CNN Interviews Trump Supporter Who Threatens Taliban-Style Takeover to Reinstate Him: ‘There’s Millions of Guns Here’

[Aldo Raine]

I believe because it is true. Can you prove the election was not stolen? Dominion could, why aren't they?

Your fraudit can't even prove fraud and that is why ewe assclowns hired them!!!!
MAGA

 

[Lastamender]

Your fraudit can't even prove fraud and that is why ewe assclowns hired them!!!!
MAGA

They were not given the chance, you stupid ****. What part of that don't you understand? There was one evidentiary hearing involving the 2020 election bought by Democrats in a NY House race. They were allowed to present evidence. Why weren't people questioning the 2020 Presidential election allowed the same chance?

I bet you are smart enough to figure the last question out.

 

[Faun]

They were not given the chance, you stupid ****. What part of that don't you understand? There was one evidentiary hearing involving the 2020 election bought by Democrats in a NY House race. They were allowed to present evidence. Why weren't people questioning the 2020 Presidential election allowed the same chance?

I bet you are smart enough to figure the last question out.

Not given the chance?? They had 4 months to review ballots.

 

[Lastamender]

Not given the chance?? They had 4 months to review ballots.

I am talking about presenting evidence in court. Reviewing ballots is a right.

 

[Faun]

I am talking about presenting evidence in court. Reviewing ballots is a right.

LOL

There is no evidence to present in court. That's why not a single case survived in court.

Case in point, there was a case filed in Nevada claiming 1,500 of dead people voted. The judge asked the plaintiff for evidence. For evidence, the plaintiff presented outdated voter roles with 1,500 names of dead people. The judge said that wasn't proof their names were used to vote in the election and asked again for evidence that 1,500 dead people voted. The plaintiff had nothing else to offer so the judge granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the case due to lack of merit.

You have no proof, FruitLoops. That's why ever case failed in court. That's why nothing has been proven outside of court. That's why you're a laughing stock.

Capiche?

 

[Lastamender]

LOL

There is no evidence to present in court. That's why not a single case survived in court.

Case in point, there was a case filed in Nevada claiming 1,500 of dead people voted. The judge asked the plaintiff for evidence. For evidence, the plaintiff presented outdated voter roles with 1,500 names of dead people. The judge said that wasn't proof their names were used to vote in the election and asked again for evidence that 1,500 dead people voted. The plaintiff had nothing else to offer so the judge granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the case due to lack of merit.

You have no proof, FruitLoops. That's why ever case failed in court. That's why nothing has been proven outside of court. That's why you're a laughing stock.

Capiche?

One more time, you do not ask for an evidentiary hearing without evidence. The corrupt judges refused to hear it knowing full well fraud would be proven.

 

[Faun]

One more time, you do not ask for an evidentiary hearing without evidence. The corrupt judges refused to hear it knowing full well fraud would be proven.

I'm showing you a case where they did...

Nevada judge tosses Trump campaign’s election challenge

A District Court judge in Carson City ruled against the attempt to overturn presidential election results, saying there was insufficient evidence to support fraud accusations.

www.reviewjournal.com

​

Democrats argued the challenge did not identify a single voter who allegedly committed fraud, nor did it provide any other evidence to warrant overturning the will of the majority of Nevada’s 1.4 million voters.​

​

“Contestants did not prove under any legal standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor in an amount equal to or greater than 33,596, or otherwise in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,” Russell wrote.​

​

“The contestants failed to meet their burden to provide credible and relevant evidence to substantiate any of the grounds set forth in (Nevada’s election contest statute) to contest the November 3, 2020 general election,” Russell wrote to close his 35-page order.​

... you're just not capable of accepting anything counter to your delusions.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Our government won't roll over, nor will our military put their weapons down and join the crazy people

They JUST did, and with your blessing

 

[Lastamender]

I'm showing you a case where they did...

Nevada judge tosses Trump campaign’s election challenge

A District Court judge in Carson City ruled against the attempt to overturn presidential election results, saying there was insufficient evidence to support fraud accusations.

www.reviewjournal.com

​

Democrats argued the challenge did not identify a single voter who allegedly committed fraud, nor did it provide any other evidence to warrant overturning the will of the majority of Nevada’s 1.4 million voters.​

​

“Contestants did not prove under any legal standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor in an amount equal to or greater than 33,596, or otherwise in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,” Russell wrote.​

​

“The contestants failed to meet their burden to provide credible and relevant evidence to substantiate any of the grounds set forth in (Nevada’s election contest statute) to contest the November 3, 2020 general election,” Russell wrote to close his 35-page order.​

... you're just not capable of accepting anything counter to your delusions.

That judge says the people that came forward were not credible. That judge has no right to decide that. In other words he was in on it either voluntarily or coerced. Funny that Nevada was the first state to pick alternative electors. Funny too how Nevada has made sure there will be no audits.

I wonder why?

 

[Concerned American]

The trump people are becoming more delusional by the day.

If they actually think that they can take over the nation like the taliban did in Afghanistan, they seriously need mental health.

Our government won't roll over, nor will our military put their weapons down and join the crazy people.

If they think that their little pea shooters are any match for our military, they are asking to die.

The only result of such an action is a lot of dead trump people.

CNN Interviews Trump Supporter Who Threatens Taliban-Style Takeover to Reinstate Him: ‘There’s Millions of Guns Here’

You should change your handle to FAKE NEWS DANA 7360.

 

[Concerned American]

Biff_Poindexter
I'm not for violence to achieve any goal. If violence is used then those who perpetrate that violence need to be arrested.

Oh and I wouldn't hold Trump responsible for what people do. People make their own choices and should be held accountable for them.

What? What? Personal responsibility? What a concept!

 

[candycorn]

CNN said BIDEN would make a good President.

They were right.

 

[candycorn]

That judge says the people that came forward were not credible. That judge has no right to decide that. In other words he was in on it either voluntarily or coerced. Funny that Nevada was the first state to pick alternative electors. Funny too how Nevada has made sure there will be no audits.

I wonder why?

Sure they do. The judge decides if witnesses are heard, what is evidence. etc...

It's law 101.

 

[Colin norris]

You should change your handle to FAKE NEWS DANA 7360.

None of them have the guts. Like you.
50 million bring their guns to dc ?
In your dreams boy.

 

[Lastamender]

Sure they do. The judge decides if witnesses are heard, what is evidence. etc...

View attachment 530647

It's law 101.

He used our laws to the frauds advantage. Case closed.

 

[Colin norris]

He used our laws to the frauds advantage. Case closed.

You're still on about the election fraud?
It's taking trump defeat syndrome a while to settle down.
How's those audits going in AZ? Got a win yet?

 

[candycorn]

He used our laws to the frauds advantage. Case closed.

Ummm no.

The judge made a decision not to admit crazy-for-cocoa-puffs bullshit into a legal proceeding. Pretty much what a judge's job is.

 

[Concerned American]

They were right.

And you are wrong, no matter how many times you delude yourself.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I do not bet with traitors. Exactly.

‘There’s Millions of Guns Here’

Treason is the sole purview of the violent, disloyal right.

 

[Aldo Raine]

They were not given the chance, you stupid ****. What part of that don't you understand? There was one evidentiary hearing involving the 2020 election bought by Democrats in a NY House race. They were allowed to present evidence. Why weren't people questioning the 2020 Presidential election allowed the same chance?

I bet you are smart enough to figure the last question out.

They weren't given a chance because ALL the judges (over 60 different court cases, all lost) laughed them out of court due to non existent evidence. Some of those same judges were appointed by the Fat Orange Idiot himself.
I know ewe are WAY to stupid to know any of this.
MAGA