Case Against Former FBI Director James Comey Dismissed

[postman]

The lenders also have estimators go out and double checks. Or did you forget that?

The estimators aren't privy to the "books".

Properties like that have valuations based on how much money they can make. Which can only be seen by going through Trumps properties finances, which the banks didn't have.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No they know about it but just lie
Lenders determine what they will lend as to loan to value. They do not accept nor consider a borrower estimation. Inconvenient fact reality for lying lib loons

Which didn't happen here. The lender accepted financial statements from the borrower that were prepared by an accounting firm.

 

[forkup]

All relevant. Thank you!

But I did hear some lawyers say that the trial judge would make that decision....

AND say it is possible....

that because Lindsey Halligan never held the prosecutor position legally, and did not have another prosecutor with her that was legitimate, the case and the indictment, actually never legally existed....there never was legally a case brought....

It wasn't like the prosecutor brought an indictment, and they made a mistake or two with the grand jury so the case was dismissed.... They said this was not a technical, or paperwork, or procedural error....which would give the extension of 6 months to indict after the dismissal....

But that this was a case where those kind of mistakes were not even looked at, this dismissal was because it could not be considered as a legal indictment in the first place, because she was NOT legally in a prosecutor position.

Now, because of this, the legal beagles said ....the law we were going over, may not be able to be utilized to give them a 6 month extension on limitation....because of Halligan's illegal appointment, the case was never legally brought....

Hmmmm??? Worth considering imho! Anyway, that is likely Comey's legal team's argument.

Then, there is Trump appealing her illegal appointment ruling to the SC, and with them...ya never know....

It's actually a point of contention that the case could be filed again. I personally think it can because of how the statute is written but it can go either way.

My larger point is though that in the end it doesn't really matter. Because I find it hard to believe they'll find another prosecutor to refile in the Comey case. They literally had to specially appoint a US attorney who was stupid enough to do so in the first place. And I think the chances that they can get one that's either senate confirmed or appointed by the district court to repeat this shit isn't very good.

If they do, they'll have a hard time finding a prosecutor to be counsel of record. Considering they had to import one from another state to do so here. And it won't be helped by this saga I'll tell you that much. Prosecutors in general don't like to bring this kind of controversial cases if for no other reason than protecting their credibility with the court.

If they get that done they'll have to deal with many of the motions that will undoubtably be filed again but weren't ruled on now. And they are serious.

Then if by some miracle they succeed they now can make a case in court in front of a jury that has to unanimously decide that Comey is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, when the original facts presented barely got a majority to indict on a probable cause standard.

So regardless of what happens Comey will almost certainly not be convicted of anything.

 

[struth]

For real estate? Nope. For individual appraisals, for example, they post the job with a vendor. The appraiser picks up the job and is in no way affiliated with the lender.

By design.

You should probably just shut up and read, you will learn something.

Yes for real estate you poor bastard

 

[WEATHER53]

For real estate? Nope. For individual appraisals, for example, they post the job with a vendor. The appraiser picks up the job and is in no way affiliated with the lender.

By design.

You should probably just shut up and read, you will learn something.Lending institutions have many staff appraisers. There is no required distancing because the appraiser is looking out for the Bank and not the borrower

You are a kid with the week off babbling in about things you are absolutely not versed in.

 

[postman]

No they know about it but just lie
Lenders determine what they will lend as to loan to value. They do not accept nor consider a borrower estimation. Inconvenient fact reality for lying lib loons

The value of a property based on just brick and mortar is a fraction of what the property is actually worth.

Hence where you have to take the owners word how much money the property makes.

Think of it like a restaurant. It's value is based on it's customers, zoning laws, and the like.

 

[WEATHER53]

You are a kid with the week off babbling in about things you are absolutely not versed in.

Lenders have staff appraisers. There is No distancing requirement because appraiser are allowed to work for the banks best interest with no obligation to the borrower. The borrower estimate of property value is not considered

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You are a kid with the week off babbling in about things you are absolutely not versed in.

