Can Atheists be Moral?

[ding]

Bullshit.

.

Bullshit.

Can Atheists be Moral?


I have yet to receive a response from you or any christian, what sins they are unable to stop committing - and that the 1st century was an affirmation of the original religion of antiquity to triumph over evil for there even to be a judgement.

4th century christianity and the other two desert religions have abandoned the original religion to substitute their own that are political documents disguised as religions to suit their own self interest that falls far short of the path leading to admission to the Everlasting.

if there are sins christians are unable to not commit they can not be moral - for those that triumph over evil they can not be 4th century christians.

morality is a goal acquired through triumph - the apex of knowledge, purity of a freed spirit being a sabbath is the path to the Everlasting.

What is it that you think sin is exactly?

Sin is anything which distances us from God. Since no man or woman is all good or all bad, there will be times when they distance themselves from God. It’s unavoidable.

There are three possible states; we can be moving towards God, we can be moving away from God or we can be static.

Furthermore, at any point in time we can change states.

So save your bullshit for someone else.

.

What is it that you think sin is exactly?

Sin is anything which distances us from God. Since no man or woman is all good or all bad, there will be times when they distance themselves from God. It’s unavoidable.

christianity is the religion of sinners, (all bad) no matter their persona of repentance they will reap what they sow - the original religion of antiquity is the triumph of good vs evil that is granted judgement and possible admission to the Everlasting.

the Almighty is simply the gatekeeper ... that will keep the unjustified from entering where they do not belong.

There are three possible states; we can be moving towards God, we can be moving away from God or we can be static.

bing the dogmatic -

Columbus crossed the void and discovered land on the otherside, that is the mission for a spirit to be freed from the physical constraints through perseverance and knowledge to triumph by their own actions to be admitted to the Everlasting as a reward - it is a sin to remain a sinner, bing. making oneself pure is not - "no man or woman is all good or all bad" - have you fooled yourself or are you just lazy.

You never answered my question. How do you define sin?

.

Sin is anything which distances us from God. Since no man or woman is all good or all bad, there will be times when they distance themselves from God. It’s unavoidable.

You never answered my question. How do you define sin?

Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

the above forgery is a sin - the 4th century christian bible is a political document disguised as a religion - is a sin ...


It’s unavoidable.

excuses are sins, not answering what sins someone is unable to stop committing, when defining sin is a sin ... when speaking of a rapprochement with the Almighty while a sinner - is a sin.

the uninterrupted history of persecution and victimization of the innocent by christianity - is a sin.

View attachment 252823


It’s unavoidable -

a history lesson from a christian ...

The reason you can’t or won’t define what sin is is because it would detract from your attack on Christianity.

So let me be very clear here, sin is anything which distances one from God.

 

[ding]

Bullshit.

.

Bullshit.

Can Atheists be Moral?


I have yet to receive a response from you or any christian, what sins they are unable to stop committing - and that the 1st century was an affirmation of the original religion of antiquity to triumph over evil for there even to be a judgement.

4th century christianity and the other two desert religions have abandoned the original religion to substitute their own that are political documents disguised as religions to suit their own self interest that falls far short of the path leading to admission to the Everlasting.

if there are sins christians are unable to not commit they can not be moral - for those that triumph over evil they can not be 4th century christians.

morality is a goal acquired through triumph - the apex of knowledge, purity of a freed spirit being a sabbath is the path to the Everlasting.

What is it that you think sin is exactly?

Sin is anything which distances us from God. Since no man or woman is all good or all bad, there will be times when they distance themselves from God. It’s unavoidable.

There are three possible states; we can be moving towards God, we can be moving away from God or we can be static.

Furthermore, at any point in time we can change states.

So save your bullshit for someone else.

.

What is it that you think sin is exactly?

Sin is anything which distances us from God. Since no man or woman is all good or all bad, there will be times when they distance themselves from God. It’s unavoidable.

christianity is the religion of sinners, (all bad) no matter their persona of repentance they will reap what they sow - the original religion of antiquity is the triumph of good vs evil that is granted judgement and possible admission to the Everlasting.

the Almighty is simply the gatekeeper ... that will keep the unjustified from entering where they do not belong.

