Can Atheists be Moral?

[badger2]

10 Mar 2019 Moral Zealotry and the Seductive Nature of Evil
Moral Zealotry and the Seductive Nature of Evil - Quillette

 

[badger2]

Consciousness came into being (including non-human animals) at the crusty lips of a volcano (Miller-Urey volcanic spark experiment), and there is nothing unique about DNA that thinks let alone speaks.

'For Marion, the true life of god is immortal. If god were not immortal, he would not be god. Marions employs this definition of god in order to make god immune from any possible refutation. If god is immortal, he cannot ever die and is consequently safe from the atheist proclamation that god is dead.....Here Derrida does not limit himself to the atheist claim that god is dead; he repeatedly makes the radically atheist claim that (god is death [italics]). That god is death does not mean that we reach god through death or that god rules over death. On the contrary, it means that the idea of immortality -- which according to Marion is 'the idea that we cannot not form of a god' -- is inseparable from the idea of absolute death.'
(Haegglund, Radical Atheism)

 

[Mindful]

Dear G-d;

If you don't exist
I will never,
and I mean never,
forgive You.

 

[BreezeWood]

You simply fool yourself and aggrandize yourself by pretending your morality derives from some divine decree.

you have failed to disprove physiology is a metaphysical substance that disappears when the spiritual component is removed from it - or that by unlocking its dependence to its physiology by the metaphysical requirement to triumph good vs evil is not a viable reason for all beings to pursue during their stay, granted life on planet Earth.

I have also failed to disprove that rainbow unicorns make ice cream in the 8th dimension. That doesn't lend any truth whatsoever to the idea that unicorns make ice cream in the 8th dimension. It also does nothing to prevent someone from saying, "Sure, stars leave the main sequence after fusing all of their hydrogen, but that is because unicorns make ice cream in the 8th dimension".

What insight does this give? What useful predictions does it yield? Does it make any difference whatsoever to the knowledge of star behavior or to how we will go about learning more about star behavior?

No.

That is all you are doing...splashing a veneer of your magical nonsense onto hard earned knowledge after the fact. The fact that this impotent exercise by you has zero effect on any knowledge ever should be your first clue that it is useless nonsense.

.

- onto hard earned knowledge after the fact.

what knowledge or fact is that ff, none you have yet to demonstrate as the origin for physiology or its nonchronological disappearance, occurring randomly only after its spiritual content is removed. as proof of the metaphysical origin for all living beings. from the universe not planet Earth. the Everlasting.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

what knowledge or fact is that ff,

Stop playong stupid, unless you want to be treated as if you are atupid. Every time anyone drops a hard earned fact about biology,you are right there to splash a veneer of your useless, magical horseshit all over it. But, gee, you never manage to uncover any of this knowledge yourself, nor does your magical horseshit seem to have any effect on it. Because it is useless pap.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

none you have yet to demonstrate as the origin for physiology

Except for every single time i have: selection.

Gee, it MUST be magical horseshit that marine animals often seem to form fusiform shapes. Or, it could just be selection. Gee, tough one...

If you are going to shamelessly lie, im going to put you on ignore.

 

[sealybobo]

I guess it's a question for everybody....

Would you rather be in a popular club with shady people, or be in an unpopular club with worthy people?

Think about your life choices before you answer.

You can spot the shady people by their behaviors. Maybe you should be the one thinking twice.

Hey ding I’m watching how the universe works. Did the Big Bang really happen? Scientists are actually questioning if the Big Bang really happened the way we think it happened.

Or is this Big Bang we refer to just the start of earths universe. Our observable universe.

It’s certainly not settled science.

Remember the tardigrade can’t see the sun or the moon. It’s observable universe is not all there is. There’s more. And I believe there’s more than our observable universe. Scientists are pondering this. Their coming up with reasons this might be plausible.

Still so much we don’t know.

 

[sealybobo]

We don’t understand the physics or origins of the universe.

Empty space isn’t empty. Virtual particles are in empty space

 

[BreezeWood]

none you have yet to demonstrate as the origin for physiology

Except for every single time i have: selection.

Gee, it MUST be magical horseshit that marine animals often seem to form fusiform shapes. Or, it could just be selection. Gee, tough one...

If you are going to shamelessly lie, im going to put you on ignore.

