Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 34,955
- 8,954
- 1,340
At this point there isn't a hill of beans to prove perjury. None of the classified material was marked as such. None. The rest is nonsense.
Perjury in her congressional testimony is easy to prove at this point.
1) She didn't have classified e-mails on her server
2) She preserved her e-mails
3) Her team read every e-mail
4) They didn't destroy any e-mails
However, it isn't going to happen. Roberts and Comey proved that. You have the ultimate Brown Shirt media and it works. You've intimidated anyone who wants to live out a normal life into silence. Glad you care about people, democracy and the rule of law so much ...
The rule of law was applied.- fact
The rule of law found that she didn't commit a crime.- fact
In the real world,that is all that is required.
In your world, a conspiracy is required for your narrative to exist.
I prefer to live in the real world.
Conspiracy? WTF are you talking about? Your tin foil slipping?
Obviously you didn't watch or read about Comey's congressional testimony. She wasn't investigated for perjury in her congressional testimony. Comey said the FBI needs a "referral" from Congress to do that. He has since gotten one.
How did you not know that?
There isn't anything there.
I agree that you should bring your list of what she has said under oath before congress that you believe she has not been truthful about. Posting video from a press conference is not testimony.
Let's review what you believe to be evidence.
I said congressional testimony, dimwit, not press conference.
Just to be clear though, lying at a press conference is OK with you? You apply that standard to Republicans too, not just Democrats?
I said congressional testimony, dimwit, not press conference.
Then you proceeded to use a press conference video as evidence.