Tommy Tuberville admits he went to NYC to help trump break his gag order.

[westwall]

No it isn't. The falsified records are NOT in dispute.

What falsified records? There MAY be a book keeping error, but Trump doesn't do his book keeping.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What falsified records?

Don't feed the sealions.

 

[Dragonlady]

How would you know about free speech? You live in KKKanada where they lock you up for disagreeing with the government.

No they don't. They lock you up for failing to obey Court Orders, just like they do in the USA.

Trump and the MAGA Cult funded a protest of lockdowns that ended BEFORE the truckers left home to go to Ottawa. They kept going and spent weeks getting drunk, partying all night, and pissing on national monuments. The NAZI, Confederate and Trump flags they were all flying didn't go over well either.

After two years in lockdown the citizens of Ottawa couldn't go out of their homes because the streets were full of drunk, unemployed, hosers, who threatened them for wearing masks.

Thursday's letters: Ottawa protest was hurtful to watch

Journalists harassed. Public health rules dismissed. Police and security guards taunted. Terry Fox’s statue defaced. Dancing and urinating on the Tomb of the…

edmontonjournal.com

Citizens groups took the truckers to Court, to end the disruption to their lives, and the Courts ordered the truckers to go home.

Judge tosses motion to dismiss proposed class-action lawsuit against convoy participants

Paul Champ, the Ottawa lawyer who launched the proposed class-action suit on behalf of the plaintiffs, said he was pleased with the outcome.

ottawacitizen.com

THE PEOPLE OF OTTAWA SENT THESE FUCKING ASSHOLE HOME. THE TRUDEAU GOVERNMENT SEIZED ALL OF THE FUNDS RAISED AND RETURNED THEM TO THEIR AMERICAN DONORS.

GiveSendGo tells court it is refunding convoy donations amid freezing order

Lawyers for a proposed class-action lawsuit against the convoy protest in Ottawa argued in court Wednesday that GiveSendGo may be in breach of a freezing order on funds raised for the convoy on the website.

www.ctvnews.ca

 

[Care4all]

Is over inflated reimbursement checks a crime?

Yes, in NY State, it is a crime to falsify your business records.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes, in NY State, it is a crime to falsify your business records.

You specified reimbursement checks.

Did the IRS collect less money because the checks were inflated?

 

[Dragonlady]

Is over inflated reimbursement checks a crime?

Yes, when they're related to "personal expenses" being falsely claimed as "business expenses".

Paying "hush money" to your mistress isn't a tax deductible personal expense, nor is it illegal.

Calling the reimbursement to your lawyer of the funds he paid on your behalf as a "payment pursuant to a [non-existant] retainer agreement", doubling it up to cover Cohen's income tax expenses in claiming it as "business income", and then writing all of these payments to Cohen off his income taxes as a "business expenses, is most definitely illegal. It's called "falsifying business records" and "tax evasion".

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes, when they're related to "personal expenses" being falsely claimed as "business expenses".

Paying "hush money" to your mistress isn't a tax deductible personal expense, nor is it illegal.

Calling the reimbursement to your lawyer of the funds he paid on your behalf as a "payment pursuant to a [non-existant] retainer agreement", doubling it up to cover Cohen's income tax expenses in claiming it as "business income", and then writing all of these payments to Cohen off his income taxes as a "business expenses, is most definitely illegal. It's called "falsifying business records" and "tax evasion".

Yes, when they're related to "personal expenses" being falsely claimed as "business expenses".

Who owns the company?

Paying "hush money" to your mistress isn't a tax deductible personal expense,

NDAs are tax deductible.

nor is it illegal.

I agree, deducting an NDA is not illegal.

It's called "falsifying business records" and "tax evasion".

How were taxes evaded? Walk through the steps.

 

[Dragonlady]

You specified reimbursement checks.

Did the IRS collect less money because the checks were inflated?

Trump paid less in taxes because the checks were inflated. But the point of these crimes was to conceal EMI's illegal campaign contributions, and the "catch and kill" schemes they were carrying out.

As a SOP for Trump to deal with unflattering publicity, nothing in the "catch and kill scheme" was illegal UNTIL Trump started running for office, and even then, if Trump had paid off the women from his own resources and his own pocket, it wouldn't have been illegal. It was having others pay off the women, and having Pecker lie about his opposition, that turned the whole matter into an election crime, and it was Trump's attempts to write the whole thing off as a business expense that got him arrested.

The testimony of Pecker, Hope Hicks, and other Trump Corporation and White House staffers - Trump was obsessed with details, especially about payments. Trump was trying to avoid paying anyone until after the election because if he lost, he was never going to pay anyone. Trump scrutinized every single check he signed and demanded discounts for everything - except those payments to Cohen.

The notes with Weisselberg's handwriting. The tape recording. The invoices. The checks - all personally signed by Donald Trump. Trump's attempts to force Cohen not to write a book - threatening to send him back to prison unless he agreed not to talk to the press. All indications of Trump's intentions, and his guilt.

 

[Dragonlady]

Yes, when they're related to "personal expenses" being falsely claimed as "business expenses".

Who owns the company?

Paying "hush money" to your mistress isn't a tax deductible personal expense,

NDAs are tax deductible.

nor is it illegal.

I agree, deducting an NDA is not illegal.

It's called "falsifying business records" and "tax evasion".

How were taxes evaded? Walk through the steps.

NDA's are only tax deductible when they relate to business. If you buy someone's silence about your proprietary information or processes, which they legally acquire, that's NDA is tax deductible.

If you pay off your mistress so your wife doesn't find out about the affair, that NDA is NOT tax deductible. If you pay off your mistress because you're running for election and you're lying to the American people, that's not tax deductible either.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Trump paid less in taxes because the checks were inflated. But the point of these crimes was to conceal EMI's illegal campaign contributions, and the "catch and kill" schemes they were carrying out.

As a SOP for Trump to deal with unflattering publicity, nothing in the "catch and kill scheme" was illegal UNTIL Trump started running for office, and even then, if Trump had paid off the women from his own resources and his own pocket, it wouldn't have been illegal. It was having others pay off the women, and having Pecker lie about his opposition, that turned the whole matter into an election crime, and it was Trump's attempts to write the whole thing off as a business expense that got him arrested.

The testimony of Pecker, Hope Hicks, and other Trump Corporation and White House staffers - Trump was obsessed with details, especially about payments. Trump was trying to avoid paying anyone until after the election because if he lost, he was never going to pay anyone. Trump scrutinized every single check he signed and demanded discounts for everything - except those payments to Cohen.

The notes with Weisselberg's handwriting. The tape recording. The invoices. The checks - all personally signed by Donald Trump. Trump's attempts to force Cohen not to write a book - threatening to send him back to prison unless he agreed not to talk to the press. All indications of Trump's intentions, and his guilt.

Trump paid less in taxes because the checks were inflated.

And Cohen paid more.

But the point of these crimes was to conceal EMI's illegal campaign contributions, and the "catch and kill" schemes they were carrying out.

Why are they campaign contributions? Cohen didn't get paid for those.

if Trump had paid off the women from his own resources and his own pocket, it wouldn't have been illegal.

His reimbursement doesn't make it legal from his own resources?

and it was Trump's attempts to write the whole thing off as a business expense that got him arrested.

NDAs are deductible.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump paid less in taxes because the checks were inflated.

And Cohen paid more.

What a strange lie. Well, not really, if the one who utters it is trolling and running out of talking points

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

NDA's are only tax deductible when they relate to business. If you buy someone's silence about your proprietary information or processes, which they legally acquire, that's NDA is tax deductible.

If you pay off your mistress so your wife doesn't find out about the affair, that NDA is NOT tax deductible. If you pay off your mistress because you're running for election and you're lying to the American people, that's not tax deductible either.

NDA's are only tax deductible when they relate to business.

You can't show where the rules say that.

If you pay off your mistress so your wife doesn't find out about the affair, that NDA is NOT tax deductible.

Link?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What a strange lie. Well, not really, if the one who utters it is trolling and running out of talking points

What lie?
If Trump paid Cohen $200,000, Trump deducts $200,000 and Cohen pays taxes on $200,000.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What lie?
If Trump paid Cohen $200,000, Trump deducts $200,000 and Cohen pays taxes on $200,000.

Oh, so you're just dense?

In what the rest of us call reality, the check was grossed up so that Trump paid the income tax instead of Cohen. Quite unlike the times he actually paid Cohen for legal services.

But maybe you can get more attention from people who don't know this. Good luck.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Oh, so you're just dense?

In what the rest of us call reality, the check was grossed up so that Trump paid the income tax instead of Cohen. Quite unlike the times he actually paid Cohen for legal services.

But maybe you can get more attention from people who don't know this. Good luck.

In what the rest of us call reality, the check was grossed up so that Trump paid the income tax instead of Cohen.

Yes. The IRS wasn't shortchanged.
You should try math for a change.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

In what the rest of us call reality, the check was grossed up so that Trump paid the income tax instead of Cohen.

Yes. The IRS wasn't shortchanged.
You should try math for a change.

Trump isn't charged with shortchanging the IRS.

I see what happened here. You got very confused and wasted a lot of your own time. Sorry about that.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Trump isn't charged with shortchanging the IRS.

I see what happened here. You got very confused and wasted a lot of your own time. Sorry about that.

Dragonlady is confused.

 

[Lastamender]

What a strange lie. Well, not really, if the one who utters it is trolling and running out of talking points

Yeah, you know how that feels.

 

[Markle]

No they don't. They lock you up for failing to obey Court Orders, just like they do in the USA.

That was your reply to:
Nostra said:
How would you know about free speech? You live in KKKanada where they lock you up for disagreeing with the government.

###​

New Liberal 'online harms' bill to make online hate punishable up to life in prison​

Bill C-63 aims to force social media, user-uploaded adult content and live-streaming services to reduce exposure to online content deemed harmful.

Author of the article:
Catherine Lévesque
Published Feb 26, 2024 • Last updated Feb 27, 2024 • 6-minute read

New Liberal 'online harms' bill to make online hate punishable up to life in prison

It aims to force social media, user-uploaded adult content and live-streaming services to reduce exposure to online content deemed harmful.

nationalpost.com

 

[Markle]

Dragonlady is confused.

OH, PLEASE, NOT Dragonlady! Say it isn't so!