Can "Alleged" Kirk Shooter "Tyler Robinson" Get a fair trial? Trump is all over the TV saying Charlie Kirk’s shooter is guilty

Yeah, hard to imagine they "found" 12 people who had no knowledge of the case after months of trying it in the media, huh?
having knowledge of a case is not new?

Do you believe people in early small town USA and the Brit colonies would be on juries only if they had no knowledge of a case

:auiqs.jpg:

learn about the trials of Brits on the so-called Boston Massacre ceases?
 
I don't know him enough to say if he was or wasn't but most well known figures on both sides seem to be provocateurs of late. We need more cerebral discourse but few want to engage, they just want to insult.

Somebody who knew him from interactions:

What do you think it said about Charlie Kirk that he thought debate was one of the ways to release that pressure valve?

I don’t think he was ever debating for the purpose of finding the truth or from a position of intellectual curiosity. I think a lot of people say that. Debates are only productive in the sense that it can test your opinions against your interlocutors’ opinions, and it’s good, it’s galvanizing. I’ve always said that 40 percent of the audience on either side have already made up their minds, and they’re not going to change. But then there’s a 20 percent in the margins that could swing in either direction. And it’s for that 20 percent in the middle, that you entertain the intellectual sparring.

For Charlie, I think the format was more so to just humiliate his ideological opponents. And he was very successful at doing propaganda of this sort, by going to college campuses and listening to what people had to say, and then giving them the right-wing talking points on the matter. Getting a couple dunks in the process. That’s a big part of the debate culture. Having said that, it still can be productive. There are still people who can have their minds changed in that process, where they go “Wow, my worldview that I took for granted is maybe seemingly not so smart.” There is some productivity that you can derive out of debates, which is why I was entertaining doing it with Charlie.

 
Well, if he's lucky he'll get a death sentence, that way he'll avoid general pop.
Oh please. enough with threats and shit. People like you fed people like teh shooter

There were also inscriptions on three recovered unfired casings. Those said:

  • "Hey fascist! Catch!" followed by an up arrow symbol, a right arrow symbol, and three down arrow symbols
  • "Oh bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao, ciao, ciao"
  • "If you read this, you are gay LMAO"
 
having knowledge of a case is not new?

Do you believe people in early small town USA and the Brit colonies would be on juries only if they had no knowledge of a case

:auiqs.jpg:

learn about the trials of Brits on the so-called Boston Massacre ceases?

1. Not too concerned with what was done a few centuries ago, this is today, when the haters had months to try the case in the media first. I was here and I remember all kinds of idiots grabbing headlines and gibbering as they danced around their campfires.
2. What is one of the questions every juror is asked before being put on the jury?
 
Oh please. enough with threats and shit. People like you fed people like teh shooter

There were also inscriptions on three recovered unfired casings. Those said:

  • "Hey fascist! Catch!" followed by an up arrow symbol, a right arrow symbol, and three down arrow symbols
  • "Oh bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao, ciao, ciao"
  • "If you read this, you are gay LMAO"
There's a big difference between stating the obvious and threatening. While I get you view him as something of a hero, that's not going to save his sorry ass.
 
There's a big difference between stating the obvious and threatening. While I get you view him as something of a hero, that's not going to save his sorry ass.
"Hero?"

Where do you weirdos go to come up with crap like this?

I used to think it was some sort of a projection. Now? You for one are seriously mentally and emotionally defective.
 
1. Not too concerned with what was done a few centuries ago, this is today, when the haters had months to try the case in the media first. I was here and I remember all kinds of idiots grabbing headlines and gibbering as they danced around their campfires.
2. What is one of the questions every juror is asked before being put on the jury?
You are crapping on values, principles and all that made America great
 
"Hero?"

Where do you weirdos go to come up with crap like this?

I used to think it was some sort of a projection. Now? You for one are seriously mentally and emotionally defective.
Well, in your own words, he did kill a pathetic provocateur. So it's not much of a stretch.

Mentally and emotionally defective, me? Seriously, read your own ******* posts you ******* lunatic.
 
Last edited:
Well, in your own words, he did kill a pathetic provocateur. So it's not much of a stretch.
Only somebody with your mindset would believe people one disagrees with deserves to be killed.

When people like you calla somebody a "pathetic oppressive provocateur" are you calling for their death? I am starting to believe you do that, believe that, are calling for that.
 
15th post
Have to ask: Can "Alleged" Kirk Shooter "Tyler Robinson" ever get a fair trial?

President Donald John is always speaking out in ways previous presidents never would have. He ignores norms, breaks rules, and laughs at demands he be civil, reasonable, or presidential.

What makes this an even more credible inquiry is the fact that most all of Trump's appointees to his administration have taken to following suit.
pretty sure I read he confessed, so yeah......******* guilty

once forensics who has the gun take any DNA it's confirmed

he likely did not wear gloves, his prints are on the gun and the bullets he loaded
 
Back
Top Bottom