Child Killers Celebrated as Heroes by Barbaric Palestinian Animals

[NeoTemplar]

Are you saying that the US never blew up a restaurant or market?

If I have to explain the difference between a suicide bomber and a US soldier, then you are morally bankrupt, and beyond help. But of course that would be a requirement for someone who openly supports Hamas, a terrorist organization who's stated policy is to intentionally murder Israeli children.

Blowing people up is blowing people up.

Blowing up terrorists attacking you from a restaurant is way different then blowing a resutrant full of children, if you can't see that then something is wrong with you.

 

[SAYIT]

Of course those candy asses would not come out and fight man to man.

By the way, where were those anti-tank missiles that the liars are always talking about?

Check out the RPGs, simpleton.


Rocket-propelled grenade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Good synopsis of RPGs.


Countering the RPG threat

Now where did Tinmore sneak off to? Mabe he's at evening prayers. Or the Community Center.......er,strip joint. Or the gay bar.

What do you have against gay bars and strip joints?

 

[georgephillip]

Wow, now IslamoTerrorist lovers are experts on rules of warfare. The same rules Muslims seem to have absolutely no regards for. Checked on how Assad is following those same rules? 12,000 of his fellow civilians have been slaughtered and counting so far. Eh it doesn't count, no Jews involved in that one. Yes, but let's of course talk about those "rule" following Muslims. Especially the Palestinians. Now we know they're really observant of "rules". Ha ha ha!

Yea I read about Syria over in the Forum dedicated to that area, this is however the Israel forum.

depending on the perspective of a state's government, a resistance movement may or may not be labelled a terrorist group based on whether the members of a resistance movement are considered lawful or unlawful combatants and their right to resist occupation is recognized.[5] Ultimately, the distinction is a political judgment.

Resistance movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There is no depending. What's clearer than the blue sky to the rest of the world is that a person walking into a restaurant and then blowing up all the women and children IS TERRORISM. No ifs ands or buts. Ony a piece of shit Muslim animal who supports other terrorist Muslim animals would call such an action a "resistance movement". Resistance movement my ass. All they are is savage animals.

Speaking of clear, blue skies:

"These results provide strong evidence that the Gulf war and trade sanctions caused a threefold increase in mortality among Iraqi children under five years of age. We estimate that an excess of more than 46,900 children died between January and August 1991. (N Engl J Med."

Only a shit-for-brains AIPAC apologist condemns the retail terror of suicide bombers while ignoring the industrial-scale murder committed by the heroic US military.

MMS: Error

 

[AgentBond007]

Not me. Israel is the one who does the terrorist propaganda thing.

What sort of Freedom Fighter does heroic deeds like this? Are you proud of this feat?

Palestinian TV airs show praising Fogel family murderer - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

Or this.

Children killed since September 2000
Israeli 129
Palestinian 1477

Remember These Children

You are making a mistake calling them human beings.

 

[SAYIT]

If I have to explain the difference between a suicide bomber and a US soldier, then you are morally bankrupt, and beyond help. But of course that would be a requirement for someone who openly supports Hamas, a terrorist organization who's stated policy is to intentionally murder Israeli children.

Blowing people up is blowing people up.

Blowing up terrorists attacking you from a restaurant is way different then blowing a restaurant full of children, if you can't see that then something is wrong with you.

Trust me, he can't see it. Tinhorn's ignorance is self-imposed and rigidly self-enforced.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Blowing people up is blowing people up.

Blowing up terrorists attacking you from a restaurant is way different then blowing a restaurant full of children, if you can't see that then something is wrong with you.

Trust me, he can't see it. Tinhorn's ignorance is self-imposed and rigidly self-enforced.

You are right. I can't see how the method of blowing people up can determine whether blowing them up is good or bad.

 

[Saigon]

See, this is where you talk just like a terrorist supporting moron. By your standards then everytime any country conducts a bombing raid of the enemy city then it is the same. That includes all the bombing raids in World Wars I and II, and all the other wars after. Israel is always held to a higher standard than the rest of the world it is not allowed to defend itself against islamic terrorist animals? You haven't proven anything other than Israel is guilty of what the US and about 100 countries have done in the past, GOING. TO WAR. Idiot.

As I said earlier, Roudy, rather than just react like a spanked child, you could actually use situations like this to learn something.

This is nothing to do with WWII, this is nothing to do with defense - this is about deliberately bombing apartment buildings.

Your original claim that Israel has never attacked civilian targets would be laughable if it wasn't so ignorant - and yet here you are again fighting with everything you have to remain ignorant.

Man up, read the link, and come back better informed.

 

[Saigon]

Bombing of enemy cities, targetting their valuable military and communication facilities has been part of every war the last 80 years. .

And again, you completely ignore the information provided to you, which specifically cited the bombing of apartment buildings.

