiest and wealthiest!

You did not answer the OP question. Can you live with $475,000 per year?

 

[mudwhistle]

The difference between rich and poor has always been there, always

The reason so many people want to come to America is because their countries don't have a Middle-Class.