Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Fact is bowe has been treated very well mainly because the press is on his side. They don't want to slam bowe because that makes their beloved obama look bad. Everyone knows Obama should have been removed after he released 5 terrorists to get the release of traitor bowe.!!!
Okay, first, we didn't have any grounds to hold those five individuals, who weren't terrorists, they were officials of the former Afghan Regime that the current afghan regime asked to release.
Second- The tragedy of Bowe Berghdahl is that they took a mentally ill man and put him in a uniform. Of course he snapped.
Fact is bowe has been treated very well mainly because the press is on his side. They don't want to slam bowe because that makes their beloved obama look bad. Everyone knows Obama should have been removed after he released 5 terrorists to get the release of traitor bowe.!!!
Okay, first, we didn't have any grounds to hold those five individuals, who weren't terrorists, they were officials of the former Afghan Regime that the current afghan regime asked to release.
Second- The tragedy of Bowe Berghdahl is that they took a mentally ill man and put him in a uniform. Of course he snapped.
He's a first class asshole. That's for sure. Absolutely no concern for those who lost their lives trying to "rescue" that POS.
Okay, first, we took five of the most dangerous evil looking vile hate-filled desperado lunatic Muslim terrorists I ever saw and turned them loose to continue their insane jihad against innocent people.
Okay, guy, you need to get real here. Did you actually read the background on these guys...
They were things like "Minister of the Interior" and "Minister of Communications".
But they was evil scary Muslims....oh my!!!!!
Second- The tragedy of JoeB131 is that they took a mentally ill man and put him on a message board. Of course he snapped.
Personal attacks- the last resort of someone who has no argument.
Sentencing is this week and I doubt he gets life in prison. He deserves at least 15 years but there is a lot of pressure from the tv networks to let him go since locking him up makes aunt barry look bad.
Of course i blame aunt barry, you nitwit. He's the one that made the deal to trade this traitor for 5 terrorists. THINK
Second post defend terrorists award!Fact is bowe has been treated very well mainly because the press is on his side. They don't want to slam bowe because that makes their beloved obama look bad. Everyone knows Obama should have been removed after he released 5 terrorists to get the release of traitor bowe.!!!
Okay, first, we didn't have any grounds to hold those five individuals, who weren't terrorists, they were officials of the former Afghan Regime that the current afghan regime asked to release.
Second- The tragedy of Bowe Berghdahl is that they took a mentally ill man and put him in a uniform. Of course he snapped.
He's a first class asshole. That's for sure. Absolutely no concern for those who lost their lives trying to "rescue" that POS.
He's a first class asshole. That's for sure. Absolutely no concern for those who lost their lives trying to "rescue" that POS.
Because even the Army isn't claiming any lives were lost looking for him.
Command sergeant major: No troops died searching for Bergdahl
But again, the Army enlists a man the Coast Guard said was psychologically unfit to serve, dropped him in the middle of a war zone, maybe gave him amphetamines to keep him alert, and then they are surprised when he does something crazy?
Once again, JoeB131 is wrong!
"Mullah Khirullah Said Wali Khairkhwa, once the Taliban’s interior minister, was “directly associated to Usama Bin Laden (UBL) and Taliban Supreme Commander Mullah Muhammad Omar” and was “trusted and respected by both.” After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, he “represented the Taliban during meetings with Iranian officials seeking to support hostilities against US and Coalition forces” and “attended a meeting at the direction of UBL, reportedly accompanied by members of HAMAS.” He is “one of the premier opium drug lords in Western Afghanistan” and was likely “associated with a militant training camp in Herat operated by deceased al-Qaida commander (in Iraq) Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.”"
"Mullah Mohammad Fazl, the Taliban’s deputy defense minister, is so senior in the Taliban hierarchy that he once threatened the Taliban’s supreme leader, Mullah Omar. Fazl has “operational associations with significant al-Qaida and other extremist personnel,” and “If released, [Fazl] would likely rejoin the Taliban and establish ties with anti-Coalition militias (ACM) participating in hostilities against US and Coalition forces in Afghanistan.”"
Why? You'll just spin and deny.Once again, JoeB131 is wrong!
"Mullah Khirullah Said Wali Khairkhwa, once the Taliban’s interior minister, was “directly associated to Usama Bin Laden (UBL) and Taliban Supreme Commander Mullah Muhammad Omar” and was “trusted and respected by both.” After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, he “represented the Taliban during meetings with Iranian officials seeking to support hostilities against US and Coalition forces” and “attended a meeting at the direction of UBL, reportedly accompanied by members of HAMAS.” He is “one of the premier opium drug lords in Western Afghanistan” and was likely “associated with a militant training camp in Herat operated by deceased al-Qaida commander (in Iraq) Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.”"
"Mullah Mohammad Fazl, the Taliban’s deputy defense minister, is so senior in the Taliban hierarchy that he once threatened the Taliban’s supreme leader, Mullah Omar. Fazl has “operational associations with significant al-Qaida and other extremist personnel,” and “If released, [Fazl] would likely rejoin the Taliban and establish ties with anti-Coalition militias (ACM) participating in hostilities against US and Coalition forces in Afghanistan.”"
So you have a lot "guilt by association", but i'm still waiting to see actual charges.
Why? You'll just spin and deny.
You can't have guys in a war zone deciding that this shit ain't for me and walking off your post leaving your guys unguarded. They won't shoot the guy but they can't let him off easy either, the precedence would be awful.
You even spin my statement, it all you ever do. Bullshit and run.Why? You'll just spin and deny.
You miss the point entirely.
There are only two LEGAL theories that we could have held these five on.
(Sorry, because we feel like it" isn't a legal theory).
One would be that they committed crimes against American citizens. We held them for something like 12 years when they were captured in 2002. No legal charges were ever brought against them in a US Court.
The other is that they were "Prisoners of War". Now, if we did that, we'd have to declare them POW"s, which means no more questioning them, no more trying to get info out of them, etc. The Geneva Conventions would apply to them.
The thing was, the AFGHAN government asked that these five be released to facilitate peace talks with the Taliban. They weren't sent back to Afghanistan, they were sent to Qatar at the request of the Afghan government.
This isn't "spin" buddy, this is a discussion of the case.
Now, this is the mess Bush created with Gitmo, where he wanted to bypass both US Law protecting criminals AND the Geneva Conventions, so Dick Cheney could get his rocks off torturing people.
But eventually, we have to do something with these guys.
You even spin my statement, it all you ever do. Bullshit and run.
This thread isn't about the 5 Taliban or why we were holding them.You even spin my statement, it all you ever do. Bullshit and run.
So you don't have an answer then.
What legal charge could we hold those five guys on?
Thanks.