Can MAGA just be honest about this?

[Moonglow]

Hello, your TDS has become pathological. One of our states is on fire from Democrat incompetence and you're still crying about TDS.

Some teachers of young children have a "tattle phone" where children record their tattles. Let's get one for Mac. He can talk into the "tattle phone" about his feelings all day and no one here has to read them anymore.

Who's in?

Democrat incompetence was not needed to start several fires.

 

[DonGlock26]

Democrat incompetence was not needed to start several fires.

It was needed to turn several fires into a disaster.

 

[MarcATL]

I wonder if everyone across the political spectrum can agree on something.

If you:

• Annex Canada
• Annex Greenland
• Remove all Central/South American illegal immigrants
• Build a wall on our Southern Border

You have literally changed the demographics of the USA damn near overnight (uh, you have a higher percentage of white people). Regardless of any other effects of those actions, that is a stone cold fact.

Is this true or not? Yes or no? Can we all agree on something that obvious?

Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Trump ramps up threats to gain control of Greenland and Panama Canal

The president-elect said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.

www.bbc.com

How far will Donald Trump go to get rid of illegal immigrants?

It is his signature policy, but the obstacles are daunting

www.economist.com

That's just a fact.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I wonder if everyone across the political spectrum can agree on something.

If you:

• Annex Canada
• Annex Greenland
• Remove all Central/South American illegal immigrants
• Build a wall on our Southern Border

You have literally changed the demographics of the USA damn near overnight (uh, you have a higher percentage of white people). Regardless of any other effects of those actions, that is a stone cold fact.

Is this true or not? Yes or no? Can we all agree on something that obvious?

Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Trump ramps up threats to gain control of Greenland and Panama Canal

The president-elect said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.

www.bbc.com

How far will Donald Trump go to get rid of illegal immigrants?

It is his signature policy, but the obstacles are daunting

www.economist.com

I'd say the demographic isn't changed. Depending on whether you want to use the number of total whites (including hispanic whites), then they are 75% of the population, if you count white alone, they are about 60%, of the population. Either number being a significant deviation from the next highest group percentage. So, adding the 20 million from Canada and the 56,000 from greenland wouldn't really change an already existing demographic.


Now, the real question is, why is it, when you claim to not be a Democrat, are you injecting race into this conversation? I've not heard a single person mention race in regards to the whole canada or greenland thing (both of which are absurd), yet you, like a Democrat, decides to make this about race. I swear, it's only the democrats that bring up race, because they think it's a weapon.

Why are you using their tactics?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

We need to annex something remote to send all the democrats so that they can only hurt themselves

.

Great use for Canada. Build a wall between.


.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Democrat incompetence was not needed to start several fires.

Lol, the celebs out there are blaming it on arsonists!! Never mind the 100 plus mph winds spreading flames and embers everywhere.

 

[Moonglow]

Lol, the celebs out there are blaming it on arsonists!! Never mind the 100 plus mph winds spreading flames and embers everywhere.

See no democrats were needed to start the fires.

 

[Moonglow]

It was needed to turn several fires into a disaster.

I doubt you could have done any better.

 

[DonGlock26]

I doubt you could have done any better.

Why? Anyone with common sense could see the issues that needed to be fixed.

 

[Moonglow]

Why? Anyone with common sense could see the issues that needed to be fixed.

Yes, it can all be fixed by getting rid of all humans. Nope, fires still occur whether humans are present or not.

 

[DonGlock26]

Yes, it can all be fixed by getting rid of all humans. Nope, fires still occur whether humans are present or not.

Are you making excuses for the California Democrats' mishandling of this disaster?

 

[Mac1958]

Why are you using their tactics?

I think that is a perfectly fair and reasonable question -- especially since there is no one on this board who has had more squabbles with the Left here over the counterproductive nature of weaponized PC/Identity Politics than me (easily provable by utilizing the "Search" function) -- so please allow me to provide a full and complete answer (something that I rarely get here):

First of all, you'll never see me screaming RACIST at someone here, and you'll never see me support the attacks, intimidation and deplatforming of conservative voices. And you'll definitely see me defending a small business owner who doesn't want to bake a cake and has had their lives ruined, and people who are accused of stupid notions like "toxic masculinity" or "cultural appropriation", or being punished for offending the wrong person. This is the shit that contributed heavily to the rise of Trumpism, and the lefties here sure as hell don't want to hear that.

However, I also believe that both ends of this racial mess are to blame in their own ways. 50/50? I don't know. I don't care. Both tribes should clean their own houses before attacking the other, and neither is doing it. So the divide continues to expand.

The fact is, I start a thread like this less for what the responses are, and more for HOW people respond. In this case, I asked a clear question and folks immediately lapsed into game-playing and personal attacks. Not that I'm surprised, of course.

There are several civil, intelligent, reasonable, interesting ways to answer the question in the OP. I'd like to think that there is at least one (1) Trumpster here with the ability to do it.

 

[Kruska]

I wonder if everyone across the political spectrum can agree on something.

If you:

• Annex Canada
• Annex Greenland
• Remove all Central/South American illegal immigrants
• Build a wall on our Southern Border

You have literally changed the demographics of the USA damn near overnight (uh, you have a higher percentage of white people). Regardless of any other effects of those actions, that is a stone cold fact.

Is this true or not? Yes or no? Can we all agree on something that obvious?

Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Trump ramps up threats to gain control of Greenland and Panama Canal

The president-elect said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.

www.bbc.com

How far will Donald Trump go to get rid of illegal immigrants?

It is his signature policy, but the obstacles are daunting

www.economist.com

Yes - but "significantly"?

The % increase in favor of white people in the "new USA" wouldn't really change significantly.
The LEGAL US citizens are presently to around 44 % not white - but Hispanic, Injuins, Black, Asian, etc. So Whites at present around 56%.?
Those 40 million "new citizens" are to around 70% white. As such the new racial mix might change to around 60%? being whites.

Those Illegal migrants ain't citizens, as such they do not contribute into racial % of the US citizens. Unless you assume that they will sooner or later become US citizens.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I wonder if everyone across the political spectrum can agree on something.

If you:

• Annex Canada
• Annex Greenland
• Remove all Central/South American illegal immigrants
• Build a wall on our Southern Border

You have literally changed the demographics of the USA damn near overnight (uh, you have a higher percentage of white people). Regardless of any other effects of those actions, that is a stone cold fact.

Is this true or not? Yes or no? Can we all agree on something that obvious?

Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Trump ramps up threats to gain control of Greenland and Panama Canal

The president-elect said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.

www.bbc.com

How far will Donald Trump go to get rid of illegal immigrants?

It is his signature policy, but the obstacles are daunting

www.economist.com

Magaturds know they elected a useless, orange bag O' shit troll.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Magaturds know they elected a useless, orange bag O' shit troll.

.




Who is going to be your PRESIDENT for FOUR LONG YEARS.

We like this.






.

 

[Muhammed]

I wonder if everyone across the political spectrum can agree on something.

If you:

• Annex Canada
• Annex Greenland
• Remove all Central/South American illegal immigrants
• Build a wall on our Southern Border

You have literally changed the demographics of the USA damn near overnight (uh, you have a higher percentage of white people). Regardless of any other effects of those actions, that is a stone cold fact.

So what?

 

[eagle1462010]

I wonder if everyone across the political spectrum can agree on something.

If you:

• Annex Canada
• Annex Greenland
• Remove all Central/South American illegal immigrants
• Build a wall on our Southern Border

You have literally changed the demographics of the USA damn near overnight (uh, you have a higher percentage of white people). Regardless of any other effects of those actions, that is a stone cold fact.

Is this true or not? Yes or no? Can we all agree on something that obvious?

Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Trump ramps up threats to gain control of Greenland and Panama Canal

The president-elect said he would not rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland.

www.bbc.com

How far will Donald Trump go to get rid of illegal immigrants?

It is his signature policy, but the obstacles are daunting

www.economist.com

 

[Curried Goats]

I think that is a perfectly fair and reasonable question -- especially since there is no one on this board who has had more squabbles with the Left here over the counterproductive nature of weaponized PC/Identity Politics than me (easily provable by utilizing the "Search" function) -- so please allow me to provide a full and complete answer (something that I rarely get here):

First of all, you'll never see me screaming RACIST at someone here, and you'll never see me support the attacks, intimidation and deplatforming of conservative voices. And you'll definitely see me defending a small business owner who doesn't want to bake a cake and has had their lives ruined, and people who are accused of stupid notions like "toxic masculinity" or "cultural appropriation", or being punished for offending the wrong person. This is the shit that contributed heavily to the rise of Trumpism, and the lefties here sure as hell don't want to hear that.

However, I also believe that both ends of this racial mess are to blame in their own ways. 50/50? I don't know. I don't care. Both tribes should clean their own houses before attacking the other, and neither is doing it. So the divide continues to expand.

The fact is, I start a thread like this less for what the responses are, and more for HOW people respond. In this case, I asked a clear question and folks immediately lapsed into game-playing and personal attacks. Not that I'm surprised, of course.

There are several civil, intelligent, reasonable, interesting ways to answer the question in the OP. I'd like to think that there is at least one (1) Trumpster here with the ability to do it.

Have you had squabbles with the left? I've seen you lecture your opinions at us and then run away like a little bitch when they're questioned.

 

[Mac1958]

Have you had squabbles with the left? I've seen you lecture your opinions at us and then run away like a little bitch when they're questioned.

Because I've given up trying to communicate with nutters here. Like you.

If you don't like that, too bad.

 

[Curried Goats]

Because I've given up trying to communicate with nutters here. Like you.

If you don't like that, too bad.

But you'll try to communicate with MAGAts who can't even be intellectually honest with themselves? You may not like my opinion but it's a real one and you are unable to engage with any real criticism of your opinion. You're just as soft as they are.