Can "Alleged" Kirk Shooter "Tyler Robinson" Get a fair trial? Trump is all over the TV saying Charlie Kirk’s shooter is guilty

I hate leftists, communists, socialists, and basically all democratic scum. Once we rid of this sewage, the constitution will become relevant again.
I imagine it means spark up a Bolivar Liberatador cigar. At least in my cigar shop that's what it would mean.
really?

Why can't you be honest either?

Is it a maga thing?
 
I just told you dumbass. Now go take a long walk on a short pier.
'Tard' says what?

Now shithead, please stand up and be a man. Stop being a Coward.

What does Smoke a Lib mean?

step up. Be honest
 
really?

Why can't you be honest either?

Is it a maga thing?
Oh, leftoids, like you are the masters of prevarication. But, like I said, that's the term we use in the cigar shop. But we use "spark up" instead of "smoke a".

I think it's a regional thing.

That being said, I see no problem with exterminating commies.
 
Evidently you are one simple mind:

"Immediately after Donald Trump lost the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Kirk promoted false and disproven claims of fraud in the election.[100][101] On November 5, 2020, Kirk was the leader of a Stop the Steal protest at the Maricopa Tabulation Center in Phoenix.[102] Kirk was considered a "big name" social influencer in Rudy Giuliani's communications plan to overturn the 2020 election.[103]"
That's not a link, dullard. That's a quote.
Do yourself a favor and watch Kirk debate college kids. Respectful and logical.
You're making a fool of yourself here.
 
Of course Tyler Robinson can get a fair trial.

If he didn't do it, everyone would love to hear his story so we might find the real shooter.

But if he did it- as it certainly seems like he did- a "fair" trial would be one which finds him as guilty as sin and dancing on the end of a rope.

a "fair" trial doesn't mean that someone who as guilty as sin should have a chance of getting off.
Ok, so doesn’t all that suggest the president of the United States should stop saying the suspect is explicitly guilty until at least after the trial?
 
Oh, leftoids, like you are the masters of prevarication. But, like I said, that's the term we use in the cigar shop. But we use "spark up" instead of "smoke a".

I think it's a regional thing.

That being said, I see no problem with exterminating commies.
I knew an American Communist Party Member that Served Valiantly in the US Armed Forced During the Vietnam War.

Bigger Patriot than any male member of the Trump family in America.
 
15th post
That's not a link, dullard. That's a quote.
Do yourself a favor and watch Kirk debate college kids. Respectful and logical.
You're making a fool of yourself here.
Try to keep up:

Here's a part of the interview with Hasan Piker

What do you think it said about Charlie Kirk that he thought debate was one of the ways to release that pressure valve?

I don’t think he was ever debating for the purpose of finding the truth or from a position of intellectual curiosity. I think a lot of people say that. Debates are only productive in the sense that it can test your opinions against your interlocutors’ opinions, and it’s good, it’s galvanizing. I’ve always said that 40 percent of the audience on either side have already made up their minds, and they’re not going to change. But then there’s a 20 percent in the margins that could swing in either direction. And it’s for that 20 percent in the middle, that you entertain the intellectual sparring.

For Charlie, I think the format was more so to just humiliate his ideological opponents. And he was very successful at doing propaganda of this sort, by going to college campuses and listening to what people had to say, and then giving them the right-wing talking points on the matter. Getting a couple dunks in the process. That’s a big part of the debate culture. Having said that, it still can be productive. There are still people who can have their minds changed in that process, where they go “Wow, my worldview that I took for granted is maybe seemingly not so smart.” There is some productivity that you can derive out of debates, which is why I was entertaining doing it with Charlie.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom