BREAKING! The Florida Grand Jury Was Never Told About 'The Presidential Records Act' Or The 'Clinton Socks Case', Both Exonerating!

[MAGA Macho Man]

Well what do you know!!!

Corrupt Jack Smith got an indictment against Trump taking advantage of the jurors ignorance pertaining to presidential records when a president leaves office. That's okay! Judge Eileen Cannon will see the treachery in this.

Truth Social

Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating on the basis of political ideology.

truthsocial.com

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

THE GRAND JURY WAS NEVER TOLD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT OR THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, BOTH EXONERATING!

 

[Moonglow]

The truth is the last thing you will get on the website.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The prosecution puts on the case before the grand jury. The defense never addresses anything. No exonerating evidence is presented. Hearsay is permitted. There is no cross examination. The defendant is not permitted counsel. It's a prosecution shit show.

 

[westwall]

Well what do you know!!!

Corrupt Jack Smith got an indictment against Trump taking advantage of the jurors ignorance pertaining to presidential records when a president leaves office. That's okay! Judge Eileen Cannon will see the treachery in this.

Truth Social

Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating on the basis of political ideology.

truthsocial.com

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

THE GRAND JURY WAS NEVER TOLD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT OR THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, BOTH EXONERATING!

Well duuuh. We all knew that.

 

[BackAgain]

Grand Juries don’t necessarily have to be fully informed on all possibly relevant law.

It suffices that a trial jury may be expressed to hear of these things.

 

[toobfreak]

Corrupt Jack Smith got an indictment against Trump taking advantage of the jurors ignorance pertaining to presidential records when a president leaves office. That's okay! Judge Eileen Cannon will see the treachery in this. THE GRAND JURY WAS NEVER TOLD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT OR THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, BOTH EXONERATING!

 

[SweetSue92]

The prosecution puts on the case before the grand jury. The defense never addresses anything. No exonerating evidence is presented. Hearsay is permitted. There is no cross examination. The defendant is not permitted counsel. It's a prosecution shit show.

This.

It is why you can "indict a ham sandwich"

And yet the idiotic liberals dance

 

[EvilCat Breath]

This.

It is why you can "indict a ham sandwich"

And yet the idiotic liberals dance

And some conservatives are always surprised.

 

[Care4all]

Well what do you know!!!

Corrupt Jack Smith got an indictment against Trump taking advantage of the jurors ignorance pertaining to presidential records when a president leaves office. That's okay! Judge Eileen Cannon will see the treachery in this.

Truth Social

Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating on the basis of political ideology.

truthsocial.com

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

THE GRAND JURY WAS NEVER TOLD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT OR THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, BOTH EXONERATING!

So trump is saying he did all those criminal acts? But should get off cuz of Bill Clinton?

Trump really needs to learn to keep his mouth shut....everything he says can be used against him!

The PRA does not cover national defense documents. The espionage act, (though not all espionage), is the criminal code covering for what Trump did, not the Presidential Records act...

 

[Mac1958]

A Grand Jury is not a regular jury. It doesn't weigh the evidence. A Grand Jury decides if there is enough incriminating evidence to indict.

That's it.

Sorry.

 

[konradv]

Well what do you know!!!

Corrupt Jack Smith got an indictment against Trump taking advantage of the jurors ignorance pertaining to presidential records when a president leaves office. That's okay! Judge Eileen Cannon will see the treachery in this.

Truth Social

Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating on the basis of political ideology.

truthsocial.com

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

THE GRAND JURY WAS NEVER TOLD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT OR THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, BOTH EXONERATING!

LOL!!! Give it up loser.

 

[Care4all]

99.5% of those indicted by a grand jury and go to trial, are unanimously found guilty by a jury of 12.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Trump really needs to learn to keep his mouth shut....everything he says can be used against him!

He doesn't need to keep his mouth shut. He's not under oath.

 

[konradv]

He doesn't need to keep his mouth shut. He's not under oath.

He doesn’t need to, but considering his penchant for putting his feet in his mouth, it would seem prudent.

 

[Care4all]

He doesn't need to keep his mouth shut. He's not under oath.

Anything he says can be used against him, in a Court of law, to prove consciousness of guilt.....

 

[kyzr]

So trump is saying he did all those criminal acts? But should get off cuz of Bill Clinton?
Trump really needs to learn to keep his mouth shut....everything he says can be used against him!
The PRA does not cover national defense documents. The espionage act, (though not all espionage), is the criminal code covering for what Trump did, not the Presidential Records act...

1. Trump is saying that the PRA governs the handling of documents. ALL documents. So there are no "crimes".

2. AG Whitaker re-read the PRA and confirmed that it covers all documents without exception.

3. The court case will determine which law governs, the PRA or the EA, stay tuned, the judge may throw the case out and say that the PRA governs, or if the EA governs the appeals may go up to the USSC for a determination. Please remember that precedent using Bill Clinton's "sock drawer tapes" says that if the ex-president has them they are his personal property.

 

[westwall]

So trump is saying he did all those criminal acts? But should get off cuz of Bill Clinton?

Trump really needs to learn to keep his mouth shut....everything he says can be used against him!

The PRA does not cover national defense documents. The espionage act, (though not all espionage), is the criminal code covering for what Trump did, not the Presidential Records act...

No, you blithering fool. He is claiming they AREN'T illegal. The PRA MAKES it so.

DURRRRRR

 

[Care4all]

1. Trump is saying that the PRA governs the handling of documents. ALL documents. So there are no "crimes".

2. AG Whitaker re-read the PRA and confirmed that it covers all documents without exception.

3. The court case will determine which law governs, the PRA or the EA, stay tuned, the judge may throw the case out and say that the PRA governs, or if the EA governs the appeals may go up to the USSC for a determination. Please remember that precedent using Bill Clinton's "sock drawer tapes" says that if the ex-president has them they are his personal property.

the PRA is civil, not criminal.

and even Trump trying to use the PRA as an excuse.... is a fallacy, not true or factual. Read it.

Tom Finton is not a lawyer, and Trump unwisely took his opinion and advice and interpretation, even though Trump was advised on several occasions by the government on what the PRA rules were....

 

[22lcidw]

The truth is the last thing you will get on the website.

We don't care anymore. We know the constitution is usurped from evil and their followers now.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Well what do you know!!!

Corrupt Jack Smith got an indictment against Trump taking advantage of the jurors ignorance pertaining to presidential records when a president leaves office. That's okay! Judge Eileen Cannon will see the treachery in this.

Truth Social

Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating on the basis of political ideology.

truthsocial.com

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

THE GRAND JURY WAS NEVER TOLD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT OR THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, BOTH EXONERATING!

Everything is “breaking” for this guy. Even a Truthsocial post.