There are three possible states; we can be moving towards God, we can be moving away from God or we can be static.

bing the dogmatic -

Columbus crossed the void and discovered land on the otherside, that is the mission for a spirit to be freed from the physical constraints through perseverance and knowledge to triumph by their own actions to be admitted to the Everlasting as a reward - it is a sin to remain a sinner, bing. making oneself pure is not - "no man or woman is all good or all bad" - have you fooled yourself or are you just lazy.

You never answered my question. How do you define sin?

.

Sin is anything which distances us from God. Since no man or woman is all good or all bad, there will be times when they distance themselves from God. It’s unavoidable.

You never answered my question. How do you define sin?

Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

the above forgery is a sin - the 4th century christian bible is a political document disguised as a religion - is a sin ...


It’s unavoidable.

excuses are sins, not answering what sins someone is unable to stop committing, when defining sin is a sin ... when speaking of a rapprochement with the Almighty while a sinner - is a sin.

the uninterrupted history of persecution and victimization of the innocent by christianity - is a sin.

View attachment 252823


It’s unavoidable -

a history lesson from a christian ...

Excuses are not sins. Excuses are rationalizations for one’s failure to produce the desired result or objective.

Excuses prevent one from seeing reality and learning the lesson they were supposed to learn and dooms them to repeating the same mistakes. Excuses transfer ones power and control to external sources. But excuses in and of themselves are not sins.

 

[hobelim]

Imagine this claim -

A guy who thinks he has a "pure mind" because he is in accord with kosher Law has, as a result, heard and seen THEEEeeEE God - - -

And spends his time parking his ass on the internet to mock folks for believing in x, y, z - getting into psycho-babble and meaningless conflicts and arguments - calls names and shows spite - mocks and mocks and mocks the christ crackerers....sits in a position of mockery..

as opposed to - what, what would someone of pure mind who's seen God do with their time?

PrrrrrrRRrrrobably donate....ALL of it...literally ALL of it, to getting off your ass and doing more worthwhile things.


It's because of these reasons, and the fact that he contradicts himself and is hella-ripe with being a hypocrite, that one must conclude that Hobelim has a brain full of disgusting impurity, and is either delusional or doesn't believe the bullshit that he himself heaps.




I have my theory.

lol....I once told Taz. if you are going to be a dick I am just going to **** with you.

Capisce?

It's not really that special, hoebilly...you're just incapable of comprehension and a rational argument and so you lash out.

Lash away - addled one .

read your previous post and then tell me who is lashing out and melting down...

It's just called medicine, HoeBilly. Your pure mind should have gleaned as much...but then, it would eliminate the necessity for said medicine if it were pure, innit?

One thing is certain...no matter how hard you try to understand the nonsensical piles Hobelim pinches off, he will tell you that you don't get it. You can literally repeat his own words back to him (without telling him you are doing so), and he will tell you that you are wrong and just too stupid to understand.

lol... you are what you is.


You say its all magical bullshit. I say it conveys hidden teaching. You say magic decoder ring. I say giving sight to the blind, talking serpents, raising the dead are metaphors. You say they are not, the authors believed that snakes could talk. I mention the vernacular of every language on earth uses such metaphors. you say magical bullshit from the great shaman hobelim..

If you are not stupid whats your excuse?


The devil makes you say stupid things?

 

[G.T.]

lol....I once told Taz. if you are going to be a dick I am just going to **** with you.

Capisce?

It's not really that special, hoebilly...you're just incapable of comprehension and a rational argument and so you lash out.

Lash away - addled one .

read your previous post and then tell me who is lashing out and melting down...

It's just called medicine, HoeBilly. Your pure mind should have gleaned as much...but then, it would eliminate the necessity for said medicine if it were pure, innit?

One thing is certain...no matter how hard you try to understand the nonsensical piles Hobelim pinches off, he will tell you that you don't get it. You can literally repeat his own words back to him (without telling him you are doing so), and he will tell you that you are wrong and just too stupid to understand.

lol... you are what you is.


