Case Against Former FBI Director James Comey Dismissed

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

It was a shit ruling TBH. She was legally appointed, but the Senate screwed up by not getting that confirmation done. That rests on Thune's desk.

Honestly, it was not a shit ruling. Trump's administration is full of people who have not put in the work to earn the qualifications for many of the positions they hold. Halligan did not meet the qualifications to prosecute this case according to what has been alleged, in addition to making multiple grave errors in her handling of the case.

And then there is Kristi Noem who is the only person I have seen who openly impersonating a police officer/law enforcement officer without anyone charging her for doing so. She parades around where the vest that officers where which designates the wearer as Police (and ICE). She's not a police officer yet no one bats an eye.

A lot of people get a laugh out of her making it sound like it's no big deal by referring to it as cosplay or her playing dress-up but anyone else would be arrested and charged for that crap.

Just two cases in point of Trump's appointments playing at being grownups and doing a grown up job.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

When those charges are brought, I'd rub it in your face, but you have no moral compass to feel shame.

There is a saying, "Wait and see".

The appeal has already been filed.

Of course it has

 

[forkup]

Oh, nothing specific ... aside from rigging an election, destroying the lives of hundreds of people by crushing them under the full weight of a corrupt Justice Department, spying on Republican Senators and Congressmen for no reason, ignoring immigration laws and allowing over 12 MILLION illegal aliens into our sovereign land ...
You know, little things like that.

Yea your right it's nothing specific. Simply the MAGA's grievance party greatest hits.

So I'll ask again. What specific law do you imagine Democrats broke?

 

[jknowgood]

Afraid he did. He submitted false financial statements under penalty of law.

A mistomenor, an outdated one at that.

 

[JoeB131]

LOL

Some ~12 million pages of discovery in the Federal indictment in the D.C. matter (pure bullshit were those indictments). Then Jack Smith demanded the trial begin in a few months after indictment, and the leftoid judge said, well, maybe we'll wait three more months.

When so much discovery takes years for the defense to go through.

Oh, the smart ass leftoid judge said that Trump should have known! he was going to be indicted a year before and should have been preparing his defense case at that time. That is unheard of, and the judge cited no precedent for such a remark.

Why would we need "discovery"? Just roll the tape of Trump riling those assholes up, and then refusing to call them off after three hours.

Done.

It didn't take four years to convict the guys who stormed the Capitol. The guy who instigated it should have been dealt with just as promptly.

But because he was an Ex-President, kid gloves were used.

 

[postman]

A mistomenor, an outdated one at that.

Outdated?
You think cooking the books should be legal?

 

[Lockback]

Yea your right it's nothing specific. Simply the MAGA's grievance party greatest hits.

So I'll ask again. What specific law do you imagine Democrats broke?

I told you.
And the rage from what they've done to thousands of people hasn't dissipated.

 

[jknowgood]

Outdated?
You think cooking the books should be legal?

Im good with getting rid of the statue of limitations. That way we could put all of Biden's crooks in jail.

 

[Lockback]

Im good with getting rid of the statue of limitations. That way we could put all of Biden's crooks in jail.

I've never been totally comfortable with the statute of limitations. And nowadays, I'd like to see them eliminated forthwith because of Biden's group of thugs.

 

[forkup]

I told you.
And the rage from what they've done to thousands of people hasn't dissipated.

No you didn't, you mentioned a whole lot of things you THINK Democrats did and then pretended they somehow refer to laws that you don't care to mention.

And I don't doubt you are full of rage. I simply doubt you have a clue as to figuring out that rage is justified.

You are simply one of the many, many people who have decided that feelings are all you need to justify something.

 

[Lockback]

No you didn't, you mentioned a whole lot of things you THINK Democrats did and then pretended they somehow refer to laws that you don't care to mention.

And I don't doubt you are full of rage. I simply doubt you have a clue as to figuring out that rage is justified.

You are simply on of the many, many people who have decided that feelings are all you need to justify something.

Ironic coming from a leftist. All leftists know is feelings.
Democrat policies aren't based on logic. They're all about feelings, no matter how ******* stupid they are.

 

[forkup]

Ironic coming from a leftist. All leftists know is feelings.
Democrat policies aren't based on logic. They're all about feelings, no matter how ******* stupid they are.

When I get asked what laws are broken, I can show them and explain how they were broken. So no, it's not ironic.

Compare and contrast.

 

[Lockback]

When I get asked what laws are broken, I can show them and explain how they were broken. So no, it's not ironic.

Compare and contrast.

The Biden "Justice" Department was absolutely fantastic at breaking laws.

 

[forkup]

The Biden "Justice" Department was absolutely fantastic at breaking laws.

So, you say. That's coincidentally the only thing you're doing, saying they did.

 

[postman]

Im good with getting rid of the statue of limitations. That way we could put all of Biden's crooks in jail.

Be careful what you wish for. That would also subject Trump to criminal prosecution for his Epstein exploits.

 

[Lockback]

So, you say. That's coincidentally the only thing you're doing, saying they did.

You don't have a clue, do you?

 

[forkup]

You don't have a clue, do you?

I have plenty of clues, the biggest one being that no matter how many times I call you out to be specific, you resort to simply other claims. That's a big clue as to your ability to support your assertions.

 

[forkup]

Be careful what you wish for. That would also subject Trump to criminal prosecution for his Epstein exploits.

Or the Mar O Lago documents case.

 

[Lockback]

I have plenty of clues, the biggest one being that no matter how many times I call you out to be specific, you resort to simply other claims.

Here's another clue for you: you continue to defend the most corrupt President and Department of Justice in American history.

 

[postman]

You don't have a clue, do you?

You don't have a list, do you?

One with investigations started by Biden, and not at the behest of the NSA.