BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...

[Toddsterpatriot]

to 1950's Law of Return

That law doesn't discriminate against the state's non-Jewish Arab citizens.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Calling the Thing by its Proper Name: “Apartheid” Between the Jordan River & the Mediterranean Sea

 

[RoccoR]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I'm not surprised. The Arab Palestinians do not recognize the difference between "Israeli Sovereignty" and the "Disputed Territory."

"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;"​

​

1. Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.​

2. Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own.​

3. The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order, public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant.​

​

Calling the Thing by its Proper Name: “Apartheid” Between the Jordan River & the Mediterranean Sea

(COMMENT)

OK: They pretty much agree that the definition of "Apartheid" in the Rome Statutes that applied to South Africa is NOT hows they are applying the term to Israel.

◈ Second, they argue that there is no political difference between one side of the Green Line (dissolved by the Israeli-Jordanian Treaty) and the other side. The logic is that Israel controls both sides. And in controlling both sides (one political jurisdiction) it becomes:​

◈ One Regime of systematic oppression.​

◈ One national-political-jurisdiction dominating a partitioned people on the other side of the Green Line.​

The Paradox Created by this Approach:

IF you by into the Single Political Jurisdiction THEN the Ramalla Government and the Palestinian Authority cannot be a "STATE." the state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:

◈ A permanent Population;​

◈ A defined Territory;​

◈ A functioning Government;​

◈ The capacity to enter into diplomatic relations.​

There is a conflict between different factions on the matter of territory.

​

Faction ONE: Palestine, which extends from the River Jordan in the east to the Mediterranean in the west and from Ras Al-Naqurah in the north to Umm Al-Rashrash in the south, is an integral territorial unit. It is the land and the home of the Palestinian people. (River to the Sea Concept)​

​

Faction TWO: The State of Palestine based on pre-June 4th 1967 border (meaning the dissolved Green Line) with East Jerusalem as its Capital.​

​

Faction THREE: It is claimed that much of the international community does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over any part of the occupied State of Palestine, including East Jerusalem. The State of Palestine is the combined Areas A, B, C.​

Finally, the Israelis are not violating the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR). The rigid security posture is to maintain restrictions provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order, public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others. Israel has the Right of Self-Determination and the Right to exercise that Right.

Just My Thought,

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;"

True yes or no?

 

[Hollie]

"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;"

True yes or no?

You're confused with terms and definitions. Yes.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;"

True yes or no?

(ANSWER)

YES!

Did I just acknowledge my own "quote?"

Most Respectfully,
R
PS
I know what comes next. You will talk about how Israeli actions mirror Paragraph 1.

 

[Mindful]

The UN remains silent. So do liberals, leftists, and other liars.

 

[Hollie]

"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;"

True yes or no?

Are Pally’s now a “race”?

 

[P F Tinmore]

"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;"

True yes or no?

Are Pally’s now a “race”?

That was explained in some of my videos that you did not watch.

 

[Hollie]

"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;"

True yes or no?

Are Pally’s now a “race”?

That was explained in some of my videos that you did not watch.

“Your” YouTube videos explain how Pally’s became a “race”?

 

[Mindful]

A Jewish woman who is concealing her face sits on a park bench marked "Only for Jews", 1938.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Can we talk about apartheid in Israel and Palestine ?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
SUBTOPIC: Apartheid
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: We most certainly can talk about it. This flip-flops about every generation. So, OK I'll start off.

Can we talk about apartheid in Israel and Palestine ?

(COMMENT)

In November 1975 there was a determination made that said:

Determines that zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.
SOURCE: A/RES/3379 (XXX) 10 November 1975

Then comes the reversal: Social, Humanitarian & Cultural Issues (Third Committee)

Decides to revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 (XXX) of 10 November 1975.
SOURCE: A/RES/46/86 16 December 1991

The pro-Arab Palestinian Movement attempts to extrapolate "Apartheid" such that it includes Israeli as a criminal violator.

The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favor of the person being investigated, prosecuted, or convicted.
SOURCE: Article 22 Nullum crimen sine lege

Now, you can prance around and attempt to make conclusions on various similarities in the to situations, but the South African events and different because the "one racial group over any other racial group" is inside one sovereign territory. However, the Arab Palestinians claim to be a "State" of their own (State of Palestine). And it depends on which faction you subscribe to as to what the territorial boundaries might be. And we have to consider what the consequences are to the defined boundaries.

The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;
SOURCE: Article 7 (2)(h) • Crimes Against Humanity

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hollie]

Can we talk about apartheid in Israel and Palestine ?

OK, if you’re going to talk about it, shouldn’t you learn some terms and definitions?

Or, just cut and paste another silly YouTube video.

