Andylusion
Platinum Member
You're lying again. Shokin never actively investigated Burisma. You also have no evidence it had anything to to with Hunter Biden, who remained on Burisma's board of directors for 3 years following the case against Zlochevsky being settled.I noticed how you didn't respond or even attempt to contradict anything I said.Fuck off. You lied. You falsely claimed Shokin's replacement let Zlochevsky off the hook. I showed you he didn't. I showed you a Kiev court let Zlochevsky off the hook. I showed you Shokin's replacement still went after Zlochevsky for tax evasion and nailed him for for $7.4 million. At this point, you're done. Anything else you have is just grasping for straws. Gum someone else's ankles.Putz, I l already explained why the Shokin's replacement dropped the case against Zlochevsky. And no, it was not on the orders of Biden. You're lying. If you really knew about these events, you wouldn't have to lie like that.He was not investigating it. There was already an open investigation and when he was assigned to it, he did nothing with it. It sat dormant for almost 2 years under his watch.
Really? Then if that was the case, and that explains why he was removed... why was the first thing the new prosecutor general did, was to dismiss the investigation completely?
Don't give me all the rest of your nonsense. You explain why the entire investigation was dropped completely, after Shokin was replaced under the direction of Joe Biden?
It's so ironic to see people trying to claim the reason he was bad, was because he didn't investigate Burisma, when the new guy placed there under orders from Biden, dropped the case completely.
Factbox: Burisma, the obscure Ukrainian gas company at the heart of U.S. political row
Some U.S. Democrats are calling for the impeachment of President Donald Trump over reports that he asked his Ukrainian counterpart to launch an investigation that could damage his Democratic political rival Joe Biden.www.reuters.comIn 2016, a Kiev district court said it had found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing by Burisma president and owner Zlochevsky and ordered the Prosecutor General’s Office to remove him from the authorities’ wanted list.
And again, Shokin's replacement, the "new guy," Prosecutor General you lied about, claiming he dropped the case against Zlochevsky completely "on the orders of Biden," charged Zlochevsky with tax evasion and fined him 7½ million dollars in back taxes...
In 2017, Burisma said all investigations against the company and Zlochevsky had been closed after the company paid an additional 180 million hryvnias ($7.44 million) in taxes.
Now everyone here sees it's not that Biden did anything wrong -- it's just that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
That's it? Zlochevsky was caught in a money laundering scheme, that involved over $23 Million dollars. They paid $7.5 Million in taxes, and everything is cool?
And in 2016 the court said he did nothing wrong. Shocking. Shocking I say. Are you shocked? Because I'm shocked.
Given the fact Shokin was pressured to not investigate... is there any chance that the same people in high office that pressured Shokin, might also pressure the court?
Here's the problem. I need an explanation of why Burisma brought Hunter Biden on the board of directors, and paid him millions. All the other evidence, contrary to your claims, fit with what I would expect to happen if Hunter Biden was used as a shield against criminal investigations.
The investigation is stopped. The prosecutor is removed. The criminal charges are dropped. The company walks away with a slap on the wrist $7 Million in taxes, and a "bad company bad" speech, and everyone walks away free, and Hunter goes home with millions.
Hunter Biden failed to disclose $400K in Burisma payments in 2014 tax return
“In 2014 you joined the Burisma board and we still need to amend your 2014 returns to reflect the unreported Burisma income,” wrote Hunter Biden’s business partner Eric Schwerin in a 2017 ema…nypost.com
And they continue to play the game going forward....
[P]lease have keys made available for new office mates,” Hunter Biden wrote in the email reviewed by The Caller which listed his father Joe, along with stepmother Jill Biden, uncle Jim Biden and Gongwen Dong, described as an “emissary” for the Chinese energy giant CEFC.
And what would a Chinese energy company want with Biden's on the team? Well clearly they looked at Burisma, and realized the stupid idiotic public would vote for such clear corruption, and wanted in on those benefits.
Can you prove to me, that Hunter Biden, or Joe Biden for that matter, has any knowledge or experience whatsoever, in running any company, or anything energy related?
Can you? Any evidence supporting that conclusion at all, I'd love to hear.
I noticed how you didn't respond or even attempt to contradict anything I said.
Here's the problem. I need an explanation of why Burisma brought Hunter Biden on the board of directors, and paid him millions. All the other evidence, contrary to your claims, fit with what I would expect to happen if Hunter Biden was used as a shield against criminal investigations.
