BREAKING: The "whistleblower"'s Attorney has ties to <<drum roll>>Hillary

[BULLDOG]

The facts presented by the whistle blower have been proven to be accurate. Trying to discredit the accusation by claiming some ties with Hillary is just dumb. Any ties are immaterial as long as the facts remain accurate.

And by "accurate" you mean "totally refuted by the actual transcripts."

The mole lied - you Stalinists took a gamble that Trump would not release the transcripts, but he did, now you traitors are fucked.

no

 

[LordBrownTrout]

BREAKING: Another pathetic attempt by the right to deflect from Trump's endless scandals and corruption.

No no. This is all tied to biden and his son. Quit lying.

 

[easyt65]

Whistleblower’s team included Dem operative who worked for Clinton, Schumer

If you thought the Ukraine whistleblower controversy could not get any more partisan, be forewarned.

The Federalist is reporting that one of the people hired to be on the anonymous whistleblower’s legal team — which many expect is a move made in preparation of a House testimony — is a very clear ally to the Democrat Party.

Andrew Bakaj, a managing partner at Compass Rose Legal Group, has ties that run deep into the Democrat Party. He interned for Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton in 2001. Bakaj reportedly specializes in whistleblower and security clearance law.


.

CORRUPT TO THEIR CORE

,

Conspiracy. Sedition. Treason. GITMO for the lot of them...

 

[Dragonlady]

Whistleblower’s team included Dem operative who worked for Clinton, Schumer

If you thought the Ukraine whistleblower controversy could not get any more partisan, be forewarned.

The Federalist is reporting that one of the people hired to be on the anonymous whistleblower’s legal team — which many expect is a move made in preparation of a House testimony — is a very clear ally to the Democrat Party.

Andrew Bakaj, a managing partner at Compass Rose Legal Group, has ties that run deep into the Democrat Party. He interned for Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton in 2001. Bakaj reportedly specializes in whistleblower and security clearance law.

CORRUPT TO THEIR CORE

,

So ******* what? Nothing about the whistleblower matters.

Donald Trump issued the transcript of a telephone call wherein he offered to exchange American military aid, for dirt on Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Trump has confessed he did this.

Go to impeachment, go directly to impeachment.

 

[Care4all]

The whistle blower's claims have already been PROVEN to be true.

Wrong. they have been proven false.

Which of the whistle blowers accusations have been proven false?

For starters, the claim that Trump demanded Biden be investigated or Ukraine wouldn't receive its military aid was proven false. There was no quid quo pro.

At the time, Trump was holding up congressionally approved funds that should have already been distributed with no stated reason, wasn't he?

BULLFEATHERS


The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 states that funds can be disburse AT THE PRESIDENT'S DISCRETION.

I know who you are: #Schiffforbrains, Am I right?

.

unless a president is using it for extortion or bribery....

 

[Uncensored2008]

The facts presented by the whistle blower have been proven to be accurate. Trying to discredit the accusation by claiming some ties with Hillary is just dumb. Any ties are immaterial as long as the facts remain accurate.

And by "accurate" you mean "totally refuted by the actual transcripts."

The mole lied - you Stalinists took a gamble that Trump would not release the transcripts, but he did, now you traitors are fucked.

no

Yes, the mole lied. The mole lied that he/she had first hand knowledge, they didn't. True that the CIA retroactively changed the standard, still Brennan's mole committed perjury. The actual transcripts READ: White House Account Of President Trump's Call With Ukraine's Leader show that the mole lied repeatedly in statements and that the fascist press lied beyond that.

IN fact the fascist press has lied so much that even Chuck Shumer's lawyer had to call CBS liars.

{
“60 Minutes” reported Sunday that it received a letter that indicated that the government whistleblower has been put under federal protection due to safety concerns.

The report had a PDF of the Sept. 28 letter from the Compass Rose Legal Group, to the officer of Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire.


The letter said, in part, “The purpose of this letter is to formally notify you of serious concerns we have regarding our client’s personal safety. We appreciate your office’s support thus far to activate appropriate resources to ensure their safety.”


The letter did not specify the “support” or “resources” that were offered.

The news program later tweeted that it stood by its “sources and reporting on the whistleblower.”

Zaid asked if the program’s response meant that it has a source other than the letter sent by the legal team.

“Because if it doesn’t, and I know it doesn’t, then it is literally making stuff up. That helps no one, especially the #whistleblower,” he tweeted.}

Whistleblower attorney says '60 Minutes' 'misinterpreted' key letter - America Online

Even the lawyer for the mole, an employee of Chuck Schumer, had to call out CBS for their filthy lies.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Whistleblower’s team included Dem operative who worked for Clinton, Schumer

If you thought the Ukraine whistleblower controversy could not get any more partisan, be forewarned.

The Federalist is reporting that one of the people hired to be on the anonymous whistleblower’s legal team — which many expect is a move made in preparation of a House testimony — is a very clear ally to the Democrat Party.

Andrew Bakaj, a managing partner at Compass Rose Legal Group, has ties that run deep into the Democrat Party. He interned for Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton in 2001. Bakaj reportedly specializes in whistleblower and security clearance law.

CORRUPT TO THEIR CORE

,

So ******* what? Nothing about the whistleblower matters.

Donald Trump issued the transcript of a telephone call wherein he offered to exchange American military aid, for dirt on Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Trump has confessed he did this.

Go to impeachment, go directly to impeachment.

You are a ******* liar.

READ: White House Account Of President Trump's Call With Ukraine's Leader

 

[Uncensored2008]

Wrong. they have been proven false.

Which of the whistle blowers accusations have been proven false?

For starters, the claim that Trump demanded Biden be investigated or Ukraine wouldn't receive its military aid was proven false. There was no quid quo pro.

At the time, Trump was holding up congressionally approved funds that should have already been distributed with no stated reason, wasn't he?

BULLFEATHERS


The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 states that funds can be disburse AT THE PRESIDENT'S DISCRETION.

I know who you are: #Schiffforbrains, Am I right?

.

unless a president is using it for extortion or bribery....

Are you going to lie that he did? You have no honor, but it's easy to expose you.

 

[BULLDOG]

The facts presented by the whistle blower have been proven to be accurate. Trying to discredit the accusation by claiming some ties with Hillary is just dumb. Any ties are immaterial as long as the facts remain accurate.

And by "accurate" you mean "totally refuted by the actual transcripts."

The mole lied - you Stalinists took a gamble that Trump would not release the transcripts, but he did, now you traitors are fucked.

no

Yes, the mole lied. The mole lied that he/she had first hand knowledge, they didn't. True that the CIA retroactively changed the standard, still Brennan's mole committed perjury. The actual transcripts READ: White House Account Of President Trump's Call With Ukraine's Leader show that the mole lied repeatedly in statements and that the fascist press lied beyond that.

IN fact the fascist press has lied so much that even Chuck Shumer's lawyer had to call CBS liars.

{
“60 Minutes” reported Sunday that it received a letter that indicated that the government whistleblower has been put under federal protection due to safety concerns.

The report had a PDF of the Sept. 28 letter from the Compass Rose Legal Group, to the officer of Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire.


The letter said, in part, “The purpose of this letter is to formally notify you of serious concerns we have regarding our client’s personal safety. We appreciate your office’s support thus far to activate appropriate resources to ensure their safety.”


The letter did not specify the “support” or “resources” that were offered.

The news program later tweeted that it stood by its “sources and reporting on the whistleblower.”

Zaid asked if the program’s response meant that it has a source other than the letter sent by the legal team.

“Because if it doesn’t, and I know it doesn’t, then it is literally making stuff up. That helps no one, especially the #whistleblower,” he tweeted.}

Whistleblower attorney says '60 Minutes' 'misinterpreted' key letter - America Online

Even the lawyer for the mole, an employee of Chuck Schumer, had to call out CBS for their filthy lies.

You're really trying to make that first hand knowledge thing mean something. It doesn't.

 

[Contumacious]

Wrong. they have been proven false.

Which of the whistle blowers accusations have been proven false?

For starters, the claim that Trump demanded Biden be investigated or Ukraine wouldn't receive its military aid was proven false. There was no quid quo pro.

At the time, Trump was holding up congressionally approved funds that should have already been distributed with no stated reason, wasn't he?

BULLFEATHERS


The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 states that funds can be disburse AT THE PRESIDENT'S DISCRETION.

I know who you are: #Schiffforbrains, Am I right?

.

unless a president is using it for extortion or bribery....

HUH?

Dems Want to Impeach a President for Trying to Expose a Crime, Then Elect the Person Who Actually Committed the Crime

Trump was entirely within his legal purview according to a treaty signed into law during the Clinton administration: Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters.


.

 

[Thinker101]

Whistleblower’s team included Dem operative who worked for Clinton, Schumer

If you thought the Ukraine whistleblower controversy could not get any more partisan, be forewarned.

The Federalist is reporting that one of the people hired to be on the anonymous whistleblower’s legal team — which many expect is a move made in preparation of a House testimony — is a very clear ally to the Democrat Party.

Andrew Bakaj, a managing partner at Compass Rose Legal Group, has ties that run deep into the Democrat Party. He interned for Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton in 2001. Bakaj reportedly specializes in whistleblower and security clearance law.


.

CORRUPT TO THEIR CORE

,

I am SHOCKED, literally shocked.

 

[daveman]

The facts presented by the whistle blower have been proven to be accurate. Trying to discredit the accusation by claiming some ties with Hillary is just dumb. Any ties are immaterial as long as the facts remain accurate.

And by "accurate" you mean "totally refuted by the actual transcripts."

The mole lied - you Stalinists took a gamble that Trump would not release the transcripts, but he did, now you traitors are fucked.

no

Yes, the mole lied. The mole lied that he/she had first hand knowledge, they didn't. True that the CIA retroactively changed the standard, still Brennan's mole committed perjury. The actual transcripts READ: White House Account Of President Trump's Call With Ukraine's Leader show that the mole lied repeatedly in statements and that the fascist press lied beyond that.

IN fact the fascist press has lied so much that even Chuck Shumer's lawyer had to call CBS liars.

{
“60 Minutes” reported Sunday that it received a letter that indicated that the government whistleblower has been put under federal protection due to safety concerns.

The report had a PDF of the Sept. 28 letter from the Compass Rose Legal Group, to the officer of Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire.


The letter said, in part, “The purpose of this letter is to formally notify you of serious concerns we have regarding our client’s personal safety. We appreciate your office’s support thus far to activate appropriate resources to ensure their safety.”


The letter did not specify the “support” or “resources” that were offered.

The news program later tweeted that it stood by its “sources and reporting on the whistleblower.”

Zaid asked if the program’s response meant that it has a source other than the letter sent by the legal team.

“Because if it doesn’t, and I know it doesn’t, then it is literally making stuff up. That helps no one, especially the #whistleblower,” he tweeted.}

Whistleblower attorney says '60 Minutes' 'misinterpreted' key letter - America Online

Even the lawyer for the mole, an employee of Chuck Schumer, had to call out CBS for their filthy lies.

You're really trying to make that first hand knowledge thing mean something. It doesn't.

You lick yogurt off of hobos' feet. I mean, I don't have first hand knowledge...but I've been assured first-hand knowledge isn't required.

Dood. That's nasty.

 

[Thunk]

C'mon now...There has got to be a tie-in with christine blassy ford some way some how

 

[BULLDOG]

The facts presented by the whistle blower have been proven to be accurate. Trying to discredit the accusation by claiming some ties with Hillary is just dumb. Any ties are immaterial as long as the facts remain accurate.

And by "accurate" you mean "totally refuted by the actual transcripts."

The mole lied - you Stalinists took a gamble that Trump would not release the transcripts, but he did, now you traitors are fucked.

no

Yes, the mole lied. The mole lied that he/she had first hand knowledge, they didn't. True that the CIA retroactively changed the standard, still Brennan's mole committed perjury. The actual transcripts READ: White House Account Of President Trump's Call With Ukraine's Leader show that the mole lied repeatedly in statements and that the fascist press lied beyond that.

IN fact the fascist press has lied so much that even Chuck Shumer's lawyer had to call CBS liars.

{
“60 Minutes” reported Sunday that it received a letter that indicated that the government whistleblower has been put under federal protection due to safety concerns.

The report had a PDF of the Sept. 28 letter from the Compass Rose Legal Group, to the officer of Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire.


The letter said, in part, “The purpose of this letter is to formally notify you of serious concerns we have regarding our client’s personal safety. We appreciate your office’s support thus far to activate appropriate resources to ensure their safety.”


The letter did not specify the “support” or “resources” that were offered.

The news program later tweeted that it stood by its “sources and reporting on the whistleblower.”

Zaid asked if the program’s response meant that it has a source other than the letter sent by the legal team.

“Because if it doesn’t, and I know it doesn’t, then it is literally making stuff up. That helps no one, especially the #whistleblower,” he tweeted.}

Whistleblower attorney says '60 Minutes' 'misinterpreted' key letter - America Online

Even the lawyer for the mole, an employee of Chuck Schumer, had to call out CBS for their filthy lies.

You're really trying to make that first hand knowledge thing mean something. It doesn't.

You lick yogurt off of hobos' feet. I mean, I don't have first hand knowledge...but I've been assured first-hand knowledge isn't required.

Dood. That's nasty.

Now, all you have to do is prove your claims are true. The whistle blower's claims have all been proven to be true, so I guess first hand knowledge doesn't matter that much as long as the claims are verified. Now, where is your verification?

 

[daveman]

And by "accurate" you mean "totally refuted by the actual transcripts."

The mole lied - you Stalinists took a gamble that Trump would not release the transcripts, but he did, now you traitors are fucked.

no

Yes, the mole lied. The mole lied that he/she had first hand knowledge, they didn't. True that the CIA retroactively changed the standard, still Brennan's mole committed perjury. The actual transcripts READ: White House Account Of President Trump's Call With Ukraine's Leader show that the mole lied repeatedly in statements and that the fascist press lied beyond that.

IN fact the fascist press has lied so much that even Chuck Shumer's lawyer had to call CBS liars.

{
“60 Minutes” reported Sunday that it received a letter that indicated that the government whistleblower has been put under federal protection due to safety concerns.

The report had a PDF of the Sept. 28 letter from the Compass Rose Legal Group, to the officer of Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire.


The letter said, in part, “The purpose of this letter is to formally notify you of serious concerns we have regarding our client’s personal safety. We appreciate your office’s support thus far to activate appropriate resources to ensure their safety.”


The letter did not specify the “support” or “resources” that were offered.

The news program later tweeted that it stood by its “sources and reporting on the whistleblower.”

Zaid asked if the program’s response meant that it has a source other than the letter sent by the legal team.

“Because if it doesn’t, and I know it doesn’t, then it is literally making stuff up. That helps no one, especially the #whistleblower,” he tweeted.}

Whistleblower attorney says '60 Minutes' 'misinterpreted' key letter - America Online

Even the lawyer for the mole, an employee of Chuck Schumer, had to call out CBS for their filthy lies.

You're really trying to make that first hand knowledge thing mean something. It doesn't.

You lick yogurt off of hobos' feet. I mean, I don't have first hand knowledge...but I've been assured first-hand knowledge isn't required.

Dood. That's nasty.

Now, all you have to do is prove your claims are true. The whistle blower's claims have all been proven to be true, so I guess first hand knowledge doesn't matter that much as long as the claims are verified. Now, where is your verification?

No, you're moving the goalposts. You said yourself first-hand knowledge doesn't mean anything.

According to you, proof is not required.

What's your favorite flavor, Nasty Boy?

 

[BULLDOG]

no

Yes, the mole lied. The mole lied that he/she had first hand knowledge, they didn't. True that the CIA retroactively changed the standard, still Brennan's mole committed perjury. The actual transcripts READ: White House Account Of President Trump's Call With Ukraine's Leader show that the mole lied repeatedly in statements and that the fascist press lied beyond that.

IN fact the fascist press has lied so much that even Chuck Shumer's lawyer had to call CBS liars.

{
“60 Minutes” reported Sunday that it received a letter that indicated that the government whistleblower has been put under federal protection due to safety concerns.

The report had a PDF of the Sept. 28 letter from the Compass Rose Legal Group, to the officer of Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire.


The letter said, in part, “The purpose of this letter is to formally notify you of serious concerns we have regarding our client’s personal safety. We appreciate your office’s support thus far to activate appropriate resources to ensure their safety.”


The letter did not specify the “support” or “resources” that were offered.

The news program later tweeted that it stood by its “sources and reporting on the whistleblower.”

Zaid asked if the program’s response meant that it has a source other than the letter sent by the legal team.

“Because if it doesn’t, and I know it doesn’t, then it is literally making stuff up. That helps no one, especially the #whistleblower,” he tweeted.}

Whistleblower attorney says '60 Minutes' 'misinterpreted' key letter - America Online

Even the lawyer for the mole, an employee of Chuck Schumer, had to call out CBS for their filthy lies.

You're really trying to make that first hand knowledge thing mean something. It doesn't.

You lick yogurt off of hobos' feet. I mean, I don't have first hand knowledge...but I've been assured first-hand knowledge isn't required.

Dood. That's nasty.

Now, all you have to do is prove your claims are true. The whistle blower's claims have all been proven to be true, so I guess first hand knowledge doesn't matter that much as long as the claims are verified. Now, where is your verification?

No, you're moving the goalposts. You said yourself first-hand knowledge doesn't mean anything.

According to you, proof is not required.

What's your favorite flavor, Nasty Boy?

When do you think I said proof is not required? You're making shit up again. Stop that.

 

[daveman]

The facts presented by the whistle blower have been proven to be accurate. Trying to discredit the accusation by claiming some ties with Hillary is just dumb. Any ties are immaterial as long as the facts remain accurate.

The facts?

Shirley, you jest.

Goodwin: Donald Trump now has to battle CIA spies in Dems’ war against him

"Trump could be accused of understatement in describing anyone who participated with the so-called whistleblower as “almost a spy.”

There is nothing “almost” about it. The trained CIA officer used his trusted position in the White House to gather secret information from what he claims were “multiple US government officials.”

He retained Democratically connected lawyers and injected his allegations into the political bloodstream with one intent: to get Trump removed from office.

Among the hints the officer and his lawyers worked with Dems to shape his complaint are the early leaks to the hysterical anti-Trump media. The goal was to whet appetites and do the most damage despite the agent having no firsthand knowledge of events he described. Mission accomplished.

CIA agents are supposed to spy on foreign adversaries. This one spied on the president, then cloaked himself in whistleblower camouflage. His sources are presumably still at work and perhaps planning another run at the president."

Trump is a whiny ***** who claims everyone is out to get him when he is the vile conniving one.

"despite the agent having no firsthand knowledge of events he described."

If English is not your vernacular I will have the referenced statement translated. Please advise.


.

Firsthand knowledge is not required. The evidence presented has been determined to be credible. You're looking for a "Get out of Jail Free Card" that doesn't exist.

Who determined it was credible, and what were the criteria?

NOTE: "ORANGE MAN BAD" is not a rational basis for judgement.

 

[daveman]

Yes, the mole lied. The mole lied that he/she had first hand knowledge, they didn't. True that the CIA retroactively changed the standard, still Brennan's mole committed perjury. The actual transcripts READ: White House Account Of President Trump's Call With Ukraine's Leader show that the mole lied repeatedly in statements and that the fascist press lied beyond that.

