Canada Now Considering Allowing Euthanasia For Children Without Parental Consent

johngaltshrugged

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2020
6,714
15,352
2,288
This is one way the evil puppet masters advance the ball (true agenda) down the field:
The Conditioning Phase:
Publish a paper on an idea that is utterly outrageous to anyone with a functioning brain & a conscience in a respected scientific journal.
Have a minion float out this deranged plan as a reasonable proposition that merits discussion.
Have other minions come to their defense with flowery language designed to fool the low-info/IQ, who start to consider the insane idea as acceptable.
Soon it is picked up further & amplified by the everyday progbots that rarely bother to think for themselves, they just parrot what Pravda tells them.
Use social media & the corrupted/snowglobed apparatus (politicians, experts, influencers, law enforcement/courts) to demonize dissent & attack anyone pointing out how truly insane an idea is by calling them racists, phobes, Putin lovers, insurrectionists, terrorists, haters, science deniers, etc...Use the
Gaslight the people into believing the majority now favor this horrific plan to drive the herd in the same direction, as most don't have the backbone to stand against the tide.

Implementation Phase:
Now that the politicians have the cover they need to put forth the plans as ordered by their masters, they give this legislation a name the sheeple will buy even when it does the exact opposite of the title.
Use the corrupted apparatus to pass this insane policy & law enforcement orders to intimidate/arrest anyone that won't play ball. Finally, send them to kangaroo courts, convict them on bogus grounds & amplify with big headlines to scare the rest of the people into compliance

Now that assisted suicide (murder) is the law in Canada & it is the world leader in this barbaric practice, the next step is coming after the kids.
"Experts" in Canada are saying a "mature" minor should have the right to choose suicide & that the parent's need not be informed.
The politicians are now considering legislation to encode the murder of your troubled child.

If, however, a capable [legally underage] patient explicitly indicates that they do not want their family members involved in their decision-making, although healthcare providers may encourage the patient to reconsider and involve their family, ultimately the wishes of capable patients with respect to confidentiality must be respected. If we regard MAID as practically and ethically equivalent to other medical decisions that result in the end of life, then confidentiality regarding MAID should be managed in this same way.


Euthanasia is now expanding to minors​

In 2018, a U.K. medical journal promoted the so-called “ethics” of child euthanasia without parental consent. In 2017, British authorities assumed ownership over an infant named Charlie Gard, a healthy infant who was born with a rare and severe genetic disorder. Even though the parents raised money for an experimental treatment overseas, and a doctor was willing to help, the British authorities essentially abducted little Charlie from his parents and held the infant against the parent’s will. The British authorities sought to terminate the boy’s life, claiming little Charlie should “die with dignity.” The European courts ruled that Charlie should be removed from life support, and denied treatment. He died at 11 months.
This case has influenced a Canadian parliamentary committee to decide whether to pass a new law than enables Canadian authorities to abduct children and kill them “ethically” without any input from the parents.
In the C-7 law, lawmakers created a provision that opens the door for minors to be euthanized. C-7 calls for a “comprehensive review of the provisions of the Criminal Code relating to medical assistance in dying and their application, including but not limited to issues relating to MATURE MINORS….” According to Canada’s Department of Justice, “parents are generally ‘entitled to make treatment decisions on their children’s behalf.”
“The mature minor doctrine, however, allows children deemed sufficiently mature to make their own treatment decisions.” Right now, Canada is seeking to expand euthanasia to include “mature minors” while stopping any family member from intervening, while revoking parental rights.


The NWO is a child death cult & anyone that supports this is just as evil as these insane criminals driving us into a depopulation reset
 
The same th8ng happened in the Netherlands. This is why I do not support euthanasia. It starts out with the best of intentions and always ends with wholesale slaughter.
Who says it starts off with the best intentions?

Perhaps people first embrace it with the best intentions.
 
This is a major reason why you do not support a socialized medical care system.

Then the government gets to decide who lives or dies based upon "quality of life" conditions arbitrarily set by an unconcerned writer who is only worried about budgets and costs.
Once "quality of life" conditions are codified...then they can be moved by interpretation or just outright changed.

How about allowing God to make such choices instead of anyone else.
 
This is a major reason why you do not support a socialized medical care system.

Then the government gets to decide who lives or dies based upon "quality of life" conditions arbitrarily set by an unconcerned writer who is only worried about budgets and costs.
Once "quality of life" conditions are codified...then they can be moved by interpretation or just outright changed.