The investigation is stopped. The prosecutor is removed. The criminal charges are dropped. The company walks away with a slap on the wrist $7 Million in taxes, and a "bad company bad" speech, and everyone walks away free, and Hunter goes home with millions.
Hunter Biden failed to disclose $400K in Burisma payments in 2014 tax return
“In 2014 you joined the Burisma board and we still need to amend your 2014 returns to reflect the unreported Burisma income,” wrote Hunter Biden’s business partner Eric Schwerin in a 2017 ema…nypost.com
And they continue to play the game going forward....
[P]lease have keys made available for new office mates,” Hunter Biden wrote in the email reviewed by The Caller which listed his father Joe, along with stepmother Jill Biden, uncle Jim Biden and Gongwen Dong, described as an “emissary” for the Chinese energy giant CEFC.
And what would a Chinese energy company want with Biden's on the team? Well clearly they looked at Burisma, and realized the stupid idiotic public would vote for such clear corruption, and wanted in on those benefits.
Can you prove to me, that Hunter Biden, or Joe Biden for that matter, has any knowledge or experience whatsoever, in running any company, or anything energy related?
Can you? Any evidence supporting that conclusion at all, I'd love to hear.
Because I caught you lying repeatedly. And every time I catch you lying, you shift your story. And now you're lying again, denying I contradicted your claims when in reality, I've contradicted just about all of your claims.
First you claimed J'Biden corruptly had a prosecutor fired for investigating his son's company. That was a lie because said ex-prosecutor wasn't actively investigating Burisma.
So then you shifted your story to that Shokin only didn't investigate Burisma because Hunter Biden was on Burisma's board of directors. I showed that's not true because Shokin's avoidance of prosecuting Burisma started weeks before Biden went to work for Burisma AND in the 2 years Shokin had to investigate them, he actually didn't go after any oligarchs or high profile cases AND in fact, his own office was raided and 2 of his prosecutors were caught taking bribes to avoid prosecution.
So then you shifted your story again, this time claiming Shokin's replacement dropped the case. I pointed out that's not true, in reality, a Kiev district court did and ordered Shokin's replacement to drop the case.
Then you repeated that lie and I proved it was false and also showed Shokin's replacement went on and nailed Zlochevsky for $7.4 million for unpaid taxes. So it was worse for Zlochevsky that Shokin got fired.
So now you're shifting your story again, this time as to why Hunter would be paid millions, as though that's evidence of corruption on Biden's part. It's not, it's evidence that you're an idiot. You're actually claiming J'Biden got a prosecutor fired for NOT actively investigating Burisma. If you had a functioning brain in your head, that alone would shake common sense into you.
I'm done chasing down your lies as you continuously shift your story around as your lies get exposed. You can play your shell game by yourself.
First you claimed J'Biden corruptly had a prosecutor fired for investigating his son's company. That was a lie because said ex-prosecutor wasn't actively investigating Burisma.
I already posted direct statements that the whole reason the prosecutor shelved the investigation, was because Hunter Biden joined the board of directors at the company.
Before Hunter Biden, investigation was active.
After Hunter Biden, investigation was shelved.... but not dismissed.
If you can't admit that much.... which is established fact... then nothing else you have to say matters, because you are not acting with integrity on this issue.
I'll tell you what.... Here is how you can prove your entire argument.
“I was forced out because I was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into Burisma, and Joe Biden’s son was a member of the board,” Shokin said in a recent sworn affidavit prepared for a European court. “I assume Burisma had the support of Joe Biden because his son was on the board.” He added that the vice president himself had “significant interests” in Burisma.
Real Clear investigation: Joe Biden’s boosters wrote his prodigal son’s entire resume
Hunter Biden profited from his father’s political connections long before he struck questionable deals in countries where Joe Biden was undertaking diplomatic missions as vice president. In fact, virtually all
www.thecentersquare.com
By all means, press for criminal charges against Shokin on false testimony in the European court.
If they can convict him on false statements... then I will agree with you, and drop my argument.
Otherwise, you are the one lying non-stop to protect your overly openly corrupt president, and condemn yourself as a supporter of corruption.
Either prove he lied in sworn testimony in court.. are you full of absolute crap.
One or the other. No in between.