After the Shah of Iran was overthrown, then batch one of Islamic fundamentalists came into power as the ruling elite of the ancient Persian civilization. In the Carter Administration, the Fundamentalists demonstrated complete anathema of the West, and went ahead with violation of ancient international customs and agreements.
Eventually, an anti-Shia-Crescent regime became a U. S. ally, the Baathists of Iraq, Saddam Hussein in charge. Saddam Hussein was wonderfully, anti-Islamic Fundamentalist.
Saddam Hussein had minimized the Islamic Shia Fundamentalist Crescent. Elsewhere, Al Qaeda allied with the Taliban, and diminished the Soviet presence in Afghanistan. The Taliban, and not Al Qaeda fanatics, were in control of Afghanistan. The Taliban were notoriously fundamentalist, and the 16th century became that nation.
Iraqi Sunni became rich, and modernizing. Saudi Sunni were rich and modernizing. Some of their dissident fanatics, apparently more fundamentalist inclined, hooked up with Al Qaeda. From New York, then attacks on the World Trade Towers were launched, and the claim was that New York was not involved(?). Not even any Saudis were involved(?). No fanatics were at all involved(?). Instead of a police matter, an entire region was intentionally regarded as being involved(?). A war with the region became U. S. intended policy.
Persia was not on radar, however, apparently regarded the region's safe haven for *******, faggots, and Jews and Slavs(?). They couldn't even stand up to Saddam Hussein: If anyone follows Toro poster's claim that a nuclear Iran was not the intended outcome of the Iraq war policy. Anyone would have to say that keeping Iran under anti-Shia-Crescent control was no longer U. S. Policy. Iran was clearly regarded no threat, and could therefore be free to develop a nuclear weapons capability, to aim at the region, and even at the United States(?). Even if they are regarded the regional bastion of *******, faggots, Jews and Slavs(?), then the leave them alone policy was clearly intended.
And lo, an angel of the Lord did not appear, and so as a consequence of the deliberate slaughter of Americans and other nationals, in the occupationof Iraq: Then World Peace was not to be said the intended outcome.
Toro poster even managed to claim that a nuclear weaponizd Persia was not the intended outcome. Persians are mostly, apparently, regarded as ******* and faggots, and slavs and Jews(?): Even now. They are not regarded a viable civilization at all. Persons like the Persians are clueless, and are mainly to be pitied.
See the Toro post above! The intent of the Iraq policy is better said an intended outcome in favor of Iran with nuclear weapons, aimed at the region, and at the United States. Iran had not vanished from the earth, when Cheney-Rove-Bush were in office. Toro registers that in fact they were not around, at any racist rate, at all!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Even casinos make better sense, and even in the South of France!)
