Cancer

[rupol2000]

It is clear that they are hiding something about cancer, there is no clarity there.

It seems Mullis wrote that chemotherapy is quackery

It can be assumed that in some cases it is simply an instrument of genocide. The same was written about the treatment of HIV and Hepatitis - that they simply kill people with toxic substances.


There was a study on cancer cells, it revealed that the cancer cell goes to a completely anaerobic metabolism. However, there are already so many anaerobic tissues in the body, in particular, part of the muscle tissue is weakly aerobic.

This is very suspicious.

They constantly promote oxygen, although it is known that oxygen metabolism is the main cause of aging and destruction.

 

[rupol2000]

A well-known artist in Russia, Zhanna Friske, died of cancer. She had previously been treated for birthproblems with stem cells, and after giving birth she was diagnosed with cancer. Everything that happened to her after that was the result of anti-cancer therapy. And she died quickly.

There could be something not clean here. Zhanna was the last frankly beautiful woman among famous singers on the Russian stage. Before her there were many brilliant women, after her there is not a single one.

Prior to that, she was in excellent shape and nothing foreshadowed trouble. She was not so young, and now there are few women who at her age would have such an appearance and athletic shape as she was in her 40s.

 

[rupol2000]

I strongly doubt that such a healthy and naturally gifted person can suddenly fall ill and die without someone's help.
at 40 now most women in russia looks like old women

 

[Colin norris]

It is clear that they are hiding something about cancer, there is no clarity there.

Like what? Some monstrous conspiracy?
Where does God enter this rubbish you post.

It seems Mullis wrote that chemotherapy is quackery

And what qualifications does he have to ascertain test?

It can be assumed that in some cases it is simply an instrument of genocide.

what a load of superstitious rubbish. This is the vaccine crap all over again.

The same was written about the treatment of HIV and Hepatitis - that they simply kill people with toxic substances.

That is a blatant lie you brain dead scaremongering ignorant fool

There was a study on cancer cells, it revealed that the cancer cell goes to a completely anaerobic metabolism. However, there are already so many anaerobic tissues in the body, in particular, part of the muscle tissue is weakly aerobic.

This is very suspicious.

Youre suspicions are completely unfounded.

They constantly promote oxygen, although it is known that oxygen metabolism is the main cause of aging and destruction.

Is it really? Well known amongst idiots like you.
Perhaps you need to disclose your expertise to the medical world.

 

[rupol2000]

Now 99% of 20-year-olds do not have the health and shape of Zhanna

 

[Colin norris]

Now 99% of 20-year-olds do not have the health and shape of Zhanna

That doesn't prove there is a conspiracy. You are raving mad. You need medication.

 

[rupol2000]

And what qualifications does he have to ascertain test?

Nobel laureate, scientist specialist in biochemistry

 

[rupol2000]

Is it really?

Yes, it has been proven and no one denies it in science. That's the reason fools like you are advised to eat antioxidants.

 

[Colin norris]

Nobel laureate, scientist specialist in biochemistry

Here's a link to exactly who she was and she was none of those. Where do you generate your lies and why do you do it? Do you have an inferiority complex?
you are a liar.

Jeanna Friske - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[rupol2000]

And the case of Zhanna exactly coincides with the mass left-wing coup in 14, when they introduced censorship and same-sex marriage, raised the retirement age, hit oil prices, organized Maidan in Ukraine, and so on. Obviously, they perceive Zhanna as a female icon of the right world in Russia.

 

[Colin norris]

And the case of Zhanna exactly coincides with the mass left-wing coup in 14, when they introduced censorship and same-sex marriage, raised the retirement age, hit oil prices, organized Maidan in Ukraine, and so on. Obviously, they perceive Zhanna as a female icon of the right world in Russia.

What a load of rubbish. She was just a club singing whore. Grow up you fool. Youre deluded with paranoia.

 

[rupol2000]

Colin norris
You asked about Mullis, you fucking cretin.

Fuck off, I don't care about your stupidity

 

[WinterBorn]

I know several people who are alive because of chemo. The side effects can be rough, but it is still the best treatment for potentially lethal cancers.

 

[rupol2000]

Can you imagine this: a woman of about 40 years old brilliantly performs under the dome of the circus at the level of a professional circus acrobat, despite the fact that she is not an acrobat and this is not her profession, and the next year she dies of illness? How likely is that given that they claim that cancer is the result of a weak immune system?

 

[JohnDB]

Oh there's a LOT of research into cancer...
A lot of gains have been made in Cancer research. Problems abound from those answers.

Cancer rates have a directly proportional rate with industrial manufacturing and petroleum refinement. IOW as pollution increases in an area so does cancer rates.

Where the real trouble lies is that as the population increases so does the need for industrialization.
Even small cities of 20,000 can create enough pollution that the residents will see a massive spike in cancer rates.

Then, where most cancers are treatable, that doesn't mean that your insurance will pay for the most effective treatment. Your insurance provider will only pay for the most cost effective treatment. Meaning that usually there's more than one way to treat cancer but your insurance will usually pay for the cheapest (and usually least effective) therapies available. Decreasing your chances of survival.

On top of this...
Most people don't get regular screenings for cancer. These screenings are usually fairly invasive and uncomfortable for early detection. (Colonoscopy is just one of many)

The causes of cancer are many and varied. Some are from bacteria. Some are from viruses. Others are from chemical pollutants. But some people are more resistant to cancer than others.

Cancer is a slow killer. Not pretty or fun. It's coming for most of us unless you die of something else.

 

[rupol2000]

I know several people who are alive because of chemo. The side effects can be rough, but it is still the best treatment for potentially lethal cancers.

Mullis wrote that this is a lie. He didn't see any connection between cancer and chemo

 

[WinterBorn]

Can you imagine this: a woman of about 40 years old brilliantly performs under the dome of the circus at the level of a professional circus acrobat, despite the fact that she is not an acrobat and this is not her profession, and the next year she dies of illness? How likely is that given that they claim that cancer is the result of a weak immune system?

Yes, I can imagine that. My girlfriend was a cyclist and a fitness buff. She was also very careful about her nutrition. And she still got breast cancer. Early detection and chemo were what saved her life.

 

[rupol2000]

Oh there's a LOT of research into cancer...
A lot of gains have been made in Cancer research. Problems abound from those answers.

Cancer rates have a directly proportional rate with industrial manufacturing and petroleum refinement. IOW as pollution increases in an area so does cancer rates.

Where the real trouble lies is that as the population increases so does the need for industrialization.
Even small cities of 20,000 can create enough pollution that the residents will see a massive spike in cancer rates.

Then, where most cancers are treatable, that doesn't mean that your insurance will pay for the most effective treatment. Your insurance provider will only pay for the most cost effective treatment. Meaning that usually there's more than one way to treat cancer but your insurance will usually pay for the cheapest (and usually least effective) therapies available. Decreasing your chances of survival.

On top of this...
Most people don't get regular screenings for cancer. These screenings are usually fairly invasive and uncomfortable for early detection. (Colonoscopy is just one of many)

The causes of cancer are many and varied. Some are from bacteria. Some are from viruses. Others are from chemical pollutants. But some people are more resistant to cancer than others.

Cancer is a slow killer. Not pretty or fun. It's coming for most of us unless you die of something else.

Everyone has heard all this nonsense, they constantly repeat mantras, but the layman does not even know what it is - cancer

 

[JohnDB]

I know several people who are alive because of chemo. The side effects can be rough, but it is still the best treatment for potentially lethal cancers.

Its amazing to me how much has changed.
Leukemia used to be a 50/50 death sentence. Meaning you had even odds of dying. Now it's get a prescription and go back to work.

It's nothing to worry about these days.

 

[WinterBorn]

Oh there's a LOT of research into cancer...
A lot of gains have been made in Cancer research. Problems abound from those answers.

Cancer rates have a directly proportional rate with industrial manufacturing and petroleum refinement. IOW as pollution increases in an area so does cancer rates.

Where the real trouble lies is that as the population increases so does the need for industrialization.
Even small cities of 20,000 can create enough pollution that the residents will see a massive spike in cancer rates.

Then, where most cancers are treatable, that doesn't mean that your insurance will pay for the most effective treatment. Your insurance provider will only pay for the most cost effective treatment. Meaning that usually there's more than one way to treat cancer but your insurance will usually pay for the cheapest (and usually least effective) therapies available. Decreasing your chances of survival.

On top of this...
Most people don't get regular screenings for cancer. These screenings are usually fairly invasive and uncomfortable for early detection. (Colonoscopy is just one of many)

The causes of cancer are many and varied. Some are from bacteria. Some are from viruses. Others are from chemical pollutants. But some people are more resistant to cancer than others.

Cancer is a slow killer. Not pretty or fun. It's coming for most of us unless you die of something else.

Part of the problem is that people without medical training are quick to believe "cancer" is one single ailment, that attacks different parts of the body. Cancer is a myriad of different ailments that all involve mutated cells that reproduce rapidly.