Comey Lays His Cards on the Table

[daws101]

The actions and intent remain the same, regardless of any amount of mental instability. However, her comments and flip-flops during the primaries and debates actually have shown that she understands how the economy works, and knows exactly what she's doing... she just doesn't care, because she wants what the establishment wants. Remember, she told Bernie that his policies have been proven to damage the economy at one point.
You don't seem to understand the laws that she factually broke.

wtf is factually broke?
something is either broke or it not both are facts .

Comey said the FBI found evidence of “potential violations” of federal law, but such cases are generally not prosecuted. “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,” Comey said.

It’s clear, though, that she violated department policies. Comey said, “To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.”

FactCheck: A guide to Clinton's emails

No... she didn't "potentially" break the law... she BROKE the law.... Here IS the law she broke...

Whoever, (Hillary) being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (established fact she did) (1) through gross negligence (aka: "extreme carelessness") permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody (like putting it on a private personal server) or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, (done at least twice because servers were moved) or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, (also done according to Comey) or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody (which she knowingly did) or delivered to anyone (which she also did) in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, (which she did) and fails to make prompt report of such loss, (which she didn't) theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined (not excused) under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

So now... tell me how she "potentially" broke this law and didn't "matter-of-factly" break it?

false but you can beat that dead horse all you like.
I just love to watch you fail around in your bullshit.

Then provide evidence to the contrary if you're so sure he's wrong. As of yet, I've seen you do nothing but deflect and squirm. Do you have anything of substance to add?

No need ,everything bossy posts is bullshit .
It refutes it's self.

 

[daws101]

false there are no facts or evidence that prove she broke the law .
that is a fact .
put another way (partially paraphrasing )any sane prosecutor would not pursue the case .

Well, YES... according to Comey's own statements, she DID.
THAT is a FACT!

He seems to ignorantly think that her INTENT to break the law has something to do with this.

It doesn't.

She broke the law... plain and simple. Doesn't matter whether she "intended" to... she DID.... I personally think that she intended to... she knew exactly what she was doing and did it anyway.

False! By comey's own word.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Lots of right wingnuts patting each other on the back here. Comey is going before Congress tomorrow and hopefully it will be televised. Let's see how much of your self-congratulations and Keyboard Kowboy wisdom holds up.

And anyone who purports to be married to an attorney should know that even a first year law student knows you can't incriminate someone of a crime based on your suspicions that they are guilty of other crimes....especially when there are no charges for either. (rolling eyes and laughing at Catfish)

It's not suspicions when the FBI has pointed out she's guilty of felonies. The Federal Records Act makes all of her emails Federal Records, it's illegal to destroy Federal Records, or attempt to destroy them. They pointed out that she deleted LOTS of emails, which they retrieved. I can name three laws she violated right off the top of my head. Violating one of which actually disqualifies her from ever holding a public office again. I'm not sure if you're in denial, or just ignorant, but you really should do some actual research.

No one has pointed out that Clinton is guilty of felonies.
You people live in a deranged little bubble world.

 

[daws101]

As this is being written Comey has just finished an explanation of the importance of intent in cases involving handling of classified materials.
I trust his opinion over bossy' s raving.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I just found this funny, since so many Liberals are in denial that she's lying... constantly... and some even deny that she's even under investigation. You know, since he points out her lies.

Well, assuming Hill's just a psychopath incapable of telling the truth, would that really make her a liar? (-:

The actions and intent remain the same, regardless of any amount of mental instability. However, her comments and flip-flops during the primaries and debates actually have shown that she understands how the economy works, and knows exactly what she's doing... she just doesn't care, because she wants what the establishment wants. Remember, she told Bernie that his policies have been proven to damage the economy at one point.

So, do you think Comey was black mailed? Threatened? Why if she is guilty, which his first 10 minutes easily showed did they not recommend prosecution?

I have no idea. It's just fucking AMAZING to me that a couple of high-profile persons in position of authority can simply choose to ignore the rule of law and fail to do their jobs. And the Democrats CHEER this because their Queen in waiting gets a pass!

Does anyone have ANY doubts that if Hillary were a Republican, she would have been indicted? ...Or anyone else, for that matter! This is nothing more than political favoritism and Comey is complicit. At the very LEAST he should be forced to resign in disgrace... but I think Congress needs to grill him under oath and get to the bottom of why he made this decision. Every underling needs to be questioned under oath until we get to the bottom of this. Someone knows something... sooner or later, someone is going to talk. If the chief law enforcement officer has been compromised through political persuasion, either intentionally or indirectly, we need to know. And we need to know RIGHT NOW!

This woman cannot be elected President. If she were the president when she did this, it would be an impeachable offense. She has totally and completely compromised national security and she should be disqualified from ever having security clearance again. We simply cannot stand for this... write your congressmen! Burn their phone lines up! DEMAND that we get to the bottom of this! Don't let this slide for one second!

best yammering yet !

