Boss
Take a Memo:
wtf is factually broke?
I just found this funny, since so many Liberals are in denial that she's lying... constantly... and some even deny that she's even under investigation. You know, since he points out her lies.
Well, assuming Hill's just a psychopath incapable of telling the truth, would that really make her a liar? (-:
The actions and intent remain the same, regardless of any amount of mental instability. However, her comments and flip-flops during the primaries and debates actually have shown that she understands how the economy works, and knows exactly what she's doing... she just doesn't care, because she wants what the establishment wants. Remember, she told Bernie that his policies have been proven to damage the economy at one point.
You don't seem to understand the laws that she factually broke.best yammering yet !So, do you think Comey was black mailed? Threatened? Why if she is guilty, which his first 10 minutes easily showed did they not recommend prosecution?
I have no idea. It's just fucking AMAZING to me that a couple of high-profile persons in position of authority can simply choose to ignore the rule of law and fail to do their jobs. And the Democrats CHEER this because their Queen in waiting gets a pass!
Does anyone have ANY doubts that if Hillary were a Republican, she would have been indicted? ...Or anyone else, for that matter! This is nothing more than political favoritism and Comey is complicit. At the very LEAST he should be forced to resign in disgrace... but I think Congress needs to grill him under oath and get to the bottom of why he made this decision. Every underling needs to be questioned under oath until we get to the bottom of this. Someone knows something... sooner or later, someone is going to talk. If the chief law enforcement officer has been compromised through political persuasion, either intentionally or indirectly, we need to know. And we need to know RIGHT NOW!
This woman cannot be elected President. If she were the president when she did this, it would be an impeachable offense. She has totally and completely compromised national security and she should be disqualified from ever having security clearance again. We simply cannot stand for this... write your congressmen! Burn their phone lines up! DEMAND that we get to the bottom of this! Don't let this slide for one second!
something is either broke or it not both are facts .
Comey said the FBI found evidence of “potential violations” of federal law, but such cases are generally not prosecuted. “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,” Comey said.
It’s clear, though, that she violated department policies. Comey said, “To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.”
FactCheck: A guide to Clinton's emails
No... she didn't "potentially" break the law... she BROKE the law.... Here IS the law she broke...
Whoever, (Hillary) being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (established fact she did) (1) through gross negligence (aka: "extreme carelessness") permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody (like putting it on a private personal server) or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, (done at least twice because servers were moved) or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, (also done according to Comey) or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody (which she knowingly did) or delivered to anyone (which she also did) in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, (which she did) and fails to make prompt report of such loss, (which she didn't) theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined (not excused) under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
So now... tell me how she "potentially" broke this law and didn't "matter-of-factly" break it?