IN fact the fascist press has lied so much that even Chuck Shumer's lawyer had to call CBS liars.

{
“60 Minutes” reported Sunday that it received a letter that indicated that the government whistleblower has been put under federal protection due to safety concerns.

The report had a PDF of the Sept. 28 letter from the Compass Rose Legal Group, to the officer of Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire.


The letter said, in part, “The purpose of this letter is to formally notify you of serious concerns we have regarding our client’s personal safety. We appreciate your office’s support thus far to activate appropriate resources to ensure their safety.”


The letter did not specify the “support” or “resources” that were offered.

The news program later tweeted that it stood by its “sources and reporting on the whistleblower.”

Zaid asked if the program’s response meant that it has a source other than the letter sent by the legal team.

“Because if it doesn’t, and I know it doesn’t, then it is literally making stuff up. That helps no one, especially the #whistleblower,” he tweeted.}

Whistleblower attorney says '60 Minutes' 'misinterpreted' key letter - America Online

Even the lawyer for the mole, an employee of Chuck Schumer, had to call out CBS for their filthy lies.

You're really trying to make that first hand knowledge thing mean something. It doesn't.

You lick yogurt off of hobos' feet. I mean, I don't have first hand knowledge...but I've been assured first-hand knowledge isn't required.

Dood. That's nasty.

Now, all you have to do is prove your claims are true. The whistle blower's claims have all been proven to be true, so I guess first hand knowledge doesn't matter that much as long as the claims are verified. Now, where is your verification?

No, you're moving the goalposts. You said yourself first-hand knowledge doesn't mean anything.

According to you, proof is not required.

What's your favorite flavor, Nasty Boy?

When do you think I said proof is not required? You're making shit up again. Stop that.

Since the liar...I mean, "whistleblower"'s claims have been disproven, and you still believe their true -- you're saying proof is not required.

 

[BULLDOG]

The facts presented by the whistle blower have been proven to be accurate. Trying to discredit the accusation by claiming some ties with Hillary is just dumb. Any ties are immaterial as long as the facts remain accurate.

The facts?

Shirley, you jest.

Goodwin: Donald Trump now has to battle CIA spies in Dems’ war against him

"Trump could be accused of understatement in describing anyone who participated with the so-called whistleblower as “almost a spy.”

There is nothing “almost” about it. The trained CIA officer used his trusted position in the White House to gather secret information from what he claims were “multiple US government officials.”

He retained Democratically connected lawyers and injected his allegations into the political bloodstream with one intent: to get Trump removed from office.

Among the hints the officer and his lawyers worked with Dems to shape his complaint are the early leaks to the hysterical anti-Trump media. The goal was to whet appetites and do the most damage despite the agent having no firsthand knowledge of events he described. Mission accomplished.

CIA agents are supposed to spy on foreign adversaries. This one spied on the president, then cloaked himself in whistleblower camouflage. His sources are presumably still at work and perhaps planning another run at the president."

Trump is a whiny ***** who claims everyone is out to get him when he is the vile conniving one.

"despite the agent having no firsthand knowledge of events he described."

If English is not your vernacular I will have the referenced statement translated. Please advise.


.

Firsthand knowledge is not required. The evidence presented has been determined to be credible. You're looking for a "Get out of Jail Free Card" that doesn't exist.

Who determined it was credible, and what were the criteria?

NOTE: "ORANGE MAN BAD" is not a rational basis for judgement.

I don't think they have received the Crazy Rudy seal of approval yet, but everybody else has determined it's true. Trump even said on TV it was all true.

 

[g5000]

Whistleblower’s team included Dem operative who worked for Clinton, Schumer

,

Hey dumbass:
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/02/ty-cobb-resigns-565621

President Donald Trump has hired Emmet Flood, an attorney who helped President Bill Clinton manage his impeachment defense, to join his legal team