It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
..
till the crucifiers are brought to justice no religion will represent the 1st century religious itinerant or the many others made to suffer by the same means. than the spoken religion of antiquity presently abandoned for the same reason.
Do you understand what you say here?
better yet ... do you know why the 1st century religious itinerant was crucified.
I guess, you'll tell me this now.
.
better yet ... do you know why the 1st century religious itinerant was crucified..I guess, you'll tell me this now.
that was meant as a question, you're the christian - and please explain the chicken that crowed 3 times ...
because they are still crowing - - > at you - - still afraid, for what "they" will do to you ...
.
* hint: "they" wrote your book.
I don't understand what you want from me. Soon will be Easter. What about the idea to follow just simple our way now? Jesus had died on April, 7th in the year 30 AD. This we will remember this year again by celebrating Easter again. It's the 1990th Easter celebration. In the moment is a fasting period, which was starting last Wednesday. We often prefer periods of 40 days (not periods of months). And "fast" has nothing to do with speed in this context - it comes from the German word "fest", what means solid, strong, hard, firm. In a fasting period we train our will to do what's good to do. This is individually different. If you do often something what's not good for you or others - or if you let it be to do what's good for you and others - then this are good situations for to start to change this wrongdoing now. Don't try to change everything - try to change only a special moment. But do it: Change it. See what this is doing with you.
.
.Jesus had died on April, 7th in the year 30 AD. This we will remember this year again by celebrating Easter again.
you seem never to know what anyone is ever saying -
howabout not celebrating till you bring to justice the crucifiers who victimized the 1st century religious itinerant to give any meaning whatsoever for whatever you are celebrating - as a memento, too - the religion of antiquity the itinerant died for.
Do you like to create a time machine and to wipe out the Romans?
Just the Germans, they're a waste of space, and like their bodies cooked crispy.
I like it when you show that you believe morals are absolute.
Wonderful that you like something. But what do you call "moral" here?
The comment was directed at Taz's apparent righteous indignation. So as much as Taz and people like Taz want to object to absolute morality and absolute truth, they demonstrate they believe in a universal right and wrong that everyone should know, understand, accept and follow.
Dirty Krautz thought that what they were doing was legit. Morals are subjectives.
You certainly don't act like morals are subjective. You only act like your beliefs that morals are subjective are subjective.
We'll never all agree on what's moral, that would make it subjective. Abortion and same sex marriage to name two that all of society will never agree on.
Nope. That makes human being subjective, dummy. No matter what the time, no matter what the issue, there were always people who believed that moral evils were wrong even when those in their societies thought it was right.
You demonstrate daily your belief in a universal right and wrong, despite your objections to the contrary.
See? you prove my point, you call abortion a universal moral evil, I don't.
In case of every abortion always a human being has to die. That's the universal component of all abortions. So how is abortion in general able to be compatible with the natural human rights? Are all abortions justifiable?
You see it one way, I see it another.
Btw, you're wrong. As usual.
What for heavens sake do you see with closed eyes? That light is an absurdity? To kill human beings is not a question of ideas, opinions or tolerance.
A fetus isn't a human being. Now you know.
When exactly starts a human being to be a human being in your view to the world? What are the very exact reasons for this in my eyes very absurde idea?
A fetus becomes a human being when it is born. Sort of like a caterpillar isn't a butterfly into it comes out of the cocoon.
That's not what every embryologist and embryology textbook says, dummy.
Again, no link. Now fuck out of my threads until you get a link, ok?
.
A butterfly begins as a caterpillar. A human begins as a fetus.
Meaning it should be obvious to everyone when life begins.Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
..
till the crucifiers are brought to justice no religion will represent the 1st century religious itinerant or the many others made to suffer by the same means. than the spoken religion of antiquity presently abandoned for the same reason.
Do you understand what you say here?
better yet ... do you know why the 1st century religious itinerant was crucified.
I guess, you'll tell me this now.
.
better yet ... do you know why the 1st century religious itinerant was crucified..I guess, you'll tell me this now.
that was meant as a question, you're the christian - and please explain the chicken that crowed 3 times ...
because they are still crowing - - > at you - - still afraid, for what "they" will do to you ...
.
* hint: "they" wrote your book.
I don't understand what you want from me. Soon will be Easter. What about the idea to follow just simple our way now? Jesus had died on April, 7th in the year 30 AD. This we will remember this year again by celebrating Easter again. It's the 1990th Easter celebration. In the moment is a fasting period, which was starting last Wednesday. We often prefer periods of 40 days (not periods of months). And "fast" has nothing to do with speed in this context - it comes from the German word "fest", what means solid, strong, hard, firm. In a fasting period we train our will to do what's good to do. This is individually different. If you do often something what's not good for you or others - or if you let it be to do what's good for you and others - then this are good situations for to start to change this wrongdoing now. Don't try to change everything - try to change only a special moment. But do it: Change it. See what this is doing with you.
.
.Jesus had died on April, 7th in the year 30 AD. This we will remember this year again by celebrating Easter again.
you seem never to know what anyone is ever saying -
howabout not celebrating till you bring to justice the crucifiers who victimized the 1st century religious itinerant to give any meaning whatsoever for whatever you are celebrating - as a memento, too - the religion of antiquity the itinerant died for.
Do you like to create a time machine and to wipe out the Romans?
Just the Germans, they're a waste of space, and like their bodies cooked crispy.
I like it when you show that you believe morals are absolute.
Wonderful that you like something. But what do you call "moral" here?
The comment was directed at Taz's apparent righteous indignation. So as much as Taz and people like Taz want to object to absolute morality and absolute truth, they demonstrate they believe in a universal right and wrong that everyone should know, understand, accept and follow.
Dirty Krautz thought that what they were doing was legit. Morals are subjectives.
You certainly don't act like morals are subjective. You only act like your beliefs that morals are subjective are subjective.
We'll never all agree on what's moral, that would make it subjective. Abortion and same sex marriage to name two that all of society will never agree on.
Nope. That makes human being subjective, dummy. No matter what the time, no matter what the issue, there were always people who believed that moral evils were wrong even when those in their societies thought it was right.
You demonstrate daily your belief in a universal right and wrong, despite your objections to the contrary.
See? you prove my point, you call abortion a universal moral evil, I don't.
In case of every abortion always a human being has to die. That's the universal component of all abortions. So how is abortion in general able to be compatible with the natural human rights? Are all abortions justifiable?
You see it one way, I see it another.
Btw, you're wrong. As usual.
What for heavens sake do you see with closed eyes? That light is an absurdity? To kill human beings is not a question of ideas, opinions or tolerance.
A fetus isn't a human being. Now you know.
When exactly starts a human being to be a human being in your view to the world? What are the very exact reasons for this in my eyes very absurde idea?
A fetus becomes a human being when it is born. Sort of like a caterpillar isn't a butterfly into it comes out of the cocoon.
That's not what every embryologist and embryology textbook says, dummy.
Again, no link. Now fuck out of my threads until you get a link, ok?
.
A butterfly begins as a caterpillar. A human begins as a fetus.
Billions of years ago?Meaning it should be obvious to everyone when life begins.Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
A genetically distinct new human life.Billions of years ago?Meaning it should be obvious to everyone when life begins.Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong. Bigly!A butterfly begins as a caterpillar. A human begins as a fetus.
And all too often ends that way.
When abortion is FREE it's so attractive to liberals that they (occasionally and only recreationally) get pregnant just to get another chunk of free stuff.
..
till the crucifiers are brought to justice no religion will represent the 1st century religious itinerant or the many others made to suffer by the same means. than the spoken religion of antiquity presently abandoned for the same reason.
Do you understand what you say here?
better yet ... do you know why the 1st century religious itinerant was crucified.
I guess, you'll tell me this now.
.
better yet ... do you know why the 1st century religious itinerant was crucified..I guess, you'll tell me this now.
that was meant as a question, you're the christian - and please explain the chicken that crowed 3 times ...
because they are still crowing - - > at you - - still afraid, for what "they" will do to you ...
.
* hint: "they" wrote your book.
I don't understand what you want from me. Soon will be Easter. What about the idea to follow just simple our way now? Jesus had died on April, 7th in the year 30 AD. This we will remember this year again by celebrating Easter again. It's the 1990th Easter celebration. In the moment is a fasting period, which was starting last Wednesday. We often prefer periods of 40 days (not periods of months). And "fast" has nothing to do with speed in this context - it comes from the German word "fest", what means solid, strong, hard, firm. In a fasting period we train our will to do what's good to do. This is individually different. If you do often something what's not good for you or others - or if you let it be to do what's good for you and others - then this are good situations for to start to change this wrongdoing now. Don't try to change everything - try to change only a special moment. But do it: Change it. See what this is doing with you.
.
.Jesus had died on April, 7th in the year 30 AD. This we will remember this year again by celebrating Easter again.
you seem never to know what anyone is ever saying -
howabout not celebrating till you bring to justice the crucifiers who victimized the 1st century religious itinerant to give any meaning whatsoever for whatever you are celebrating - as a memento, too - the religion of antiquity the itinerant died for.
Do you like to create a time machine and to wipe out the Romans?
Just the Germans, they're a waste of space, and like their bodies cooked crispy.
I like it when you show that you believe morals are absolute.
Wonderful that you like something. But what do you call "moral" here?
The comment was directed at Taz's apparent righteous indignation. So as much as Taz and people like Taz want to object to absolute morality and absolute truth, they demonstrate they believe in a universal right and wrong that everyone should know, understand, accept and follow.
Dirty Krautz thought that what they were doing was legit. Morals are subjectives.
You certainly don't act like morals are subjective. You only act like your beliefs that morals are subjective are subjective.
We'll never all agree on what's moral, that would make it subjective. Abortion and same sex marriage to name two that all of society will never agree on.
Nope. That makes human being subjective, dummy. No matter what the time, no matter what the issue, there were always people who believed that moral evils were wrong even when those in their societies thought it was right.
You demonstrate daily your belief in a universal right and wrong, despite your objections to the contrary.
See? you prove my point, you call abortion a universal moral evil, I don't.
In case of every abortion always a human being has to die. That's the universal component of all abortions. So how is abortion in general able to be compatible with the natural human rights? Are all abortions justifiable?
You see it one way, I see it another.
Btw, you're wrong. As usual.
What for heavens sake do you see with closed eyes? That light is an absurdity? To kill human beings is not a question of ideas, opinions or tolerance.
A fetus isn't a human being. Now you know.
When exactly starts a human being to be a human being in your view to the world? What are the very exact reasons for this in my eyes very absurde idea?
A fetus becomes a human being when it is born. Sort of like a caterpillar isn't a butterfly into it comes out of the cocoon.
That's not what every embryologist and embryology textbook says, dummy.
Again, no link. Now fuck out of my threads until you get a link, ok?
.
A butterfly begins as a caterpillar. A human begins as a fetus.
Not according to science. Did you even read the link?
.A genetically distinct new human life.Billions of years ago?Meaning it should be obvious to everyone when life begins.Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
.A genetically distinct new human life.
..
till the crucifiers are brought to justice no religion will represent the 1st century religious itinerant or the many others made to suffer by the same means. than the spoken religion of antiquity presently abandoned for the same reason.
Do you understand what you say here?
better yet ... do you know why the 1st century religious itinerant was crucified.
I guess, you'll tell me this now.
.
better yet ... do you know why the 1st century religious itinerant was crucified..I guess, you'll tell me this now.
that was meant as a question, you're the christian - and please explain the chicken that crowed 3 times ...
because they are still crowing - - > at you - - still afraid, for what "they" will do to you ...
.
* hint: "they" wrote your book.
I don't understand what you want from me. Soon will be Easter. What about the idea to follow just simple our way now? Jesus had died on April, 7th in the year 30 AD. This we will remember this year again by celebrating Easter again. It's the 1990th Easter celebration. In the moment is a fasting period, which was starting last Wednesday. We often prefer periods of 40 days (not periods of months). And "fast" has nothing to do with speed in this context - it comes from the German word "fest", what means solid, strong, hard, firm. In a fasting period we train our will to do what's good to do. This is individually different. If you do often something what's not good for you or others - or if you let it be to do what's good for you and others - then this are good situations for to start to change this wrongdoing now. Don't try to change everything - try to change only a special moment. But do it: Change it. See what this is doing with you.
.
.Jesus had died on April, 7th in the year 30 AD. This we will remember this year again by celebrating Easter again.
you seem never to know what anyone is ever saying -
howabout not celebrating till you bring to justice the crucifiers who victimized the 1st century religious itinerant to give any meaning whatsoever for whatever you are celebrating - as a memento, too - the religion of antiquity the itinerant died for.
Do you like to create a time machine and to wipe out the Romans?
Just the Germans, they're a waste of space, and like their bodies cooked crispy.
I like it when you show that you believe morals are absolute.
Wonderful that you like something. But what do you call "moral" here?
The comment was directed at Taz's apparent righteous indignation. So as much as Taz and people like Taz want to object to absolute morality and absolute truth, they demonstrate they believe in a universal right and wrong that everyone should know, understand, accept and follow.
Dirty Krautz thought that what they were doing was legit. Morals are subjectives.
You certainly don't act like morals are subjective. You only act like your beliefs that morals are subjective are subjective.
We'll never all agree on what's moral, that would make it subjective. Abortion and same sex marriage to name two that all of society will never agree on.
Nope. That makes human being subjective, dummy. No matter what the time, no matter what the issue, there were always people who believed that moral evils were wrong even when those in their societies thought it was right.
