Yeah, it does. I remember the case well. And agreed with the ruling.
Link provided in previous post. Ownership image of the United States Code provided in previous post.
The court was correct in that the law (previous image supplied) clearly defines what are "Presidential Records" and what are "Personal Records" in terms of who has ownership and as the court said, it cannot change that definition. (Images provided in this post.)
The court did not say that Presidential Records become Personal Records as defined by the law simply because the FPOTUS said so.
The records in the #45 FPOTUS case are not diaries, journals, and personal notes - they are official administration documents.
(And this is an interesting side discussion but one that has nothing to do with the FPOTUS indictment because the indictment has nothing to do with "Presidential Records", the indictment is about willful retention of classified documents and the FPOTUS's failure to return them upon notification by the property US Government officer or employee under 18 USC 793(e) [Espionage Act].
WW