Boehner cannot sue the President

[LadyGunSlinger]

You're still clueless:

IV. Memorandums as Law





The Legality of Expanding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) | DREAM Action Coalition

Agency and inter-agency policy has what to do with the designated powers of the Executive Branch set forth in the United States Constitution?

The president may direct the agencies he oversees. Been that way since the beginning. Who do you supposed passed the Immigration and Naturalization Act?

Where in the United States Constitution does it give the Executive Branch the authority to write new laws? Directing an agency and writing news laws are two separate issues..

 

[Ravi]

Agency and inter-agency policy has what to do with the designated powers of the Executive Branch set forth in the United States Constitution?

The president may direct the agencies he oversees. Been that way since the beginning. Who do you supposed passed the Immigration and Naturalization Act?

Where in the United States Constitution does it give the Executive Branch the authority to write new laws? Directing an agency and writing news laws are two separate issues..

He didn't write a new law. He set policy for an agency he oversees. As authorized by Congress.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

You're still clueless:

IV. Memorandums as Law



The Legality of Expanding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) | DREAM Action Coalition

You think anyone can simply write a "Memorandum" as an adjunct to settled law????? ROFLMAO

In this case, yes. Congress gave the president this power when it passed the Immigration Act. Maybe even before then.

Congress doesn't delegate authority to the Executive Branch.. OMG

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

LMFAO!!!!! In the story:

But Boehner may not be able to do so. According to Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the University of California, Irvine Law School

Who the **** is Erwin????? Because "ERWIN" said so????

What the **** do lawyers know about the law? Fuckin' idiots!

BRAWNDO - THE THIRST MUTILATOR

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

The president may direct the agencies he oversees. Been that way since the beginning. Who do you supposed passed the Immigration and Naturalization Act?

Where in the United States Constitution does it give the Executive Branch the authority to write new laws? Directing an agency and writing news laws are two separate issues..

He didn't write a new law. He set policy for an agency he oversees. As authorized by Congress.

Wow..Just wow.. and this is what makes up the Democrat Party.. ^^^^^^^^^

 

[Ravi]

You think anyone can simply write a "Memorandum" as an adjunct to settled law????? ROFLMAO

In this case, yes. Congress gave the president this power when it passed the Immigration Act. Maybe even before then.

Congress doesn't delegate authority to the Executive Branch.. OMG

It was in 1952 when the original law was passed. Sucks to be you.

 

[bodecea]

Agency and inter-agency policy has what to do with the designated powers of the Executive Branch set forth in the United States Constitution?

The president may direct the agencies he oversees. Been that way since the beginning. Who do you supposed passed the Immigration and Naturalization Act?

Where in the United States Constitution does it give the Executive Branch the authority to write new laws? Directing an agency and writing news laws are two separate issues..

What are these new laws written? Their # or name please. (all laws are numbered, btw)

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

The president may direct the agencies he oversees. Been that way since the beginning. Who do you supposed passed the Immigration and Naturalization Act?

Where in the United States Constitution does it give the Executive Branch the authority to write new laws? Directing an agency and writing news laws are two separate issues..

What are these new laws written? Their # or name please. (all laws are numbered, btw)

Ask SCOTUS, they struck down your wonder boy today in regard to recess appointments.. it was THE BIATCH SLAP HEARD AROUND THE WORLD!!! roflmao- while not per say a law, it violated the letter of the law held within the US CONSTITUTION

 

[Ravi]

And of course they don't delegate authority to the president. They pass laws letting the president do things outside his presidential powers because they are lazy SOBs. Remember when they granted Dubya the POWER to invade the wrong country? Where was the lawsuit then?

Boneless has totally lost it.

 

[hjmick]

Where in the United States Constitution does it give the Executive Branch the authority to write new laws? Directing an agency and writing news laws are two separate issues..

What are these new laws written? Their # or name please. (all laws are numbered, btw)

Ask SCOTUS, they struck down your wonder boy today in regard to recess appointments.. It was specified law in that but it was THE BIATCH SLAP HEARD AROUND THE WORLD!!! roflmao

They ***** slapped every President going forward, and rightly so. Of course, today's decision does not change the appointments already made...

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

And of course they don't delegate authority to the president. They pass laws letting the president do things outside his presidential powers because they are lazy SOBs. Remember when they granted Dubya the POWER to invade the wrong country? Where was the lawsuit then?

Boneless has totally lost it.

"They pass laws letting the President do "things" outside his presidential powers."


OMG

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

i, you have received -3763 reputation points from bodecea.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
Such Irony...Such Irony.

Regards,
bodecea


ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The BUTCH is flustered along with her ZOMBIEcohorts.. Having a bad day??? Bwhahaha

 

[Ravi]

And of course they don't delegate authority to the president. They pass laws letting the president do things outside his presidential powers because they are lazy SOBs. Remember when they granted Dubya the POWER to invade the wrong country? Where was the lawsuit then?

Boneless has totally lost it.

"They pass laws letting the President do "things" outside his presidential powers."


OMG

I noticed you weren't upset when Congress voted to let Dubya wage a war if he felt like it.

 

[Ravi]

What are these new laws written? Their # or name please. (all laws are numbered, btw)

Ask SCOTUS, they struck down your wonder boy today in regard to recess appointments.. It was specified law in that but it was THE BIATCH SLAP HEARD AROUND THE WORLD!!! roflmao

They ***** slapped every President going forward, and rightly so. Of course, today's decision does not change the appointments already made...

Sounds more like a slap on the wrist, then. Does this mean that a future Republican president can't recess appoint a Ted Cruz type to SCOTUS?

Works for me.

 

[JimH52]

No Court is going to take it up.

Basically that is what he is saying, but that won't keep the loons from spending thousands if not millions of dollars trying. Be stupid is what they do...

 

[Kosh]

Why Boehner Can?t Sue Obama

Boehner is just throwing red meet to the RW loons. They will eventually stop drooling over this GOP wet dream.

Is that a lesson the far left blog sites learned when Pelosi wanted to sue Bush?

 

[Plasmaball]

Why Boehner Can?t Sue Obama

Boehner is just throwing red meet to the RW loons. They will eventually stop drooling over this GOP wet dream.

Correct.

Boehner lacks standing to sue.

This is nothing but a partisan temper tantrum.

no he does have standing issue.

 

[Plasmaball]

And of course they don't delegate authority to the president. They pass laws letting the president do things outside his presidential powers because they are lazy SOBs. Remember when they granted Dubya the POWER to invade the wrong country? Where was the lawsuit then?

Boneless has totally lost it.

what?

 

[hjmick]

Ask SCOTUS, they struck down your wonder boy today in regard to recess appointments.. It was specified law in that but it was THE BIATCH SLAP HEARD AROUND THE WORLD!!! roflmao

They ***** slapped every President going forward, and rightly so. Of course, today's decision does not change the appointments already made...

Sounds more like a slap on the wrist, then. Does this mean that a future Republican president can't recess appoint a Ted Cruz type to SCOTUS?

Works for me.

Not so long as Congress is in session. Even pro forma sessions. The decision puts an end to that practice. Presidents from both parties have done this, made appointments during pro forma sessions, but I believe you would have to go back a ways to find one. I know Bush, Clinton, and Bush did not do it...


I guess they understood the Constitution a little better... Or their people did...

 

[TemplarKormac]

Article III Section 2:

"The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects."

Boehner has no standing to sue anyhow. He's making a fool of himself and needs to be replaced post haste.