Comey Indicted

[MisterBeale]

The case against Flynn was rock solid.

And the Grand Jury would not have allowed this indictment of Comey to go forward unless there is something there.

Are you really this dumb?


nm

 

[MisterBeale]

That's absurd.

You're the expert.

The majority of what you post is laughably absurd and disconnected to reality.

 

[Marener]

And the Grand Jury would not have allowed this indictment of Comey to go forward unless there is something there.

Are you really this dumb?


nm

You don't actually understand how grand juries work, do you?

Getting a grand jury indictment is a FAR lower bar than getting a conviction at trial. Prosecutors don't take cases to trial unless they have a good chance at winning.

The former prosecutor who Trump fired knew this which is why he didn't want to pursue it.

 

[Marener]

You're the expert.

The majority of what you post is laughably absurd and disconnected to reality.

Name a prosecutor that a previous president fired because they weren't prosecuting their political enemies.

Please and thank you.

 

[schmidlap]

Comey was involved in the Russia hoax.

Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election to help Trump and hurt Clinton was exposed by the FBI, the NSA, and the CIA, and confirmed by two Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committees.

In December 2019, Trump's DOJ Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz released a report finding no political bias against Trump by Comey or other FBI officials in their Russia probe.

April 21, 2020.​

​

A bipartisan Senate report released Tuesday affirms the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusions that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election in a far-ranging influence campaign approved by Russian President Vladimir Putin and aimed at helping Donald Trump win the White House.​

​

The report rejects Trump’s claims that the intelligence community was biased against him when it concluded that Russia had interfered on his behalf in the election. It says instead that intelligence officials had specific information that Russia preferred Trump in the election, that it sought to denigrate Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton and that Putin had “approved and directed aspects” of the Kremlin’s influence campaign.​

Senate panel backs assessment that Russia interfered in 2016

WASHINGTON (AP) — A bipartisan Senate report released Tuesday affirms the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusions that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election in a far-ranging influence campaign approved by Russian President Vladimir Putin and aimed at helping Donald Trump win the Whit

apnews.com

​

 

[MisterBeale]

The former prosecutor who Trump fired knew this which is why he didn't want to pursue it.

Bullshit.

The reason he did not pursue it is b/c he is an establishment toady who white-knighted for the establishment.

 

[Marener]

The reason he did not pursue it is b/c he is an establishment toady who white-knighted for the establishment.

How did you reach that conclusion?

 

[j-mac]

Erik Siebert wasn't some Biden holdover, he was nominated BY TRUMP to be the US attorney for Virginia.

Trump fired him specifically because he didn't prosecute Comey.

Man, they really don't tell you anything, do they.

So, the President can’t fire anyone?

 

[BlindBoo]

Name a prosecutor that a previous president fired because they weren't prosecuting their political enemies.

Please and thank you.

The goal is to try and normalize the criminal behavior of the criminal president with lies like 'they all did it'.

 

[Marener]

So, the President can’t fire anyone?

Don't be a troll. No one is suggesting any such thing.

 

[j-mac]

Don't be a troll. No one is suggesting any such thing.

I’m asking you.

 

[excalibur]

 

[excalibur]

I give two to one odds he walks.

It is the process that is the punishment, as long as he has to pay his own legal bills and no D.C. law firm does it pro bono.

 

[Marener]

It is the process that is the punishment, as long as he has to pay his own legal bills and no D.C. law firm does it pro bono.

And if a law firm does represent him pro bono, Trump will try to figure out a way to punish them with government authority.

Because you’re all very corrupt.

I hope he pushes for a trial immediately.

 

[excalibur]

And if a law firm does represent him pro bono, Trump will try to figure out a way to punish them with government authority.

Because you’re all very corrupt.

I hope he pushes for a trial immediately.

The corruption is in D.C. and people like Comey.

 

[Moonglow]

It is the process that is the punishment, as long as he has to pay his own legal bills and no D.C. law firm does it pro bono.

I am sure some anonymous donor will step up.

 

[struth]

NOT AS A PROSECUTOR.

Ok, but that’s not what you stated

And who cares? What matters is a foreperson signed it

 

[sparky]

I'm usually against the political prosecution of enemies.

Yet you cheered on all the lawfare here Joe....~S~

 

[wist43]

Why didn't Durham indict him or aany of the Big Fish Benedict Donald wants in jail? They are not really looking to convict anyone. There was no new investigation. No new damning evidence. This too will run it's course and in due time will be forgotten by the goldfish memory of the Herd-Mind, and they will have been distracted by new squirrel, very much like the old squirrel, very sad what happens to the squirrels these day......

Accountability has to start somewhere... might as well be now.

I never thought fighting the Establishment would get this far.

The biggest fish run BIS - never get them. Never get the people who control the money, control economies, facilitate the drug trade, promote child $ex trafficking, start wars, etc.

They are purely evil and immensely powerful.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Next up, Bolton! Then we can finally go after Clinton and Obama for their treason!