Conservatives push for end of "no fault" divorce

[surada]

What is the divorce rate in Israel?
PETAH TIKVA, ISRAEL, October 9, 2023 /EINPresswire.com/ -- In the wake of recent statistics revealing a staggering 47.3% divorce rate in Israel, the nation finds itself grappling with the multifaceted implications of a system deeply intertwined with religious and civil law.Oct 9, 2023
https://www.wjtv.com › ein-presswire
Divorce Rate in Israel as High as 47.3% - WJTV

 

[surada]

In 2022, Japan's divorce rate was 1.47 divorces per 1,000 people, which was a third year in a row of decline. This is lower than the divorce rate in countries like the United States and Canada, which is closer to 40%. However, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare says that 35.5% of marriages in Japan end in divorce, and international marriages have an even higher rate. For example, more than half of international marriages end in divorce, and over 57% of marriages between a Japanese man and a Chinese or Korean woman end in divorce.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Why do you assume it's a fad?

Because there’s no reason to stay in it if it gets difficult, thus, becomes largely a meaningless label to those outside of the church.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Well adjusted kids, to start with.

Study after study shows children do better when both parents are in the home.

So...you want to force people to stay in a miserable (or abusive) marriage "for the kids." You think growing up with two people who hate each other will make them "well adjusted"?

 

[Mr. Friscus]

So...you want to force people to stay in a miserable (or abusive) marriage "for the kids." You think growing up with two people who hate each other will make them "well adjusted"?

The data says it’s generally better than single parent households. There are exceptions, but we should generally encourage marriages to stay together

 

[rightwinger]

The data says it’s generally better than single parent households. There are exceptions, but we should generally encourage marriages to stay together

I doubt if the kids would agree

Mommy and Daddy fighting all the time or peacefully apart

 

[Jarlaxle]

I doubt if the kids would agree

Mommy and Daddy fighting all the time or peacefully apart

Or beating Mommy to a pulp.

 

[irosie91]

Or beating Mommy to a pulp.

for the record---there is no "no fault" divorce in christian law.
Blame it on the Anglican Church

 

[hadit]

The contract is between consenting adults. The state isn't party to the marriage.

As long as the state offers tax incentives to be married and have children, it is part of the contract. If you want the state to stay out of it, a lot needs to change. Divorces should not be done in a court room, just for one example, with the state forcing one partner to foot the bill and essentially pay the other one to play around as much as desired.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

I doubt if the kids would agree

Mommy and Daddy fighting all the time or peacefully apart

Data is data.. and it’s generally with me

 

[rightwinger]

Data is data.. and it’s generally with me

Show your work

 

[surada]

As long as the state offers tax incentives to be married and have children, it is part of the contract. If you want the state to stay out of it, a lot needs to change. Divorces should not be done in a court room, just for one example, with the state forcing one partner to foot the bill and essentially pay the other one to play around as much as desired.

The state has NO say in how your marriage operates. None. That's law 101. All they do is register the contract.

 

[surada]

About fucking time!!!!!!
Modern women have been abusing the "system" and WRECKING families for far too long!!!

Women aren't hostages. They don't agree to that in the marriage contract.

The main issues to be settled in a divorce are property division, parental responsibilities, child support and spousal maintenance.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Women aren't hostages.

That reeks of horrendous assumptions about men. Misandry

 

[HeyNorm]

Because there are very solid reasons for making it a little more difficult, (but not impossible) to divorce, especially when children are involved. Maybe we should make the marriage contract stronger, spelling out details of how to dissolve it should that become necessary. Every contract spells out how it can be dissolved and who walks away with what should it happen. Marriage is a contract, so if we're not going to assume it's for life anymore, pre-nups need to be a lot more common.

Agree completely

 

[initforme]

So waiting until ones 30s to have a kid is smart.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

IData is data.. and it’s generally with me

No, the data really is not with you at all. You are assuming the the marriage itself is a basic framework to benefit of the children. Couples should do everything they can to benefit children. These are your rambling assumptions untroubled by data.

Parents should not only be married, they must be engaged with the marriage and engaged with the children. The data shows the a marriage of people that don't like each other is far, far more detrimental than a divorce removing parenting decisions from the marriage. For one thing, it leads to the weaponization of the children who must constantly demonstrate .who they love more.

Everyone understands the breakup of homes where there is violence. Overlooked are the homes of the parties who stay together for the children and consider their lives a waste. The children of such parents eventually here "I stayed in this marriage for you. I wasted my life for you. All of that pain and misery is your fault.

 

[initforme]

Pre nups make sense. They should cover all divorce scenarios and be negotiated by both parties in the marriage.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

No, the data really is not with you at all. You are assuming the the marriage itself is a basic framework to benefit of the children. Couples should do everything they can to benefit children. These are your rambling assumptions untroubled by data.

Parents should not only be married, they must be engaged with the marriage and engaged with the children. The data shows the a marriage of people that don't like each other is far, far more detrimental than a divorce removing parenting decisions from the marriage. For one thing, it leads to the weaponization of the children who must constantly demonstrate .who they love more.

Everyone understands the breakup of homes where there is violence. Overlooked are the homes of the parties who stay together for the children and consider their lives a waste. The children of such parents eventually here "I stayed in this marriage for you. I wasted my life for you. All of that pain and misery is your fault.

The Troubling data of single parent children is undeniable, even if you try.

Far higher rates of crime, drug use, depression, suicide, etc.

It drowns out any theories you have

 

[initforme]

The Troubling data of single parent children is undeniable, even if you try.

Far higher rates of crime, drug use, depression, suicide, etc.

It drowns out any theories you have

So less couples having kids isn't a bad thing.