COLDER Greenland GAINS Ice In June – Media Silent

[Sunsettommy]

You were never removed from my ignore list and your crap article's interpretation was immediately and sufficiently challenged. No fault of the Danish. Unlike you idiots, they have no difficulty disclosing their extremely pertinent disclaimers right upfront, such as curiously not including any ice loss due to calving. That alone would make a sensible person pause and ask themself, "Self, why don't they include ice loss due to calving?" You lame brains? Evidently not so much. Perhaps any sort of meta scale analysis is not their purpose at all? AT ALL? Maybe they just use it to forecast the local weather? They also stack models on top of models, periodically tweak and retrofit all the data to best align with their current favorite massage therapy, and actually calculate the daily change in surface water mass rather than "ice gain" or loss. Doesn't that sound exactly like the kind of stuff you idiots always whine about whenever the IPCC puts out a new report? But when the Danes do it -- that suddenly means it's okay. Fine and dandy.

You people are lamer than a cat after encountering a sickle bar. Only the cat would cry far less and make more sense.

Your entire rant lacks a counterpoint to the article that crawled under your sensitive leftist skin so deeply as the quiche eating child you are digging deep like a tick that makes you rant on and on like a brain damaged liberal.

You are in deep fear of Polar Portal website which is what the article builds around which is simple to follow and understand but for warmist/alarmists it is a scary place to visit...... BOO!

Grow up kid as your continual avoidance of POLAR PORTAL is foolish and hilarious.

Latest conditions hope I didn't scare you....

You related to him?

Clouseau!

 

[Grumblenuts]

You are in deep fear of Polar Portal website which is what the article builds around

You mean embellishes upon.. wildly.. but you knew that. Only your lame self clearly has nowhere else to go and nothing better to do. Polar Portal is/was never the issue nor YOUR source for this stupid thread. Polar Portal backs none of your idiotic assertions, twinkletoes.

2021 is the 25th year in a row in which Greenland’s Ice Sheet lost more mass during the course of the melting season than it gained during the winter. The early part of the summer was cold and wet with unusually heavy and late snowfall in June, which delayed the onset of the melting season, whilst a heatwave at the end of July led to a considerable loss of ice.

 

[Sunsettommy]

You mean embellishes upon.. wildly.. but you knew that. Only your lame self clearly has nowhere else to go and nothing better to do. Polar Portal is/was never the issue nor YOUR source for this stupid thread. Polar Portal backs none of your idiotic assertions, twinkletoes.

Once again to remind you that the article was covering a SINGLE month of JUNE never disputed the slow mass loss over several decades' you moron! which I pointed out a few times already here in the forum here it is again from IMBIE (you are probably scared of this website too)

Here is the title of the thread you keep forgetting:

COLDER Greenland GAINS Ice In June – Media Silent

and the body of the article that scares you so much even though it is 100% true according to POLAR PORTAL

"The month of June is breaking records across the Greenland ice sheet, and not records for warmth and melt –as the mainstream media have trained you to expect– but new benchmarks for COLD and GAINS.

The SMB gains occurring right now across Greenland are truly astonishing.

Data-driven FACTS reveal vast regions to the south have been GAINING RECORD/NEAR-RECORD LEVELS of snow & ice all month.

Never before in June has the Greenland ice sheet grown by more than 4 Gigatons in a single day (since 1981 when DMI records began), but now the past week has gone and delivered two such days — June 3, and now yesterday, June 10.

In fact, yesterday’s gains actually neared 5 Gts — you can see from the chart below how anomalous that gain is for the time of year:"

===

It was about a single month of June 2020 you idiot!

You need to turn your brain on.

 

[mamooth]

Your entire rant

Geez, we get it. You're a cowardly troll. No need to keep hammering so hard on that point, since everyone already accepts it as gospel.

Now, back to doing what enrages you most. That is, ignoring your evasions and insults, and focusing on what it was that caused you to run. That is, discussing the actual topic.

Why do you keep focusing on a one-month blip and ignoring the steady trend of Greenland ice mass loss?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Geez, we get it. You're a cowardly troll. No need to keep hammering so hard on that point, since everyone already accepts it as gospel.

Now, back to doing what enrages you most. That is, ignoring your evasions and insults, and focusing on what it was that caused you to run. That is, discussing the actual topic.

Why do you keep focusing on a one-month blip and ignoring the steady trend of Greenland ice mass loss?

The article is about a SINGLE month blip, why does that indisputable fact bother you so much?

Meanwhile no one here disputes the mass loss but warmist/alarmists media and even you act so worried over it when it is actually a very small loss as shown by the second chart.

It expanded during the LIA now it is melting back to a lower mass balance point just like Glacier Park always small glaciers did.

 

[mamooth]

The article is about a SINGLE month blip, why does that indisputable fact bother you so much?

It doesn't. It hasn't bothered anyone here. Nobody can understand why you keep saying that.

Meanwhile no one here disputes the mass loss but warmist/alarmists media and even you act so worried over it when it is actually a very small loss as shown by the second chart.

Okay, so one of your points is that you have no regrets over using a deception-by-bad-scaling tactic. Thanks for finally making that clear.

