Can MAGA just be honest about this?

[BackAgain]

Is that a "yes" or a "no"?

Is it a valid question?

There are only about 60,000 souls in Greenland.

We aren’t annexing Canada anyway. But with their demographics and population size, they would impact our demographics. Not sure why that matters.

The wall won’t alter our demographics much as long as we keep deporting our illegal alien population.

You also overlook birth rates by demographic sub groups.

But again. You fail to state why your “question” matters.

 

[Mac1958]

But again. You fail to state why your “question” matters.

I don't need it to matter to you, sorry.

 

[BackAgain]

I don't need it to matter to you, sorry.

I didn’t say you need it.

I just noted that you didn’t bother.

And, in any event, your reason was swiftly pointed out for all to see by CrusaderFrank

 

[Independent thinker]

I think that is a perfectly fair and reasonable question -- especially since there is no one on this board who has had more squabbles with the Left here over the counterproductive nature of weaponized PC/Identity Politics than me (easily provable by utilizing the "Search" function) -- so please allow me to provide a full and complete answer (something that I rarely get here):

First of all, you'll never see me screaming RACIST at someone here, and you'll never see me support the attacks, intimidation and deplatforming of conservative voices. And you'll definitely see me defending a small business owner who doesn't want to bake a cake and has had their lives ruined, and people who are accused of stupid notions like "toxic masculinity" or "cultural appropriation", or being punished for offending the wrong person. This is the shit that contributed heavily to the rise of Trumpism, and the lefties here sure as hell don't want to hear that.

However, I also believe that both ends of this racial mess are to blame in their own ways. 50/50? I don't know. I don't care. Both tribes should clean their own houses before attacking the other, and neither is doing it. So the divide continues to expand.

The fact is, I start a thread like this less for what the responses are, and more for HOW people respond. In this case, I asked a clear question and folks immediately lapsed into game-playing and personal attacks. Not that I'm surprised, of course.

There are several civil, intelligent, reasonable, interesting ways to answer the question in the OP. I'd like to think that there is at least one (1) Trumpster here with the ability to do it.

Except you OP is racist.

 

[Nostra]

Mac1958 asks "MAGA" to be honest and then fails to be honest in his own thread. LOL

Mac the Hack is a lying Sack.

 

[Mac1958]

Except you OP is racist.

Now YOU'RE doing it, and I never did.

Good stuff, thanks.

 

[theHawk]

I wonder if everyone across the political spectrum can agree on something.

If you:

• Annex Canada
• Annex Greenland
• Remove all Central/South American illegal immigrants
• Build a wall on our Southern Border

You have literally changed the demographics of the USA damn near overnight (uh, you have a higher percentage of white people). Regardless of any other effects of those actions, that is a stone cold fact.

Is this true or not? Yes or no? Can we all agree on something that obvious?

Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Trump ramps up threats to gain control of Greenland and Panama Canal

The president-elect said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.

www.bbc.com

How far will Donald Trump go to get rid of illegal immigrants?

It is his signature policy, but the obstacles are daunting

www.economist.com

Greenland only has 57,000 people.

For context Arizona State University has 113,000 undergraduate students.

We aren’t making Panama a state, only taking over our canal.


We aren’t making Canada a state, Trump is trolling them, and lefties like you.

 

[Nostra]

I think that is a perfectly fair and reasonable question -- especially since there is no one on this board who has had more squabbles with the Left here over the counterproductive nature of weaponized PC/Identity Politics than me (easily provable by utilizing the "Search" function) -- so please allow me to provide a full and complete answer (something that I rarely get here):

First of all, you'll never see me screaming RACIST at someone here, and you'll never see me support the attacks, intimidation and deplatforming of conservative voices. And you'll definitely see me defending a small business owner who doesn't want to bake a cake and has had their lives ruined, and people who are accused of stupid notions like "toxic masculinity" or "cultural appropriation", or being punished for offending the wrong person. This is the shit that contributed heavily to the rise of Trumpism, and the lefties here sure as hell don't want to hear that.

However, I also believe that both ends of this racial mess are to blame in their own ways. 50/50? I don't know. I don't care. Both tribes should clean their own houses before attacking the other, and neither is doing it. So the divide continues to expand.

The fact is, I start a thread like this less for what the responses are, and more for HOW people respond. In this case, I asked a clear question and folks immediately lapsed into game-playing and personal attacks. Not that I'm surprised, of course.

There are several civil, intelligent, reasonable, interesting ways to answer the question in the OP. I'd like to think that there is at least one (1) Trumpster here with the ability to do it.

Try asking a legit question not based on a lie if you want real answers, dumbass.

You always ask these loaded questions based on lies, then whine and cry about the responses you get.

 

[Mac1958]

Try asking a legit question not based on a lie if you want real answers, dumbass.

You always ask these loaded questions based on lies, then whine and cry about the responses you get.

Wrong again, Trumpster.

The responses are always very telling. Always. As I've already pointed out.

But you can keep whining, if you'd like.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I wonder if everyone across the political spectrum can agree on something.

If you:

• Annex Canada
• Annex Greenland
• Remove all Central/South American illegal immigrants
• Build a wall on our Southern Border

You have literally changed the demographics of the USA damn near overnight (uh, you have a higher percentage of white people). Regardless of any other effects of those actions, that is a stone cold fact.

Is this true or not? Yes or no? Can we all agree on something that obvious?

Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Trump ramps up threats to gain control of Greenland and Panama Canal

The president-elect said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.

www.bbc.com

How far will Donald Trump go to get rid of illegal immigrants?

