CNN Demands WH Declare 'Media Not The Enemy' Despite Proven Lies / Biased Attacks

[Brain357]

You keep posting things that don't back up your claim. Why is that?

It is like asking for evidence the sky is blue on a sunny day. No need for any links, just take a look out the window.

Yes, you seem to have no need for facts.

How about when CNN claimed Comey was going to testify he didn't tell Trump he wasn't under investigation?

Do you have a link so I can know what you are talking about? How this claim was reported is very important.

You never heard this before?

Link.

 

[Mike473]

Comey unlikely to judge on obstruction - CNNPolitics

CORRECTION AND UPDATE: This article was published before Comey released his prepared opening statement. The article and headline have been corrected to reflect that Comey does not directly dispute that Trump was told multiple times he was not under investigation in his prepared testimony released after this story was published.

An earlier version of this story said that Comey would dispute Trump's interpretation of their conversations. But based on his prepared remarks, Comey outlines three conversations with the President in which he told Trump he was not personally under investigation.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Dude, their top reporter called for journalists to join him in making ANTI-TRUMP BUMPER STICKERS AND LAPEL BUTTONS....called on fellow journalists to JOIN HIM AND OTHER ANTI-TRUMP PROTESTORS out in front of the WH....

Okay. But that has nothing to do with CNN firing people for reporting untruths.

 

[Brain357]

I think the fake news press and supporters of the fake news press are not understanding the people calling them fake news do so not because they expect outlets like CNN and MSNBC to be more like Fox, but simply for them to be more balanced in presenting the good things TRUMP is doing. I can turn on CNN or MSNBC at just about anytime and it's a one-sided attackfest. More often than not republican response is when the republican is in disagreement with TRUMP, seldom do they present a pro-TRUMP supporting view, and even on the occasion they do it is always a 5 to 1 line up.

And what is something good that they have not covered?

How much time did CNN or MSNBC spend on the ceremony to honor the remains of 50 service members received from North Korea?

No idea.
Using DNA to identify deceased US troops - CNN

 

[Brain357]

Comey unlikely to judge on obstruction - CNNPolitics

CORRECTION AND UPDATE: This article was published before Comey released his prepared opening statement. The article and headline have been corrected to reflect that Comey does not directly dispute that Trump was told multiple times he was not under investigation in his prepared testimony released after this story was published.

An earlier version of this story said that Comey would dispute Trump's interpretation of their conversations. But based on his prepared remarks, Comey outlines three conversations with the President in which he told Trump he was not personally under investigation.

And how was it worded? That's very important. I doubt they said with certainty he would, but instead gave whatever reason for why they thought he would.

 

[frigidweirdo]

But politics is politics.
All you can do is push for something that is better. Or less bad.

And at the same time, you can do everything possible to hold these people accountable and to higher standards for the future.

But the tribes are clearly not willing to do that.
.

No, they're not. Which is why having more choice, will make it harder for any one group to get so much power and so many tribal sheep.

 

[bripat9643]

No Republican wants government to run the media. However, it's an indisputable fact that the government trains and brainwashes the media before they start their careers. That needs to stop.

Really? And where are these camps that the government trains future media at? Your stupidity really is funny.

They're called universities and public schools.

I went to public schools and university and came out a Republican. Wasn't till I realized they are a joke that I became an independent.

You, a Republican?

Yes, given that I'm actually fiscally responsible the idea of being a republican is ridiculous. But sadly it was true. Then I watched them turn the balanced budget from Clinton into increased deficits. They are a joke.

By "fiscally responsible" you mean you support tax and spend. Liberals always have euphemisms for their socialist agenda.

 

[Brain357]

Really? And where are these camps that the government trains future media at? Your stupidity really is funny.

They're called universities and public schools.

I went to public schools and university and came out a Republican. Wasn't till I realized they are a joke that I became an independent.

You, a Republican?

