- Thread starter
- #21
Your analysis is salary. Not total compensation.No they aren't.
View attachment 656580
Chief Executives
www.bls.gov
Median CEO makes less than $200K
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your analysis is salary. Not total compensation.No they aren't.
View attachment 656580
Chief Executives
www.bls.gov
Median CEO makes less than $200K
Name a better system? I fully support helping the poor and taxing the rich more to pay for improvements in society.
Appreciate the comment but it’s really only held by top 10%. 90% of America doesn’t have meaningful capital in savings.
We are in a current situation where the workers at the bottom cannot get a raise of share in the economy without those in power taking it back from them.
***Mod Comment - Need to provide links to back up statements made as facts. That's in the forum rules.***
- The rising wages at the bottom are seen as an evil trend destabilizing the economy
- Company profit margins being higher than ever (basically rising wages at the top) is seen as economically healthy and good
- Companies have raised prices to protect profit margins to historical highs during supply issues taking advantage of shortages in the marketplace is seen as good
- The Uber wealthy continue to accumulate wealth in tough pandemic times and good times (pre and post pandemic) and no one cares
- The answer from those in power will be to raise interest rates, slow the economy to create unemployment hurting the bottom, again
- Tax rates on workers and capital continue to favor capital owners
- Unrealized wealth is only accumulated by the top - hell wealth is only accumulated at the top where top 10% own 89% of the wealth
- CEOs are making a historical multiplier over their workers salary, north of 270X’s
I owe my livelihood to capitalism and make top 1% money but it is the systemic exploitation of the bottom through very powerful controls of capital at the top. There needs to be a more balanced playing field.
How can people who work with their way through life get the same breaks as those who own their way through life? No one wants to take shit away… they want a fair shake.
View attachment 656573
No it doesn’t. Do you think a goal of capitalism should be a large healthy middle class? Ours is shrinking. It’s not capitalism here that is the problem as much as it is the way it’s applied and people are favored.Facts are facts. 2 million illegals a year with nothing but the shirts on their backs flock to America for a better life. Which proves your OP is bullshit.
As long as you get to define "even", eh?Nothing wrong with Capitalism if it is an even playing field.
No doubt there are taxes. They just aren’t equivalent to money earned laboring. All they money you earned.. if it met holding over a certain time was taxes at much lower rates than if you labored for the money.
I’m looking for intelligent discussion. If you don’t have any that’s fine. I’m not impressed with your admission that you don’t have one.
No it doesn’t. Do you think a goal of capitalism should be a large healthy middle class? Ours is shrinking. It’s not capitalism here that is the problem as much as it is the way it’s applied and people are favored.
Savings being a general term. The median (the person in the middle) has $5,300 saved. Only 65% have a 401K for retirement sitting at $30k.Savings? Saving is generally counted as just savings accounts, which is a dumb place to keep your money.
Lot of people have significant money in mutual funds retirement accounts.
Except for cases of fraud, they're paid the wage they agree to work for. And in agreeing to that wage, they are setting the value of their labor. This is the truest measure. The marxist idea that labor has some kind of intrinsic value is nonsense.What you are describing is exactly what I pointed out. People are not paid by what you think their labor is worth, people are paid by what an employer considers their labor worth.
Why can’t the answer be that regardless of how you earn your money it’s treated the same? Whether you build a fence or loan money to someone to build a fence, or own the store that sold the fence pieces your earnings are taxed and treated the same? That’s just a start.What you are describing is exactly what I pointed out. People are not paid by what you think their labor is worth, people are paid by what an employer considers their labor worth. What you want is an all government system that pays people what you want them to get paid which has never happened in the existence of our country. So why not move if there are already countries to your liking instead of ruining this country?
And Socialism exists when you can't find baby formula you fucking hypocriteWe are in a current situation where the workers at the bottom cannot get a raise of share in the economy without those in power taking it back from them.
***Mod Comment - Need to provide links to back up statements made as facts. That's in the forum rules.***
- The rising wages at the bottom are seen as an evil trend destabilizing the economy
- Company profit margins being higher than ever (basically rising wages at the top) is seen as economically healthy and good
- Companies have raised prices to protect profit margins to historical highs during supply issues taking advantage of shortages in the marketplace is seen as good
- The Uber wealthy continue to accumulate wealth in tough pandemic times and good times (pre and post pandemic) and no one cares
- The answer from those in power will be to raise interest rates, slow the economy to create unemployment hurting the bottom, again
- Tax rates on workers and capital continue to favor capital owners
- Unrealized wealth is only accumulated by the top - hell wealth is only accumulated at the top where top 10% own 89% of the wealth
- CEOs are making a historical multiplier over their workers salary, north of 270X’s
I owe my livelihood to capitalism and make top 1% money but it is the systemic exploitation of the bottom through very powerful controls of capital at the top. There needs to be a more balanced playing field.
How can people who work with their way through life get the same breaks as those who own their way through life? No one wants to take shit away… they want a fair shake.
View attachment 656573
No it doesn’t. Do you think a goal of capitalism should be a large healthy middle class? Ours is shrinking. It’s not capitalism here that is the problem as much as it is the way it’s applied and people are favored.
Well.. since the top 10% own 89% of all wealth it’s still lopsided. But taxes are only a piece. There is still the tax rate differences on how you earn your money and unrealized profits that a laborer can’t hide.The top 1% pay over 25% of all collected federal income taxes in this country. The top 20% pay 80%. How much higher do you want to tax them?
If the federal tax rate were 0%, the federal government would collect no money. If the federal tax rate were 100%, the federal government would still collect no money because who would be stupid enough to create wealth?
You mean like back in the day when America was great and union membership was strong?How about better employee protection on employment to move negotiating power to the worker? Improve the workers ability to negotiate higher wages.
Savings being a general term. The median (the person in the middle) has $5,300 saved. Only 65% have a 401K for retirement sitting at $30k.
I have a way better job than you and likely make 10Xs what you did last year. This isn’t envy. It’s a discussion in equity. I worked hard for my job. I don’t want to be at par with those who don’t work hard. I just think the rules favor those in power. We need more balanced rules.And Socialism exists when you can't find baby formula you fucking hypocrite
Capitalism failed you. You on break now from the freeway exit with your will work for food sign?