Blowing Up Darwin

[Robert W]

What religion? I have no Kingdom halls to attend or doorbells to ring while selling religious beliefs on the weekend. That's your gig, sweetie.

ID'iot creationerism is not a scientific theory. A scientific theory is a detailed explanation that is supported with physical evidence and experimental support. ID'iot creationism is not a scientific theory, detailed or otherwise, and offers no physical evidence or experimental support.

Which you admit in post upon post and many here feel sorry you rely so much on your religious views.

 

[Robert W]

And evolution remains a fact.

Of course it is a fact. I have provided a few examples as proof. Now your next assignment is using Earth as your source, prove to us how life began with just the stuff found on Earth?

 

[Hollie]

Which you admit in post upon post and many here feel sorry you rely so much on your religious views.

Science is not a religion. You harbor many ignorant ideas.

Religious fundamentalists do not perform research or experimentation because you have a bias that rejects anything that disagrees with your preconceived notions. Tell us about the field research being compiled at your Kingdom hall.

We know with certainty that creationism cannot survive the process of debate/scientific testing/peer review that the relevant scientific community must pass. What we're left with on the creationism side is fraudulent Discovery Institute green-screen labs, phony creationist "journals" and appeals to supernaturalism.

Let's see the creationists do real science. Let's see them present their young earth and "the fosill record is a conspiracy", loons before the relevant community of scientists, especially those in geology/paleontology, biology, and physics, to defend their claims. But, again, the religious fundamentalists who represent the creationists refuse to step up to the plate and perform the scientific experiments or publish in mainstream peer-review scientific journals to support their claims to supernaturalism.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Where is the testable data that elements just fall together and create a living cell?

Every observation and shred of evidence ever collected, which all shows our universe is deterministic and follows natural laws.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course it is a fact. I have provided a few examples as proof. Now your next assignment is using Earth as your source, prove to us how life began with just the stuff found on Earth?

You mean, evidence. Not proof. Proof is for mathematics.

And it's a stupid question. What you mean to ask is to prove magic was not involved.

A stupid question you reserve just for your religious fetishes. I notice you don't ask the same question about star formation.

The evidence is all the evidence ever collected about anything, which shows the universe is deterministic and follows natural laws.

 

[Robert W]

Science is not a religion. You harbor many ignorant ideas.

Religious fundamentalists do not perform research or experimentation because you have a bias that rejects anything that disagrees with your preconceived notions.

We know with certainty that creationism cannot survive the process of debate/scientific testing/peer review that the relevant scientific community must pass. What we're left with on the creationism side is fraudulent Discovery Institute green-screen labs, phony creationist "journals" and appeals to supernaturalism.

Let's see the creationists do real science. Let's see them present their young earth and "the fosill record is a conspiracy", loons before the relevant community of scientists, especially those in geology/paleontology, biology, and physics, to defend their claims. But, again, the religious fundamentalists who represent the creationists refuse to step up to the plate and perform the scientific experiments or publish in mainstream peer-review scientific journals to support their claims to supernaturalism.

I have not presented even one religious view. Yet you keep lying about me and tell this forum what I believe, even though every instance where you get caught, you keep riding that wild horse you call science.
Let's see your proof of where life started. Walk us though your scientific proofs. I even posted great information by citing a book Professor Schoph wrote. He details what is needed at a minimum for life to happen. His book is pure science yet I read it but you have not. That is not scientific at all on your part.

 

[Robert W]

Every observation and shred of evidence ever collected, which all shows our universe is deterministic and follows natural laws.

There are millions of scientists on Earth. Yet not one has created life. And they have tried and tried since they learned about Darwin. Even you can't present a study where life was proven to have started. I see no chemistry or physics from you, just puffery on your part.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Science is not a religion. You harbor many ignorant ideas.

You are not making scientific claims or making scientific arguments, I suspect that you really think you are but you aren't.

Scientism is a religion and it is your devotion to that dogma that makes you religious.

Religious fundamentalists do not perform research or experimentation because you have a bias that rejects anything that disagrees with your preconceived notions. Tell us about the field research being compiled at your Kingdom hall.

We know with certainty that creationism cannot survive the process of debate/scientific testing/peer review that the relevant scientific community must pass. What we're left with on the creationism side is fraudulent Discovery Institute green-screen labs, phony creationist "journals" and appeals to supernaturalism.

Let's see the creationists do real science. Let's see them present their young earth and "the fosill record is a conspiracy", loons before the relevant community of scientists, especially those in geology/paleontology, biology, and physics, to defend their claims. But, again, the religious fundamentalists who represent the creationists refuse to step up to the plate and perform the scientific experiments or publish in mainstream peer-review scientific journals to support their claims to supernaturalism.

 

[Robert W]

I notice you don't ask the same about star formation.

Excellent on your part. Maybe there is hope for you. Stars are also very excellent to study as is the field of explaining how life started for thousands of life such as spiders, birds, elephants, worms, germs and thousands more. Your task is to prove where and how life started.

 

[Hollie]

You are not making scientific claims or making scientific arguments, I suspect that you really think you are but you aren't.

Scientism is a religion and it is your devotion to that dogma that makes you religious.

Evolution is a scientific claim and proven fact. Not so with you religious extremism which amounts to appeals to fear, ignorance and superstition.