It is his signature policy, but the obstacles are daunting

www.economist.com

Does anyone know if Mac has ever queried for the inverse?
I scare him so he has me ignored….somebody should fix his post. See below.

I wonder if everyone across the political spectrum can agree on something.

If you:

• Import four Ohio’s (48 million) worth of brown people from our south

You have literally changed the demographics of the USA damn near overnight (uh, you have a higher percentage of BROWN people). Regardless of any other effects of those actions, that is a stone cold fact.

Is this true or not? Yes or no? Can we all agree on something that obvious?

 

[OldFlame]

Wrong again, Trumpster.

The responses are always very telling. Always. As I've already pointed out.

But you can keep whining, if you'd like.

They're apparently not 'telling' you anything since you fail to understand them.

 

[Nostra]

Wrong again, Trumpster.

The responses are always very telling. Always. As I've already pointed out.

But you can keep whining, if you'd like.

Nope not wrong. more lies by you.

Your question is based on a lie, as always. Keep whining about your responses, Simp.

 

[Mac1958]

Have you seen the latest? Dotard's incoming NSA is saying trump's Greenland distraction is all about minerals. IOW, "cleanup in aisle 12."

It's been fun watching them react to a simple question.

They're conditioned to avoid and attack, so it's all they know to do. There are plenty of ways to honestly answer the question, but it's beyond them.

 

[Nostra]

It's been fun watching them react to a simple question.

They're conditioned to avoid and attack, so it's all they know to do. There are plenty of ways to honestly answer the question, but it's beyond them.

Yep, we are conditioned to ignore bullshut questions based on a lie, Simp.

 

[Mister Iggy]

It's been fun watching them react to a simple question.

They're conditioned to avoid and attack, so it's all they know to do. There are plenty of ways to honestly answer the question, but it's beyond them.

 

[Mister Iggy]

It's been fun watching them react to a simple question.

They're conditioned to avoid and attack, so it's all they know to do. There are plenty of ways to honestly answer the question, but it's beyond them.

If you want sincere replies, don't ask dumb, race baiting nonsense.

 

[OldFlame]

It's been fun watching them react to a simple question.

They're conditioned to avoid and attack, so it's all they know to do. There are plenty of ways to honestly answer the question, but it's beyond them.

Well, it doesn't take much to amuse a narcissist tard I guess.

 

[WelfareQueen]

I wonder if everyone across the political spectrum can agree on something.

If you:

• Annex Canada
• Annex Greenland
• Remove all Central/South American illegal immigrants
• Build a wall on our Southern Border

You have literally changed the demographics of the USA damn near overnight (uh, you have a higher percentage of white people). Regardless of any other effects of those actions, that is a stone cold fact.

Is this true or not? Yes or no? Can we all agree on something that obvious?

Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Trump ramps up threats to gain control of Greenland and Panama Canal

The president-elect said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.

www.bbc.com

How far will Donald Trump go to get rid of illegal immigrants?

It is his signature policy, but the obstacles are daunting

www.economist.com

So, since your supposition is Canada and Greenland are mostly "White," does that mean, by your definition, they are racist?

 

[imawhosure]

It's been fun watching them react to a simple question.

They're conditioned to avoid and attack, so it's all they know to do. There are plenty of ways to honestly answer the question, but it's beyond them.

Yep, we are conditioned to ignore bullshut questions based on a lie, Simp.

Well, it doesn't take much to amuse a narcissist tard I guess.

Da Mighty MACAFLOOZY tries to bait, lololol. From a supposed money person, to now a phycologist. Why all, look at your responses, shame on you.........some clown name MACAFLOOZY stands in front of you and pi**es on your new pair of shoes, then wants to know why you are upset!

Every DAMN time you respond to FLOOZY, you just add this------------->HEY FLOOZY, how is FORWARD HO-HO-HO doing-) And guess who the head HO-HO-HO for forward is on here-) Yes, that would be the charming and undelightful, MACAFLOOZY!

 

[ThisIsMe]

I think that is a perfectly fair and reasonable question -- especially since there is no one on this board who has had more squabbles with the Left here over the counterproductive nature of weaponized PC/Identity Politics than me (easily provable by utilizing the "Search" function) -- so please allow me to provide a full and complete answer (something that I rarely get here):

First of all, you'll never see me screaming RACIST at someone here, and you'll never see me support the attacks, intimidation and deplatforming of conservative voices. And you'll definitely see me defending a small business owner who doesn't want to bake a cake and has had their lives ruined, and people who are accused of stupid notions like "toxic masculinity" or "cultural appropriation", or being punished for offending the wrong person. This is the shit that contributed heavily to the rise of Trumpism, and the lefties here sure as hell don't want to hear that.

However, I also believe that both ends of this racial mess are to blame in their own ways. 50/50? I don't know. I don't care. Both tribes should clean their own houses before attacking the other, and neither is doing it. So the divide continues to expand.

The fact is, I start a thread like this less for what the responses are, and more for HOW people respond. In this case, I asked a clear question and folks immediately lapsed into game-playing and personal attacks. Not that I'm surprised, of course.

There are several civil, intelligent, reasonable, interesting ways to answer the question in the OP. I'd like to think that there is at least one (1) Trumpster here with the ability to do it.

That's great. You've given us the synopsis if what you wouldn't do, but that still doesn't answer why you wanted to take this to a racial place, when nobody else had even mentioned race as a part of the whole notion.


Also, I did answer your question and why I don't think it will change the demographic.