You say its all magical bullshit. I say it conveys hidden teaching. You say magic decoder ring. I say giving sight to the blind, talking serpents, raising the dead are metaphors. You say they are not, the authors believed that snakes could talk. I mention the vernacular of every language on earth uses such metaphors. you say magical bullshit from the great shaman hobelim..

If you are not stupid what your excuse?

straw-man

he, n'or I, have said they're not metaphors.

Your addled mind causes bad, strawmen arguments. Purify yourself, kook.

Also, the magical bullshit is believing in the deity, which you DO

 

[hobelim]

It's not really that special, hoebilly...you're just incapable of comprehension and a rational argument and so you lash out.

Lash away - addled one .

read your previous post and then tell me who is lashing out and melting down...

It's just called medicine, HoeBilly. Your pure mind should have gleaned as much...but then, it would eliminate the necessity for said medicine if it were pure, innit?

One thing is certain...no matter how hard you try to understand the nonsensical piles Hobelim pinches off, he will tell you that you don't get it. You can literally repeat his own words back to him (without telling him you are doing so), and he will tell you that you are wrong and just too stupid to understand.

lol... you are what you is.


You say its all magical bullshit. I say it conveys hidden teaching. You say magic decoder ring. I say giving sight to the blind, talking serpents, raising the dead are metaphors. You say they are not, the authors believed that snakes could talk. I mention the vernacular of every language on earth uses such metaphors. you say magical bullshit from the great shaman hobelim..

If you are not stupid what your excuse?

straw-man

he, n'or I, have said they're not metaphors.

Your addled mind causes bad, strawmen arguments. Purify yourself, kook.

Yes, he said they are not metaphors. they believed that snakes can talk. no one can know what the truth is... lol

you are an asshole.

 

[G.T.]

read your previous post and then tell me who is lashing out and melting down...

It's just called medicine, HoeBilly. Your pure mind should have gleaned as much...but then, it would eliminate the necessity for said medicine if it were pure, innit?

One thing is certain...no matter how hard you try to understand the nonsensical piles Hobelim pinches off, he will tell you that you don't get it. You can literally repeat his own words back to him (without telling him you are doing so), and he will tell you that you are wrong and just too stupid to understand.

lol... you are what you is.


You say its all magical bullshit. I say it conveys hidden teaching. You say magic decoder ring. I say giving sight to the blind, talking serpents, raising the dead are metaphors. You say they are not, the authors believed that snakes could talk. I mention the vernacular of every language on earth uses such metaphors. you say magical bullshit from the great shaman hobelim..

If you are not stupid what your excuse?

straw-man

he, n'or I, have said they're not metaphors.

Your addled mind causes bad, strawmen arguments. Purify yourself, kook.

Yes, he said they are not metaphors. they believed that snakes can talk. no one can know what the truth is... lol

you are an asshole.

No, he didn't. You mis-comprehended, like is always your problem.

You believe in a magical fairy that reveals himself when you submit to the behaviors he likes. Raise your paw, kook.

 

[hobelim]

It's just called medicine, HoeBilly. Your pure mind should have gleaned as much...but then, it would eliminate the necessity for said medicine if it were pure, innit?

One thing is certain...no matter how hard you try to understand the nonsensical piles Hobelim pinches off, he will tell you that you don't get it. You can literally repeat his own words back to him (without telling him you are doing so), and he will tell you that you are wrong and just too stupid to understand.

lol... you are what you is.


You say its all magical bullshit. I say it conveys hidden teaching. You say magic decoder ring. I say giving sight to the blind, talking serpents, raising the dead are metaphors. You say they are not, the authors believed that snakes could talk. I mention the vernacular of every language on earth uses such metaphors. you say magical bullshit from the great shaman hobelim..

If you are not stupid what your excuse?

straw-man

he, n'or I, have said they're not metaphors.

Your addled mind causes bad, strawmen arguments. Purify yourself, kook.

Yes, he said they are not metaphors. they believed that snakes can talk. no one can know what the truth is... lol

you are an asshole.

No, he didn't. You mis-comprehended, like is always your problem.

You believe in a magical fairy that reveals himself when you submit to the behaviors he likes. Raise your paw, kook.

you don't know what you are talking about. FFI spend days trying to tell me that the authors believed that snakes can talk and opening the eyes of the blind was a magical belief..Then he tells me that no one can know what the truth is..

just like the stupid things you say his moronic position only serves as another rational justification and daily confirmation of the truth of my beliefs that the law of God remains in effect and is in full force.

 

[G.T.]

One thing is certain...no matter how hard you try to understand the nonsensical piles Hobelim pinches off, he will tell you that you don't get it. You can literally repeat his own words back to him (without telling him you are doing so), and he will tell you that you are wrong and just too stupid to understand.

lol... you are what you is.


You say its all magical bullshit. I say it conveys hidden teaching. You say magic decoder ring. I say giving sight to the blind, talking serpents, raising the dead are metaphors. You say they are not, the authors believed that snakes could talk. I mention the vernacular of every language on earth uses such metaphors. you say magical bullshit from the great shaman hobelim..

If you are not stupid what your excuse?

straw-man

he, n'or I, have said they're not metaphors.

Your addled mind causes bad, strawmen arguments. Purify yourself, kook.

Yes, he said they are not metaphors. they believed that snakes can talk. no one can know what the truth is... lol

you are an asshole.

No, he didn't. You mis-comprehended, like is always your problem.

You believe in a magical fairy that reveals himself when you submit to the behaviors he likes. Raise your paw, kook.

you don't know what you are talking about. FFI spend days trying to tell me that the authors believed that snakes can talk and opening the eyes of the blind was a magical belief..Then he tells me that no one can know what the truth is..

just like you his moronic position only serves as another rational justification and daily confirmation of the truth of my beliefs.

I understand that's what you're forced to tell yourself, because you're not capable of intellectually supporting your belief in sky fairy bro - I'm past that hiccup in your addled brain and I'm now onto you lying about others' positions.

People that eat a wafer to symbolically represent receiving christ in their being are akin to people believing that following dictated behaviors will please their sky fairy enough to let you see and hear him.

There's a foot of control on your neck, based on the same fairy tale but interpreted in a different way. Raise your paw, kook - hold it high.

 

[hobelim]

lol... you are what you is.


You say its all magical bullshit. I say it conveys hidden teaching. You say magic decoder ring. I say giving sight to the blind, talking serpents, raising the dead are metaphors. You say they are not, the authors believed that snakes could talk. I mention the vernacular of every language on earth uses such metaphors. you say magical bullshit from the great shaman hobelim..

If you are not stupid what your excuse?

straw-man

he, n'or I, have said they're not metaphors.

Your addled mind causes bad, strawmen arguments. Purify yourself, kook.

Yes, he said they are not metaphors. they believed that snakes can talk. no one can know what the truth is... lol

you are an asshole.

No, he didn't. You mis-comprehended, like is always your problem.

You believe in a magical fairy that reveals himself when you submit to the behaviors he likes. Raise your paw, kook.

you don't know what you are talking about. FFI spend days trying to tell me that the authors believed that snakes can talk and opening the eyes of the blind was a magical belief..Then he tells me that no one can know what the truth is..

just like you his moronic position only serves as another rational justification and daily confirmation of the truth of my beliefs.

I understand that's what you're forced to tell yourself, because you're not capable of intellectually supporting your belief in sky fairy bro - I'm past that hiccup in your addled brain and I'm now onto you lying about others' positions.

People that eat a wafer to symbolically represent receiving christ in their being are akin to people believing that following dictated behaviors will please their sky fairy enough to let you see and hear him.

There's a foot of control on your neck, based on the same fairy tale but interpreted in a different way. Raise your paw, kook - hold it high.

no, I am telling the truth. The guy didn't have the substance to admit that there was hidden teaching in what he derides as a fairy tale. Just like you.

astonishing!

And seeing and hearing God is not about having auditory and visual hallucinations. Like I said, God is a character in a book who says this or that..seeing and hearing the words of the living God is simply about understanding the subjects in the book just like when Jesus said "if you have seen me you have seen the father" he wasn't talking about his physical appearance or having visions of an invisible sky fairy. He was saying that if you understood him you would understand the character in the book and how that hidden God is actively involved in real life.

duh.

raise your paw - kook?

damn...You really need to come up with some new material..

 

[G.T.]

straw-man

he, n'or I, have said they're not metaphors.

Your addled mind causes bad, strawmen arguments. Purify yourself, kook.

Yes, he said they are not metaphors. they believed that snakes can talk. no one can know what the truth is... lol

you are an asshole.

No, he didn't. You mis-comprehended, like is always your problem.

You believe in a magical fairy that reveals himself when you submit to the behaviors he likes. Raise your paw, kook.

you don't know what you are talking about. FFI spend days trying to tell me that the authors believed that snakes can talk and opening the eyes of the blind was a magical belief..Then he tells me that no one can know what the truth is..

just like you his moronic position only serves as another rational justification and daily confirmation of the truth of my beliefs.

I understand that's what you're forced to tell yourself, because you're not capable of intellectually supporting your belief in sky fairy bro - I'm past that hiccup in your addled brain and I'm now onto you lying about others' positions.

People that eat a wafer to symbolically represent receiving christ in their being are akin to people believing that following dictated behaviors will please their sky fairy enough to let you see and hear him.

There's a foot of control on your neck, based on the same fairy tale but interpreted in a different way. Raise your paw, kook - hold it high.

no, I am telling the truth. The guy didn't have the substance to admit that there was hidden teaching in what he derides as a fairy tale. Just like you.

And seeing and hearing God is not about having auditory and visual hallucinations. Like I said, God is a character in a book who says this or that..seeing and hearing the words of the living God is simply about understanding the subjects in the book just like when Jesus said "if you have seen me you have seen the father" he wasn't talking about his physical appearance.

duh.

raise your paw - kook?

damn...You really need to come up with some new material..

no, kook, your god is a character too - a hallucinated one. You are easy to convince of things when they're dressed up in fanciful word-play. Kosher law controls you, raise your paw, kook - - and it does so because you seek your sky fairy that you could't possibly verify exists, raise your paw if you believe in magic, kook.

I have no problem agreeing that there's teachings in scripture, but you keep lying and saying I do.

You lie, and lie again, and I can quote my posts saying verbatim what you just said I don't admit. Why is that like 2nd nature, to you, to lie so easily? Your kosher law permits lying on messageboards because you're triggered when your beliefs are challenged and you cannot support them rationally? That's the under-current, and has been all along.

As far as them being "hidden," no that's just your self aggrandizing. The thesis of the parables is not hard to understand. ****, they couldn't be if someone like YOU understands them! Albeit, you're really poor at following them.

Your problem is that you put your own intellect on a pedestal that's a world trade center tower higher than where you actually are, add in the gullibility that would allude to believing in your magic fairy.

 

[hobelim]

Yes, he said they are not metaphors. they believed that snakes can talk. no one can know what the truth is... lol

you are an asshole.

No, he didn't. You mis-comprehended, like is always your problem.

You believe in a magical fairy that reveals himself when you submit to the behaviors he likes. Raise your paw, kook.

you don't know what you are talking about. FFI spend days trying to tell me that the authors believed that snakes can talk and opening the eyes of the blind was a magical belief..Then he tells me that no one can know what the truth is..

just like you his moronic position only serves as another rational justification and daily confirmation of the truth of my beliefs.

I understand that's what you're forced to tell yourself, because you're not capable of intellectually supporting your belief in sky fairy bro - I'm past that hiccup in your addled brain and I'm now onto you lying about others' positions.

People that eat a wafer to symbolically represent receiving christ in their being are akin to people believing that following dictated behaviors will please their sky fairy enough to let you see and hear him.

There's a foot of control on your neck, based on the same fairy tale but interpreted in a different way. Raise your paw, kook - hold it high.

no, I am telling the truth. The guy didn't have the substance to admit that there was hidden teaching in what he derides as a fairy tale. Just like you.

And seeing and hearing God is not about having auditory and visual hallucinations. Like I said, God is a character in a book who says this or that..seeing and hearing the words of the living God is simply about understanding the subjects in the book just like when Jesus said "if you have seen me you have seen the father" he wasn't talking about his physical appearance.

duh.

raise your paw - kook?

damn...You really need to come up with some new material..

no, kook, your god is a character too - a hallucinated one. You are easy to convince of things when they're dressed up in fanciful word-play. Kosher law controls you, raise your paw, kook - - and it does so because you seek your sky fairy that you could't possibly verify exists, raise your paw if you believe in magic, kook.