How about allowing God to make such choices instead of anyone else.
Nonsense

Socialist countries like Cuba and Venezuela and North Korea all have people flocking there to get free health care.

:auiqs.jpg:
 
The same th8ng happened in the Netherlands. This is why I do not support euthanasia. It starts out with the best of intentions and always ends with wholesale slaughter.
I have previously been put off by these stories which come out from time to time and basically seem like murder. However today I started wondering if this was the same sort of thing where people call 2 week old fetus's 'kids' and I am not sure that is not the case. Euthanasia is illegal in the UK even for people who have a disease which they will die of and which is causing them on going pain and lack of dignity. Illegal. The only way to do it is to go over to Europe. So Euthanasia for babies cannot be being carried out in the UK. There have though been some instances where parents are losing their babies and cannot cope with it. They instead use their crowdfunding money to take their baby here and there causing that baby pain and discomfort. While everyone accepts that parents find it unbearable to lose their babies, the well being of the baby has also to be taken into consideration and where there is no hope for the baby, where they are kept alive artificially and are living in pain, the sane and loving way is to let them go.
 
I have previously been put off by these stories which come out from time to time and basically seem like murder. However today I started wondering if this was the same sort of thing where people call 2 week old fetus's 'kids' and I am not sure that is not the case. Euthanasia is illegal in the UK even for people who have a disease which they will die of and which is causing them on going pain and lack of dignity. Illegal. The only way to do it is to go over to Europe. So Euthanasia for babies cannot be being carried out in the UK. There have though been some instances where parents are losing their babies and cannot cope with it. They instead use their crowdfunding money to take their baby here and there causing that baby pain and discomfort. While everyone accepts that parents find it unbearable to lose their babies, the well being of the baby has also to be taken into consideration and where there is no hope for the baby, where they are kept alive artificially and are living in pain, the sane and loving way is to let them go.
Doctor Alexa has spoken.

Did you inform God this as well?

And to think we can't so much as call a woman a woman without first consulting a biologist, but we can make the decision to end other peoples lives.
 
I have previously been put off by these stories which come out from time to time and basically seem like murder. However today I started wondering if this was the same sort of thing where people call 2 week old fetus's 'kids' and I am not sure that is not the case. Euthanasia is illegal in the UK even for people who have a disease which they will die of and which is causing them on going pain and lack of dignity. Illegal. The only way to do it is to go over to Europe. So Euthanasia for babies cannot be being carried out in the UK. There have though been some instances where parents are losing their babies and cannot cope with it. They instead use their crowdfunding money to take their baby here and there causing that baby pain and discomfort. While everyone accepts that parents find it unbearable to lose their babies, the well being of the baby has also to be taken into consideration and where there is no hope for the baby, where they are kept alive artificially and are living in pain, the sane and loving way is to let them go.
That's the way it starts out. End the suffering of those with no hope, in unbearable pain. It never stays there. In the Netherlands four people had to hold a woman down as she screamed for her life. She was euthanized by those who felt she had nothing to live for. It ceases to be euthanasia and becomes execution.
 
That's the way it starts out. End the suffering of those with no hope, in unbearable pain. It never stays there. In the Netherlands four people had to hold a woman down as she screamed for her life. She was euthanized by those who felt she had nothing to live for. It ceases to be euthanasia and becomes execution.
I have heard that one. She had written that she wanted Euthanasia if she had to be taken into care and developed Altheimer's and was I think going into or had already gone into care. She didn't want it and fought against it. I did not agree with that and was surprised when the court ruled it was right. They ruled that she had made clear when she was in command of her faculties that in this sort of situation she wanted Euthanasia. I would say it needed to go with what she felt now even if she said that before. However I am very strick and have not yet supported it.

However there is no Euthanasia in the UK and that article was assuming there was. We can now keep people alive almost indefinitely and particularly with babies if the parents aren't willing to accept that it is over then a court must. It always takes time for parents to accept something like that.

I do also approve of people being able to end their lives when they have a life ending illness which causes pain but I think the UK has that best. No Euthanasia in the UK but family can take people over to Europe without comeback.
 
Last edited:
We have 1 collectivist on here arguing the "greater good" BS as if they know what is best for all.
The state has no authority to end an innocent life no matter the age & arguing otherwise makes you pro-murder.
Period

Of course, the baby butchering death cult can never acknowledge something that should be such obvious common sense based on acceptable standards of decency & morality
 

Forum List

Back
Top