Boehner cannot sue the President

Today , the Supreme Court of the United States had to unanimously biatch slap a sitting President due to his overreach in usurping the Constitution. The Legislative Branch is doing the right thing in bringing this in to the Courts. I want to see any Court in this country violate the law and side with Barack Obama..
 
President can set immigration policy as it is a federal duty. So saying that kids that were brought here can work toward citizenship is in no way, shape, or form an illegal act.

Boneless is an absolute moron.

Suing over Obamacare and letting the states decide on welfare is just icing on the cake.
 
President can set immigration policy as it is a federal duty. So saying that kids that were brought here can work toward citizenship is in no way, shape, or form an illegal act.

Boneless is an absolute moron.

Suing over Obamacare and letting the states decide on welfare is just icing on the cake.



WTF????? Where in the Constitution does it say that???
 
Obama needs to ramp up his Executive Orders

Since Congress is content to do nothing, doesn't mean the President should be

He needs to make Congress try to stop him

^^^ There it is.. The total disregard for the letter of the law/ The US Constitution.

Quote that section please. Thank you.

Oh, and for your easy reference. Were you squawking like this when Reagan was racking them up, GunDinger? Bahahahahaha....



image004.png


When It Comes To Abuse Of Presidential Power, Obama Is A Mere Piker - Forbes



Video: Obama Has Signed 923 Executive Orders In 40 Months | Pakalert Press

Not as many as this one claims but he has signed a lot, 184
http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/executive-orders?page=11
19 pages of orders to read through .
 
Last edited:
President can set immigration policy as it is a federal duty. So saying that kids that were brought here can work toward citizenship is in no way, shape, or form an illegal act.

Boneless is an absolute moron.

Suing over Obamacare and letting the states decide on welfare is just icing on the cake.

You should stick to the entertainment threads. This post makes you look severely ignorant.
 
No Court is going to take it up.

Of course not.

It's a very simple concept.

In order to "sue" you have to prove damages.

The damages are overstepping his authority. Again what people are forgetting here is that a president doesn't technically have these powers. Congress has always turned the other way with these issues.
 
President can set immigration policy as it is a federal duty. So saying that kids that were brought here can work toward citizenship is in no way, shape, or form an illegal act.

Boneless is an absolute moron.

Suing over Obamacare and letting the states decide on welfare is just icing on the cake.

You should stick to the entertainment threads. This post makes you look severely ignorant.

Bring on the lawsuit. The president can say who to deport and who to go easy on. That's all he did.

Make the GOPers look even more bigoted than they already are, if that's possible.
 
President can set immigration policy as it is a federal duty. So saying that kids that were brought here can work toward citizenship is in no way, shape, or form an illegal act.

Boneless is an absolute moron.

Suing over Obamacare and letting the states decide on welfare is just icing on the cake.

You should stick to the entertainment threads. This post makes you look severely ignorant.

Bring on the lawsuit. The president can say who to deport and who to go easy on. That's all he did.

Make the GOPers look even more bigoted than they already are, if that's possible.


Wow.. You are frighteningly ignorant... The Democrat party loves you Ravi.. seriously, they count on low educated voters such as yourself.
 
You should stick to the entertainment threads. This post makes you look severely ignorant.

Bring on the lawsuit. The president can say who to deport and who to go easy on. That's all he did.

Make the GOPers look even more bigoted than they already are, if that's possible.


Wow.. You are frighteningly ignorant... The Democrat party loves you Ravi.. seriously, they count on low educated voters such as yourself.
heh, obviously you are as clueless as Boneless.
 
Bring on the lawsuit. The president can say who to deport and who to go easy on. That's all he did.

Make the GOPers look even more bigoted than they already are, if that's possible.


Wow.. You are frighteningly ignorant... The Democrat party loves you Ravi.. seriously, they count on low educated voters such as yourself.
heh, obviously you are as clueless as Boneless.

Boneless? What is boneless?I have no bones in my body? You've made a complete fool of yourself today.. Anyone who comes to a political forum and doesn't understand the virgin concept of the three branches of government to include delegated authority / Separation of powers, shouldn't even ******* vote in my opinion much less post here with an opinion... you're too ******* ignorant.
 
will Bonehead sue the POTUS 55 times and tie his record for passing the defunding of Obamacare? time will tell ... and Bonehead will still be a Bonehead


partisan politics.
 
will Bonehead sue the POTUS 55 times and tie his record for passing the defunding of Obamacare? time will tell ... and Bonehead will still be a Bonehead


partisan politics.

BUTTHURT.. you just got your ******* ass handed to you in the thread on the SCOTUS decision where you claimed the word need appeared in the Recess clause and claimed the Constitution was changed today.. I kicked your stupidass all over that thread so now you come over here with your limp dick tears.. Go read and ******* educate yourself and take that dumb biatch Raging Ravi with you.
 
Wow.. You are frighteningly ignorant... The Democrat party loves you Ravi.. seriously, they count on low educated voters such as yourself.
heh, obviously you are as clueless as Boneless.

Boneless? What is boneless?I have no bones in my body? You've made a complete fool of yourself today.. Anyone who comes to a political forum and doesn't understand the virgin concept of the three branches of government to include delegated authority / Separation of powers, shouldn't even ******* vote in my opinion much less post here with an opinion... you're too ******* ignorant.
You're still clueless:

IV. Memorandums as Law

Agencies, such as ICE and DHS, are within the Executive Branch of government, and thus fall within the Obama Administration. Agencies have discretion in the application of the law that they are responsible for. Exercise of this discretion is not only legal, but also required. The general authority for deferred action exists under the Immigration and Nationality Act 103(a), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), granting the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to enforce immigration law. 3 Although no statutes or regulations outline deferred action in specific terms, the Supreme Court has clearly ruled that decisions to initiate or terminate enforcement proceedings fall squarely within the authority of the Executive, and can thus be heavily influenced via deferred action by President Obama. 4 This discretion must be practiced within the confines of the law and subject to the chain of command of the agency. If an agency memorandum comes from the top of the chain of command, such as the Secretary of Homeland Security, it becomes the policy for the agency, subject only to extremely narrowly-tailored limitations of the law.

The Legality of Expanding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) | DREAM Action Coalition
 
heh, obviously you are as clueless as Boneless.

Boneless? What is boneless?I have no bones in my body? You've made a complete fool of yourself today.. Anyone who comes to a political forum and doesn't understand the virgin concept of the three branches of government to include delegated authority / Separation of powers, shouldn't even ******* vote in my opinion much less post here with an opinion... you're too ******* ignorant.
You're still clueless:

IV. Memorandums as Law

Agencies, such as ICE and DHS, are within the Executive Branch of government, and thus fall within the Obama Administration. Agencies have discretion in the application of the law that they are responsible for. Exercise of this discretion is not only legal, but also required. The general authority for deferred action exists under the Immigration and Nationality Act 103(a), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), granting the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to enforce immigration law. 3 Although no statutes or regulations outline deferred action in specific terms, the Supreme Court has clearly ruled that decisions to initiate or terminate enforcement proceedings fall squarely within the authority of the Executive, and can thus be heavily influenced via deferred action by President Obama. 4 This discretion must be practiced within the confines of the law and subject to the chain of command of the agency. If an agency memorandum comes from the top of the chain of command, such as the Secretary of Homeland Security, it becomes the policy for the agency, subject only to extremely narrowly-tailored limitations of the law.



The Legality of Expanding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) | DREAM Action Coalition


Agency and inter-agency policy has what to do with the designated powers of the Executive Branch set forth in the United States Constitution?
 
15th post
Boneless? What is boneless?I have no bones in my body? You've made a complete fool of yourself today.. Anyone who comes to a political forum and doesn't understand the virgin concept of the three branches of government to include delegated authority / Separation of powers, shouldn't even ******* vote in my opinion much less post here with an opinion... you're too ******* ignorant.
You're still clueless:

IV. Memorandums as Law

Agencies, such as ICE and DHS, are within the Executive Branch of government, and thus fall within the Obama Administration. Agencies have discretion in the application of the law that they are responsible for. Exercise of this discretion is not only legal, but also required. The general authority for deferred action exists under the Immigration and Nationality Act 103(a), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), granting the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to enforce immigration law. 3 Although no statutes or regulations outline deferred action in specific terms, the Supreme Court has clearly ruled that decisions to initiate or terminate enforcement proceedings fall squarely within the authority of the Executive, and can thus be heavily influenced via deferred action by President Obama. 4 This discretion must be practiced within the confines of the law and subject to the chain of command of the agency. If an agency memorandum comes from the top of the chain of command, such as the Secretary of Homeland Security, it becomes the policy for the agency, subject only to extremely narrowly-tailored limitations of the law.



The Legality of Expanding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) | DREAM Action Coalition


Agency and inter-agency policy has what to do with the designated powers of the Executive Branch set forth in the United States Constitution?
The president may direct the agencies he oversees. Been that way since the beginning. Who do you supposed passed the Immigration and Naturalization Act?

:lol:
 
heh, obviously you are as clueless as Boneless.

Boneless? What is boneless?I have no bones in my body? You've made a complete fool of yourself today.. Anyone who comes to a political forum and doesn't understand the virgin concept of the three branches of government to include delegated authority / Separation of powers, shouldn't even ******* vote in my opinion much less post here with an opinion... you're too ******* ignorant.
You're still clueless:

IV. Memorandums as Law

Agencies, such as ICE and DHS, are within the Executive Branch of government, and thus fall within the Obama Administration. Agencies have discretion in the application of the law that they are responsible for. Exercise of this discretion is not only legal, but also required. The general authority for deferred action exists under the Immigration and Nationality Act 103(a), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), granting the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to enforce immigration law. 3 Although no statutes or regulations outline deferred action in specific terms, the Supreme Court has clearly ruled that decisions to initiate or terminate enforcement proceedings fall squarely within the authority of the Executive, and can thus be heavily influenced via deferred action by President Obama. 4 This discretion must be practiced within the confines of the law and subject to the chain of command of the agency. If an agency memorandum comes from the top of the chain of command, such as the Secretary of Homeland Security, it becomes the policy for the agency, subject only to extremely narrowly-tailored limitations of the law.

The Legality of Expanding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) | DREAM Action Coalition

You think anyone can simply write a "Memorandum" as an adjunct to settled law????? ROFLMAO
 
Congress has already defaulted on its role to legislate

President Obama is right to fill the void to the maximum extent his legislative powers allow

Let Congress take him to court if they think it will get anywhere. Meanwhile.....keep pumping out those Executive Orders
 
Boneless? What is boneless?I have no bones in my body? You've made a complete fool of yourself today.. Anyone who comes to a political forum and doesn't understand the virgin concept of the three branches of government to include delegated authority / Separation of powers, shouldn't even ******* vote in my opinion much less post here with an opinion... you're too ******* ignorant.
You're still clueless:

IV. Memorandums as Law

Agencies, such as ICE and DHS, are within the Executive Branch of government, and thus fall within the Obama Administration. Agencies have discretion in the application of the law that they are responsible for. Exercise of this discretion is not only legal, but also required. The general authority for deferred action exists under the Immigration and Nationality Act 103(a), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), granting the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to enforce immigration law. 3 Although no statutes or regulations outline deferred action in specific terms, the Supreme Court has clearly ruled that decisions to initiate or terminate enforcement proceedings fall squarely within the authority of the Executive, and can thus be heavily influenced via deferred action by President Obama. 4 This discretion must be practiced within the confines of the law and subject to the chain of command of the agency. If an agency memorandum comes from the top of the chain of command, such as the Secretary of Homeland Security, it becomes the policy for the agency, subject only to extremely narrowly-tailored limitations of the law.

The Legality of Expanding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) | DREAM Action Coalition

You think anyone can simply write a "Memorandum" as an adjunct to settled law????? ROFLMAO

In this case, yes. Congress gave the president this power when it passed the Immigration Act. Maybe even before then.
 
Back
Top Bottom