It's predictable you wouldn't understand that.

Your revulsion for science is obvious as there are irreconcilable problems with your claims to gods and supernaturalism.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Evolution is a scientific claim and proven fact. Not so with you religious extremism which amounts to appeals to fear, ignorance and superstition.

It's predictable you wouldn't understand that.

Your revulsion for science is obvious as there are irreconcilable problems with your claims to gods and supernaturalism.

 

[scruffy]

Of course it is a fact. I have provided a few examples as proof. Now your next assignment is using Earth as your source, prove to us how life began with just the stuff found on Earth?

Still with the dishonesty.

You guys are a waste of time.

The topic is SPECIES. You know, that guy Darwin.

Nucleosome fibre topology guides transcription factor binding to enhancers - Nature

Motif grammar on nucleosome fibres acts as signpost elements, directing TF combinatorial binding to enhancers.

www.nature.com

Note the human shaped arms and legs on this chicken.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Still with the dishonesty.

You guys are a waste of time.

The topic is SPECIES. You know, that guy Darwin.

Nucleosome fibre topology guides transcription factor binding to enhancers - Nature

Motif grammar on nucleosome fibres acts as signpost elements, directing TF combinatorial binding to enhancers.

www.nature.com

Note the human shaped arms and legs on this chicken.

View attachment 1055310

As I suspected, that picture is a selfie and by no measure on earth can those limbs be described as "human shaped". I think you should leave biology to others.

Also those aren't arms, they're legs

 

[Robert W]

The topic is SPECIES. You know, that guy Darwin.

It is vital to this topic to explain the beginning of life. Species came later.

 

[Hollie]

View attachment 1055309

Another of your unattributed, unsourced cut and paste spam articles.

Religionism.
strict practice of or devotion to religion. also : exaggerated religious zealotry.

Religionism is the realm of the
Science loathing religious extremists who are fearful of fact and demonstration because their gods are too weak to survive objective examination.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Still with the dishonesty.

You guys are a waste of time.

The topic is SPECIES. You know, that guy Darwin.

Nucleosome fibre topology guides transcription factor binding to enhancers - Nature

Motif grammar on nucleosome fibres acts as signpost elements, directing TF combinatorial binding to enhancers.

www.nature.com

Note the human shaped arms and legs on this chicken.

View attachment 1055310

• Tucker Carlson, on Joe Rogan: “Evolution as articulated by Darwin is kinda not true. There is no evidence for it….if all life originated from a single organism, there would be a fossil record of that….and there is not.”

• • Meyer: “Here in London, 2016, there was a conference held by the most august scientific society, the Royal Society, a group of evolutionary biologists, are dissatisfied with Darwin’s method of evolutionary change, natural selection and random mutation …lacks the creative power to generate major changes in life.”

 

[PoliticalChic]

Still with the dishonesty.

You guys are a waste of time.

The topic is SPECIES. You know, that guy Darwin.

Nucleosome fibre topology guides transcription factor binding to enhancers - Nature

Motif grammar on nucleosome fibres acts as signpost elements, directing TF combinatorial binding to enhancers.

www.nature.com

Note the human shaped arms and legs on this chicken.

View attachment 1055310

"The topic is SPECIES. You know, that guy Darwin."


Did you actually write this????



“You are lying AGAIN.

Darwin did not offer to explain life on earth.”

Blowing Up Darwin Post #896




AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection was specifically designed to explain the variety of life on Earth, proposing that all living organisms descended from a common ancestor and diversified over time through adaptations to their environment, resulting in the vast array of species we see today.


You have brought into doubt everything you have written.

 

[Hollie]

• Tucker Carlson, on Joe Rogan: “Evolution as articulated by Darwin is kinda not true. There is no evidence for it….if all life originated from a single organism, there would be a fossil record of that….and there is not.”

• • Meyer: “Here in London, 2016, there was a conference held by the most august scientific society, the Royal Society, a group of evolutionary biologists, are dissatisfied with Darwin’s method of evolutionary change, natural selection and random mutation …lacks the creative power to generate major changes in life.”

Curious you get your science information from a talk show host.

You also troll the supermarket checkout lines for science journals such as the Star Magazine tabloid, right?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Curious you get your science information from a talk show host.

You also troll the supermarket checkout lines for science journals such as the Star Magazine tabloid, right?

 

[Hollie]

"The topic is SPECIES. You know, that guy Darwin."


Did you actually write this????



“You are lying AGAIN.

Darwin did not offer to explain life on earth.”

Blowing Up Darwin Post #896




AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection was specifically designed to explain the variety of life on Earth, proposing that all living organisms descended from a common ancestor and diversified over time through adaptations to their environment, resulting in the vast array of species we see today.


You have brought into doubt everything you have written.

• Tucker Carlson, on Joe Rogan: “Evolution as articulated by Darwin is kinda not true. There is no evidence for it….if all life originated from a single organism, there would be a fossil record of that….and there is not.”

• • Meyer: “Here in London, 2016, there was a conference held by the most august scientific society, the Royal Society, a group of evolutionary biologists, are dissatisfied with Darwin’s method of evolutionary change, natural selection and random mutation …lacks the creative power to generate major changes in life.”

You are so desperate you're reduced to cutting and pasting multiple instances of the same nonsense to spam your thread.

What a laughable joke.