Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,371
- 12,945
- 2,400
- Thread starter
- #241
It's a fact. Only cultists, like you, ignore facts.
Mamooth like the other ignorant warmist/alarmists here don't even know what the AGW conjecture consist of.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a fact. Only cultists, like you, ignore facts.
Both CO2 and methane are carbon based "greenhouse" gases at STP. "AGW" means the anthropogenic (or manmade) portion of global warming. The extra warming vastly due to human extraction of sequestered carbon followed by its release at or above the planet surface, whereas the broader term "GW" means the manmade plus the natural warming (/cooling). We also add warming by clear cutting old growth forests, polluting waterways, and paving paradise.
Since your butthurt sent you here, and since you responded to Westwall running from this question ...Mamooth like the other ignorant warmist/alarmists here don't even know what the AGW conjecture consist of.
Tell me moron, at what wavelength do the molecules emit? This is temperature dependent, so be careful how you answer.And they do. The CO2 spectrum and and H2O spectrum overlap in a lot of places, so one has no problem warming the other with their IR emissions.
This is basic stuff, and Billy fails at it.
Nope, still not persuading me to take you off ignore.
All we know for certain is that they use climate hysteria to transfer wealth away from the USAIt works the other way around and this is why they are so confused. As the water warms it releases CO2....as it cools it takes I'm CO2...the CO2 PPM is a function of ocean water temp.
And the truth is they just don't know very much about it.
Lake Mead is turning into a pond and we don't hear anything about that in the media either.Principia Scientific International
COLDER Greenland GAINS Ice In June – Media Silent
Published on June 15, 2020
Written by Cap Allon
Excerpt:
The month of June is breaking records across the Greenland ice sheet, and not records for warmth and melt –as the mainstream media have trained you to expect– but new benchmarks for COLD and GAINS.
The SMB gains occurring right now across Greenland are truly astonishing.
Data-driven FACTS reveal vast regions to the south have been GAINING RECORD/NEAR-RECORD LEVELS of snow & ice all month.
Never before in June has the Greenland ice sheet grown by more than 4 Gigatons in a single day (since 1981 when DMI records began), but now the past week has gone and delivered two such days — June 3, and now yesterday, June 10.
In fact, yesterday’s gains actually neared 5 Gts — you can see from the chart below how anomalous that gain is for the time of year:
LINK
======
CO2 must be pooped out up there, Jack Frost refuses to stand down!
How will we water the almonds then!?," cried Tommy.If the reservoir drops below 895 feet — a possibility still years away — the lake would reach dead pool status, with potentially catastrophic consequences for millions of people across Arizona, California, Nevada and parts of Mexico.
Added Frank, the Alarmed Crusader, "Our fancy power boats will Shirley grind to a halt!""This is deadly serious stuff," Robert Glennon, an emeritus professor at the University of Arizona who specializes in water law and policy, told NBC News on Wednesday.
What is it you think I cannot answer?Thank you for admitting you don't know.
It is why I bring it up to show you mamooth crick and other warmist/alarmists show total inability to answer standard 101 stuff about AGW conjecture which is in TWO parts.
Cheers.
So, you do believe a "trend" that has lasted one month refutes a trend that has lasted decades?Another link free chart you post while you continue to ignore the ONE-month chart I posted with a link which was a YEAR AGO!
You have a problem.
This region is known for its long-lasting droughts. They last 100 or more years very frequently in geological history. We are on the cooling side of the 360 year solar cycle. This means the La Niña flow aloft will become the persistent weather pattern long term.Lake Mead is turning into a pond and we don't hear anything about that in the media either.
Sounds like the same old fossil fuel/ military industry talking points we've been hearing for 50 years at least.This region is known for its long-lasting droughts. They last 100 or more years very frequently in geological history. We are on the cooling side of the 360 year solar cycle. This means the La Niña flow aloft will become the persistent weather pattern long term.
View attachment 662450
Sounds like the same old fossil fuel/ military industry talking points we've been hearing for 50 years at least.
In the meantime we are $ 31 trillion dollars in debt while China is leading the world in fighting climate change .....slowing global warming , being conservative with our resources..... establishing lithium mines everywhere..... about to crash the petrodollar with Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Brazil and a couple other countries.
We're dumping a trillion dollars a year on "National Security" since
9/11.
So, you do believe a "trend" that has lasted one month refutes a trend that has lasted decades?
View attachment 662437
Cumulative ice mass loss from Greenland and Antarctica
The figure shows the cumulative ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from recent studies, weighted according to the primary satellite data source following the approach of the Ice Sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (The IMBIE team, 2018...www.eea.europa.eu
SHOW YOUR WORK
Like you just did.do not regurgitate drone talking points.
I showed you empirical evidence generated flow patterns... you gave me..... talking points.You chose to ignore it.
Like you just did.
What is it you think I cannot answer?
It is why I bring it up to show you mamooth crick and other warmist/alarmists show total inability to answer standard 101 stuff about AGW conjecture which is in TWO parts.
So, you do believe a "trend" that has lasted one month refutes a trend that has lasted decades?
View attachment 662437
Cumulative ice mass loss from Greenland and Antarctica
The figure shows the cumulative ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from recent studies, weighted according to the primary satellite data source following the approach of the Ice Sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (The IMBIE team, 2018...www.eea.europa.eu
At normal temps, they emit at wavelengths that overlap the the absorption spectrum of the other gas.Tell me moron, at what wavelength do the molecules emit? This is temperature dependent, so be careful how you answer.