Yes, given that I'm actually fiscally responsible the idea of being a republican is ridiculous. But sadly it was true. Then I watched them turn the balanced budget from Clinton into increased deficits. They are a joke.

By "fiscally responsible" you mean you support tax and spend. Liberals always have euphemisms for their socialist agenda.

I support a balanced budget. Republicans control the government and deficits are increasing during a strong economy. They are not fiscally responsible.

 

[bripat9643]

They're called universities and public schools.

I went to public schools and university and came out a Republican. Wasn't till I realized they are a joke that I became an independent.

You, a Republican?

Yes, given that I'm actually fiscally responsible the idea of being a republican is ridiculous. But sadly it was true. Then I watched them turn the balanced budget from Clinton into increased deficits. They are a joke.

By "fiscally responsible" you mean you support tax and spend. Liberals always have euphemisms for their socialist agenda.

I support a balanced budget. Republicans control the government and deficits are increasing during a strong economy. They are not fiscally responsible.

You support a balanced budget by raising taxes. Who are you trying to kid? GW inherited the tech bubble from Clinton, and then 9/11 happened shortly thereafter. The sure sign of a leftwing douchebag is that he ignores those two central facts. Clinton only had a balanced budget because he benefited from the peace dividend, which allowed Congress to lower defense spending every year of his reign. He didn't reduce any other type of spending. What you support is a Democrat being in office at the right time to benefit from world events. In other words, you support taking credit for pure luck.

 

[Brain357]

I went to public schools and university and came out a Republican. Wasn't till I realized they are a joke that I became an independent.

You, a Republican?

Yes, given that I'm actually fiscally responsible the idea of being a republican is ridiculous. But sadly it was true. Then I watched them turn the balanced budget from Clinton into increased deficits. They are a joke.

By "fiscally responsible" you mean you support tax and spend. Liberals always have euphemisms for their socialist agenda.

I support a balanced budget. Republicans control the government and deficits are increasing during a strong economy. They are not fiscally responsible.

You support a balanced budget by raising taxes. Who are you trying to kid. GW inherited the tech bubble from Clinton, and then 9/11 happened shortly thereafter. The sure sign of a leftwing douchebag is that he ignores those two central facts. Clinton only had a balanced budget because he benefited from the peace dividend, which allowed Congress to lower defense spending every year of his reign. He didn't reduce any other type of spending. What you support is a Democrat being in office at the right time to benefit from world events. In other words, you support pure luck.

Bush spent on wars that made no sense. He was not fiscally responsible.

Trump is increasing deficits in a strong economy. You can't claim to be fiscally responsible if you support that.

 

[bripat9643]

You, a Republican?

Yes, given that I'm actually fiscally responsible the idea of being a republican is ridiculous. But sadly it was true. Then I watched them turn the balanced budget from Clinton into increased deficits. They are a joke.

By "fiscally responsible" you mean you support tax and spend. Liberals always have euphemisms for their socialist agenda.

I support a balanced budget. Republicans control the government and deficits are increasing during a strong economy. They are not fiscally responsible.

You support a balanced budget by raising taxes. Who are you trying to kid. GW inherited the tech bubble from Clinton, and then 9/11 happened shortly thereafter. The sure sign of a leftwing douchebag is that he ignores those two central facts. Clinton only had a balanced budget because he benefited from the peace dividend, which allowed Congress to lower defense spending every year of his reign. He didn't reduce any other type of spending. What you support is a Democrat being in office at the right time to benefit from world events. In other words, you support pure luck.

Bush spent on wars that made no sense. He was not fiscally responsible.

Trump is increasing deficits in a strong economy. You can't claim to be fiscally responsible if you support that.

Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion, yet you voted for him twice.

 

[Brain357]

Yes, given that I'm actually fiscally responsible the idea of being a republican is ridiculous. But sadly it was true. Then I watched them turn the balanced budget from Clinton into increased deficits. They are a joke.

By "fiscally responsible" you mean you support tax and spend. Liberals always have euphemisms for their socialist agenda.