.

im going to put you on ignore.

you have offered no response for the origin of physiology in any of your posts -

as pointed out earlier ...

physiology is not native to primordial Earth and is a metaphysical substance that appears and disappears in reference to its spiritual content.

 

[ding]

I guess it's a question for everybody....

Would you rather be in a popular club with shady people, or be in an unpopular club with worthy people?

Think about your life choices before you answer.

You can spot the shady people by their behaviors. Maybe you should be the one thinking twice.

Hey ding I’m watching how the universe works. Did the Big Bang really happen? Scientists are actually questioning if the Big Bang really happened the way we think it happened.

Or is this Big Bang we refer to just the start of earths universe. Our observable universe.

It’s certainly not settled science.

Remember the tardigrade can’t see the sun or the moon. It’s observable universe is not all there is. There’s more. And I believe there’s more than our observable universe. Scientists are pondering this. Their coming up with reasons this might be plausible.

Still so much we don’t know.

And yet we do not see thermal equilibrium.

So you tell me why everything isn’t at the same temperature.

 

[ding]

We don’t understand the physics or origins of the universe.

Empty space isn’t empty. Virtual particles are in empty space

It seems the fact that there was a beginning freaks you out.

 

[RWS]

We may not know what came before the big gang, but we certainly know it's not Snata Clause, or Christian religions. Or any religious god for that matter.

We do know a whole lot of physics took place. And those physics may be a sign of God. But it's not the god of your terrible religions.

No god that creates the big bang, wants you to kill other people 12 billion years later. But all your religious gods do.

Is that not like a little weird?

 

[ding]

We may not know what came before the big gang, but we certainly know it's not Snata Clause, or Christian religions. Or any religious god for that matter.

We do know a whole lot of physics took place. And those physics may be a sign of God. But it's not the god of your terrible religions.

No god that creates the big bang, wants you to kill other people 12 billion years later. But all your religious gods do.

Is that not like a little weird?

There’s only one creator. You keep confusing different perceptions of the creator for beliefs there are many different creators.

Stop watching American Gods so much.

 

[sealybobo]

I guess it's a question for everybody....

Would you rather be in a popular club with shady people, or be in an unpopular club with worthy people?

Think about your life choices before you answer.

You can spot the shady people by their behaviors. Maybe you should be the one thinking twice.

Hey ding I’m watching how the universe works. Did the Big Bang really happen? Scientists are actually questioning if the Big Bang really happened the way we think it happened.

Or is this Big Bang we refer to just the start of earths universe. Our observable universe.

It’s certainly not settled science.

Remember the tardigrade can’t see the sun or the moon. It’s observable universe is not all there is. There’s more. And I believe there’s more than our observable universe. Scientists are pondering this. Their coming up with reasons this might be plausible.

Still so much we don’t know.

And yet we do not see thermal equilibrium.

So you tell me why everything isn’t at the same temperature.

I don’t know. Stupid question. Irrelevant

The wonderful thing I learned last night watching that show is that I was right. The Big Bang is only the best way we can explain how our observable universe started. It’s based on what we know. But there’s so much we don’t know.

So for now scientists aren’t going with the multiverse as a scientific theory because we don’t have any evidence for other universe.

Actually, there is a place in our universe that scientists think might be where our universe and another have maybe collided with each other.

Point is, the Big Bang theory is just about as good as the flat earth theory. It may appear to be right but we don’t have enough knowledge to know for sure.

I have always known there must be more beyond our observable universe. And it’s ignorant to think this is all there is when space goes on in all directions infinitely. There is no end. Even beyond our observable universe.

So please don’t ask me why everything isn’t the same temperature. If it’s a serious question that scientists ponder, I’m sure they don’t know. And what does that have to do with anything? It’s just some stupid question you are stuck on. Must be locust of control

 

[ding]

I guess it's a question for everybody....

Would you rather be in a popular club with shady people, or be in an unpopular club with worthy people?

Think about your life choices before you answer.

You can spot the shady people by their behaviors. Maybe you should be the one thinking twice.

Hey ding I’m watching how the universe works. Did the Big Bang really happen? Scientists are actually questioning if the Big Bang really happened the way we think it happened.

Or is this Big Bang we refer to just the start of earths universe. Our observable universe.

It’s certainly not settled science.

Remember the tardigrade can’t see the sun or the moon. It’s observable universe is not all there is. There’s more. And I believe there’s more than our observable universe. Scientists are pondering this. Their coming up with reasons this might be plausible.

Still so much we don’t know.

And yet we do not see thermal equilibrium.

So you tell me why everything isn’t at the same temperature.

I don’t know. Stupid question. Irrelevant

The wonderful thing I learned last night watching that show is that I was right. The Big Bang is only the best way we can explain how our observable universe started. It’s based on what we know. But there’s so much we don’t know.

So for now scientists aren’t going with the multiverse as a scientific theory because we don’t have any evidence for other universe.

Actually, there is a place in our universe that scientists think might be where our universe and another have maybe collided with each other.

Point is, the Big Bang theory is just about as good as the flat earth theory. It may appear to be right but we don’t have enough knowledge to know for sure.

I have always known there must be more beyond our observable universe. And it’s ignorant to think this is all there is when space goes on in all directions infinitely. There is no end. Even beyond our observable universe.

So please don’t ask me why everything isn’t the same temperature. If it’s a serious question that scientists ponder, I’m sure they don’t know. And what does that have to do with anything? It’s just some stupid question you are stuck on. Must be locust of control

It’s a question whose answer tells us the universe had a beginning. So it is a serious question and it is relevant.

 

[sealybobo]

I guess it's a question for everybody....

Would you rather be in a popular club with shady people, or be in an unpopular club with worthy people?

Think about your life choices before you answer.

You can spot the shady people by their behaviors. Maybe you should be the one thinking twice.

Hey ding I’m watching how the universe works. Did the Big Bang really happen? Scientists are actually questioning if the Big Bang really happened the way we think it happened.

Or is this Big Bang we refer to just the start of earths universe. Our observable universe.

It’s certainly not settled science.

Remember the tardigrade can’t see the sun or the moon. It’s observable universe is not all there is. There’s more. And I believe there’s more than our observable universe. Scientists are pondering this. Their coming up with reasons this might be plausible.

Still so much we don’t know.

And yet we do not see thermal equilibrium.

So you tell me why everything isn’t at the same temperature.

I don’t know. Stupid question. Irrelevant

The wonderful thing I learned last night watching that show is that I was right. The Big Bang is only the best way we can explain how our observable universe started. It’s based on what we know. But there’s so much we don’t know.

So for now scientists aren’t going with the multiverse as a scientific theory because we don’t have any evidence for other universe.

Actually, there is a place in our universe that scientists think might be where our universe and another have maybe collided with each other.

Point is, the Big Bang theory is just about as good as the flat earth theory. It may appear to be right but we don’t have enough knowledge to know for sure.

I have always known there must be more beyond our observable universe. And it’s ignorant to think this is all there is when space goes on in all directions infinitely. There is no end. Even beyond our observable universe.

So please don’t ask me why everything isn’t the same temperature. If it’s a serious question that scientists ponder, I’m sure they don’t know. And what does that have to do with anything? It’s just some stupid question you are stuck on. Must be locust of control

It’s a question whose answer tells us the universe had a beginning. So it is a serious question and it is relevant.

The observable universe did have a beginning. But what was before? And is our universe the only one?

Yesterday they were explaining how something can come from nothing and how nothing isn’t really nothing. There’s stuff in dark space. The air between you and your screen. There’s stuff in that “nothing”

Seriously, you people who talk about this kind of science but you don’t watch how the universe works, need to tune in.

You need to see a lot of your questions are answered, a lot of what you think is wrong, or might be wrong. And you hear what the scientific community knows and doesn’t know.

It’s how I know your confidence in your theories is coming from ignorance.

 

[ding]

You can spot the shady people by their behaviors. Maybe you should be the one thinking twice.

Hey ding I’m watching how the universe works. Did the Big Bang really happen? Scientists are actually questioning if the Big Bang really happened the way we think it happened.

Or is this Big Bang we refer to just the start of earths universe. Our observable universe.

It’s certainly not settled science.

Remember the tardigrade can’t see the sun or the moon. It’s observable universe is not all there is. There’s more. And I believe there’s more than our observable universe. Scientists are pondering this. Their coming up with reasons this might be plausible.

Still so much we don’t know.

And yet we do not see thermal equilibrium.

So you tell me why everything isn’t at the same temperature.

I don’t know. Stupid question. Irrelevant

The wonderful thing I learned last night watching that show is that I was right. The Big Bang is only the best way we can explain how our observable universe started. It’s based on what we know. But there’s so much we don’t know.

So for now scientists aren’t going with the multiverse as a scientific theory because we don’t have any evidence for other universe.

Actually, there is a place in our universe that scientists think might be where our universe and another have maybe collided with each other.

Point is, the Big Bang theory is just about as good as the flat earth theory. It may appear to be right but we don’t have enough knowledge to know for sure.

I have always known there must be more beyond our observable universe. And it’s ignorant to think this is all there is when space goes on in all directions infinitely. There is no end. Even beyond our observable universe.

So please don’t ask me why everything isn’t the same temperature. If it’s a serious question that scientists ponder, I’m sure they don’t know. And what does that have to do with anything? It’s just some stupid question you are stuck on. Must be locust of control

It’s a question whose answer tells us the universe had a beginning. So it is a serious question and it is relevant.

The observable universe did have a beginning. But what was before? And is our universe the only one?

Yesterday they were explaining how something can come from nothing and how nothing isn’t really nothing. There’s stuff in dark space. The air between you and your screen. There’s stuff in that “nothing”

Seriously, you people who talk about this kind of science but you don’t watch how the universe works, need to tune in.

You need to see a lot of your questions are answered, a lot of what you think is wrong, or might be wrong. And you hear what the scientific community knows and doesn’t know.

It’s how I know your confidence in your theories is coming from ignorance.

It was nothing before. It literally popped into existence 14 billion years ago.

The mass of a false vacuum is not equal to the mass of the universe. The mass of a false vacuum is zero. The creation of the universe through a quantum tunneling event literally popped all matter and energy into existence. And the event followed the laws of nature. Specifically quantum mechanics and conservation.

 

[sealybobo]

Hey ding I’m watching how the universe works. Did the Big Bang really happen? Scientists are actually questioning if the Big Bang really happened the way we think it happened.

Or is this Big Bang we refer to just the start of earths universe. Our observable universe.

It’s certainly not settled science.

Remember the tardigrade can’t see the sun or the moon. It’s observable universe is not all there is. There’s more. And I believe there’s more than our observable universe. Scientists are pondering this. Their coming up with reasons this might be plausible.

Still so much we don’t know.

And yet we do not see thermal equilibrium.

So you tell me why everything isn’t at the same temperature.

I don’t know. Stupid question. Irrelevant

The wonderful thing I learned last night watching that show is that I was right. The Big Bang is only the best way we can explain how our observable universe started. It’s based on what we know. But there’s so much we don’t know.

So for now scientists aren’t going with the multiverse as a scientific theory because we don’t have any evidence for other universe.

Actually, there is a place in our universe that scientists think might be where our universe and another have maybe collided with each other.

Point is, the Big Bang theory is just about as good as the flat earth theory. It may appear to be right but we don’t have enough knowledge to know for sure.

I have always known there must be more beyond our observable universe. And it’s ignorant to think this is all there is when space goes on in all directions infinitely. There is no end. Even beyond our observable universe.

So please don’t ask me why everything isn’t the same temperature. If it’s a serious question that scientists ponder, I’m sure they don’t know. And what does that have to do with anything? It’s just some stupid question you are stuck on. Must be locust of control

It’s a question whose answer tells us the universe had a beginning. So it is a serious question and it is relevant.

The observable universe did have a beginning. But what was before? And is our universe the only one?

Yesterday they were explaining how something can come from nothing and how nothing isn’t really nothing. There’s stuff in dark space. The air between you and your screen. There’s stuff in that “nothing”

Seriously, you people who talk about this kind of science but you don’t watch how the universe works, need to tune in.

You need to see a lot of your questions are answered, a lot of what you think is wrong, or might be wrong. And you hear what the scientific community knows and doesn’t know.

It’s how I know your confidence in your theories is coming from ignorance.

It was nothing before. It literally popped into existence 14 billion years ago.

The mass of a false vacuum is not equal to the mass of the universe. The mass of a false vacuum is zero. The creation of the universe through a quantum tunneling event literally popped all matter and energy into existence. And the event followed the laws of nature. Specifically quantum mechanics and conservation.

You know the thing that is stumping scientists is inflation.

There’s so much you and they don’t know.

 

[sealybobo]

Hey ding I’m watching how the universe works. Did the Big Bang really happen? Scientists are actually questioning if the Big Bang really happened the way we think it happened.

Or is this Big Bang we refer to just the start of earths universe. Our observable universe.

It’s certainly not settled science.

Remember the tardigrade can’t see the sun or the moon. It’s observable universe is not all there is. There’s more. And I believe there’s more than our observable universe. Scientists are pondering this. Their coming up with reasons this might be plausible.

Still so much we don’t know.

And yet we do not see thermal equilibrium.

So you tell me why everything isn’t at the same temperature.

I don’t know. Stupid question. Irrelevant

The wonderful thing I learned last night watching that show is that I was right. The Big Bang is only the best way we can explain how our observable universe started. It’s based on what we know. But there’s so much we don’t know.

So for now scientists aren’t going with the multiverse as a scientific theory because we don’t have any evidence for other universe.

Actually, there is a place in our universe that scientists think might be where our universe and another have maybe collided with each other.

Point is, the Big Bang theory is just about as good as the flat earth theory. It may appear to be right but we don’t have enough knowledge to know for sure.

I have always known there must be more beyond our observable universe. And it’s ignorant to think this is all there is when space goes on in all directions infinitely. There is no end. Even beyond our observable universe.

So please don’t ask me why everything isn’t the same temperature. If it’s a serious question that scientists ponder, I’m sure they don’t know. And what does that have to do with anything? It’s just some stupid question you are stuck on. Must be locust of control

It’s a question whose answer tells us the universe had a beginning. So it is a serious question and it is relevant.

The observable universe did have a beginning. But what was before? And is our universe the only one?

Yesterday they were explaining how something can come from nothing and how nothing isn’t really nothing. There’s stuff in dark space. The air between you and your screen. There’s stuff in that “nothing”

Seriously, you people who talk about this kind of science but you don’t watch how the universe works, need to tune in.

You need to see a lot of your questions are answered, a lot of what you think is wrong, or might be wrong. And you hear what the scientific community knows and doesn’t know.

It’s how I know your confidence in your theories is coming from ignorance.

It was nothing before. It literally popped into existence 14 billion years ago.

How did it happen?

 

[ding]

And yet we do not see thermal equilibrium.

So you tell me why everything isn’t at the same temperature.

I don’t know. Stupid question. Irrelevant

The wonderful thing I learned last night watching that show is that I was right. The Big Bang is only the best way we can explain how our observable universe started. It’s based on what we know. But there’s so much we don’t know.

So for now scientists aren’t going with the multiverse as a scientific theory because we don’t have any evidence for other universe.

Actually, there is a place in our universe that scientists think might be where our universe and another have maybe collided with each other.

Point is, the Big Bang theory is just about as good as the flat earth theory. It may appear to be right but we don’t have enough knowledge to know for sure.

I have always known there must be more beyond our observable universe. And it’s ignorant to think this is all there is when space goes on in all directions infinitely. There is no end. Even beyond our observable universe.

So please don’t ask me why everything isn’t the same temperature. If it’s a serious question that scientists ponder, I’m sure they don’t know. And what does that have to do with anything? It’s just some stupid question you are stuck on. Must be locust of control

It’s a question whose answer tells us the universe had a beginning. So it is a serious question and it is relevant.

The observable universe did have a beginning. But what was before? And is our universe the only one?

Yesterday they were explaining how something can come from nothing and how nothing isn’t really nothing. There’s stuff in dark space. The air between you and your screen. There’s stuff in that “nothing”

Seriously, you people who talk about this kind of science but you don’t watch how the universe works, need to tune in.

You need to see a lot of your questions are answered, a lot of what you think is wrong, or might be wrong. And you hear what the scientific community knows and doesn’t know.

It’s how I know your confidence in your theories is coming from ignorance.

It was nothing before. It literally popped into existence 14 billion years ago.

The mass of a false vacuum is not equal to the mass of the universe. The mass of a false vacuum is zero. The creation of the universe through a quantum tunneling event literally popped all matter and energy into existence. And the event followed the laws of nature. Specifically quantum mechanics and conservation.

You know the thing that is stumping scientists is inflation.

There’s so much you and they don’t know.

Really? How so?