Comey Lays His Cards on the Table


I just found this funny, since so many Liberals are in denial that she's lying... constantly... and some even deny that she's even under investigation. You know, since he points out her lies.

Well, assuming Hill's just a psychopath incapable of telling the truth, would that really make her a liar? (-:

The actions and intent remain the same, regardless of any amount of mental instability. However, her comments and flip-flops during the primaries and debates actually have shown that she understands how the economy works, and knows exactly what she's doing... she just doesn't care, because she wants what the establishment wants. Remember, she told Bernie that his policies have been proven to damage the economy at one point.
So, do you think Comey was black mailed? Threatened? Why if she is guilty, which his first 10 minutes easily showed did they not recommend prosecution?

I have no idea. It's just fucking AMAZING to me that a couple of high-profile persons in position of authority can simply choose to ignore the rule of law and fail to do their jobs. And the Democrats CHEER this because their Queen in waiting gets a pass!

Does anyone have ANY doubts that if Hillary were a Republican, she would have been indicted? ...Or anyone else, for that matter! This is nothing more than political favoritism and Comey is complicit. At the very LEAST he should be forced to resign in disgrace... but I think Congress needs to grill him under oath and get to the bottom of why he made this decision. Every underling needs to be questioned under oath until we get to the bottom of this. Someone knows something... sooner or later, someone is going to talk. If the chief law enforcement officer has been compromised through political persuasion, either intentionally or indirectly, we need to know. And we need to know RIGHT NOW!

This woman cannot be elected President. If she were the president when she did this, it would be an impeachable offense. She has totally and completely compromised national security and she should be disqualified from ever having security clearance again. We simply cannot stand for this... write your congressmen! Burn their phone lines up! DEMAND that we get to the bottom of this! Don't let this slide for one second!
best yammering yet !
You don't seem to understand the laws that she factually broke.
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .


Comey said the FBI found evidence of “potential violations” of federal law, but such cases are generally not prosecuted. “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,” Comey said.

It’s clear, though, that she violated department policies. Comey said, “To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.”

FactCheck: A guide to Clinton's emails


No... she didn't "potentially" break the law... she BROKE the law.... Here IS the law she broke...

Whoever, (Hillary) being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (established fact she did) (1) through gross negligence (aka: "extreme carelessness") permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody (like putting it on a private personal server) or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, (done at least twice because servers were moved) or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, (also done according to Comey) or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody (which she knowingly did) or delivered to anyone (which she also did) in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, (which she did) and fails to make prompt report of such loss, (which she didn't) theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined (not excused) under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

So now... tell me how she "potentially" broke this law and didn't "matter-of-factly" break it?
 
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

Well... it means just what it says, dumbass... she factually broke the law. It's a fact she broke the law. There is no "other fact" that she didn't break the law. Can your dumb ass comprehend that? Do we need to break out the crayons and finger paints? :dunno:
false there are no facts or evidence that prove she broke the law .
that is a fact .
put another way (partially paraphrasing )any sane prosecutor would not pursue the case .
 

I just found this funny, since so many Liberals are in denial that she's lying... constantly... and some even deny that she's even under investigation. You know, since he points out her lies.

Well, assuming Hill's just a psychopath incapable of telling the truth, would that really make her a liar? (-:

The actions and intent remain the same, regardless of any amount of mental instability. However, her comments and flip-flops during the primaries and debates actually have shown that she understands how the economy works, and knows exactly what she's doing... she just doesn't care, because she wants what the establishment wants. Remember, she told Bernie that his policies have been proven to damage the economy at one point.
I have no idea. It's just fucking AMAZING to me that a couple of high-profile persons in position of authority can simply choose to ignore the rule of law and fail to do their jobs. And the Democrats CHEER this because their Queen in waiting gets a pass!

Does anyone have ANY doubts that if Hillary were a Republican, she would have been indicted? ...Or anyone else, for that matter! This is nothing more than political favoritism and Comey is complicit. At the very LEAST he should be forced to resign in disgrace... but I think Congress needs to grill him under oath and get to the bottom of why he made this decision. Every underling needs to be questioned under oath until we get to the bottom of this. Someone knows something... sooner or later, someone is going to talk. If the chief law enforcement officer has been compromised through political persuasion, either intentionally or indirectly, we need to know. And we need to know RIGHT NOW!

This woman cannot be elected President. If she were the president when she did this, it would be an impeachable offense. She has totally and completely compromised national security and she should be disqualified from ever having security clearance again. We simply cannot stand for this... write your congressmen! Burn their phone lines up! DEMAND that we get to the bottom of this! Don't let this slide for one second!
best yammering yet !
You don't seem to understand the laws that she factually broke.
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .


Comey said the FBI found evidence of “potential violations” of federal law, but such cases are generally not prosecuted. “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,” Comey said.

It’s clear, though, that she violated department policies. Comey said, “To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.”

FactCheck: A guide to Clinton's emails


No... she didn't "potentially" break the law... she BROKE the law.... Here IS the law she broke...

Whoever, (Hillary) being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (established fact she did) (1) through gross negligence (aka: "extreme carelessness") permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody (like putting it on a private personal server) or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, (done at least twice because servers were moved) or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, (also done according to Comey) or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody (which she knowingly did) or delivered to anyone (which she also did) in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, (which she did) and fails to make prompt report of such loss, (which she didn't) theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined (not excused) under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

So now... tell me how she "potentially" broke this law and didn't "matter-of-factly" break it?
false but you can beat that dead horse all you like.
I just love to watch you fail around in your bullshit.
 
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

Well... it means just what it says, dumbass... she factually broke the law. It's a fact she broke the law. There is no "other fact" that she didn't break the law. Can your dumb ass comprehend that? Do we need to break out the crayons and finger paints? :dunno:
false there are no facts or evidence that prove she broke the law .
that is a fact .
put another way (partially paraphrasing )any sane prosecutor would not pursue the case .


BULLSHIT

18 USC 793, makes it a felony to "mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way"(emphasis added)
, as Comey himself notes at the beginning of yesterday's statement. Maybe Comey perceives a difference between extreme carelessness and gross negligence, but if so he never bothered to elucidate it.

The decision whether or not to prosecute depends on AN INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


.
 
Wonder what the pay off is?
Supreme Court Justice Nominee or is that for Lynch
and Comey will get appointed to her AG position.
 
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

Well... it means just what it says, dumbass... she factually broke the law. It's a fact she broke the law. There is no "other fact" that she didn't break the law. Can your dumb ass comprehend that? Do we need to break out the crayons and finger paints? :dunno:
false there are no facts or evidence that prove she broke the law .
that is a fact .
put another way (partially paraphrasing )any sane prosecutor would not pursue the case .


BULLSHIT

18 USC 793, makes it a felony to "mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way"(emphasis added)
, as Comey himself notes at the beginning of yesterday's statement. Maybe Comey perceives a difference between extreme carelessness and gross negligence, but if so he never bothered to elucidate it.

The decision whether or not to prosecute depends on AN INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


.
only an
insane one.
I'm sure you know plenty ..
also where would you find an actual independent PROSECUTOR!?
independent
Examples
See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
adjective
1.
not influenced or controlled by others in matters of opinion, conduct, etc.; thinking or acting for oneself:
an independent thinker.
2.
not subject to another's authority or jurisdiction; autonomous; free:
an independent businessman.
3.
not influenced by the thought or action of others:
independent research.
4.
not dependent; not depending or contingent upon something else for existence, operation, etc.
5.
not relying on another or others for aid or support.
6.
rejecting others' aid or support; refusing to be under obligation to others.
7.
possessing a competency:

good luck.
 
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

Well... it means just what it says, dumbass... she factually broke the law. It's a fact she broke the law. There is no "other fact" that she didn't break the law. Can your dumb ass comprehend that? Do we need to break out the crayons and finger paints? :dunno:
false there are no facts or evidence that prove she broke the law .
that is a fact .
put another way (partially paraphrasing )any sane prosecutor would not pursue the case .
At minimum contempt of congress.
"I did not send any mail marked secret"
 
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

Well... it means just what it says, dumbass... she factually broke the law. It's a fact she broke the law. There is no "other fact" that she didn't break the law. Can your dumb ass comprehend that? Do we need to break out the crayons and finger paints? :dunno:
false there are no facts or evidence that prove she broke the law .
that is a fact .
put another way (partially paraphrasing )any sane prosecutor would not pursue the case .


BULLSHIT

18 USC 793, makes it a felony to "mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way"(emphasis added)
, as Comey himself notes at the beginning of yesterday's statement. Maybe Comey perceives a difference between extreme carelessness and gross negligence, but if so he never bothered to elucidate it.

The decision whether or not to prosecute depends on AN INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


.

What Comey did was use the defintion of gross negligence not the words. Why in the Hell do you suppose he did so? Why did he lay out her criminal conduct for 10 mins then say "oh so what?" I am thinking there are pictures out there he doesn't want us to see.
 
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

Well... it means just what it says, dumbass... she factually broke the law. It's a fact she broke the law. There is no "other fact" that she didn't break the law. Can your dumb ass comprehend that? Do we need to break out the crayons and finger paints? :dunno:
false there are no facts or evidence that prove she broke the law .
that is a fact .
put another way (partially paraphrasing )any sane prosecutor would not pursue the case .
At minimum contempt of congress.
"I did not send any mail marked secret"

She is going to use the "I am too stupid to know" defense.
 
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

Well... it means just what it says, dumbass... she factually broke the law. It's a fact she broke the law. There is no "other fact" that she didn't break the law. Can your dumb ass comprehend that? Do we need to break out the crayons and finger paints? :dunno:
false there are no facts or evidence that prove she broke the law .
that is a fact .
put another way (partially paraphrasing )any sane prosecutor would not pursue the case .
At minimum contempt of congress.
"I did not send any mail marked secret"

She is going to use the "I am too stupid to know" defense.
Then she's too stupid to be President.
 
177634_600.jpg
 
Actually Comey's statement proved she committed perjury in the Benghazi investigation.
really where ?
"I did not receive or send any material marked..................blah,blah,blah,blah.
that all depends on how hard she see checked to see if it was marked, if she didn't some one else should have .
still it did not rise to criminal behavior.

If one cannot be bothered to read her own correspondence before clicking "send," knowing that many of those correspondences would be sensitive, one has no business holding any sort of security clearance. The onus was on her, 100%, to ensure she did not transmit info insecurely and to report any sensitive info she received on unsecure channels. It was her duty and responsibility; it was in her job description FFS.
 
comey.jpg

wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

Well... it means just what it says, dumbass... she factually broke the law. It's a fact she broke the law. There is no "other fact" that she didn't break the law. Can your dumb ass comprehend that? Do we need to break out the crayons and finger paints? :dunno:
false there are no facts or evidence that prove she broke the law .
that is a fact .
put another way (partially paraphrasing )any sane prosecutor would not pursue the case .
At minimum contempt of congress.
"I did not send any mail marked secret"

She is going to use the "I am too stupid to know" defense.
Then she's too stupid to be President.

In all fairness she did suffer brain injury when she got drunk and fell.
 
Actually Comey's statement proved she committed perjury in the Benghazi investigation.
really where ?
"I did not receive or send any material marked..................blah,blah,blah,blah.
that all depends on how hard she see checked to see if it was marked, if she didn't some one else should have .
still it did not rise to criminal behavior.


Classification stamps




Cover sheets

HARD TO MISS
true but were they attached? or were they intentionally disregarded for reasons other than laziness?

thanks![/QUOTE

They were retyped per the SOS instructions and sent without classification stamps. The very E-mail by SOS was in a thread here yesterday as provided by Wikileaks.
 
false there are no facts or evidence that prove she broke the law .
that is a fact .
put another way (partially paraphrasing )any sane prosecutor would not pursue the case .

Well, YES... according to Comey's own statements, she DID.
THAT is a FACT!

