The Great Hurricane Drought of 2025

[CrusaderFrank]

Why 1C per doubling of CO2 is a weak GHG?

No! Clearly it’s a thermonuclear force multiplier of a molecule. A 250PPM increase in CO2, will increase temperature 1C, a 500PPM increase will boil off our atmosphere

 

[ding]

No! Clearly it’s a thermonuclear force multiplier of a molecule. A 250PPM increase in CO2, will increase temperature 1C, a 500PPM increase will boil off our atmosphere

It's the feedback they pile on that's in error. The GHG effect is real. To deny it only weakens your position. There's no value in being unreasonable.

 

[EMH]

The earth always warms in an interglacial period.

Love message boards...

Thread '"Interglacials" are 100% refuted by ice cores'

Oct 28, 2025

CO2 FRAUD is 100% about getting science invalids to believe planet Earth warms and cools as a whole. That conclusion was completely blown out of the water by the fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed during the past 1 million years.

The "interglacial" is part of CO2 FRAUD's attempt to mislead on that issue.

Google Search

The last interglacial...

• EMH
• Replies: 4
• Forum: Environment

• 

 

[ding]

Love message boards...

Thread '"Interglacials" are 100% refuted by ice cores'

Oct 28, 2025

CO2 FRAUD is 100% about getting science invalids to believe planet Earth warms and cools as a whole. That conclusion was completely blown out of the water by the fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed during the past 1 million years.

The "interglacial" is part of CO2 FRAUD's attempt to mislead on that issue.

Google Search

The last interglacial...

• EMH
• Replies: 4
• Forum: Environment

• 

You were wrong about it then and you are wrong about it now. No one other than you denies the 30 or so glacial cycles of the past 3 million years. The evidence is overwhelming. Your denial makes you unreasonable and unreliable.

 

[EMH]

The GHG effect is real.

but but but but oceans currents cause climate change because water causes ice... lol...


The CO2 FRAUD taxpayer funded "Faux Skeptics" are the same as the "climate scientists," rejects from other parts of science, easily outed as liars and frauds...



YOUR THEORY is that increasing atmospheric CO2 causes warming. CO2 increased and atmosphere did not warm.


THEORY REJECTED

 

[ding]

but but but but oceans currents cause climate change because water causes ice... lol...


The CO2 FRAUD taxpayer funded "Faux Skeptics" are the same as the "climate scientists," rejects from other parts of science, easily outed as liars and frauds...



YOUR THEORY is that increasing atmospheric CO2 causes warming. CO2 increased and atmosphere did not warm.


THEORY REJECTED

You are a moron.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's the feedback they pile on that's in error. The GHG effect is real. To deny it only weakens your position. There's no value in being unreasonable.

If you’re telling us the 250ppm of CO2 can raise temperature 1F, just show us the lab work

Do increasing increments of 250 PPM and show us the effect on temperature

 

[EMH]

If you’re telling us the 250ppm of CO2 can raise temperature 1F, just show us the lab work

Do increasing increments of 250 PPM and show us the effect on temperature

They cannot simulate the atmosphere in a lab. They can put CO2 in a jar, shine IR at it, and notice it gets warmer, and scream for more funding...

they've been doing that for 3 decades, and they still have no real evidence of any warming outside of Urban Heat Island Effect.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

We have Earth data. Slight microscopic long term down trend in SAP = Earth not warming

Now post the actual data. Any place on Earth, daily temperature and SAP. 6 months should be plenty.

*****.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

They cannot simulate the atmosphere in a lab. They can put CO2 in a jar, shine IR at it, and notice it gets warmer, and scream for more funding...

they've been doing that for 3 decades, and they still have no real evidence of any warming outside of Urban Heat Island Effect.

But they never once produced a lab experiment controlling for CO2

It’s an absolute “gimme!” if it worked at all as they claimed

With sealed containers, it should be easy to replicate the increase in temperature from CO2

 

[EMH]

Now post the actual data. Any place on Earth, daily temperature and SAP. 6 months should be plenty.

*****.

LOL!!!

You've lost every time.

No more WU fudge for us???

 

[EMH]

But they never once produced a lab experiment controlling for CO2

It’s an absolute “gimme!” if it worked at all as they claimed

With sealed containers, it should be easy to replicate the increase in temperature from CO2

maybe CO2 FRAUD is in a bit of a lazy despair period...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

LOL!!!

