Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Trust no one. Not even me.Trust me there are pages of laws broken by it including his employment contract.
Shallow thinking. In your case, however, that’s redundant.I’d pack the court. Goodbye Heller. Goodbye Citizens united.
I am a conservative Republican. I don't see how overturning Roe has anything to do with giving power to rapists. They are disgusting criminals that should spend a long time in prison. The woman that was raped and the newly conceived baby are both victims of the rapist.Most republicans didn't think it was an issue till now. We will see how many are comfortable giving rapists that kinda power.
You don't see how forcing women that had been raped to have a baby is intrusive.I am a conservative Republican. I don't see how overturning Roe has anything to do with giving power to rapists. They are disgusting criminals that should spend a long time in prison. The woman that was raped and the newly conceived baby are both victims of the rapist.
Ethel Waters, Jesse Jackson, and Eartha Kitt were all conceived by rape.
We are in the zone of lying and cheating on the courts. At least packing the courts isn’t lying or cheating.Shallow thinking. In your case, however, that’s redundant.
That's fucked up folks.You don't see how forcing women that had been raped to have a baby is intrusive.
Impeachment is a legal remedy for removing those Justices.When are you assholes going to learn that everything cannot go your way?
Yes. I assume it was leaked by some leftist scumbag. That’s what we’ve been discussing. What about it?
Well McConnell did seat a justice in a election year which he would under Obama.What’s good for th
We are in the zone of lying and cheating on the courts. At least packing the courts isn’t lying or cheating.
The court has its own police force.You assume Merrick Garland cares.
Took control of the timeline away from the democrats--the midterm distraction will fade by Aug. but don't despair, the commie democrats will come up with another---WWIII?? It is improper to release the draft. Obviously, the intent of the leaker was to induce blowback to see if some Justice might just cave-in.
However, with the opinion expected by June or July anyway, your guess is way off. Actually, I’d assume most Republicans are thrilled at this hoped-for outcome.
Is it still improper if we found out it was say, Chief Justice Robert’s staff who leaked it ? Or is it just improper if you find our it’s a liberal staff worker ?? It is improper to release the draft. Obviously, the intent of the leaker was to induce blowback to see if some Justice might just cave-in.
However, with the opinion expected by June or July anyway, your guess is way off. Actually, I’d assume most Republicans are thrilled at this hoped-for outcome.
No evidence of any lying or cheating. So, your premises blow. And the court packing idea is retarded. If you make it 13 justices, that can later be changed to 21 by your opponents down the road.What’s good for th
We are in the zone of lying and cheating on the courts. At least packing the courts isn’t lying or cheating.
Sniff, Sniff, boo hoo---here's your crying towel. Get over it.Well McConnell did seat a justice in a election year which he would under Obama.
Very trying...It’s almost as if HandleTheTruth is trying to communicate.
Have you ever considered using English? Editing? Spell check. Grammar check? Logic? Honesty? Nah. Of course not.Well McConnell did seat a justice in a election year which he would under Obama.
It’s improper no matter who did it or why. Is this really such a difficult concept for you?Is it still improper if we found out it was say, Chief Justice Robert’s staff who leaked it ? Or is it just improper if you find our it’s a liberal staff worker ?
They didn't want to George Floyded.70 trump appointed judges wanted none of that.
I doubt it. I don't think the number of abortions will even slow down.
Sure, it’s Nicaragua, Honduras and now the United States who have walked backwards on woman’s rights. Great company to be in. Wonder if women will be allowed to retain the right to vote if the right has its way…..The way the process works is, they study the case and decide which way they will "vote" in the decision. In this case, they came out 6-3. At that point the Chief Justice assigns one of the "6" to draft the opinion. When the draft is complete it is circulated among all the justices, then feedback comes in, it's re-written a few times, but the final tally generally does not change.
Anyone seeing this development and attributing it to "radical right-wingers" on the court is an idiot. RvW was a horrible decision - possibly the worst in the past 50 years. It is based on nothing, and takes a horrific leap into policy-making, which the Court has no right or power to do. It has NOTHING TO DO with abortion, or public policy on abortion. That aspect is left to the state legislatures, where it belongs.
The reason why Leftists in Congress have been so fixated on RvW when interviewing Republican nominees is because they have KNOWN ALL ALONG what a horrible decision it was, and how easily it could be overturned, given the right case.
Unfortunately for the public dialog, Democrats are too stupid to separate the Constitutional issue from the public policy issue. And of course there has never been sufficient support for the Leftists position on abortion to do anything legislatively. Which is why they constantly lie about polls showing that the public supports them. Liars.