You don't seem to understand the laws that she factually broke.

You don't seem to understand the laws that she factually broke.

How perfectly ironic.

 

[daws101]

law)
Page issues
"Dolus" redirects here. For the Croatian village, see Doluš.
In criminal law, intent is one of three general classes of mens rea necessary to constitute aconventional as opposed to strict liabilitycrime. A more formal, generally-synonymous legal term is scienter: intent or knowledge of .

 

[daws101]

mens rea

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Acronyms,Wikipedia.
Mens Rea
As an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and wilfulness.

 

[mamooth]

The cycle is complete. Far right has become far left. Most American conservatives are now indistinguishable from Stalinists. The righties on this thread are some of the proudest Stalinists you'll ever encounter.

"Comrade, you have offended TheParty. Your guilt is obvious. Confess, and it will go easier on you. If you don't confess, that only proves your guilt more conclusively."

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The cycle is complete. Far right has become far left. Most American conservatives are now indistinguishable from Stalinists. The righties on this thread are some of the proudest Stalinists you'll ever encounter.

"Comrade, you have offended TheParty. Your guilt is obvious. Confess, and it will go easier on you. If you don't confess, that only proves your guilt more conclusively."

Says a member of the Fascist party

 

[Claudette]

Comey may have had his hands tied on prosecuting that POS but he sure let everyone know how stupid, carless and incompetent both she and her State Department were.

 

[daws101]

The cycle is complete. Far right has become far left. Most American conservatives are now indistinguishable from Stalinists. The righties on this thread are some of the proudest Stalinists you'll ever encounter.

"Comrade, you have offended TheParty. Your guilt is obvious. Confess, and it will go easier on you. If you don't confess, that only proves your guilt more conclusively."

Says a member of the Fascist party

Said no one ever.

 

[daws101]

Comey may have had his hands tied on prosecuting that POS but he sure let everyone know how stupid, carless and incompetent both she and her State Department were.

Your point?
You do realize that there are lots of republicans is the state department?

 

[Claudette]

Comey may have had his hands tied on prosecuting that POS but he sure let everyone know how stupid, carless and incompetent both she and her State Department were.

Your point?
You do realize that there are lots of republicans is the state department?

Well her State Department was stupid, careless and incompetent. That includes everyone who had anything to do with either Benghazi or her e-mails.

Your point??

 

[whitehall]

To continue the poker analogy "Comey laid his cards on the table with a winning hand and then he folded". It's incomprehensible that an investigator could lay out such a good case for indictment and then refuse to recommend indictment. He looks like a fool and his career is likely over thanks to his loyalty to the administration.

 

[daws101]

Comey may have had his hands tied on prosecuting that POS but he sure let everyone know how stupid, carless and incompetent both she and her State Department were.

Your point?
You do realize that there are lots of republicans is the state department?

Well her State Department was stupid, careless and incompetent. That includes everyone who had anything to do with either Benghazi or her e-mails.

Your point??

My point is obvious.

 

[daws101]

To continue the poker analogy "Comey laid his cards on the table with a winning hand and then he folded". It's incomprehensible that an investigator could lay out such a good case for indictment and then refuse to recommend indictment. He looks like a fool and his career is likely over thanks to his loyalty to the administration.

Fantasize much?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Comey may have had his hands tied on prosecuting that POS but he sure let everyone know how stupid, carless and incompetent both she and her State Department were.

Your point?
You do realize that there are lots of republicans is the state department?

Well her State Department was stupid, careless and incompetent. That includes everyone who had anything to do with either Benghazi or her e-mails.

Your point??

Probably most of those serving in the State Dept have served under several presidents.

 

[Claudette]

Comey may have had his hands tied on prosecuting that POS but he sure let everyone know how stupid, carless and incompetent both she and her State Department were.

Your point?
You do realize that there are lots of republicans is the state department?

Well her State Department was stupid, careless and incompetent. That includes everyone who had anything to do with either Benghazi or her e-mails.

Your point??

My point is obvious.

Since no one but you knows what your point is, guess it ain't that obvious.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

To continue the poker analogy "Comey laid his cards on the table with a winning hand and then he folded". It's incomprehensible that an investigator could lay out such a good case for indictment and then refuse to recommend indictment. He looks like a fool and his career is likely over thanks to his loyalty to the administration.

You're right of course. He probably isn't very competent and doesn't much care about his integrity.

 

[daws101]

Comey may have had his hands tied on prosecuting that POS but he sure let everyone know how stupid, carless and incompetent both she and her State Department were.

Your point?
You do realize that there are lots of republicans is the state department?

Well her State Department was stupid, careless and incompetent. That includes everyone who had anything to do with either Benghazi or her e-mails.

Your point??

My point is obvious.

Since no one but you knows what your point is, guess it ain't that obvious.

No one ,meaning you. I'm not surprised you don't see the point.