BREAKING: President Trump Takes the Gloves Off, Asks the Court to Hold Jack Smith in Contempt For Violating Order

[Arlette]

Smith is like something out of an old grindhouse flick; the sadistic Nazi concentration camp guard.

No. In criminal cases the compelling interest is a prompt/speedy trial.

 

[WEATHER53]

Now remember former Americans, Trump is gagged from discussing innocence

 

[MagicMike]

What an absolutely and appallingly ignorant and dishonest thing to say.

How so intheButtAgain?
Do you have a link perhaps to some specific crime Biden has been charged with?

 

[Lastamender]

There is no evidence of him doing so, so whatever you're laughing at is imaginary.

No evidence?

 

[BS Filter]

How so intheButtAgain?
Do you have a link perhaps to some specific crime Biden has been charged with?

The impeachment proceedings will reveal the charges.

 

[Blaster]

As he should. Smith has been extremely unethical during these proceedings. He needs to be prosecuted for prosecutorial malfeasance!

BREAKING: President Trump Takes the Gloves Off, Asks the Court to Hold Jack Smith in Contempt For Violating Order | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump’s attorneys on Thursday asked the Court to hold Special Counsel Jack Smith in contempt for violating Judge Chutkan’s order staying all proceedings in the January 6 case against Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Smith has a poor grasp of the law.

 

[WEATHER53]

Smith now saying Trump will have opponents executed if he wins?
Do you lib loons still think Smith is fair and impartial

 

[IM2]

No evidence?

That's right. No evidence.

 

[MagicMike]

The impeachment proceedings will reveal the charges.

Why don't you try holding your breath while you wait for those?

 

[IM2]

Smith now saying Trump will have opponents executed if he wins?
Do you lib loons still think Smith is fair and impartial

Trump has said what he''s going too do and Smith is the prosecutor, he doesn't have to be fair and impartial pertaining to the guy he''s prosecting.

 

[MagicMike]

Smith now saying Trump will have opponents executed if he wins?
Do you lib loons still think Smith is fair and impartial

Sure.
Honest and accurate too.

 

[IM2]

Smith has a poor grasp of the law.

No, he actually has an experts grasp.

 

[IM2]

The impeachment proceedings will reveal the charges.

The kangaroo impeachment will show nothing.

 

[BS Filter]

Why don't you try holding your breath while you wait for those?

Is that what you're doing while waiting for Trump's trial?

 

[g5000]

As he should. Smith has been extremely unethical during these proceedings. He needs to be prosecuted for prosecutorial malfeasance!

BREAKING: President Trump Takes the Gloves Off, Asks the Court to Hold Jack Smith in Contempt For Violating Order | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump’s attorneys on Thursday asked the Court to hold Special Counsel Jack Smith in contempt for violating Judge Chutkan’s order staying all proceedings in the January 6 case against Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Why is anyone dumb enough to bleev anything the Gateway Pissant has to say?

The judge did not stay any pre-trial motions or other matters which do not advance the case. He only stayed the trial date.

I hope this catches you up, and you stop hoaxing yourself with lying propagandist garbage.

 

[MagicMike]

Is that what you're doing while waiting for Trump's trial?

Which one?

 

[BS Filter]

Which one?

Any one you want. They're all a joke.

 

[g5000]

Here's an idea.

Let's read the judge's stay order for ourselves, shall we? The Gateway Pissant is lying, and so is Trump.

DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

Here's the part which shreds Trump's tiny gloves:

Second, the court does not understand the required stay of further proceedings to divest it of jurisdiction to enforce the measures it has already imposed to safeguard the integrity of these proceedings, including: Defendant’s conditions of release, ECF No. 13; the protective orders governing discovery materials, ECF No. 28, 37; the restrictions on extrajudicial statements, ECF No. 105, as modified by the D.C. Circuit’s decision in United States v. Trump, No. 23-3190, 2023 WL 8517991, at *28 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 8, 2023); and protective jury procedures, ECF No. 130. Unlike, for example, requiring additional discovery or briefing, maintaining those measures does not advance the case towards trial or impose burdens of litigation on Defendant beyond those he already carries. And if a criminal defendant could bypass those critical safeguards merely by asserting immunity and then appealing its denial, then during the appeal’s pendency, the defendant could irreparably harm any future proceedings and their participants.


Boom-shaka-laka!

 

[g5000]

I have never once seen an occasion where the Gateway Pissant was right about anything.

 

[BackAgain]

How so intheButtAgain?
Do you have a link perhaps to some specific crime Biden has been charged with?

Why ask when you’ve already determined to reject the answers?

You’re neither intelligent nor honest MuddledTwit.

You'd think he'd be excited at the opportunity to display and explain his innocence on a massive stage!

if you think that, you don’t grasp the concept of “think.”