It expanded during the LIA now it is melting back to a lower mass balance point just like Glacier Park always small glaciers did.

Well, no. The last trace of the LIA was totally and absolutely over by 1850.

Yes, glaciers take a long time to adjust. But if your theory was true, the glaciers should have been melting fast around 1850, and then the melt should have gradually slowed down. Since the opposite of that has been oberved, your theory is disproved.

 

[Grumblenuts]

It was about a single month of June 2020 you idiot!

You need to turn your brain on.

Now yell that at your mirror instead, genius. This too:

Here is the title of the thread you keep forgetting:

COLDER Greenland GAINS Ice In June – Media Silent

Your assertion. Your topic. Your responsibility to back with more than just wishful thinking. Did Greenland actually gain ice in June of 2020 as YOU keep claiming? Why do YOU care so much? Indeed, as you now admit, even if true -- a one month "blip" would make no difference in the long term "trend," i.e. in terms of climate change or global warming. Perhaps you really are that fixated upon their local weather forecasts for some odd reason?.. But then why presume anyone here could possibly give a crap less?

and the body of the article that scares you so much even though it is 100% true according to POLAR PORTAL

And now you're reduced to simply lying (again). Your link there does not IN FACT provide that quote. Polar Portal actually demonstrates zero interest in supporting your endlessly runny string of BS. All that follows is actually product from your pseudoscience site (Electroverse), a link to which you provide last, apparently hoping no one serious would bother to check. Wrong. Lame!

"The month of June is breaking records across the Greenland ice sheet, and not records for warmth and melt –as the mainstream media have trained you to expect– but new benchmarks for COLD and GAINS.

The SMB gains occurring right now across Greenland are truly astonishing.

Data-driven FACTS reveal vast regions to the south have been GAINING RECORD/NEAR-RECORD LEVELS of snow & ice all month.

Never before in June has the Greenland ice sheet grown by more than 4 Gigatons in a single day (since 1981 when DMI records began), but now the past week has gone and delivered two such days — June 3, and now yesterday, June 10.

In fact, yesterday’s gains actually neared 5 Gts — you can see from the chart below how anomalous that gain is for the time of year:"

Who are you really quoting, Tommy? Who's this Cap Allon wuss really? Why are you so damned infatuated with some chicken too weaselly to even publish their BS using their real name? Is that you?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Now yell that at your mirror instead, genius. This too:

Your assertion. Your topic. Your responsibility to back with more than just wishful thinking. Did Greenland actually gain ice in June of 2020 as YOU keep claiming? Why do YOU care so much? Indeed, as you now admit, even if true -- a one month "blip" would make no difference in the long term "trend," i.e. in terms of climate change or global warming. Perhaps you really are that fixated upon their local weather forecasts for some odd reason?.. But then why presume anyone here could possibly give a crap less?

And now you're reduced to simply lying (again). Your link there does not IN FACT provide that quote. Polar Portal actually demonstrates zero interest in supporting your endlessly runny string of BS. All that follows is actually product from your pseudoscience site (Electroverse), a link to which you provide last, apparently hoping no one serious would bother to check. Wrong. Lame!

Who are you really quoting, Tommy? Who's this Cap Allon wuss really? Why are you so damned infatuated with some chicken too weaselly to even publish their BS using their real name? Is that you?

Your stupidity is off the charts since you STILL have not countered the post one article, you spend all your time complaining about the source.

You rely on source fallacy which is a sign of a mentally lazy person.

Post one article remains unchallenged.

Do everyone a favor put me back on ignore as I am now doing to you.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Only a self-deluded cultist denier could write "–as the mainstream media have trained you to expect–" and imagine being taken seriously. That alone should have tipped you off that the entire business was manufactured farce. Repeating such trash while wishing really hard for it to be factual will get you nowhere. But okay, okay, have a cookie.

Electroverse - Bias and Credibility

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Stay in Your Echo Chamber. Whatever Else You Hear May Burst Your Eardrums.

Why should realists want to be taken seriously by GreenHead fanatics? I see too much compromise with your side if anyone cares that you don't take Pro-Growth Prometheans seriously.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Stay in Your Echo Chamber. Whatever Else You Hear May Burst Your Eardrums.

Why should realists want to be taken seriously by GreenHead fanatics? I see too much compromise with your side if anyone cares that you don't take Pro-Growth Prometheans seriously.

Keep smokin' whatever that shit is. Just keep in mind:

–as the mainstream media have trained you to expect–

is your new cult catchphrase. You've been trained by the lamestream media, you adorable little "realist" you!

 

[Grumblenuts]

Your stupidity is off the charts since you STILL have not countered the post one article, you spend all your time complaining about the source.

You rely on source fallacy which is a sign of a mentally lazy person.

Post one article remains unchallenged.

Do everyone a favor put me back on ignore as I am now doing to you.

I can't hear you.. neener, neener!

 

[Grumblenuts]

Who are you really quoting, Tommy? Who's this Cap Allon wuss really? Why are you so damned infatuated with some chicken too weaselly to even publish their BS using their real name? Is that you?