I have no problem agreeing that there's teachings in scripture, but you keep lying and saying I do.

You lie, and lie again, and I can quote my posts saying verbatim what you just said I don't admit. Why is that like 2nd nature, to you, to lie so easily? Your kosher law permits lying on messageboards because you're triggered when your beliefs are challenged and you cannot support them rationally? That's the under-current, and has been all along.

As far as them being "hidden," no that's just your self aggrandizing. The thesis of the parables is not hard to understand. ****, they couldn't be if someone like YOU understands them! Albeit, you're really poor at following them.

You problem is that you put your own intellect on a pedestal that's a world trade center tower higher than where you actually are, add in the gullibility that would allude to believing in your magic fairy.

you derided kosher law as something equivalent to eating christ crackers, nothing hidden or mysterious about it, just kookie.Then you say that what I showed you that there is practical wisdom in that hidden teaching in kosher law you deride that as a decoder ring fallacy, only to say a little later that the teaching is obvious.

I don't believe in a magic fairy. I see God at work even in your shameful descent into a dishonest creature that crawls on its belly.

A very rational justification and confirmation in actual reality of my beliefs.

No one has to wait for the kingdom of God to come. They just have to open their eyes and see that the law of God is already in effect and is already in full force.

 

[G.T.]

No, he didn't. You mis-comprehended, like is always your problem.

You believe in a magical fairy that reveals himself when you submit to the behaviors he likes. Raise your paw, kook.

you don't know what you are talking about. FFI spend days trying to tell me that the authors believed that snakes can talk and opening the eyes of the blind was a magical belief..Then he tells me that no one can know what the truth is..

just like you his moronic position only serves as another rational justification and daily confirmation of the truth of my beliefs.

I understand that's what you're forced to tell yourself, because you're not capable of intellectually supporting your belief in sky fairy bro - I'm past that hiccup in your addled brain and I'm now onto you lying about others' positions.

People that eat a wafer to symbolically represent receiving christ in their being are akin to people believing that following dictated behaviors will please their sky fairy enough to let you see and hear him.

There's a foot of control on your neck, based on the same fairy tale but interpreted in a different way. Raise your paw, kook - hold it high.

no, I am telling the truth. The guy didn't have the substance to admit that there was hidden teaching in what he derides as a fairy tale. Just like you.

And seeing and hearing God is not about having auditory and visual hallucinations. Like I said, God is a character in a book who says this or that..seeing and hearing the words of the living God is simply about understanding the subjects in the book just like when Jesus said "if you have seen me you have seen the father" he wasn't talking about his physical appearance.

duh.

raise your paw - kook?

damn...You really need to come up with some new material..

no, kook, your god is a character too - a hallucinated one. You are easy to convince of things when they're dressed up in fanciful word-play. Kosher law controls you, raise your paw, kook - - and it does so because you seek your sky fairy that you could't possibly verify exists, raise your paw if you believe in magic, kook.

I have no problem agreeing that there's teachings in scripture, but you keep lying and saying I do.

You lie, and lie again, and I can quote my posts saying verbatim what you just said I don't admit. Why is that like 2nd nature, to you, to lie so easily? Your kosher law permits lying on messageboards because you're triggered when your beliefs are challenged and you cannot support them rationally? That's the under-current, and has been all along.

As far as them being "hidden," no that's just your self aggrandizing. The thesis of the parables is not hard to understand. ****, they couldn't be if someone like YOU understands them! Albeit, you're really poor at following them.

You problem is that you put your own intellect on a pedestal that's a world trade center tower higher than where you actually are, add in the gullibility that would allude to believing in your magic fairy.

you derided kosher law as something equivalent to eating christ crackers, nothing hidden or mysterious about it, just kookie.Then you say that what I showed you that there is practical wisdom in that hidden teaching in kosher law you deride that as a decoder ring fallacy, only to say a little later that the teaching is obvious.

