Case Against Former FBI Director James Comey Dismissed

The estimators aren't privy to the "books".

Properties like that have valuations based on how much money they can make. Which can only be seen by going through Trumps properties finances, which the banks didn't have.
They send adjusters out there to make sure it's worth what they are going to loan.
 
They send adjusters out there to make sure it's worth what they are going to loan.
That did not happen, it is a lie, and you can stop repeating it.

Trump lied to an accounting firm who prepared false statements that he affirmed, signed, and submitted to lenders and insurance companies under penalty of law.

Remember when you said, "break the law, go to jail."...? Were you just out of your medication, when you said that?
 
They have 6 months to refile.

Apparently they plan to chew that up with their dead end appeal.
Probably. In fact, as I said before I think Halligan cracked open a bottle of champagne when the case was dismissed like this because it saves her having to defend how she handled this case.
 
That did not happen, it is a lie, and you can stop repeating it.

Trump lied to an accounting firm who prepared false statements that he affirmed, signed, and submitted to lenders and insurance companies under penalty of law.

Remember when you said, "break the law, go to jail."...? Were you just out of your medication, when you said that?
No he didn't, if an institution lends money without double checking the value. Then they are as stupid as you
 
She did not avoid taxes or falsely claim two homes as her primary home and is not charged with that either, silly one....sheesh!

She had 1 primary home for tax purposes, and paid her taxes properly....there are no charges for anything illegal on that....

She is charged with getting a better mortgage rate....that saved her only +/- $600 a year, over the 30 year life of the mortgage....if she did lie on her mortgage app, (which she didn't.). Charges are never brought on anyone under her circumstances again from what I have read, therefore it is among other things, an illegal vindictive or selective prosecution.

And her niece that lived in her second home, doesn't pay her aunt rent....which her niece testified under oath in a previous grand jury brought in that failed to indict.....


So, why didn't the judge dismiss the indictment based on your [false] reading of the matter?

But rather dismissed it over a procedural matter and without prejudice, meaning she can be re-indicted on the same charges.
 
So, why didn't the judge dismiss the indictment based on your [false] reading of the matter?
Because they judge wasn't even allowed to hear the merits of the case, once it was determined the prosecutor had no right to be there at all.
 
Last edited:
ausuuzizizzizizz.webp
 
When those charges are brought, I'd rub it in your face, but you have no moral compass to feel shame.

There is a saying, "Wait and see".

The appeal has already been filed.

And it will fail.

The problem is this is a bullshit case, and the president should not be using the DOJ to wage personal vendettas.
 
Way to tell the entire world how little you understand how our government works.
Interesting observation albeit a freaking hilarious one at that.

You see, shit brains, the blob’s DOJ just demonstrated that THEY don’t know how our government works. Their case got kicked out of court....not mine.

Now run along junior.
Bad luck in front of Marxist judges, yet overall, Trump is winning the court battles.

Someone needs a whaaaaambulance.
 
And it will fail.

The problem is this is a bullshit case, and the president should not be using the DOJ to wage personal vendettas.
And with all the good advice you give, remember this when you come to power again.
 
Unless he is a Democrat, amiright?

Stupid ****.


They'll justify in their warped minds any Federal or state charges against anyone named Trump or connected to Trump (think the laughable RICO charges filed in Fulton County against 19 people).

That is proof of the ongoing Øbama Cult. I mean, they voted for the giggler, obviously high Kamala Harris because they were told to; no primaries, no convention discussion needed.
 
15th post
Actually, the Democrats followed due process and then some with Trump.


LOL

Some ~12 million pages of discovery in the Federal indictment in the D.C. matter (pure bullshit were those indictments). Then Jack Smith demanded the trial begin in a few months after indictment, and the leftoid judge said, well, maybe we'll wait three more months.

When so much discovery takes years for the defense to go through.

Oh, the smart ass leftoid judge said that Trump should have known! he was going to be indicted a year before and should have been preparing his defense case at that time. That is unheard of, and the judge cited no precedent for such a remark.



mean, kind of hard to deny Trump committed crimes when he did them on national TV.


Trump committed no crimes on national TV, that is an insane statement. Telling people to peacefully protest is no crime.
 
Actually, the Democrats followed due process and then some with Trump.

I mean, kind of hard to deny Trump committed crimes when he did them on national TV.
None of that is true. Obama took action to overthrow Trump.
 
It will be appealed and a real judge will hear the case.
The SOL has already lapsed on Comey's charges and I'm not sure why the same doesn't apply to L James as well since the media has reported the date of the alleged violation to have been in August 2020 and I was told that the SOL for this type of charge is 5 years, so the SOL should have already lapsed on the day she was charged with the offenses which was in October 2025.

Once the statute of limitations has lapsed nothing can be done unless they were tolled for some unknown reason.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom