Can "Alleged" Kirk Shooter "Tyler Robinson" Get a fair trial? Trump is all over the TV saying Charlie Kirk’s shooter is guilty

Don't pick your nose - your head will cave in.
seriously, you believe you can spar with The Dante? :auiqs.jpg:

"Your mind is too narrow, and it's no surprise
If you fell on a pin, well, you'd be blind in both eyes
" -
Steppenwolf
 
Dante and the rest of the Trump Hater crowd wants Robinson to get the O.J. treatment. Not gonna happen. Utah has the death penalty and firing squad is an option.
O.J.?

Trump used the Charlie Manson defense.

If Robinson is found to be guilty, he will maybe appeal like Trump keeps doing. What would be wrong with that?

And scum like you have no idea what Dante believes or feels about this Tyler guy. No idea.
 
Try to keep up:

Here's a part of the interview with Hasan Piker

What do you think it said about Charlie Kirk that he thought debate was one of the ways to release that pressure valve?

I don’t think he was ever debating for the purpose of finding the truth or from a position of intellectual curiosity. I think a lot of people say that. Debates are only productive in the sense that it can test your opinions against your interlocutors’ opinions, and it’s good, it’s galvanizing. I’ve always said that 40 percent of the audience on either side have already made up their minds, and they’re not going to change. But then there’s a 20 percent in the margins that could swing in either direction. And it’s for that 20 percent in the middle, that you entertain the intellectual sparring.

For Charlie, I think the format was more so to just humiliate his ideological opponents. And he was very successful at doing propaganda of this sort, by going to college campuses and listening to what people had to say, and then giving them the right-wing talking points on the matter. Getting a couple dunks in the process. That’s a big part of the debate culture. Having said that, it still can be productive. There are still people who can have their minds changed in that process, where they go “Wow, my worldview that I took for granted is maybe seemingly not so smart.” There is some productivity that you can derive out of debates, which is why I was entertaining doing it with Charlie.
Hasan Piker's opinion means nothing. Try smarter, fucktard.
Charlie Kirk: class act.
Dante: jack ass.
 
If he gets the death penalty - it'll be a fair trial.
It'll take too long. Just put in general pop. Much quicker that way.
Perhaps if its held in Alaska. He sure won't receive an unbiased jury in Utah if I were to wager.

Justice is difficult and it should be if it performed based on its foundation of principles.
Alaska doesn't have the death penalty.
 
think about it people
Think about what?

I personally am pretty sure Robinson is guilty, it’s not kosher for the president to e stating guilt before a trial.
 
It'll take too long. Just put in general pop. Much quicker that way.

Alaska doesn't have the death penalty.
Look, I know my beliefs might be unpopular with on here some and this kid committed an evil crime for which he must pay.

I said the same in protection of cops when they are charged with a crime, they shouldn't be in general population. A man should pay his dues to society but we cannot lose our humanity to evil out of a sense of vengeance. We lose our own light with G-d when we do.

Whatever the agreed upon laws in his community demand then he must be judged accordingly and fairly. I am not a fan of capital punishment, this young man appears to be guilty so he will face consequences.

There is a great amount of evil in the air but we must not let it overcome us.
 
I knew an American Communist Party Member that Served Valiantly in the US Armed Forced During the Vietnam War.

Bigger Patriot than any male member of the Trump family in America.
So what. He's a commie who's desire is to destroy the USA.

That makes him an enemy of the PEOPLE.
 
Ok, so doesn’t all that suggest the president of the United States should stop saying the suspect is explicitly guilty until at least after the trial?
Why bother. The leftoids were all declaring Rittenhouse guilty, Trump guilty, etc.
 
O.J.?

Trump used the Charlie Manson defense.

If Robinson is found to be guilty, he will maybe appeal like Trump keeps doing. What would be wrong with that?

And scum like you have no idea what Dante believes or feels about this Tyler guy. No idea.
If found guilty and sentenced to death, he gets one appeal as a matter of right.
 
Ok, so doesn’t all that suggest the president of the United States should stop saying the suspect is explicitly guilty until at least after the trial?
TRANSLATION: "Isn't the president usurping the job of the media by leveling the playing field?"
think about it people
:spank:
 
Last edited:
Look, I know my beliefs might be unpopular with on here some and this kid committed an evil crime for which he must pay.

I said the same in protection of cops when they are charged with a crime, they shouldn't be in general population. A man should pay his dues to society but we cannot lose our humanity to evil out of a sense of vengeance. We lose our own light with G-d when we do.

Whatever the agreed upon laws in his community demand then he must be judged accordingly and fairly. I am not a fan of capital punishment, this young man appears to be guilty so he will face consequences.

There is a great amount of evil in the air but we must not let it overcome us.
I, on the other hand, support flushing toilets.
 
15th post
Charlie Kirk was a pathetic provocateur
I don't know him enough to say if he was or wasn't but most well known figures on both sides seem to be provocateurs of late. We need more cerebral discourse but few want to engage, they just want to insult.
 
Back
Top Bottom