I don't believe in a magic fairy. I see God at work even in your shameful descent into a dishonest creature that crawls on its belly.

A very rational justification and confirmation of my beliefs.

Here's more of your TERRIBLE comprehension skills.

No, kosher law itself and christ crackers are not what I equated.

I equated your belief in a magic fairy revelation that comes from following kosher law with eating the wafer.

Try and keep up, kook.

You really suck at reading comprehension, which might be why you're so yeshua damned gullible.

You do believe in a magic fairy - "you see god at work,"

The god that you're incapable of rationally verifying exists - while making fun of christ crackerers for being irrational.

You are a god damn kook, and a dumb one that miscomprehends simple concepts. You can't even follow a fuckin dialogue, let alone articulate your decoder ring hidden seeekritts..

I could ******* articulate them better than you, and I think your beliefs are ******* ridiculous.

 

[hobelim]

You really suck at reading comprehension, which might be why you're so yeshua damned gullible.

You do believe in a magic fairy - "you see god at work,"

The god that you're incapable of rationally verifying exists - while making fun of christ crackerers for being irrational.

You are a god damn kook, and a dumb one that miscomprehends simple concepts.

I believe in what I see with my own eyes. I am not incapable of rationally verifying the existence of God, you are incapable of grasping the reality that you have already provided the evidence for the rational justification of my belief.

 

[G.T.]

You really suck at reading comprehension, which might be why you're so yeshua damned gullible.

You do believe in a magic fairy - "you see god at work,"

The god that you're incapable of rationally verifying exists - while making fun of christ crackerers for being irrational.

You are a god damn kook, and a dumb one that miscomprehends simple concepts.

I believe in what I see with my own eyes. I am not incapable of rationally verifying the existence of God, you are incapable of grasping the reality that you have already provided the evidence for the rational justification of my belief.

That's not an argument, it's an assertion.

Part of learning how to rationally justify something, is knowing what the **** rational and justify mean in the first place.

And I'm still not sure how lying, bickering, name calling and acting like an ass clown on the internet exemplifies a pure mind that follows kosher law - doing those things must be a hidden command huh billy?

 

[hobelim]

You really suck at reading comprehension, which might be why you're so yeshua damned gullible.

You do believe in a magic fairy - "you see god at work,"

The god that you're incapable of rationally verifying exists - while making fun of christ crackerers for being irrational.

You are a god damn kook, and a dumb one that miscomprehends simple concepts.

I believe in what I see with my own eyes. I am not incapable of rationally verifying the existence of God, you are incapable of grasping the reality that you have already provided the evidence for the rational justification of my belief.

That's not an argument, it's an assertion.

Part of learning how to rationally justify something, is knowing what the **** rational and justify mean in the first place.

And I'm still not sure how lying, bickering, name calling and acting like an ass clown on the internet exemplifies a pure mind that follows kosher law - doing those things must be a hidden command huh billy?

Yes its a hidden command.


You, a he-goat 'without blemish", have been carefully chosen and prepared as a sin offering.

Your slaughter has been dedicated to the Lord.

 

[G.T.]

Hobelim is a unique circumstance of fail -

He believes in the magicalness that a God exists and cares only to be revealed if you follow a law (cough: controls you); and makes fun of the magicalness of a belief in a god that asks you make a symbolic sacrament to him.

So here you have me, a person that finds them equally ridiculous, defending the wafer eaters from the kosher law swallower.



awesome!

 

[G.T.]

You really suck at reading comprehension, which might be why you're so yeshua damned gullible.

You do believe in a magic fairy - "you see god at work,"

The god that you're incapable of rationally verifying exists - while making fun of christ crackerers for being irrational.

You are a god damn kook, and a dumb one that miscomprehends simple concepts.

I believe in what I see with my own eyes. I am not incapable of rationally verifying the existence of God, you are incapable of grasping the reality that you have already provided the evidence for the rational justification of my belief.

That's not an argument, it's an assertion.

Part of learning how to rationally justify something, is knowing what the **** rational and justify mean in the first place.

And I'm still not sure how lying, bickering, name calling and acting like an ass clown on the internet exemplifies a pure mind that follows kosher law - doing those things must be a hidden command huh billy?

Yes its a hidden command.


You, a he-goat 'without blemish", have been carefully chosen and prepared as a sin offering.

Your slaughter has been dedicated to the Lord.

We can dedicate slaughters and not crackers though, magical-kook Billy!

 

[hobelim]

You really suck at reading comprehension, which might be why you're so yeshua damned gullible.

You do believe in a magic fairy - "you see god at work,"

The god that you're incapable of rationally verifying exists - while making fun of christ crackerers for being irrational.

You are a god damn kook, and a dumb one that miscomprehends simple concepts.

I believe in what I see with my own eyes. I am not incapable of rationally verifying the existence of God, you are incapable of grasping the reality that you have already provided the evidence for the rational justification of my belief.

That's not an argument, it's an assertion.

Part of learning how to rationally justify something, is knowing what the **** rational and justify mean in the first place.

And I'm still not sure how lying, bickering, name calling and acting like an ass clown on the internet exemplifies a pure mind that follows kosher law - doing those things must be a hidden command huh billy?

Yes its a hidden command.


You, a he-goat 'without blemish", have been carefully chosen and prepared as a sin offering.

Your slaughter has been dedicated to the Lord.

We can dedicate slaughters and not crackers though, magical-kook Billy!

We? lol ... the facade begins to crack...


How many of you are there?

 

[G.T.]

You really suck at reading comprehension, which might be why you're so yeshua damned gullible.

You do believe in a magic fairy - "you see god at work,"

The god that you're incapable of rationally verifying exists - while making fun of christ crackerers for being irrational.

You are a god damn kook, and a dumb one that miscomprehends simple concepts.

I believe in what I see with my own eyes. I am not incapable of rationally verifying the existence of God, you are incapable of grasping the reality that you have already provided the evidence for the rational justification of my belief.

That's not an argument, it's an assertion.

Part of learning how to rationally justify something, is knowing what the **** rational and justify mean in the first place.

And I'm still not sure how lying, bickering, name calling and acting like an ass clown on the internet exemplifies a pure mind that follows kosher law - doing those things must be a hidden command huh billy?

Yes its a hidden command.


You, a he-goat 'without blemish", have been carefully chosen and prepared as a sin offering.

Your slaughter has been dedicated to the Lord.

We can dedicate slaughters and not crackers though, magical-kook Billy!

We? lol ... the facade begins to crack...


How many of you are there?

did you have trouble following how you stepped on your own dick there, Billy?

Let me be clearer -

You mock folks for assuming a dedication is made to their sky fairy through a cracker, and stated that my slaughter is a dedication to your magical sky fairy.

They're equally ridiculous concepts because of the underlying, common thread: they both assume a sky fairy that likes sacrifices.

 

[hobelim]

I believe in what I see with my own eyes. I am not incapable of rationally verifying the existence of God, you are incapable of grasping the reality that you have already provided the evidence for the rational justification of my belief.

That's not an argument, it's an assertion.

Part of learning how to rationally justify something, is knowing what the **** rational and justify mean in the first place.

And I'm still not sure how lying, bickering, name calling and acting like an ass clown on the internet exemplifies a pure mind that follows kosher law - doing those things must be a hidden command huh billy?

Yes its a hidden command.


You, a he-goat 'without blemish", have been carefully chosen and prepared as a sin offering.

Your slaughter has been dedicated to the Lord.

We can dedicate slaughters and not crackers though, magical-kook Billy!

We? lol ... the facade begins to crack...


How many of you are there?

did you have trouble following how you stepped on your own dick there, Billy?

Let me be clearer -

You mock folks for assuming a dedication is made to their sky fairy through a cracker, and stated that my slaughter is a dedication to your magical sky fairy.

They're equally ridiculous concepts because of the underlying, common thread: they both assume a sky fairy that likes sacrifices.

I make no such assumptions. I read the book, I understand the lessons and see how they apply to real life.

I see what God did so thats what I do.

so when you came slithering along full of guile I put you in your place, beneath all the cattle and the wild beasts of the field. Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven and all that..Simple.

thats what is actually taking place.