 

[themirrorthief]

Can we talk about apartheid in Israel and Palestine ?

OK, if you’re going to talk about it, shouldn’t you learn some terms and definitions?

Or, just cut and paste another silly YouTube video.

the UN is the largest scam organization ever...please force them out of new yuk

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

Can we talk about apartheid in Israel and Palestine

Can you first talk about your errors and omissions?

 

[Hollie]

This is not the BDS thread.

 

[watchingfromafar]

the UN is the largest scam organization ever...please force them out of new yuk

When God chose the Jews to be His chosen, He did this for a specific reason. And that reason was to set a good example for others to follow. The Old Testament is full of references to this fact. God told His chosen how to treat the stranger. The term “stranger” is referenced 128 times in the Old Testament. God also used Moses to set God’s views in stone to assure that these words would last for many generations to follow.

What did the Jews do in return, did they follow His instructions setting a great example for others to follow-?

NO, THEY DID NOT

You can google Israeli snipers singling out and murdering Palestinian children in cold blooded murder.

You can google Palestinian villages being bulldozed to the ground so Jewish settlements could be built over the rubble.

Leading human rights group calls Israel an ‘apartheid’ state

January 12, 2021
JERUSALEM (AP) — A leading Israeli human rights group has begun describing both Israel and its control of the Palestinian territories as a single “apartheid” regime, using an explosive term that the country’s leaders and their supporters vehemently reject.

In a report released Tuesday, B’Tselem says that while Palestinians live under different forms of Israeli control in the occupied West Bank, blockaded Gaza, annexed east Jerusalem and within Israel itself, they have fewer rights than Jews in the entire area between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River.

“One of the key points in our analysis is that this is a single geopolitical area ruled by one government,” said B’Tselem director Hagai El-Ad. “This is not democracy plus occupation. This is apartheid between the river and the sea.”
Leading human rights group calls Israel an 'apartheid' state

The IDF spokesman announces: Continue to shoot Palestinian Children
Feb 9, 2020 — Israeli soldiers are allowed to shoot children. Nobody punishes them for shooting children. When a Palestinian child is shot it's not a story. There's ...
The IDF spokesman announces: Continue to shoot Palestinian children - Opinion - Haaretz.com

Children in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict –
Children in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict refers to the impact of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict ... It stated that the Palestinian children who are detained by the Israeli military are subjected to.,.,.
Children in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict - Wikipedia

‎UN: IDF deliberately shot children on Gaza border in apparent war crime
UN: IDF deliberately shot children on Gaza border in apparent ...www.jpost.com › Middle East
Mar 1, 2019 — In a likely war crime, IDF soldiers deliberately shot at children and people with disabilities when it quelled Hamas-led protests on the Gaza ...
UN: IDF deliberately shot children on Gaza border in apparent war crime - The Jerusalem Post (jpost.com)

Israeli forces fatally shoot Palestinian child during village protest
Dec 4, 2020 — Ali Abu Aalya succumbs to wounds after being shot in stomach by Israeli ... Israeli forces fatally shot a Palestinian child near the occupied West Bank ... was the use of live fire from the illegal Israeli military occupation forces.
Israeli forces fatally shoot Palestinian child during village protest | Middle East Eye

Palestinians say boy, 13, shot and killed by IDF in West Bank
Palestinians say boy, 13, shot and killed by IDF in West Bank | The Times of Israel

UN: Number of Palestinian children killed by Israel in 2018 highest in 4 years
UN: Number of Palestinian children killed by Israel in 2018 highest in 4 years | The Times of Israel

Israeli snipers targeted children, health workers and journalists in Gaza protests, UN says

UN probe on Thursday said there is evidence Israel committed crimes against humanity in responding to last year's protests in Gaza, as snipers targeted people clearly identifiable as children, health workers and journalists.
Israeli snipers targeted children, health workers and journalists in Gaza protests, UN says (telegraph.co.uk)

UN rights experts 'deeply troubled' by impunity for killing of ...

Dec 17, 2020 — The boy was the sixth Palestinian child killed in 2020 by Israeli forces using live ammunition, said the experts. On 4 December, he was shot in ...

Israeli snipers targeted children, health workers and ...www.telegraph.co.uk › News
Feb 28, 2019 — "The Commission found reasonable grounds to believe that Israeli snipers shot at journalists, health workers, children and persons with ...

Israeli snipers targeted children, health workers and journalists in Gaza protests, UN says (telegraph.co.uk)

Israeli authorities killed seven Palestinian children last year ...www.abc.net.au › news › israeli-authorities-criticised-o...
Israeli authorities killed seven Palestinian children last year. Their parents are calling for justice - ABC News

God is not happy about His chosen murdering children, and you should condemn this too

-