Can someone show where the Constitution requires the Senate to conduct an impeachment investigation?

[JGalt]

Then at the last minute and before the Senate trial starts, the Democrats drag out this halfwit idiot Lev Parnas, thinking he's the one going to finally put the screws to President Trump.

Parnas has as little credibility as that stupid bitch Blasey Ford had, during the Kavanaugh hearing.

 

[bripat9643]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

 

[BULLDOG]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

What has "already been found"? The House hasn't even presented a valid reason or evidence enough for an impeachment. Why the hell do you think Schumer, Schiff, and Nadler are digging so hard for more?

Dumb question.

 

[Nostra]

Then at the last minute and before the Senate trial starts, the Democrats drag out this halfwit idiot Lev Parnas, thinking he's the one going to finally put the screws to President Trump.

Parnas has as little credibility as that stupid bitch Blasey Ford had, during the Kavanaugh hearing.

And now Schifferbrains has been caught lying about evidence Parnas supposedly had.

 

[Maxdeath]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

You mean like all the idiots that assured everyone that the Steele dossier was going to get Trump out of the White House. Perhaps when you and other idiots were yammering that Mueller would be arresting Trump in the White House. Like when everyone was jumping on Stormy Daniels as being the nail in his coffin. All the other pretend we got him now.
Sorry if most sane people just see this as nothing but another failed we have him now moment. Everyone has heard the Dems yelling that they needed to impeach Trump before he even sat in the Oval Office. One even stated it more succinctly. We must impeach him before he is reelected.

You expected everyone to accept the dem third Riech style trial.
Where only certain witnesses were allowed to be called.
Where only certain questions were allowed.
Where only certain people were allowed to ask questions.
Where even one of the Dems lied then later pretended it was supposed to be a parody. Where he took breaks to leak to the press.
Then you pretend someone should be outraged when the scam isn't working out.

 

[BULLDOG]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

 

[JGalt]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

So will you still be defending this stupid "impeachment" even after the Senate finds no grounds, and Trump wins a second term?

I haven't heard you mention "Trump/Russian collusion" in quite a while. Does that mean you're over that now?

 

[Maxdeath]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

That's funny I could have sworn that was what CNN and most if not all the left on here were calling it.

 

[Maxdeath]

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

So will you still be defending this stupid "impeachment" even after the Senate finds no grounds, and Trump wins a second term?

I haven't heard you mention "Trump/Russian collusion" in quite a while. Does that mean you're over that now?

The left will never be over that. In fact they are already starting to claim that Russia, China and the Ukraine are already helping to get him elected. Got to have yor excuses ready, no need to wait till the last minute.

 

[Circe]

So why is Schifferbrains and the rest of Nazi's Clown Brigade over in the Senate right now begging them to do the job of the House?

So they can keep it all going forever and ever and ever and ever...…...

 

[Circe]

Did the Dems scam the country?

Oh, Shirley, not?

 

[bripat9643]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

And neither is the current circus. It's not a real trial.

 

[BULLDOG]

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

So will you still be defending this stupid "impeachment" even after the Senate finds no grounds, and Trump wins a second term?

I haven't heard you mention "Trump/Russian collusion" in quite a while. Does that mean you're over that now?

Barr's unethical lies and delay hid much of what is still clearly reported in that document.

 

[BULLDOG]

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

That's funny I could have sworn that was what CNN and most if not all the left on here were calling it.

Link? That was an investigation. The senate conducts the trial.

 

[bripat9643]

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

So will you still be defending this stupid "impeachment" even after the Senate finds no grounds, and Trump wins a second term?

I haven't heard you mention "Trump/Russian collusion" in quite a while. Does that mean you're over that now?

Barr's unethical lies and delay hid much of what is still clearly reported in that document.

What lies?

 

[bripat9643]

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

That's funny I could have sworn that was what CNN and most if not all the left on here were calling it.

Link? That was an investigation. The senate conducts the trial.

Then why are Adolph Schiffler and Schumer demanding more investigation?

 

[Nostra]

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

That's funny I could have sworn that was what CNN and most if not all the left on here were calling it.

Link? That was an investigation. The senate conducts the trial.

Exactly.

So why is Schifferbrains and his Clown Brigade over at the Senate begging them to do the investigation the House is required to do?

Oops!

 

[BULLDOG]

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

And neither is the current circus. It's not a real trial.

Only because the Trump party won't allow it.

 

[bripat9643]

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

And neither is the current circus. It's not a real trial.

Only because the Trump party won't allow it.

Apparently that went right over our head. You just said the House is supposed to do the investigation. So why should the Trump party allow it?

 

[BULLDOG]

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Says the douchebag who defended the Soviet show trial in the House every step of the way.

That wasn't a trial dumb ass.

So will you still be defending this stupid "impeachment" even after the Senate finds no grounds, and Trump wins a second term?

I haven't heard you mention "Trump/Russian collusion" in quite a while. Does that mean you're over that now?

Barr's unethical lies and delay hid much of what is still clearly reported in that document.

What lies?

You were able to sweep those facts under the rug. I'm not interested in arguing that with you.