BREAKING BOMBSHELL: RINO Speaker Robin Vos ADMITS Widespread Fraud Occurred In Wisconsin But Says Legislature Cannot Decertify [VIDEO]

[beagle9]

Not sure why you’re bringing this one back.

I was merely showing you that the Republican strategy of attacking Hunter Biden didn’t work in the last election campaign.

So you're ok with Hunter's criminality, and Biden as the big guy eh ? So IOW you are corrupt and defending the indefensible ?

 

[XponentialChaos]

So you're ok with Hunter's criminality, and Biden as the big guy eh ? So IOW you are corrupt and defending the indefensible ?

If Hunter did something illegal, convict him and throw him in prison. Fine with me.

 

[beagle9]

If Hunter did something illegal, convict him and throw him in prison. Fine with me.

Well hopefully that will eventually come around when the guard changes. If not this nation is totally screwed.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Well hopefully that will eventually come around when the guard changes. If not this nation is totally screwed.

Yes, yes. The sky is always falling with you guys.

 

[beagle9]

Yes, yes. The sky is always falling with you guys.

Well quit making it fall then. No one wants to go through the bull crap your party has created, and keeps on creating, but it's desperation demands that the nation keeps getting dragged through the mud. It's really a damned shame, but you don't give a crap just as long as you can keep enjoying the pain y'all keep suffering upon the American people.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Well quit making it fall then.

Right. I’m the one making the sky fall in your little world.

So dramatic.

 

[beagle9]

Right. I’m the one making the sky fall in your little world.

So dramatic.

Don't flatter yourself... It's you in company with all your other cohort's that are making this nation fall. Y'all are only giving time for the Chinese to ready itself along with Russia to finally realize just how weak you people have made this nation become. When they unite for the cause of somehow ending our bull crap, then it'll be you eating your bull crap with either chop sticks in hell or with Russian shackles on your feet and hands while you're eating with those chopsticks in the hell you helped to create for this country.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Don't flatter yourself... It's you in company with all your other cohort's that are making this nation fall.

The nation isn’t falling.

Are you done crying at me now? Your over-dramatic whining isn’t really going anywhere. Can I get you some tissue?

 

[Delldude]

And Fox News hasn’t fully covered the Jan 6 hearings. The media is biased.

Is that your point?

Fox News and a couple others covered the laptop story and didn't conspire to censor the issue and/or remove content by people with the intent on affecting the outcome of an election.

And by your own admission, Fox HAS had J6 coverage.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Fox News and a couple others covered the laptop story and didn't conspire to censor the issue and/or remove content by people with the intent on affecting the outcome of an election.

And by your own admission, Fox HAS had J6 coverage.

Then why didn’t air the coverage as it happened?

Only one major cable news channel did not carry the Jan. 6 hearing live: Fox News

Airing the hearing would have required Fox to broadcast flat contradictions of what its personalities have told their audience in the past year and a half: that the riot was a mere legal protest.

www.npr.org

 

[Delldude]

The democrats democrats most certainly DID NOT BREAK ELECTION LAW!
The partisan and conspiratorial accusations and lawsuits were dismissed by the Courts....!


------

Breaking down the ‘Zuckerberg 5′ in Wisconsin election report; CTCL derides allegations​

Special Counsel Michael Gableman presents the findings of his office's investigation into the 2020 election to Assembly members, on March 1, 2022.(WMTV/Michelle Baik)
By Nick Viviani
Published: Mar. 2, 2022 at 6:19 PM EST





MADISON, Wis. (WMTV) - The organization behind the grants cited multiple times throughout the Wisconsin Special Counsel’s report rejected its allegations, citing legal decisions and the way the grants were awarded. The grants, coupled with other allegations, were cited by Special Counsel Michael Gableman on Tuesday when he recommended lawmakers seriously consider decertifying President Joe Biden’s victory.
“This so-called report from Michael Gableman rehashes many of the arguments made in more than a dozen frivolous lawsuits filed to smear the CTCL COVID-19 Response Grants program,” the Center for Tech and Civic Life said Wednesday in a response to NBC15 News.
The CTCL pointed to those multiple lawsuits challenging the awards and noted that “conservative, liberal, and two Republican-appointed Supreme Court Justices” rejected the arguments. One of the judges, it added, dubbed the claims a “conspiracy theory.” U.S. District Judge William Griesbach, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, refused to block the grant money in October 2020 under a lawsuit filed by Kaardal on behalf of the Wisconsin Voters Alliance, in conjunction with the conservative Thomas Moore Society.
The judge said then that there was nothing in state law “that can be fairly construed as prohibiting the defendant Cities from accepting funds from CTCL.” The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on an appeal of that case that those who brought the lawsuit failed to identify any laws that would prohibit the grants. Kaardal again raised the issue in a federal lawsuit he filed in Washington, D.C., on behalf of the Wisconsin Voters Alliance, two Wisconsin Republican state lawmakers and others. That lawsuit sought to let state lawmakers in Wisconsin and other states allocate their Electoral College votes.
ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, appointed by President Barack Obama, dismissed the lawsuit and referred Kaardal to a court committee for discipline just for bringing the case. Kaardal has appealed that. In a third case, the Wisconsin Voters Alliance represented by Kaardal asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to overturn the election results for several reasons, including the grants. The court refused to take the case.
CTCL awarded grants to more than 200 local election offices in Wisconsin, including its five largest cities, and they were designed to help “election departments… facing an unprecedented challenge of administering safe and secure elections,” according to a statement released by the organization at the time.
A bulk of Gableman’s report focused on those five largest cities, which the report repeatedly described as Zuckerberg 5, a reference to Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg. A search of the 136-page report finds 137 instances of the authors using the term “Zuckerberg 5.” The Special Counsel’s Office alleges the CTCL and the five cities – Green Bay, Kenosha, Madison, Milwaukee, and Racine – embraced the term, and referenced a letterhead with the five cities seals.
A citation to the link corresponding with the allegation indicated that the seals may have been positioned next to the phrase Zuckerberg 5; however, it did not work in the copy provided to the media. A call to the Special Counsel’s Office to get an example went unanswered, save for a message that the voicemail had not been set up. NBC15 News also reached out to Speaker Robin Vos’ office on Wednesday morning and was told a representative would be able to pull it. As of 4 p.m. it was not made available. This story will be updated when it is.
ADVERTISEMENT

The CTCL denied ever using the term internally in reference to the five cities in a statement to NBC15 News. A spokesperson for Mayor Satya Rhodes-Conway, Katie Crawley, told us, “we have never used the term, nor is it in any City documents.”
The only mention of specific cities in Wisconsin other than those five receiving funds from CTCL was a section labeled “Other Entities Have Reported About CTCL’s Selective Funding to the Zuckerberg 5,” which points to studies by the Conservative-leaning Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty and the Foundation for Government Accountability. From the former, the authors take a comparison to show that the five cities featured in the report received larger amounts on a per capita basis. The FGA citation lists five allegations by the organization, including one that said “More than 200 Wisconsin jurisdictions received ‘Zuckerbucks’ for the 2020 election, totaling more than $9 million.
The Special Counsel’s report argued the grants fell under the state’s definition of bribery because private money was used to help people vote in-person or via an absentee ballot. The bribery allegation was rejected as well by Rhodes-Conway, who called the accusations that the Dane Co. Clerk’s Office acted with a partisan bent or were bribed “patently ridiculous (and) “election departments… facing an unprecedented challenge of administering safe and secure elections.”
The CTCL’s response also indicated that, while the grants in Wisconsin ended up going to those five cities, any U.S. local election office in the country that played a role in the election could apply. It also noted that every eligible office that did apply was awarded money by the agency.

Grant Totals for ‘Zuckerberg 5′ (per CTCL)​

City	Cash Grant
Green Bay	$1,245,706
Kenosha	$862,779
Madison	$1,271,788
Milwaukee	$3,409,500
Racine	$1,699,100

“Once applicants were verified as legitimate, they were approved for grant funds which had to be used exclusively for the public purpose of planning and operationalizing safe and secure election administration,” the statement continued.
In all, it said grants were awarded to 2,500 election departments in 49 states, with over half of its awards going to smaller communities with fewer than 25,000 registered voters.
The Special Counsel’s report accused the CTCL of coercing the five cities cited in his report – and none of the approximately 200 other Wisconsin election offices – through secondary grants that it states, “were not for purely altruistic purposes as “strings” were clearly attached.” (additional quotation marks were made by report authors) The authors listed the conditions of the secondary contract, which they write would require the election agencies to detail how they spent the money on election-related expenditures.


The report listed the four conditions investigators found as only using the election grants for “planning and operationalizing safe and secure election administration,” requiring the cities to show that was how the money was spent, not cut other election funding because it received the grant and giving the funds to another agency without approval by CTCL. Additionally, it asserts that the goals of reaching out to historically disenfranchised residents, among other voters, and encouraging an increase in in-person voting, early voting, and absentee voting, “matched that of the Biden-voter profile.”

Zuckerberg’s name became associated with the CTCL following a $250 million donation to the organization by the 37-year-old and his wife Priscilla Chan as part of their efforts to help election offices deal with ravages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Breaking down the ‘Zuckerberg 5′ in Wisconsin election report; CTCL derides allegations

The organization behind the grants cited multiple times throughout the Wisconsin Special Counsel’s report rejected its allegations, citing legal decisions and the way the grants were awarded.

www.nbc15.com

Courts Rule States Did Not Follow Their Own Election Laws In 2020

 

[Delldude]

Then why didn’t air the coverage as it happened?

Only one major cable news channel did not carry the Jan. 6 hearing live: Fox News

Airing the hearing would have required Fox to broadcast flat contradictions of what its personalities have told their audience in the past year and a half: that the riot was a mere legal protest.

www.npr.org

Your article just proved Fox did cover it.

 

[Delldude]

You were saying something about juvenile name-calling? Tell me more about those maturel, rational discussion techniques of yours that consist of insults instead of addressing the point of my post.

Care to try again? Perhaps without the hypocrisy this time?

Pot calls kettle black...details at 11.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Your article just proved Fox did cover it.

Right. They just didn’t air it live and they didn’t cover it as much as other networks.

Your dumb point is proving to be ineffective.

 

[Delldude]

Right. They just didn’t air it live and they didn’t cover it as much as other networks.

Your dumb point is proving to be ineffective.

It was aired on Fox........duh......live.

 

[XponentialChaos]

It was aired on Fox........duh......live.

No, they didn’t.

Only one major cable news channel did not carry the Jan. 6 hearing live: Fox News

Airing the hearing would have required Fox to broadcast flat contradictions of what its personalities have told their audience in the past year and a half: that the riot was a mere legal protest.

www.npr.org

Fox News Will Not Carry Thursday’s Jan. 6 Hearing Live

The network will keep its usual prime-time lineup instead. Its sister network, Fox Business, will air the hearing.

www.nytimes.com

Sam Donaldson: Fox News Didn’t Air 1/6 Hearing Because Fox ‘Learned Its Lesson’ On Election Night 2020

The former ABC News White House Correspondent said Fox News chose not to air content critical of Donald Trump. "If it wants to make money, it has to have Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson.”

www.forbes.com

As the Jan 6. hearing aired, Fox News ran an ad-free Tucker Carlson show pushing the debunked claim the riot was an FBI plot

In the edition of his show broadcast during the Jan 6 hearings, Carlson sought to discredit them using conspiracy theories and falsehoods.

news.yahoo.com

 

[beagle9]

Then why didn’t air the coverage as it happened?

Only one major cable news channel did not carry the Jan. 6 hearing live: Fox News

Airing the hearing would have required Fox to broadcast flat contradictions of what its personalities have told their audience in the past year and a half: that the riot was a mere legal protest.

www.npr.org

Because they know a sham-wow when they see one... lol

 

[XponentialChaos]

Because they know a sham-wow when they see one... lol

So the media is biased. Good job. You’ve figured out the obvious.

 

[Delldude]

No, they didn’t.

Only one major cable news channel did not carry the Jan. 6 hearing live: Fox News

Airing the hearing would have required Fox to broadcast flat contradictions of what its personalities have told their audience in the past year and a half: that the riot was a mere legal protest.

www.npr.org

Fox News Will Not Carry Thursday’s Jan. 6 Hearing Live

The network will keep its usual prime-time lineup instead. Its sister network, Fox Business, will air the hearing.

www.nytimes.com

Sam Donaldson: Fox News Didn’t Air 1/6 Hearing Because Fox ‘Learned Its Lesson’ On Election Night 2020

The former ABC News White House Correspondent said Fox News chose not to air content critical of Donald Trump. "If it wants to make money, it has to have Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson.”

www.forbes.com

As the Jan 6. hearing aired, Fox News ran an ad-free Tucker Carlson show pushing the debunked claim the riot was an FBI plot

In the edition of his show broadcast during the Jan 6 hearings, Carlson sought to discredit them using conspiracy theories and falsehoods.

news.yahoo.com

Sweet...............are they required per FCC to carry live hearings from deranged leftists?
That is the ultimate question.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Sweet...............are they required per FCC to carry live hearings from deranged leftists?
That is the ultimate question.

I didn’t say they were required to. You said they showed them live. I was correcting you.

All caught up now?