Cops bust parties at people's homes but refuse to bust rioters!

Would this be an example of where we need police reform? Is it the place of the police to arrest people having a peaceful get together?

Shouldn't you be addressing this question to the mayors and governors directing them to?

Sorry, are they here to address?

Sorry, are the police?

I didn't ask them either. I asked those participating. I guess you aren't interested in answering so this is what you do.

No, I did answer it. You simply don't like the answer. The police work for the city, county, or state. It is the people you elect as mayor, city council, governor, commissioner, sheriff, etc who ultimately direct the actions of the police, so if you have a problem with how they are conducting business take it up with the people you vote for because that's who they are getting their cue from. Period.

I asked the opinion of those participating here if they thought this was an example of out of control police officers. I didn't ask who hired them.

I didn't and can't vote for any of the entities mentioned. I understand why you don't want to voice an opinion though.
What I believe is there seems to be different sets of rules with the police now. They have good will with some voters and none with others and some in between. At some point some of these people may get violent in situations not protesting/rioting.
 
Would this be an example of where we need police reform? Is it the place of the police to arrest people having a peaceful get together?

Shouldn't you be addressing this question to the mayors and governors directing them to?

Sorry, are they here to address?

Sorry, are the police?

I didn't ask them either. I asked those participating. I guess you aren't interested in answering so this is what you do.

No, I did answer it. You simply don't like the answer. The police work for the city, county, or state. It is the people you elect as mayor, city council, governor, commissioner, sheriff, etc who ultimately direct the actions of the police, so if you have a problem with how they are conducting business take it up with the people you vote for because that's who they are getting their cue from. Period.

I asked the opinion of those participating here if they thought this was an example of out of control police officers. I didn't ask who hired them.

I didn't and can't vote for any of the entities mentioned. I understand why you don't want to voice an opinion though.
What I believe is there seems to be different sets of rules with the police now. They have good will with some voters and none with others and some in between. At some point some of these people may get violent in situations not protesting/rioting.

The ones that support them don't get pulled over for being white.
 
Illegal party promoters are renting houses in order to charge partygoers a fee to get stabbed and shot.
Not a bad gig if you can pull it off.
 
The police shutting down the house party is because our odious governor has decreed the state is locked down. Parties are illegal. Protests are legal. Shopping where you pay for merchandise is illegal. Shoplifting, where the merchandise is stolen is legal.
 
This is beyond belief, the government now feels they have the tight to tell you how many friends you can invite to your home. The government has no authority to tell you how many people can be at your home. Police have now busted parties in both California and New Jersey. The cops feeling it safer to bust domestic house parties instead of protecting businesses from rioters trying to burn them down by this act show what cowards they are. and how the government is trying to control your personal life



50 police officers deployed to bust up a party of 100 seems to be a bit of overkill
 
This is beyond belief, the government now feels they have the tight to tell you how many friends you can invite to your home. The government has no authority to tell you how many people can be at your home. Police have now busted parties in both California and New Jersey. The cops feeling it safer to bust domestic house parties instead of protecting businesses from rioters trying to burn them down by this act show what cowards they are. and how the government is trying to control your personal life


This is just the beginning. What's to come will involve Americans made to kneel as law enforcement or COVID tracers shoot every other one in the head for violating social distancing/mask "laws". Don't believe it? Just wait and see. My guess is most of these social distancing violations will be found and punished in and around key conservative voting areas nationwide. THIS is what happens when Americans become herds of cows indifferent to the slaughterhouse. Cowards, aren't we all?
 
This is beyond belief, the government now feels they have the tight to tell you how many friends you can invite to your home. The government has no authority to tell you how many people can be at your home. Police have now busted parties in both California and New Jersey. The cops feeling it safer to bust domestic house parties instead of protecting businesses from rioters trying to burn them down by this act show what cowards they are. and how the government is trying to control your personal life



WHERE THEY MADE THEIR MISTAKE:
  1. Protesing is protected activity, parties violating state orders are not.
  2. They forgot to all wear their BLM tee shirts and carry a few signs. :smoke:

Wrong. Parties in private homes are constitutionally protected under "freedom of assembly."

Burning down buildings is not protected by anything.
 
The Police in these leftist shit holes have nothing but bad choices against the rioters...........The Dems rule the states, the cities, and the DAs...........and they have basically told them to STAND DOWN all over the Nation........

If they go bust up these protests the Justice system will go after them instead of the dang rioters..............

Here are their choices....

Get beaten by a stick.
or
Get beaten by a stick.

They are enforcing these rules or they lose their jobs because of Political BS..............I don't understand why they want to be police anymore with the BS going on today.

I refuse to join this .......COPS ARE COWARDS BS....on this thread.......They are screwed no matter what they do.........and run by Politicians unfit to lead a girl scout troop.
 
The party in California was not large. The house is a 3 story mansion. It looked like a sparsely attended party to me. Only 100 people, it certainly wasn't big. It had a DJ and a food truck showed up. No one in that neighborhood would complain.
True only 100 people but as the article states there were 50 cops which on would assume had better things to do.

If they can afford 50 cops to break up a house party there are too many cops.
Understand what you are saying, based on what most people think cops do the most of, but most of my interactions with police have in-fact been about taxation supposedly to affect behaviors, but often just to generate revenue, so quite often, just tax collectors, ie, speeding, public yet peaceful intoxication, city sticker or plates out of date, etc. They generate a lot of money. Some communities use speed traps effectively to augment the tax base funds. if big enough, a peaceful house part is much easier to generate fines faster and more efficiently at less operational expense of fuel and wear and tear on equipment and police officers than than speeding tickets and a heck of a lot less than wading into a riot. Just the ticketing process at a house party offers much better opportunity for more and greater fines, when just finding out who is in there often offers up people already wanted for other unpaid offense debts. For the public good health and the public coffers, they are a very attractive nuisance, that is a new income stream.
Exactly.... the Social Distancing and Mask edicts are not about health and safety it is just another income stream for the cites
Miami has already set up "Mask Traps" where people are ticketed for no mask much like speed traps for cars
 
The party in California was not large. The house is a 3 story mansion. It looked like a sparsely attended party to me. Only 100 people, it certainly wasn't big. It had a DJ and a food truck showed up. No one in that neighborhood would complain.
True only 100 people but as the article states there were 50 cops which on would assume had better things to do.

If they can afford 50 cops to break up a house party there are too many cops.
Understand what you are saying, based on what most people think cops do the most of, but most of my interactions with police have in-fact been about taxation supposedly to affect behaviors, but often just to generate revenue, so quite often, just tax collectors, ie, speeding, public yet peaceful intoxication, city sticker or plates out of date, etc. They generate a lot of money. Some communities use speed traps effectively to augment the tax base funds. if big enough, a peaceful house part is much easier to generate fines faster and more efficiently at less operational expense of fuel and wear and tear on equipment and police officers than than speeding tickets and a heck of a lot less than wading into a riot. Just the ticketing process at a house party offers much better opportunity for more and greater fines, when just finding out who is in there often offers up people already wanted for other unpaid offense debts. For the public good health and the public coffers, they are a very attractive nuisance, that is a new income stream.
Exactly.... the Social Distancing and Mask edicts are not about health and safety it is just another income stream for the cites
Miami has already set up "Mask Traps" where people are ticketed for no mask much like speed traps for cars
It is at least dual purpose. If a city is on partial lock down, it has got to be impacting lower traffic citation generation to the coffers. I have heard some really high fines. Sounds like revenue generation to me, even as one who has no problem what so ever with masking in public.
 
Wrong. Parties in private homes are constitutionally protected under "freedom of assembly."
Burning down buildings is not protected by anything.
Well you're kinda half right.
Parties normally ARE considered freedom of assembly under normal times, that is, until it disturbs the peace or violates temporary state orders from the governor under extraordinary circumstances. Can't say I agree with it but that's the game they are playing.

And apparently burning down buildings IS protected something since these same governors and mayors are protecting it! Again, not that I agree with it.
 
The party in California was not large. The house is a 3 story mansion. It looked like a sparsely attended party to me. Only 100 people, it certainly wasn't big. It had a DJ and a food truck showed up. No one in that neighborhood would complain.
True only 100 people but as the article states there were 50 cops which on would assume had better things to do.

If they can afford 50 cops to break up a house party there are too many cops.
Understand what you are saying, based on what most people think cops do the most of, but most of my interactions with police have in-fact been about taxation supposedly to affect behaviors, but often just to generate revenue, so quite often, just tax collectors, ie, speeding, public yet peaceful intoxication, city sticker or plates out of date, etc. They generate a lot of money. Some communities use speed traps effectively to augment the tax base funds. if big enough, a peaceful house part is much easier to generate fines faster and more efficiently at less operational expense of fuel and wear and tear on equipment and police officers than than speeding tickets and a heck of a lot less than wading into a riot. Just the ticketing process at a house party offers much better opportunity for more and greater fines, when just finding out who is in there often offers up people already wanted for other unpaid offense debts. For the public good health and the public coffers, they are a very attractive nuisance, that is a new income stream.
Exactly.... the Social Distancing and Mask edicts are not about health and safety it is just another income stream for the cites
Miami has already set up "Mask Traps" where people are ticketed for no mask much like speed traps for cars
It is at least dual purpose. If a city is on partial lock down, it has got to be impacting lower traffic citation generation to the coffers. I have heard some really high fines. Sounds like revenue generation to me, even as one who has no problem what so ever with masking in public.
I agree with everything except the forced masking
If masking was really about health you would think that the government would issue a minimum standard for masks.
As it stands now a piece of single ply toilet paper draped across you nose and mouth fills the requirement.
 
This is beyond belief, the government now feels they have the tight to tell you how many friends you can invite to your home. The government has no authority to tell you how many people can be at your home. Police have now busted parties in both California and New Jersey. The cops feeling it safer to bust domestic house parties instead of protecting businesses from rioters trying to burn them down by this act show what cowards they are. and how the government is trying to control your personal life



WHERE THEY MADE THEIR MISTAKE:
  1. Protesing is protected activity, parties violating state orders are not.
  2. They forgot to all wear their BLM tee shirts and carry a few signs. :smoke:

Wrong. Parties in private homes are constitutionally protected under "freedom of assembly."

Burning down buildings is not protected by anything.

We are free to assemble in a nightclub also but they are shut down. Legally at that. Whether you agree or not it's going to be found legal. The same here. This has all been determined to be legal. But you generally support the authoritarians so...................
 

Forum List

Back
Top