Case Against Former FBI Director James Comey Dismissed

Why would it die pretrial?

Why would a Judge expect a prosecutor to present all their evidence to a grand jury? Why would they even ask?

What evidence that was presented was privleged? and why does it matter? The issue would be at trial if the evidence is admissible

Incorrect.

"The issue would be at trial if the evidence is admissible"

Evidence admissibility is address pre-trial. Not at trial before a jury.

WW
 
No, they caught him red handed.

The only reason he was not convicted was because the Supreme Court gave him a get out of jail free card.

He was dead to rights guilty.He even bragged about it.

It failed and tarnished the reputation of the FBI.
 
you can object at trial to evidence.

I didn't say you couldn't.

What I said is the admissibility of evidence at trial was handled via pre-trial motions. The defense can then object at trial to preserver the point on appeal, but the admissibility question is handled pre-trial before a jury is seated.

We don't have ambush court proceedings in this county, such issues are dealt with in advance.

WW
 
I didn't say you couldn't.

What I said is the admissibility of evidence at trial was handled via pre-trial motions. The defense can then object at trial to preserver the point on appeal, but the admissibility question is handled pre-trial before a jury is seated.

We don't have ambush court proceedings in this county, such issues are dealt with in advance.

WW
You can object at trial and a judge can rule evidence is not admissible at trial. You can also do pre-trial motions, you are correct, but you can also do it at trial.
 
Different prosecutor or it's approved on appeal.
Different prosecutor? Uh, Trump had to illegally point an incompetent, corrupt hack even to bring the indictment. He can't do that again.

And he had to do so because no experienced prosecutor would bring the case.

So how do you figure he will be getting someone through confirmation that would bring the case?

Dream on.

Appeal? Of a technical ruling with a single aspect? There is nothing to appeal.
 
She turned outdated mistomenors into felonies.
Two lies. Trump turned them into felonies by doing them to cover up other crimes. So says the letter of the law, not Letitia James.

And the fat rapist was kind enough to pause the clock by moving out of New York.

More regurgitated babble from you that you don't even understand.
 
Different prosecutor? Uh, Trump had to illegally point an incompetent, corrupt hack even to bring the indictment. He can't do that again.

And he had to do so because no experienced prosecutor would bring the case.

So how do you figure he will be getting someone through confirmation that would bring the case?

Dream on.

Appeal? Of a technical ruling with a single aspect? There is nothing to appeal.
Watch.
 
15th post
Two lies. Trump turned them into felonies by doing them to cover up other crimes. So says the letter of the law, not Letitia James.

And the fat rapist was kind enough to pause the clock by moving out of New York.

More regurgitated babble from you that you don't even understand.
Every lender was happy with Trump and said they would business with him again.
 
Every lender was happy with Trump and said they would business with him again.
Another lie.

Only one man said that, and he was a FORMER employee of Deutsche Bank.

Yet Deutsche Bank released a public statement that they would no longer do business with Trump or any of his businesses.

Are you starting to notice a pattern yet, liar? You are a victim of predatory liars who fill your head with lies, turning you into a liar.
 
Trump didn't break the law, but James did trying to lock him up
James
Another lie.

Only one man said that, and he was a FORMER employee of Deutsche Bank.

Yet Deutsche Bank released a public statement that they would no longer do business with Trump or any of his businesses.

Are you starting to notice a pattern yet, liar? You are a victim of predatory liars who fill your head with lies, turning you into a liar.
The bank sent a representative to court to testify

And I get said he was a great customer they’d do business with again
 
Another lie.

Only one man said that, and he was a FORMER employee of Deutsche Bank.

Yet Deutsche Bank released a public statement that they would no longer do business with Trump or any of his businesses.

Are you starting to notice a pattern yet, liar? You are a victim of predatory liars who fill your head with lies, turning you into a liar.
James said Mark a largo was worth 10 million. Not even close to what it's worth.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom