MinTrut
Diamond Member
- Jun 7, 2021
- 14,327
- 7,879
- 1,938
It's all in the thread for you to see.Thats what i figured![]()
If you wish to see it, you'll see it.
If you wish to pretend it's not here, you can continue to do that too.
Your choice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's all in the thread for you to see.Thats what i figured![]()
In this one instance - this thread - I take that as a compliment.Hell you are just like mac.
You're projecting; you refuse to accept reality about this backfired thread of yours.Say dumb shit and then not want to back it up.
You're in denial.You both are fucking jokes![]()
Good analysis.Here is how to understand Mac, folks.
Do you remember back in 2015 when he was all about "regressives". He used the term then as often as he does "Trumpsters" now. At that time, who was most threatened by the so-called progressive wing of the Democrat party as represented by Bernie Sanders? Yep, Hillary and the Swamp establishment.
Curiously, all mention of "regressives" disappeared as if by magic in 2016, when he switched to "Trumpster" as his go-to epithet. Do you think that was a coincidence that he simply moved on to the current threat to the swamp establishment?
Now that the Swamp is firmly in control, he is still all about "Trumpsters", but should a new threat arise to the establishment, you can be sure that a new epithet will be created. For today, he is in complete solidarity with all the double digit useful idiots he once decried as all his blather about being independent in any fashion is just to distract people away from the DNC mission that drives his posts.
Progressives and fascists, yes; socialists, no..
It makes no sense to you, because you fail to recognize the sense it makes.
Progressives, Authoritarian Fascists, and Socialists knew they would never be widely accepted by those terms in Modern America ...
So they labeled themselves Liberals ... And it kind of stuck with the people who were stupid enough to believe it and play along ...
.
The problem with this is that there are only two actual leftists here that I've seen, so these interactions with so many on the "regressive left" sound like a fantasy on your part.^^^ This is the kind of thing that I find so fascinating about this place. And politics, in general, I guess.
Ideologues are adept at just making things up out of thin air, believing them immediately, and then attacking based on pure fantasy.
"All mention of 'regressives' disappeared as if by magic in 2016", he says.
So, here is reality:
This August 10, Post 466: Trump supporters: If Trump broke the law, should he be held legally accountable?
This August 7, Post 120: If “We” Had An Educated Electorate…
This June 2, Post 29: Herschel Walker says he supports critical race theory "100%"
And then they bitch and moan that I don't engage. Why in the world would I? There is no way to keep up with their rage, their lies and their fantasies.
Liberals would have panned this, not leftists.In a thread many years ago, I brought up the name John Stuart Mill, only to have him panned by every leftist in the thread.
These morons do not know what liberalism entails. All they know is lock-step conformity. They are like the proles in 1984 where today, we are at war with Eurasia and we have always been at war with Eurasia, but tomorrow we will be at war with Eastasia and we will have always been at war with Eastasia.
I understood Mac the first week I was here.If you had been in this form longer than just a year, you would fully understand this call out.
In general, I agree 100%.It is 100% justified and Mac has no defense for his bullshit.
See above.You're gonna have to just trust us on this one.
See above.You haven't been around long enough to see Mac's behavior.
Indubitably.He has some personal investment and establishment behavior. Probably a portfolio that includes military/industrial complex reacharounds.
Biden's brain is soup.Dont you think biden thinks he’s helping the poor?
AOC is an utter fraud.Of course he thinks so
And so does AOC
And both go about it in the most big government way they can get away with
I have no idea what you're saying.I think you have a much kinder picture of yourself than the rest of us see you
Modern liberals are extremely dangerous, and quite plentiful.Liberals are leftists who are simply not the worst of the worst
I'm already appreciating you again.Im a hack for all things "conservative"-
but im as pro choice as they come
I dont want theological policy
Gays should be able to get married. Hell anyone should be able to get married and marry whoever and how ever many people they want
Yeah, im a real hack for "all things conservative"
You dilapidated bag of dumbfuck![]()
I think he's making the case that because the Democrats [pretend to] care about the poor, they MUST be on the dreaded left!Lol. So you oppose them because they THINK they are helping the poor. WTF?
How about we debate Harley?You want to debate too, bigmouth? Ill slap you around like I do him every day.
Progressives and fascists, yes; socialists, no.
No leftist is a liberal or Democrat; it's like saying the Jews were Nazis.
Yeah -- I've always seen you as a classy liberal..
I wasn't asking your opinion.
I didn't say anything about leftist, Democrats or Republicans, and don't care what bee you may have in your bonnet about that.
I am a Classical Liberal, not to be confused with a Libertarian ...
And don't have any use for whatever Authoritarian Fascists need to tell themselves to pretend they are something different.
.
Democrats do not care about anyone but themselves if you are writing about the Politicians…I think he's making the case that because the Democrats [pretend to] care about the poor, they MUST be on the dreaded left!
But you & I & anyone paying attention know better.
He'll be back.Aw man. This thing's still going?
Looks like Mac bailed.
Being filled with that much hot air must be most distressing.Poor guy...