Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why aren't climate "scientists" talking about the earthquake of 2011 that moved the entire country of Japan 8 feet and shifted the earth on its axis?
No money in it? The theory that the earth might be rotating faster and on a different axis surely has a bearing on the weather
just as the theory of man-made global warming but you can't extort money and use an earthquake as a political tool.
"Way freakin small so it had no effect on climate". There's a scientific analysis for you.
Here's a thought for you. Move 8 inches underground or under water and see if you die. The last time the earth moved on it's axis the Sahara was in a temperate climate."Way freakin small so it had no effect on climate". There's a scientific analysis for you.
Here's a thought exercise for you.
Move 8 inches north or south.
Did the climate change?
No?
Then the 8-inch figure-axis shift due to the earthquake will not affect climate.
Here's a thought for you. Move 8 inches underground or under water and see if you die. The last time the earth moved on it's axis the Sahara was in a temperate climate.
The last time the earth moved on it's axis the Sahara was in a temperate climate.
Stop watching "fishing shows? I thought we were arguing about a scientific fact that the Fukishima earthquake actually shifted the entire Japanese land mass about eight feet and caused the earth to shift on it's axis? Maybe you would rather talk about unfounded theories.You should stop watching fishing shows if this stuff worries you ... the globe didn't tilt on it's axis ... whoever told you this lied ...
Stop watching "fishing shows? I thought we were arguing about a scientific fact that the Fukishima earthquake actually shifted the entire Japanese land mass about eight feet and caused the earth to shift on it's axis? Maybe you would rather talk about unfounded theories.
Wikipedia says Fukashima was the most powerful undersea earthquake in history and measured about a 9-0 and moved the main island of Japan about 8 ft. ...east. Two nuclear reactors melted down and the environmental disaster is ongoing.
Becuase it was simply an act of God to keep Guam from tipping overWhy aren't climate "scientists" talking about the earthquake of 2011 that moved the entire country of Japan 8 feet and shifted the earth on its axis?
Because it's not related to climate in any way, so they'd look like morons if they talked about it.
No money in it? The theory that the earth might be rotating faster and on a different axis surely has a bearing on the weather
Nope. The changes were way freakin' small, so it has no effect on climate.
just as the theory of man-made global warming but you can't extort money and use an earthquake as a political tool.
Thanks for demonstrating my onoging point, which is how denialism has nothing to do with science, being that it's entirely about politics. That's why all deniers are right-wing extremists who can only rant about politics. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly vanish along with it. In stark contrast, the real science crosses all political boundaries all across the world, because it's real science. If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change a bit.
Why aren't climate "scientists" talking about the earthquake of 2011 that moved the entire country of Japan 8 feet and shifted the earth on its axis?
Because it's not related to climate in any way, so they'd look like morons if they talked about it.
No money in it? The theory that the earth might be rotating faster and on a different axis surely has a bearing on the weather
Nope. The changes were way freakin' small, so it has no effect on climate.
just as the theory of man-made global warming but you can't extort money and use an earthquake as a political tool.
Thanks for demonstrating my onoging point, which is how denialism has nothing to do with science, being that it's entirely about politics. That's why all deniers are right-wing extremists who can only rant about politics. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly vanish along with it. In stark contrast, the real science crosses all political boundaries all across the world, because it's real science. If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change a bit.
Why aren't climate "scientists" talking about the earthquake of 2011 that moved the entire country of Japan 8 feet and shifted the earth on its axis?
Because it's not related to climate in any way, so they'd look like morons if they talked about it.
No money in it? The theory that the earth might be rotating faster and on a different axis surely has a bearing on the weather
Nope. The changes were way freakin' small, so it has no effect on climate.
just as the theory of man-made global warming but you can't extort money and use an earthquake as a political tool.
Thanks for demonstrating my onoging point, which is how denialism has nothing to do with science, being that it's entirely about politics. That's why all deniers are right-wing extremists who can only rant about politics. If right-wing politics vanished, denialism would instantly vanish along with it. In stark contrast, the real science crosses all political boundaries all across the world, because it's real science. If left-wing politics vanished, the science wouldn't change a bit.
But, but, but, it was just a few years ago that you clowns claimed globull warming would cause earthquakes!
The North star is still there and I can probably see it better than you can where I live but it's a juvenile argument mostly left to global warming junkies. Maybe Fukashima wasn't "the most powerful earthquake in history" based on revised figures but the main island of Japan moved 8 ft. east and the earth tilted slightly on it's axis. None of the global warming "scientists" want to consider the impact of such a catastrophic event including an ongoing nuclear meltdown because there is no money in it. It's easier to extort billions from good old Uncle and blame the decadent U.S. for causing droughts and floods in Africa.Wikipedia says Fukashima was the most powerful undersea earthquake in history and measured about a 9-0 and moved the main island of Japan about 8 ft. ...east. Two nuclear reactors melted down and the environmental disaster is ongoing.
You're reading wrong ... perhaps a link to the Wikipedia article that claims this is in order ...
I did check myself, and the 1960 Valdivia Earthquake in Chile was centered a few miles inland ... 9.5 MW ... the 1964 Good Friday Earthquake in Alaska was centered less than a quarter mile inland ... 9.2 MW ...
However, the 2004 Boxing Day Earthquake near Indonesia was centered a good 20 miles offshore ... 9.2 MW ... so the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake ... 9.0 MW ... is NOT the most most powerful undersea earthquake ... although it might be the most intense, which is a "feels like" measure but not one that measures energy release per unit time ...
Surprisingly, cesium-135 contamination isn't a meteorological parameter, and so has absolutely nothing to do with climate ... and the melt-downs are strictly a human disaster ... the environment is expected to prosper in short order, as demonstrated by the top predators thriving in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone right now ... wolves, owls and foxes are thick where the people had to abandon ... c.f. "Radioactive Wolves" documentary produced by Nature on PBS (so it has to be true) ...
When Cascadia ruptures again ... and it most certainly will ... we have the potential to measure the single most powerful earthquake in seismographic history ... 9.7 MW or better ... enough to ruin a sunny day in these parts ... that will be about 50 miles offshore ...
Please ... why do you think it's a "scientific fact" that the Earth shifted on her axis? ... how many of the great telescopes in the world built on equatorial mounts had to be torn down and rebuilt? ... go out and look, why in God's name do you think Polaris is no long the North Star? ... is it the same reason you think it never rains in Virginia during summer anymore? ... sheesh ... maybe once a month actually come out of your parents' basement and look around ...
The North star is still there and I can probably see it better than you can where I live but it's a juvenile argument mostly left to global warming junkies. Maybe Fukashima wasn't "the most powerful earthquake in history" based on revised figures but the main island of Japan moved 8 ft. east and the earth tilted slightly on it's axis. None of the global warming "scientists" want to consider the impact of such a catastrophic event including an ongoing nuclear meltdown because there is no money in it. It's easier to extort billions from good old Uncle and blame the decadent U.S. for causing droughts and floods in Africa.