Your desire to remain ignorant may be one of the strongest forces known to nature.

 

[Roudy]

If I have to explain the difference between a suicide bomber and a US soldier, then you are morally bankrupt, and beyond help. But of course that would be a requirement for someone who openly supports Hamas, a terrorist organization who's stated policy is to intentionally murder Israeli children.

Blowing people up is blowing people up.

Blowing up terrorists attacking you from a restaurant is way different then blowing a resutrant full of children, if you can't see that then something is wrong with you.

Timmore is the official spokesperson for Hamas. That's more than just wrong, that's ******* mental.

 

[Roudy]

Bombing of enemy cities, targetting their valuable military and communication facilities has been part of every war the last 80 years. .

And again, you completely ignore the information provided to you, which specifically cited the bombing of apartment buildings.

Your desire to remain ignorant may be one of the strongest forces known to nature.

Duh, your telling everybody about the Lebanon War 1 is not some tyoe of new "revelation" you ******* idiot. They made the same accusations about the Lebanon war as they did for Lebanon War 2 and Gaza more recenty. Non of it true of course.

That's all you can do, lie and misrepresent. Actually you've established quite a reputation for just that recently. Congratulations or should I say MABRUK.

 

[Saigon]

Roudy -

Non of it true of course.

Here is the evidence for it once again, since you obviously missed it the first time.



The Israel seige of Beirut, 1982.

An overview:

For seven weeks, Israel attacked the city by sea, air, and land, cutting off food & water supplies, disconnecting the electricity, and securing the airport and some southern suburbs, but for the most part coming no closer to their goals. As with most sieges, the population of the city, thousands of civilians, suffered alongside the PLO guerrillas. Israel was roundly accused of indiscriminately shelling the city in addition to the other measures taken to weaken the PLO. By the end of the first week of July 500 buildings had been destroyed by Israeli shells and bombs.

Siege of Beirut - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And some details:

On 3 July, the IDF tightened its economic blockade. A force of some 200 tanks moved from east Beirut and quickly secured the Green Line separating the Christian and Muslim parts of Beirut. Now Israeli soldiers and LF militiamen at checkpoints stopped all but essential personnel (doctors or policemen, for example) from entering west Beirut. The IDF also shut off all fuel, food, and water into the city. This situation lasted until 7 July when the Reagan administration convinced the Begin government to rescind its order for a brief period.

t the end of July, Sharon decided to complement the bombardment of west Beirut with ground attacks designed to tighten the noose around the PLO headquarters and the Palestinian camps.[42] He seemed determined to force a military resolution to the PLO's withdrawal from the Lebanese capital rather than see a diplomatic one under American auspices. The new strategy began on 31 July with a prolonged bombardment of the city. Then on 1 August at 0300, a task force of Israeli infantry, paratroopers, and tanks launched an attack in the south and captured Beirut International Airport by the end of the day. During daylight hours, the IDF pounded west Beirut for fourteen straight hours with air, naval, and artillery bombardment. As ground troops consolidated their gains, the IDF continued a bombardment of west Beirut for two more days.

Then, on 4 August, Sharon launched the war's largest ground operation against the city. Beirut residents now experienced twenty straight hours of shelling, as the IDF conducted a general bombing attack that day. Israeli gunboats blasted the entire shoreline from the hotel district in the north to Ouzai in the south. Planes and artillery struck other areas of west Beirut. Especially hard hit were the refugee camps and the Fakhani district. No place, however, appeared safe, as every civilian seemed to have been in close proximity to an exploding shell.

The attack of 4 August inflicted significant damage on west Beirut. Shells had hit many of the city's most important landmarks and institutions. Among the damaged buildings were the American University Hospital, the prime minister's building, the Central Bank, the ministry of information, the offices of Newsweek and United Press International, and the two luxury hotels housing foreign journalists. Residential areas also experienced damage. To increase suffering on the civilian population, the IDF maintained a blockade of water, electricity, and fuel, so much so that American University Hospital appealed on the radio for diesel fuel to help doctors and staff treat the many wounded. Unable to inflict serious damage on the IDF, the Arab defenders fired rockets and artillery into Christian east Beirut, leaving many streets temporarily deserted. Sections of the business district gained the appearance of a ghost town for a

This text is very worth reading:

Combat Studies Institute

 

[Roudy]

See, this is where you talk just like a terrorist supporting moron. By your standards then everytime any country conducts a bombing raid of the enemy city then it is the same. That includes all the bombing raids in World Wars I and II, and all the other wars after. Israel is always held to a higher standard than the rest of the world it is not allowed to defend itself against islamic terrorist animals? You haven't proven anything other than Israel is guilty of what the US and about 100 countries have done in the past, GOING. TO WAR. Idiot.

As I said earlier, Roudy, rather than just react like a spanked child, you could actually use situations like this to learn something.