You demonstrate daily your belief in a universal right and wrong, despite your objections to the contrary.
See? you prove my point, you call abortion a universal moral evil, I don't.
In case of every abortion always a human being has to die. That's the universal component of all abortions. So how is abortion in general able to be compatible with the natural human rights? Are all abortions justifiable?
You see it one way, I see it another.
Btw, you're wrong. As usual.
What for heavens sake do you see with closed eyes? That light is an absurdity? To kill human beings is not a question of ideas, opinions or tolerance.
A fetus isn't a human being. Now you know.
When exactly starts a human being to be a human being in your view to the world? What are the very exact reasons for this in my eyes very absurde idea?
A fetus becomes a human being when it is born. Sort of like a caterpillar isn't a butterfly into it comes out of the cocoon.
That's not what every embryologist and embryology textbook says, dummy.
Again, no link. Now fuck out of my threads until you get a link, ok?
.
A butterfly begins as a caterpillar. A human begins as a fetus.
Not according to science. Did you even read the link?
The human being starts off as a fetus. The whole thing starts at conception. No problem there. What is it you're trying to get at?
Of course it is a relevant distinction. At conception a new genetically distinct human being has come into existence. One that has never existed before and will never exist again..A genetically distinct new human life.Billions of years ago?Meaning it should be obvious to everyone when life begins.Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
.A genetically distinct new human life.
is that an appropriate distinction -
.
View attachment 464149
.
when Garden Earth is what is being ravished by those same caring "christians", or
.
View attachment 464150
.
the life of a lamb is not the same value in weight for the enduring Garden. where in fact, religious and secular have no distinctive difference for the same objective conclusion.
..
till the crucifiers are brought to justice no religion will represent the 1st century religious itinerant or the many others made to suffer by the same means. than the spoken religion of antiquity presently abandoned for the same reason.
Do you understand what you say here?
better yet ... do you know why the 1st century religious itinerant was crucified.
I guess, you'll tell me this now.
.
better yet ... do you know why the 1st century religious itinerant was crucified..I guess, you'll tell me this now.
that was meant as a question, you're the christian - and please explain the chicken that crowed 3 times ...
because they are still crowing - - > at you - - still afraid, for what "they" will do to you ...
.
* hint: "they" wrote your book.
I don't understand what you want from me. Soon will be Easter. What about the idea to follow just simple our way now? Jesus had died on April, 7th in the year 30 AD. This we will remember this year again by celebrating Easter again. It's the 1990th Easter celebration. In the moment is a fasting period, which was starting last Wednesday. We often prefer periods of 40 days (not periods of months). And "fast" has nothing to do with speed in this context - it comes from the German word "fest", what means solid, strong, hard, firm. In a fasting period we train our will to do what's good to do. This is individually different. If you do often something what's not good for you or others - or if you let it be to do what's good for you and others - then this are good situations for to start to change this wrongdoing now. Don't try to change everything - try to change only a special moment. But do it: Change it. See what this is doing with you.
.
.Jesus had died on April, 7th in the year 30 AD. This we will remember this year again by celebrating Easter again.
you seem never to know what anyone is ever saying -
howabout not celebrating till you bring to justice the crucifiers who victimized the 1st century religious itinerant to give any meaning whatsoever for whatever you are celebrating - as a memento, too - the religion of antiquity the itinerant died for.
Do you like to create a time machine and to wipe out the Romans?
Just the Germans, they're a waste of space, and like their bodies cooked crispy.
I like it when you show that you believe morals are absolute.
Wonderful that you like something. But what do you call "moral" here?
The comment was directed at Taz's apparent righteous indignation. So as much as Taz and people like Taz want to object to absolute morality and absolute truth, they demonstrate they believe in a universal right and wrong that everyone should know, understand, accept and follow.
Dirty Krautz thought that what they were doing was legit. Morals are subjectives.
You certainly don't act like morals are subjective. You only act like your beliefs that morals are subjective are subjective.
We'll never all agree on what's moral, that would make it subjective. Abortion and same sex marriage to name two that all of society will never agree on.
Nope. That makes human being subjective, dummy. No matter what the time, no matter what the issue, there were always people who believed that moral evils were wrong even when those in their societies thought it was right.
You demonstrate daily your belief in a universal right and wrong, despite your objections to the contrary.
See? you prove my point, you call abortion a universal moral evil, I don't.
In case of every abortion always a human being has to die. That's the universal component of all abortions. So how is abortion in general able to be compatible with the natural human rights? Are all abortions justifiable?
You see it one way, I see it another.
Btw, you're wrong. As usual.
