jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,500
- 34,583
- 2,180
and no one did. so again, I'm asking you, you believe mueller, what is it they interfered with since it really wasn't the DNC server? We know votes weren't touched. so what is the interference?the fact remains, the DNC server was never inspected for a hack, nor can anyone remotely pull files with the limitations of throughput, so, me, I ask questions, so how do they know such a thing when there is absolutely zero evidence of such a thing present.
The server, along with all the other computers on their network, had to be inspected in real time. All the processes and threads had to be checked out to see what they were doing.
I'm wondering why folks like you that belive this crap can't offer up what that interference actually was. Mueller wouldn't, nor any congressional rep. so why should I believe they did when no one, nadda, zippola has shown evidence of it. I know there was a coup, i know it, there is evidence and a lack of it, like this, no russia evidence. yet two and a half years of investigation. And we got zip for it.
So again, explain what it is you believe the interference was.
You have your head on your shoulders straight, so you can at least be honest.