I support a balanced budget. Republicans control the government and deficits are increasing during a strong economy. They are not fiscally responsible.

You support a balanced budget by raising taxes. Who are you trying to kid. GW inherited the tech bubble from Clinton, and then 9/11 happened shortly thereafter. The sure sign of a leftwing douchebag is that he ignores those two central facts. Clinton only had a balanced budget because he benefited from the peace dividend, which allowed Congress to lower defense spending every year of his reign. He didn't reduce any other type of spending. What you support is a Democrat being in office at the right time to benefit from world events. In other words, you support pure luck.

Bush spent on wars that made no sense. He was not fiscally responsible.

Trump is increasing deficits in a strong economy. You can't claim to be fiscally responsible if you support that.

Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion, yet you voted for him twice.

No I didn't. Do you always just make shit up?

Trump is increasing deficits in a strong economy and you still support him. That's the reality. Don't pretend to be fiscally responsible.

 

[Brain357]

Yes, given that I'm actually fiscally responsible the idea of being a republican is ridiculous. But sadly it was true. Then I watched them turn the balanced budget from Clinton into increased deficits. They are a joke.

By "fiscally responsible" you mean you support tax and spend. Liberals always have euphemisms for their socialist agenda.

I support a balanced budget. Republicans control the government and deficits are increasing during a strong economy. They are not fiscally responsible.

You support a balanced budget by raising taxes. Who are you trying to kid. GW inherited the tech bubble from Clinton, and then 9/11 happened shortly thereafter. The sure sign of a leftwing douchebag is that he ignores those two central facts. Clinton only had a balanced budget because he benefited from the peace dividend, which allowed Congress to lower defense spending every year of his reign. He didn't reduce any other type of spending. What you support is a Democrat being in office at the right time to benefit from world events. In other words, you support pure luck.

Bush spent on wars that made no sense. He was not fiscally responsible.

Trump is increasing deficits in a strong economy. You can't claim to be fiscally responsible if you support that.

Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion, yet you voted for him twice.

This is what is happening under republican leadership:
Deficit Projected to Top $1 Trillion Starting Next Year

You clearly are not fiscally responsible.

 

[bripat9643]

By "fiscally responsible" you mean you support tax and spend. Liberals always have euphemisms for their socialist agenda.

I support a balanced budget. Republicans control the government and deficits are increasing during a strong economy. They are not fiscally responsible.

You support a balanced budget by raising taxes. Who are you trying to kid. GW inherited the tech bubble from Clinton, and then 9/11 happened shortly thereafter. The sure sign of a leftwing douchebag is that he ignores those two central facts. Clinton only had a balanced budget because he benefited from the peace dividend, which allowed Congress to lower defense spending every year of his reign. He didn't reduce any other type of spending. What you support is a Democrat being in office at the right time to benefit from world events. In other words, you support pure luck.

Bush spent on wars that made no sense. He was not fiscally responsible.

Trump is increasing deficits in a strong economy. You can't claim to be fiscally responsible if you support that.

Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion, yet you voted for him twice.

This is what is happening under republican leadership:
Deficit Projected to Top $1 Trillion Starting Next Year

You clearly are not fiscally responsible.

The Dims pushed for 5/6ths of the additional spending. That's the ransom Trump had to pay to get his defense spending increase. Revenues are increasing under Trump's tax cuts, not decreasing. I agree that Trump should not have caved to Democrat extortion, but that doesn't give you the right to put all the blame on Trump.

 

[Brain357]

I support a balanced budget. Republicans control the government and deficits are increasing during a strong economy. They are not fiscally responsible.

You support a balanced budget by raising taxes. Who are you trying to kid. GW inherited the tech bubble from Clinton, and then 9/11 happened shortly thereafter. The sure sign of a leftwing douchebag is that he ignores those two central facts. Clinton only had a balanced budget because he benefited from the peace dividend, which allowed Congress to lower defense spending every year of his reign. He didn't reduce any other type of spending. What you support is a Democrat being in office at the right time to benefit from world events. In other words, you support pure luck.

Bush spent on wars that made no sense. He was not fiscally responsible.

Trump is increasing deficits in a strong economy. You can't claim to be fiscally responsible if you support that.

Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion, yet you voted for him twice.

This is what is happening under republican leadership:
Deficit Projected to Top $1 Trillion Starting Next Year

You clearly are not fiscally responsible.

The Dims pushed for 5/6ths of the additional spending. Revenues are increasing under Trump's tax cuts.

Repubs control the government. They could have stopped any new spending. Fact is they wanted their own spending. And deficits increase. You support it.

 

[Lakhota]

CNN Reporter Throws Tantrum After Not Getting His Way At The WH Press Conference & Runs For The Door

Gone are the good ol' days when CNN openly admitted to not only reporting the news but also admitting to telling people what to think about and how to think. Gone are the days when they went unchallenged, when they could write and say whatever they wanted because there was simply no one on the Right willing to step up and call them out on their lies and spin. The Left Wing media is clearly about to have a melt-down as this new President has changed all of that!

CNN, more than any other Liberal media source, has been hit probably the worst, having been called out, challenged, and exposed for their lies and propaganda. Their dismal viewer ratings are proof of that. The chants of 'CNN Sucks' now overpowers their reporters' attempted biased reporting. All of it, however, is their own fault and well deserved.

CNN has been caught time after time reporting fake news. Time and gain they have issued retraction after retraction, simply deleted stories without mention, have been sued for false stories, and have fired staff members over fake news. Their reporters have said horrible things about this President and his administration...all while insisting they are NOT biased.

In the latest meltdown by CNN, Reporter Jim Acosta attacked WH Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, calling her Un-American after she refused to declare 'the media is not the enemy of the people'.

** ACTUALLY Jim, when the media repeatedly intentionally pushes propaganda, hit pieces, and fake news - so much so that retractions, pulled stories, law suits, and fired employees become the norm - the media has become 'the enemy of the people'. There was a time when TRUE journalists claimed to be the 'champion of the people' because they exposed lies by shining the light of truth on 'the enemies of the people'. Americans are not sheep who blindly follow - the fact that the liberal media is a manipulative false-reporting entity is not some revelation but has been known for quite some time now. The opposite is quite the case now - much like the FBI, the media, especially CNN, have destroyed their OWN reputation.

At one point in the briefing, being denied what he demanded Sanders give him, like some child throwing a tantrum, fake news CNN correspondent Jim Acosta walked out on the Press Conference.

I've got 2 words for CNN and Acosta: 'BUH-BYE!'

Believe it or not, if CNN ceased to exist 5 minutes from now the world would be just FINE. The news would still get reported. No one would miss Acosta. No one would miss CNN. MSNBC and the other remaining Left Wing media would step up and fill the void of Left-leaning biased reporting created by CNN's disappearance. Acosta 'showing his ass' and walking out did NOTHING.

"Acosta’s self-described “rant” went even further than usual as he quipped that he and his colleagues should “make some bumper sticks” and “buttons” to protest outside the White House against the President and his administration. That’s amusing since that’s not all that different from what happens on CNN."

Yeah, making anti-Trump bumper stickers and buttons and joining the liberal extremists out in front of the WH in protesting this President and his administration would show everyone how UNBIASED they are.

Bwuhahaha....


Like Don Quixote charging the windmill, CNN charged Sanders and the Trump administration at the WH again....and ended up showing himself to the door...with very few people caring, as Acosta did nothing but confirm how biased CNN and Liberal media is and how much CNN really does 'sick'.

Put another 'W' in the Win column for Trump and the American people versus Fake News / Fake News CNN.


https://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-ac...ter-walking-out-of-briefing-im-tired-of-this/

LOL: Jim Acosta Suggests Reporters Make ‘Bumper Sticks,’ ‘Buttons’ to Protest Outside WH

Let's hope no media personnel are harmed or killed because of Trump's madness.

C-SPAN Caller Threatens ‘To Shoot’ CNN Hosts Brian Stelter And Don Lemon

 

[bripat9643]

You support a balanced budget by raising taxes. Who are you trying to kid. GW inherited the tech bubble from Clinton, and then 9/11 happened shortly thereafter. The sure sign of a leftwing douchebag is that he ignores those two central facts. Clinton only had a balanced budget because he benefited from the peace dividend, which allowed Congress to lower defense spending every year of his reign. He didn't reduce any other type of spending. What you support is a Democrat being in office at the right time to benefit from world events. In other words, you support pure luck.

Bush spent on wars that made no sense. He was not fiscally responsible.

Trump is increasing deficits in a strong economy. You can't claim to be fiscally responsible if you support that.

Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion, yet you voted for him twice.

This is what is happening under republican leadership:
Deficit Projected to Top $1 Trillion Starting Next Year

You clearly are not fiscally responsible.

The Dims pushed for 5/6ths of the additional spending. Revenues are increasing under Trump's tax cuts.

Repubs control the government. They could have stopped any new spending. Fact is they wanted their own spending. And deficits increase. You support it.

Most of the new spending was demanded by the Dims. Quit pretending you don't know how this game is played. That's as dishonest as giving Clinton credit for balancing the budget.

 

[Brain357]

Bush spent on wars that made no sense. He was not fiscally responsible.

Trump is increasing deficits in a strong economy. You can't claim to be fiscally responsible if you support that.

Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion, yet you voted for him twice.

This is what is happening under republican leadership:
Deficit Projected to Top $1 Trillion Starting Next Year

You clearly are not fiscally responsible.

The Dims pushed for 5/6ths of the additional spending. Revenues are increasing under Trump's tax cuts.

Repubs control the government. They could have stopped any new spending. Fact is they wanted their own spending. And deficits increase. You support it.

Most of the new spending was demanded by the Dims. Quit pretending you don't know how this game is plaid. That's as dishonest as giving Clinton credit for balancing the budget.

And with the Repubs in control they can demand all they want, but they only get it if the Repubs ok it. Which they did. Trump signed off on it. Sorry snowflake, you are not fiscally responsible.

 

[bripat9643]

Obama increased the debt by $10 trillion, yet you voted for him twice.

This is what is happening under republican leadership:
Deficit Projected to Top $1 Trillion Starting Next Year

You clearly are not fiscally responsible.

The Dims pushed for 5/6ths of the additional spending. Revenues are increasing under Trump's tax cuts.

Repubs control the government. They could have stopped any new spending. Fact is they wanted their own spending. And deficits increase. You support it.

Most of the new spending was demanded by the Dims. Quit pretending you don't know how this game is plaid. That's as dishonest as giving Clinton credit for balancing the budget.

And with the Repubs in control they can demand all they want, but they only get it if the Repubs ok it. Which they did. Trump signed off on it. Sorry snowflake, you are not fiscally responsible.

Sorry, douchebag, buy you aren't fooling anyone about not being a tax and spend leftwinger.

 

[Brain357]

This is what is happening under republican leadership:
Deficit Projected to Top $1 Trillion Starting Next Year

You clearly are not fiscally responsible.

The Dims pushed for 5/6ths of the additional spending. Revenues are increasing under Trump's tax cuts.

Repubs control the government. They could have stopped any new spending. Fact is they wanted their own spending. And deficits increase. You support it.

Most of the new spending was demanded by the Dims. Quit pretending you don't know how this game is plaid. That's as dishonest as giving Clinton credit for balancing the budget.

And with the Repubs in control they can demand all they want, but they only get it if the Repubs ok it. Which they did. Trump signed off on it. Sorry snowflake, you are not fiscally responsible.

Sorry, douchebag, buy you aren't fooling anyone about not being a tax and spend leftwinger.

Nobody believes you or republicans are fiscally responsible. Only a moron would believe that.