Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If they argued to change it back after losing and then gaining power back would they be hypocrites? Yes very much so just like the Republicans were on voting for a Supreme Court justice in an election year.they would be hypocrites if they kept changing this law every election.
have they done that?
i intentionally kept it to one topic and not bounced around to say AND THEY DO IT TOO as those discussions never get anywhere.If they argued to change it back after losing and then gaining power back would they be hypocrites? Yes very much so just like the Republicans were on voting for a Supreme Court justice in an election year.
So, arguing against getting rid of it when you are not in the majority....then arguing to get rid of it when you are in the majority isn't hypocrisy?If they argued to change it back after losing and then gaining power back would they be hypocrites? Yes very much so just like the Republicans were on voting for a Supreme Court justice in an election year.
i intentionally kept it to one topic and not bounced around to say AND THEY DO IT TOO as those discussions never get anywhere.
So, arguing against getting rid of it when you are not in the majority....then arguing to get rid of it when you are in the majority isn't hypocrisy?
Try to stay on topic and not attempt to deflect to unrelated bullshit.
nevermind. you did the change topics and never answer original point dance so im done.And I said it would be hypocritical.
nevermind. you did the change topics and never answer original point dance so im done.
there appears the only bipartisan agreement in washington is against xiden, and chuck’s tyrannySo Cryin' Chucky is going to force a vote that isn't even close and makes him look like an idiot for pushing it.
Let's show America just how bi-partisan it is to oppose what Schumer wants.
Great strategery.
if you endorse the big lie, Trump will endorse you. if you don't, Trump will UNLEASH HIS FURYyea, that must be it.
pknopp said:I did answer what I can answer. I can not answer something we have not come to yet.
pknopp said:
Republicans want photo voters registration cards. For decades they have voted without them. Hypocrites?
they voted without them, as far as i know, only when not required. you're saying following the law while wanting it changed is hypocritical?
the hypocrisy is when they have "power" and want restraints taken off but as soon as that "power" is gone, the restraints must come back. they argue either way is the death of democracy when in the end it's simply "no you are not power absolute".
it would also be hypocritical if they demanded voter ID's, got them, THEN didn't want them followed for XYZ reason. but they've not done that, have they?
you're mixing the 2 where they simply don't *BOTH* go the distance to hypocrisy.
they want it changed EVERY TIME to suit their benefit. not change it to re-establish rules and then abide by them. HUGE difference.That's been the entire argument overall. Dem's used the filibuster when it was the rule but they want it changed.
in 2006 schurmer said getting rid of the filibuster would kill democracy.That has not happened. That has not been proposed. Would I be surprised if Democrats argued it at some point? No.
i have not demonized anyone. i said these actions were not done and ...You are demonizing people for something they have not done. I am stating what has been done.
they want it changed EVERY TIME to suit their benefit.
you and reality need to come to grips soon.I have zero desire to discuss something that has not happened.
nypost.com
www.washingtontimes.com
www.foxnews.com
then speak to todays hypocrisy or hide behind verbiage you disagree with.I have zero desire to discuss something that has not happened.
you and reality need to come to grips soon.
What Chuck Schumer said about the filibuster when the shoe was on the other foot
Now that Democrats have the Senate majority, Sen. Chuck Schumer is arguing strenuously for sidelining the filibuster to “wash away 200 years of history.”Chuck Schumer’s filibuster hypocrisy
Hypocrisy and lies from politicians are so rampant in Washington that hardly anyone pays them much attention anymore.Chuck Schumer on the filibuster in 2017: If you can't get 60 votes, 'you shouldn't change the rules'
The Senate Majority Leader is leading the effort to gut the filibuster in order to pass legislation to federalize elections.
IF YOU CAN'T GET 60 VOTES YOU SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE RULES.
it has happened. the dems defended it when it was useful to them, demonize it now that it's in their way. so don't give me whatever shit you're trying to give me about hypocrisy and republicans voting w/o a voter ID card *if* not required.
not the same thing AT ALL.
Whataboutism is all you have, loser.Yes he said that in the past. Graham said that votes on Supreme Court justices shouldn't be voted on in election years also. The two parties are nothing but hypocritical but that does not back your predictions for the future.