This is nothing to do with WWII, this is nothing to do with defense - this is about deliberately bombing apartment buildings.

Your original claim that Israel has never attacked civilian targets would be laughable if it wasn't so ignorant - and yet here you are again fighting with everything you have to remain ignorant.

Man up, read the link, and come back better informed.

**** off, the apartment buildings were bombed because the animals were shooting missiles from it. At least Israel, unlike the subhuman Arab apes, had the courtesy of warning the occupants by phone calls and pamphlets. You compare this, to some Muslim animal walking into a restaurant, preplanned, and intentionally blowing up women and kids? You are a sick terrorist supporting ****. No different than the rest of the terrorist supporting pigs on this board. How do you type with your tongue constantly lodged up your mosque Imam's ass?

 

[Saigon]

You compare this, to some Muslim animal walking into a restaurant, preplanned, and intentionally blowing up women and kids? You are a sick terrorist supporting ****. ?

No, I don't compare the two acts, given they have virtually nothing at all in common - the only person here comparing the two is you.

the apartment buildings were bombed because the animals were shooting missiles from it

If you will read the material which I have now presented for you twice, you will find that not all of the targets hit by Israeli forces had any connection to the PLO or any other group.

YOU made the claim that Israel has never knowingly bombed civilian targets, a claim that is obviously false.

If you can admit your error then perhaps we can move on?

You are a sick terrorist supporting ****

No, I'm not. I do not support any violent attack against any civilian target for any reason or under any circumstances. What I do support is honesty and objectivity on recording historical facts.

And everytime you are forced to resort to this kind of off-topic abuse and concede the debate, it's just further proof of your humiliation really, isn't it?

 

[Hossfly]

See, this is where you talk just like a terrorist supporting moron. By your standards then everytime any country conducts a bombing raid of the enemy city then it is the same. That includes all the bombing raids in World Wars I and II, and all the other wars after. Israel is always held to a higher standard than the rest of the world it is not allowed to defend itself against islamic terrorist animals? You haven't proven anything other than Israel is guilty of what the US and about 100 countries have done in the past, GOING. TO WAR. Idiot.

As I said earlier, Roudy, rather than just react like a spanked child, you could actually use situations like this to learn something.

This is nothing to do with WWII, this is nothing to do with defense - this is about deliberately bombing apartment buildings.

Your original claim that Israel has never attacked civilian targets would be laughable if it wasn't so ignorant - and yet here you are again fighting with everything you have to remain ignorant.

Man up, read the link, and come back better informed.

**** off, the apartment buildings were bombed because the animals were shooting missiles from it. At least Israel, unlike the subhuman Arab apes, had the courtesy of warning the occupants by phone calls and pamphlets. You compare this, to some Muslim animal walking into a restaurant, preplanned, and intentionally blowing up women and kids? You are a sick terrorist supporting ****. No different than the rest of the terrorist supporting pigs on this board. How do you type with your tongue constantly lodged up your mosque Imam's ass?

I'm trying to find the article w/video of the IDF making thousands of phone calls, phamplets and loudspeaker announcements to residents to evacuate before they begin bombing and shelling.They give the residents a substantial grace period to evacuate, but of course the Freedom Fighters won't release their valuable human shields and Israel catches hell from the uninformed world, especially the UM.

 

[Hossfly]

Hooray for the IDF!!!

Of course those candy asses would not come out and fight man to man.

By the way, where were those anti-tank missiles that the liars are always talking about?

Check out the RPGs, simpleton.


Rocket-propelled grenade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Good synopsis of RPGs.


Countering the RPG threat

Tinmore won't respond because he knows he preaches lies and is ashamed and scared of his handlers.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Of course those candy asses would not come out and fight man to man.

By the way, where were those anti-tank missiles that the liars are always talking about?

Check out the RPGs, simpleton.


Rocket-propelled grenade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Good synopsis of RPGs.


Countering the RPG threat

Tinmore won't respond because he knows he preaches lies and is ashamed and scared of his handlers.

How many of those Israeli tanks were destroyed again?

 

[Hossfly]

Check out the RPGs, simpleton.


Rocket-propelled grenade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Good synopsis of RPGs.


Countering the RPG threat

Tinmore won't respond because he knows he preaches lies and is ashamed and scared of his handlers.

How many of those Israeli tanks were destroyed again?

Not the issue, Peabody.

 

[Roudy]

Roudy -

Non of it true of course.

Here is the evidence for it once again, since you obviously missed it the first time.



The Israel seige of Beirut, 1982.

An overview:

For seven weeks, Israel attacked the city by sea, air, and land, cutting off food & water supplies, disconnecting the electricity, and securing the airport and some southern suburbs, but for the most part coming no closer to their goals. As with most sieges, the population of the city, thousands of civilians, suffered alongside the PLO guerrillas. Israel was roundly accused of indiscriminately shelling the city in addition to the other measures taken to weaken the PLO. By the end of the first week of July 500 buildings had been destroyed by Israeli shells and bombs.

Siege of Beirut - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And some details:

On 3 July, the IDF tightened its economic blockade. A force of some 200 tanks moved from east Beirut and quickly secured the Green Line separating the Christian and Muslim parts of Beirut. Now Israeli soldiers and LF militiamen at checkpoints stopped all but essential personnel (doctors or policemen, for example) from entering west Beirut. The IDF also shut off all fuel, food, and water into the city. This situation lasted until 7 July when the Reagan administration convinced the Begin government to rescind its order for a brief period.

t the end of July, Sharon decided to complement the bombardment of west Beirut with ground attacks designed to tighten the noose around the PLO headquarters and the Palestinian camps.[42] He seemed determined to force a military resolution to the PLO's withdrawal from the Lebanese capital rather than see a diplomatic one under American auspices. The new strategy began on 31 July with a prolonged bombardment of the city. Then on 1 August at 0300, a task force of Israeli infantry, paratroopers, and tanks launched an attack in the south and captured Beirut International Airport by the end of the day. During daylight hours, the IDF pounded west Beirut for fourteen straight hours with air, naval, and artillery bombardment. As ground troops consolidated their gains, the IDF continued a bombardment of west Beirut for two more days.

Then, on 4 August, Sharon launched the war's largest ground operation against the city. Beirut residents now experienced twenty straight hours of shelling, as the IDF conducted a general bombing attack that day. Israeli gunboats blasted the entire shoreline from the hotel district in the north to Ouzai in the south. Planes and artillery struck other areas of west Beirut. Especially hard hit were the refugee camps and the Fakhani district. No place, however, appeared safe, as every civilian seemed to have been in close proximity to an exploding shell.

The attack of 4 August inflicted significant damage on west Beirut. Shells had hit many of the city's most important landmarks and institutions. Among the damaged buildings were the American University Hospital, the prime minister's building, the Central Bank, the ministry of information, the offices of Newsweek and United Press International, and the two luxury hotels housing foreign journalists. Residential areas also experienced damage. To increase suffering on the civilian population, the IDF maintained a blockade of water, electricity, and fuel, so much so that American University Hospital appealed on the radio for diesel fuel to help doctors and staff treat the many wounded. Unable to inflict serious damage on the IDF, the Arab defenders fired rockets and artillery into Christian east Beirut, leaving many streets temporarily deserted. Sections of the business district gained the appearance of a ghost town for a

This text is very worth reading:

Combat Studies Institute

You can't even read the text you are quoting? Nowhere does it say that civilians were targetted directly and intentionally. Israel was at war with the PLO that had gained control of parts of Lebanon, as did Hezbollah in the second military operation more recently. Their their was the enemy string holds. Moreover, keep up, I am not the ine that compared it, your fellow terrorist worshippers like Tinmore, Jos, Ima, and eots brought those kinds of comparisons up. You are an illiterate, ignorant, IslamoTerrorist supporter. From your article:

"At the end of July, Sharon decided to complement the bombardment of west Beirut with ground attacks designed to tighten the noose around the PLO headquarters and the Palestinian camps.[42] He seemed determined to force a military resolution to the PLO's withdrawal from the Lebanese capital rather than see a diplomatic one under American auspices. The new strategy began on 31 July with a prolonged bombardment of the city. Then on 1 August at 0300, a task force of Israeli infantry, paratroopers, and tanks launched an attack in the south and captured Beirut International Airport by the end of the day. During daylight hours, the IDF pounded west Beirut for fourteen straight hours with air, naval, and artillery bombardment. As ground troops consolidated their gains, the IDF continued a bombardment of west Beirut for two more days."

What's the difference between what Israel did and what the US did in Iraq, Afganistan, or any other country at war has done? Nothing. Exactly.

 

[Saigon]

Roudy -

Nowhere does it say that civilians were targetted directly and intentionally.

I have no idea what you mean by "directly", but there is no question that targets included residential buildings, and non residential-targets were located in areas which meant any strike would cause civilian propoerties.


Beirut residents now experienced twenty straight hours of shelling.

Especially hard hit were the refugee camps and the Fakhani district. No place, however, appeared safe, as every civilian seemed to have been in close proximity to an exploding shell.

Among the damaged buildings were the American University Hospital, the prime minister's building, the Central Bank, the ministry of information, the offices of Newsweek and United Press International, and the two luxury hotels housing foreign journalists. Residential areas also experienced damage.

The link lists several incidents in more detail - please read it.

 

[Saigon]

What's the difference between what Israel did and what the US did in Iraq, Afganistan, or any other country at war has done? Nothing. Exactly.

Are you suggesting that the US routinely bombs residential propoerties?

Possibly so, but that is your claim - not mine.