You should shut up and listen, as i work in the industry, and your knowledge is confined to whatever the paid liar on Newsmax said 5 minutes ago.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Lenders have staff appraisers.

Tell us you have never bought a house without saying you have never bought a house.

 

[struth]

It does. It's called "tolling", and it occurs when the accuses flees the jurisdiction of the crime.

657. Tolling of Statute of Limitations

This is archived content from the U.S. Department of Justice website. The information here may be outdated and links may no longer function. Please contact webmaster@usdoj.gov if you have any questions about the archive site.

www.justice.gov

The running of statutes of limitations is tolled during periods of fugitivity. 18 U.S.C. § 3290.

I know what tolling is, but don’t tolling only applied after the person is charged

Try again dembot

All you have done is provide evidence that you are dumb

 

[WEATHER53]

The value of a property based on just brick and mortar is a fraction of what the property is actually worth.

Hence where you have to take the owners word how much money the property makes.

Think of it like a restaurant. It's value is based on it's customers, zoning laws, and the like.

They would get tax returns as to gross and net and not merely the borrowers comments

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Basically James overwhelmed Trump and his lawyers with mountains of evidence, all signed by Trump.

It was so overwhelming, that the judge decided to save the time of the courts and the money of the taxpayers by issuing a summary judgment that Trump had committed fraud for decades.

It was so overwhelming, that Trump basically admitted to all of it publicly and said he was protected by a nonexistent disclaimer that his financial statements should not be trusted.

Which was hilarious. Just give the fat rapist rope, and he will always hang himself.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Er...thread is about COmey guys.

 

[WEATHER53]

Tell us you have never bought a house without saying you have never bought a house.

I’ve owned and sold so much real estate that I’m a circuit and district court expert witness
You are a kid who presents feeling and fart throwing wishes as reality when you are clueless
Walk into a bank tomorrow with your own written estimate on something you want to buy and see what they say and do.
Oops you can’t-you are a minor

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Er...thread is about COmey guys.

Indeed. But that case is dead. So I'm bored.

 

[Marener]

The borrower estimate of property value is not considered

It was for the loans Trump took out.

Is Trump legally required to be truthful on his financial statements?

 

[forkup]

It was for the loans Trump took out.

Is Trump legally required to be truthful on his financial statements?

Lol don't expect a straight answer here. According to these jokers Trump isn't even required to qualify as human. They'll support him no matter what he does, or the law says. It's that simple.

 

[jknowgood]

Because Letitia James went the civil suit route for maximum pain and punishment.

She had it out for Trump, for political reasons only. Got it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's actually a point of contention that the case could be filed again. I personally think it can because of how the statute is written but it can go either way.

My larger point is though that in the end it doesn't really matter. Because I find it hard to believe they'll find another prosecutor to refile in the Comey case. They literally had to specially appoint a US attorney who was stupid enough to do so in the first place. And I think the chances that they can get one that's either senate confirmed or appointed by the district court to repeat this shit isn't very good.

If they do, they'll have a hard time finding a prosecutor to be counsel of record. Considering they had to import one from another state to do so here. And it won't be helped by this saga I'll tell you that much. Prosecutors in general don't like to bring this kind of controversial cases if for no other reason than protecting their credibility with the court.

If they get that done they'll have to deal with many of the motions that will undoubtably be filed again but weren't ruled on now. And they are serious.

Then if by some miracle they succeed they now can make a case in court in front of a jury that has to unanimously decide that Comey is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, when the original facts presented barely got a majority to indict on a probable cause standard.

So regardless of what happens Comey will almost certainly not be convicted of anything.

They have 6 months to refile.

Apparently they plan to chew that up with their dead end appeal.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She had it out for Trump, for political reasons only. Got it.

Too bad the fat rapist committed decades of fraud, else he would have had less to worry about.