You've lost every time.

No more WU fudge for us???

And you're still a *****.

Or are you just too stupid to find the data to support your claim?

I think you're a stupid *****.

 

[ding]

If you’re telling us the 250ppm of CO2 can raise temperature 1F, just show us the lab work

Do increasing increments of 250 PPM and show us the effect on temperature

You aren't helping the cause by denying the GHG effect. You are hurting it.

And you can't just say 250 ppm will raise temperature by 1C. It's a doubling of CO2. So to add 1C from the pre-industrial revolution of 280 ppm, it would take an atmospheric CO2 level of 580 ppm. And then to add another 1C it would take an atmospheric CO2 level of 1,160 ppm. And then to add another 1C it would take an atmospheric CO2 of 2,320 ppm.

Now do you understand?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You aren't helping the cause by denying the GHG effect. You are hurting it.

And you can't just say 250 ppm will raise temperature by 1C. It's a doubling of CO2. So to add 1C from the pre-industrial revolution of 280 ppm, it would take an atmospheric CO2 level of 580 ppm. And then to add another 1C it would take an atmospheric CO2 level of 1,160 ppm. And then to add another 1C it would take an atmospheric CO2 of 2,320 ppm.

Now do you understand?

This is called presenting facts not in evidence.

If CO2 is THAT powerful, please, Please, PLEASE show one lab experiment where the control tank has 250PPM CO2 and the test tanks have 500, 1,000 and 3,000PPM CO2 and test for temperature

Mythbusters tried it, but they not only had to use 7,000PPM CO2 they added an ice sculpture melting in the control tank. Water vapor being a far more powerful GHG than the Almighty CO2.

If it worked as posited, we'd see literally millions of successful experiments billions of times a day to get us to cut back our carbon footprint.

 

[ding]

This is called presenting facts not in evidence.

If CO2 is THAT powerful, please, Please, PLEASE show one lab experiment where the control tank has 250PPM CO2 and the test tanks have 500, 1,000 and 3,000PPM CO2 and test for temperature

Mythbusters tried it, but they not only had to use 7,000PPM CO2 they added an ice sculpture melting in the control tank. Water vapor being a far more powerful GHG than the Almighty CO2.

If it worked as posited, we'd see literally millions of successful experiments billions of times a day to get us to cut back our carbon footprint.

It's a fact that CO2 is a greenhouse gas that has a logarithmic relationship to temperature. Your denial - based on a flawed TV show experiment - hurts the cause.

 

[EMH]

And you're still a *****.

Or are you just too stupid to find the data to support your claim?

I think you're a stupid *****.

YOU have NO DATA to refute the claims.

EMH has DATA and lying about it doesn't change anything.

It is YOU who has all the fear, too chicken to conspire with WU for more fudge...

Mossad coward still too chicken to fly a motorized paraglider. Why?

BECAUSE YOU ARE A *****, a COWARD, a LIAR, a TRAITOR, and you would never have any courage outside of behind your little PC monitor...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's a fact that CO2 is a greenhouse gas that has a logarithmic relationship to temperature. Your denial - based on a flawed TV show experiment - hurts the cause.

Here's an 800,000 year long data set showing temperature, in red, PLUMMETING, when CO2, in blue, peaks. CO2 lags on both increase and decrease by about 1,000 years

According to your belief, that should be physically impossible

 

[EMH]

It's a fact that CO2 is a greenhouse gas that has a logarithmic relationship to temperature.

Not according to ALL ACTUAL DATA on the subject

satellites
balloons
surface air pressure


all three of those expose the truth that adding CO2 to atmosphere doesn't warm anything...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

YOU have NO DATA to refute the claims.

EMH has DATA and lying about it doesn't change anything.

It is YOU who has all the fear, too chicken to conspire with WU for more fudge...

EMH has DATA and lying about it doesn't change anything.

Mossad coward still too chicken to fly a motorized paraglider. Why?
BECAUSE YOU ARE A *****, a COWARD, a LIAR, a TRAITOR, and you would never have any courage outside of behind your little PC monitor...

YOU have NO DATA to refute the claims.

YOU have NO DATA to prove the claims.

EMH has DATA and lying about it doesn't change anything.

EMH won't post the data because EMH is a *****.

Mossad coward still too chicken to fly a motorized paraglider. Why?

EMH still won't post the mortality rate for paragliders. EMH is a *****.