What for heavens sake do you see with closed eyes? That light is an absurdity? To kill human beings is not a question of ideas, opinions or tolerance.
A fetus isn't a human being. Now you know.
When exactly starts a human being to be a human being in your view to the world? What are the very exact reasons for this in my eyes very absurde idea?
A fetus becomes a human being when it is born. Sort of like a caterpillar isn't a butterfly into it comes out of the cocoon.
That's not what every embryologist and embryology textbook says, dummy.
Again, no link. Now fuck out of my threads until you get a link, ok?
.
A butterfly begins as a caterpillar. A human begins as a fetus.
Not according to science. Did you even read the link?
The human being starts off as a fetus. The whole thing starts at conception. No problem there. What is it you're trying to get at?
It should be, yet so many deny it. Life began far back and life may continue, it is essentially immortal, while everything and everyone born dies. All this noise about decisions and consequences sounds very silly when it comes from so many who have thought so little.Meaning it should be obvious to everyone when life begins.Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong. Bigly!
That's true, life is a continuous unbroken chain. It is all connected.It should be, yet so many deny it. Life began far back and life may continue, it is essentially immortal, while everything and everyone born dies. All this noise about decisions and consequences sounds very silly when it comes from so many who have thought so little.Meaning it should be obvious to everyone when life begins.Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
.Of course it is a relevant distinction. At conception a new genetically distinct human being has come into existence. One that has never existed before and will never exist again..A genetically distinct new human life.Billions of years ago?Meaning it should be obvious to everyone when life begins.Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
.A genetically distinct new human life.
is that an appropriate distinction -
.
View attachment 464149
.
when Garden Earth is what is being ravished by those same caring "christians", or
.
View attachment 464150
.
the life of a lamb is not the same value in weight for the enduring Garden. where in fact, religious and secular have no distinctive difference for the same objective conclusion.
Would you end its life? Because it kind of sounds like you are arguing you would.
abortion is no different than all the other means for pregnancy intervention, bing proves the point by their own actions.
.Of course it is a relevant distinction. At conception a new genetically distinct human being has come into existence. One that has never existed before and will never exist again.
Would you end its life? Because it kind of sounds like you are arguing you would.
No new genetically distinct person died from a vasectomy or using birth control. So, no. It's not the same thing..Of course it is a relevant distinction. At conception a new genetically distinct human being has come into existence. One that has never existed before and will never exist again..A genetically distinct new human life.Billions of years ago?Meaning it should be obvious to everyone when life begins.Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
.A genetically distinct new human life.
is that an appropriate distinction -
.
View attachment 464149
.
when Garden Earth is what is being ravished by those same caring "christians", or
.
View attachment 464150
.
the life of a lamb is not the same value in weight for the enduring Garden. where in fact, religious and secular have no distinctive difference for the same objective conclusion.
Would you end its life? Because it kind of sounds like you are arguing you would.
abortion is no different than all the other means for pregnancy intervention, bing proves the point by their own actions..Of course it is a relevant distinction. At conception a new genetically distinct human being has come into existence. One that has never existed before and will never exist again.
Would you end its life? Because it kind of sounds like you are arguing you would.
having a vasectomy is the same decision as to end a pregnancy - they are both related to a physiological flaw that modern science has found multiple means to remedy -
as always the "christians" show no regard for Garden Earth and their rightful place than whatever suits their fancy they justify through their book of ambiguity for anything they please.
Do you believe abortion is moral?.Of course it is a relevant distinction. At conception a new genetically distinct human being has come into existence. One that has never existed before and will never exist again..A genetically distinct new human life.Billions of years ago?Meaning it should be obvious to everyone when life begins.Meaning, taking part of a post to make some kind of obscure point?It's pretty self evident, isn't it?A new edition starts with conception.
.A genetically distinct new human life.
is that an appropriate distinction -
.
View attachment 464149
.
when Garden Earth is what is being ravished by those same caring "christians", or
.
View attachment 464150
.
the life of a lamb is not the same value in weight for the enduring Garden. where in fact, religious and secular have no distinctive difference for the same objective conclusion.
Would you end its life? Because it kind of sounds like you are arguing you would.
abortion is no different than all the other means for pregnancy intervention, bing proves the point by their own actions..Of course it is a relevant distinction. At conception a new genetically distinct human being has come into existence. One that has never existed before and will never exist again.
Would you end its life? Because it kind of sounds like you are arguing you would.
having a vasectomy is the same decision as to end a pregnancy - they are both related to a physiological flaw that modern science has found multiple means to remedy -
as always the "christians" show no regard for Garden Earth and their rightful place than whatever suits their fancy they justify through their book of ambiguity for anything they please.