Busy Hurricane Season is predicted for 2024

LOL, why are you so messed up in every post, when all you had to do was just reply to what I stated, my point was you said it is the first ever but in reality that is going to be false because before the 1970's we simply didn't cover all of the oceans thus not all massive or early hurricanes were seen and far less before 1900 as over 75% of the worlds warm ocean area were barely travelled so your hyperbole is what it is then a millions of years before that..... lol.
I should have said earliest Cat 5 storm SEEN in over 100 years.
Secondly, I am the one who started this thread predicting a big tropical storm and hurricane season which is largely because of warmer than usual SST and low shear winds and apparently due to barrier lays that strongly contributed to rapid intensification when it went through the area now that it passed favorable ocean surface conditions it has weakened quite a bit losing at least 25 mph steady but Bertha is forecasted to decline into a Tropical storm by Friday evening might not go back to hurricane level before landfall.
My apologies. I had only seen posters rejecting the NHC forecast.
 
It will be interesting to see how those stormproof structures fare in the coming storms. Oh wait, they were never built. :omg:
 
and now it is getting stronger again, already back to a Cat III

Yeah, just barely. They are predicting a TS after it crosses the Yucatan. Which is probably right but I think it will strengthen back to at least a Cat 1 before landfall in the US. The weather service we use has consistently under estimated its ability to intensify.
 
Meanwhile Beryl is the ONLY tropical storm in the Atlantic.........


1720233169287.png
 
Last edited:
its early in the season.

peakofseason.gif

I know that it is the overconcern that it is unusually early, and powerful is why I show there is nothing else going on as a contrast that weather is variable as they don't arrive on a tight schedule.
 
I know that it is the overconcern that it is unusually early, and powerful is why I show there is nothing else going on as a contrast that weather is variable as they don't arrive on a tight schedule.
You haven't addressed the conditions that are driving those predictions and the behavior of Beryl: the extraordinarily high SST in the Atlantic Ocean. Do you think surface water temperature has nothing to do with storm intensity?
 
You haven't addressed the conditions that are driving those predictions and the behavior of Beryl: the extraordinarily high SST in the Atlantic Ocean. Do you think surface water temperature has nothing to do with storm intensity?
I think it's perfectly normal for an interglacial period that is still warming up to its pre-glacial temperature. You think the planet has never been in this position before?

glacial cycles.png
 
I think it's perfectly normal for an interglacial period that is still warming up to its pre-glacial temperature. You think the planet has never been in this position before?

View attachment 973147
I was talking about THIS hurricane season, not the past 400,000 years.
 
I was talking about THIS hurricane season, not the past 400,000 years.
I know. You are implying this season is unusual. I'm telling you it's no different than any of the previous interglacial periods at this temperature level.
 
15th post
I know. You are implying this season is unusual. I'm telling you it's no different than any of the previous interglacial periods at this temperature level.
This season is predicted to be unusual within the human record of meterology. The current conversation concerns the accuracy or dependability of the NHC forecast for this season. Your uneducated comments, as usual, are irrelevant.
 
This season is predicted to be unusual within the human record of meterology. The current conversation concerns the accuracy or dependability of the NHC forecast for this season. Your uneducated comments, as usual, are irrelevant.
Destroying your extreme weather argument due to AGW is never irrelevant.
 
Destroying your extreme weather argument due to AGW is never irrelevant.
Dream on, young man, dream on. PS, arguing with me would be a waste of time. They aren't my arguments. They're the arguments of thousands of degreed, actively researching and publishing climate scientists. Since, even when given the opportunity to engage in a conversation with one, you declined, I'm not too awful worried that you're right and they're wrong.
 
Dream on, young man, dream on. PS, arguing with me would be a waste of time. They aren't my arguments. They're the arguments of thousands of degreed, actively researching and publishing climate scientists. Since, even when given the opportunity to engage in a conversation with one, you declined, I'm not too awful worried that you're right and they're wrong.
I'm not arguing with you or them. I'm correcting it. Science works best when challenged.
 
Back
Top Bottom