LOL Speaking on an integrity test, here's one for you Rumpy. In the entire history of our country, 250 years, name a single person that has faced four simultaneous criminal prosecutions in four different jurisdictions on four different sets of charges. Just one, other than your cult's partisan witch hunt against Trump
Your question has a flawed premise.
Let's do a flip side of your question, which will reveal that flaw:
Name one president in 250 years whose criminal conduct would result in 4 indictments, 88 felony counts, in four different jurisdictions?
There are none, and that, in direct opposition to what you are implying, is the real reason. You are trying to shift the blame to Democrats, but the blame belongs squarely on Trump's shoulders, and none of other.
He was the one who incited an insurrection, an insurrection that was upheld by several state judges and 9 justices of the Supreme Court (none of the judges or justices contested the lower court's finding of fact, that Trump incited, and/or, aided and gave comfort to, insurrection to the constitution of the United States), and his acts leading for months up to and including 1/6, led to two indictments.
He was the one whose aggravated circumstances surrounding the documents case, when all he has to do to not have been indicted was merely to cooperate fully with the government, as did Reagan, Pence, and Biden, and he wouldn't not have been charged. But he conspired to obstruct the government's efforts to retrieve valuable NDI documents, including at least on nuclear document (that one, alone, will get you 5 years), noting that the charge of espionage does not depend on any classification regime (making all claims of 'classification' moot).
Trump was the one who fornicated with a playboy playmate while his newly wed wife was pregnant, then fornicated with a pornstar four months after she gave birth, then several years later, when he became a candidate for US President, conspired with Cohen & Pecker to cover up the sexual acts given that it might hurt his chances to become president, whereupon he and Cohen concocted the scheme that Cohen would take out a HELOC loan on his property, pay Stormy $130k hush money, get her to sign and NDA, and Nat Enquirer President Pecker would pay McDougal $250k to kill her story (she thought it was going to be published), and when Trump won the presidency, he reimbursed Cohen via 8 checks for $35 grand each, reported it falsely as a 'legal expense' (leading to the 8 felony counts of falsifying biz records, elevated to felonies because of the tie in to the cover up) but failed to mention that it was, in essence, and in kind campaign donation, violated federal wire transfer laws, violated election campaign laws (or whatever the actual felonies were), which was never prosecuted (Because Bill Barr, at Trump's instruction, pressured the the DA and/or the SDNY not to prosecute--[I forget which] ), whereupon, when Bragg became DA of NY, investigated the case and a staff attorney convinced him that they had the evidence to elevate the 8 misdemeanor counts to felonies because of the cover up.
No prior president did these things.
You see, Rawley, the flaw in your premise is that although you are suggesting that there is something wrong with Democrats (noting that Garland is a centrist and Smith is an independent, destroying your argument right there), because there never has been, in 250 years, a president whose criminal conduct would result is so many indictments.
www.foxbusiness.com
nypost.com
nypost.com
www.yahoo.com