He seems to ignorantly think that her INTENT to break the law has something to do with this.

It doesn't.

She broke the law... plain and simple. Doesn't matter whether she "intended" to... she DID.... I personally think that she intended to... she knew exactly what she was doing and did it anyway.
 

I just found this funny, since so many Liberals are in denial that she's lying... constantly... and some even deny that she's even under investigation. You know, since he points out her lies.

Well, assuming Hill's just a psychopath incapable of telling the truth, would that really make her a liar? (-:

The actions and intent remain the same, regardless of any amount of mental instability. However, her comments and flip-flops during the primaries and debates actually have shown that she understands how the economy works, and knows exactly what she's doing... she just doesn't care, because she wants what the establishment wants. Remember, she told Bernie that his policies have been proven to damage the economy at one point.
So, do you think Comey was black mailed? Threatened? Why if she is guilty, which his first 10 minutes easily showed did they not recommend prosecution?

I have no idea. It's just fucking AMAZING to me that a couple of high-profile persons in position of authority can simply choose to ignore the rule of law and fail to do their jobs. And the Democrats CHEER this because their Queen in waiting gets a pass!

Does anyone have ANY doubts that if Hillary were a Republican, she would have been indicted? ...Or anyone else, for that matter! This is nothing more than political favoritism and Comey is complicit. At the very LEAST he should be forced to resign in disgrace... but I think Congress needs to grill him under oath and get to the bottom of why he made this decision. Every underling needs to be questioned under oath until we get to the bottom of this. Someone knows something... sooner or later, someone is going to talk. If the chief law enforcement officer has been compromised through political persuasion, either intentionally or indirectly, we need to know. And we need to know RIGHT NOW!

This woman cannot be elected President. If she were the president when she did this, it would be an impeachable offense. She has totally and completely compromised national security and she should be disqualified from ever having security clearance again. We simply cannot stand for this... write your congressmen! Burn their phone lines up! DEMAND that we get to the bottom of this! Don't let this slide for one second!
best yammering yet !
You don't seem to understand the laws that she factually broke.
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

It's the confirmed version of "Allegedly". Obviously.
 
Well, assuming Hill's just a psychopath incapable of telling the truth, would that really make her a liar? (-:
The actions and intent remain the same, regardless of any amount of mental instability. However, her comments and flip-flops during the primaries and debates actually have shown that she understands how the economy works, and knows exactly what she's doing... she just doesn't care, because she wants what the establishment wants. Remember, she told Bernie that his policies have been proven to damage the economy at one point.
best yammering yet !
You don't seem to understand the laws that she factually broke.
wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

Comey said the FBI found evidence of “potential violations” of federal law, but such cases are generally not prosecuted. “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,” Comey said.

It’s clear, though, that she violated department policies. Comey said, “To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.”

FactCheck: A guide to Clinton's emails

No... she didn't "potentially" break the law... she BROKE the law.... Here IS the law she broke...

Whoever, (Hillary) being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (established fact she did) (1) through gross negligence (aka: "extreme carelessness") permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody (like putting it on a private personal server) or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, (done at least twice because servers were moved) or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, (also done according to Comey) or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody (which she knowingly did) or delivered to anyone (which she also did) in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, (which she did) and fails to make prompt report of such loss, (which she didn't) theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined (not excused) under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

So now... tell me how she "potentially" broke this law and didn't "matter-of-factly" break it?
false but you can beat that dead horse all you like.
I just love to watch you fail around in your bullshit.
Then provide evidence to the contrary if you're so sure he's wrong. As of yet, I've seen you do nothing but deflect and squirm. Do you have anything of substance to add?
 
Then provide evidence to the contrary if you're so sure he's wrong. As of yet, I've seen you do nothing but deflect and squirm. Do you have anything of substance to add?

The only "substance" duhs EVER has to add is his fecal matter. At the special school, they have to keep him occupied with play-dough and jello cups so that he doesn't smear all the walls with his fecal matter. We don't have any jello cups or play-dough here though, so we're stuck having to put up with his smearing every thread with his fecal matter.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom