Corrupt Clarence Thomas May NEVER Recover from This Reality Check

[rightwinger]

She was a kook who lied about the man she followed from job to job.

Hill maintained her demeanor and was very credible.
Thomas should have been rejected

 

[Auld Phart]

While our Supreme Court has always been above reproach, Thomas has dragged them to a new low. Justices for sale

First Monday in October (1981) ⭐ 6.4 | Comedy, Drama

1h 38m | R

www.imdb.com

 

[rightwinger]

You've been mainlining MSNBC again, haven't you? Thomas is one of the brightest legal scholars ever to sit on the bench not to mention a man of impeccable integrity, mainstream media innuendo and spurious accusations are not the equivalent of facts.

The left only hates him because he's both an originalist and an African American, they see him as an escaped slave that refuses to live in a cage.

"As fire when thrown into water is cooled down and put out, so also a false accusation when brought against a man of the purest and holiest character, boils over and is at once dissipated, and vanishes." -- Marcus Tullius Cicero

As a Judge, Thomas is mediocre at best with few significant decisions. Most of his career, he just followed Scalia

It is his personal life that has destroyed his credibility. His acceptance of lavish gifts from partisan donors left his impartiality in question

 

[WEATHER53]

Hill maintained her demeanor and was very credible.
Thomas should have been rejected

She was a stalker and he rebuffed her and she retaliated
Nobody and I repeat nobody puts their own public hairs on a coke can and give it to a woman as intent to sexually harass .
It was a high tech lynching as he stated

 

[OKTexas]

This is what he gets for selling out. He sold out blacks and he's selling out the country.

The young turds, seriously? You always pick on the black guy that doesn't share your screwed up opinions. Of course you never go full on karen when jackson when she rules in a way you don't like.

.

 

[NetJedi]

As a Judge, Thomas is mediocre at best with few significant decisions. Most of his career, he just followed Scalia

ROFLMAO! Thomas and Scalia had deep disagreements on fundamentals and never made any secret of the fact despite being close friends,
Do some homework before coming at me with this fictious nonsense.

It is his personal life that has destroyed his credibility. His acceptance of lavish gifts from partisan donors left his impartiality in question

His credibility is quite intact, it's only "questioned" by those with a political axe to grind, he'll be honored as a great legal scholar for many generations, while his detractors will be completely forgotten.

 

[rightwinger]

ROFLMAO! Thomas and Scalia had deep disagreements on fundamentals and never made any secret of the fact despite being close friends,
Do some homework before coming at me with this fictious nonsense.

His credibility is quite intact, it's only "questioned" by those with a political axe to grind, he'll be honored as a great legal scholar for many generations, while his detractors will be completely forgotten.

Even his fellow judges are embarrassed by him
He gives the whole court a bad reputation

Thomas shamelessly accepting lavish gifts puts the whole court in question

 

[DGS49]

Too stupid to even comprehend "corruption." Quid pro quo requires a quo.

You fucking idiots.

 

[struth]

This is what he gets for selling out. He sold out blacks and he's selling out the country.

Wow a guy who voted for racial jungle joe, who pretends to be black, is attacking a black judge

Shouldn’t you be burning crosses?

 

[struth]

Even his fellow judges are embarrassed by him
He gives the whole court a bad reputation

Thomas shamelessly accepting lavish gifts puts the whole court in question

Here comes a racist

 

[OKTexas]

As a Judge, Thomas is mediocre at best with few significant decisions. Most of his career, he just followed Scalia

It is his personal life that has destroyed his credibility. His acceptance of lavish gifts from partisan donors left his impartiality in question

Yet 4 other justices have to agree for a majority decision, are you saying they are corrupt as well? And what about the unanimous decisions you dems don't like? Is everyone on the court corrupt? The fact is you just don't like it if things don't go the way you want and the rule of law is upheld, you just need some to blame.

.

 

[0311]

Racist much

Not about race asshat, it is the fact he is corrupt.

 

[NetJedi]

Even his fellow judges are embarrassed by him
He gives the whole court a bad reputation

Thomas shamelessly accepting lavish gifts puts the whole court in question

More nonsense, again, this is why I find it difficult to take you seriously. You just parrot things you heard on the mainstream media, unfortunately for you, I've done my homework.

 

[rightwinger]

Too stupid to even comprehend "corruption." Quid pro quo requires a quo.

You fucking idiots.

Judges are held to a higher standard. At least judges below Supreme Court are

They need to avoid even the appearance of corruption.
Accepting lavish gifts from partisan donors is not against the law.
But it does call your impartiality into question

 

[rightwinger]

More nonsense, again, this is why I find it difficult to take you seriously. You just parrot things you heard on the mainstream media, unfortunately for you, I've done my homework.

No, actually I worked for the federal government for over 30 years and was held to stricter ethical standards than Justice Thomas is.

 

[IM2]

The young turds, seriously? You always pick on the black guy that doesn't share your screwed up opinions. Of course you never go full on karen when jackson when she rules in a way you don't like.

.

Kitanje Brown Jackson hasn't ruled against things that take away opportunities from blacks. Thomas has, which is particularly pathetic since he's ruled on things that allowed him to be where he is today, and that's why you defend him. I'm sure you would not accept any white SCOTUS member who would rule to allow America to go back under British rule, but you don't mind Thomas ruling on things that will take blacks back to Jim Crow status.

 

[struth]

Kitanje Brown Jackson hasn't ruled against things that take away opportunities from blacks. Thomas has, which is particularly pathetic since he's ruled on things that allowed him to be where he is today, and that's why you defend him. I'm sure you would not accept any white SCOTUS member who would rule to allow America to go back under British rule, but you don't mind Thomas ruling on things that will take blacks back to Jim Crow status.

What ruling are you talking about?

Starte the case

Justice Jackson ruled against black women the day she said she can’t define a black woman

 

[IM2]

Yet 4 other justices have to agree for a majority decision, are you saying they are corrupt as well? And what about the unanimous decisions you dems don't like? Is everyone on the court corrupt? The fact is you just don't like it if things don't go the way you want and the rule of law is upheld, you just need some to blame.

.

Thomas, Alito, and Roberts have shown questionable ethics. Nobody has said anything about Gorsuch, Kavanaugh or Coney Barrett, even though two of these justices were put in during election years, while Gorsuch shouldn't even be in the seat, but McConnell refused to give the black president his rightful choice. So you Republicans can just stop crying because you guys break rules and get called for it. Follow the rules and you'll have no problem.

 

[0311]

A Supreme Court Justice must be held a very high ethical standard. Thomas has no standards. He accepts bribes and as a sitting justice he should not. It is NOT the color of his skin, it is the content of his character to paraphrase MLK.

 

[IM2]

She was a stalker and he rebuffed her and she retaliated
Nobody and I repeat nobody puts their own public hairs on a coke can and give it to a woman as intent to sexually harass .
It was a high tech lynching as he stated

Hill was not a stalker. There was no high-tech lynching. But what Thomas has done to the black community is.